[ANN] AEON [2019-09-27: Upgrade to version 0.13.0.0 ASAP HF@1146200 Oct 25] - page 169.

estenity

hero member

Activity: 1928

Merit: 538

Quote from: myagui on September 06, 2016, 04:25:01 PM

Quote from: estenity on September 06, 2016, 10:32:14 AM

Quote from: myagui on September 06, 2016, 10:07:54 AM

On what grounds are you claiming that it is not a fake alarm? ... Roll Eyes

This binary has been used by other folks for nearly a year without any account of issues or malware at all.

I'll be happy to investigate if you have anything going beyond 'its not fake alarm'. Err... Not nice buddy. Undecided

OK, thank you, how to proceed ?

If you trust the person providing the miner (which is me in this case), and/or if you have a "disposable" environment, meaning, a box where you can safely run the miner without risk of compromising any wallets/coins/data, then by all means run it and evaluate the behavior, to see if there's anything at all looking abnormal.

You'll need to add some exception/exclusion to your anti-malware software, otherwise I presume it will block and/or delete the miner before you get to do anything with it.

In any instance, take caution with posts being quoted, as this is a common practice used to replace the original download link with a malicious one!

Better yet, you can easily compile ccminer yourself, in which case you don't need to trust anyone, you can inspect the sources and verify them to be clean. IIRC, you really just need Visual Studio 2013 w/Cuda 6.5 or 7.5 to build it. I'll only add that you'll get the same false alarm regarding the trojan though Grin

Thank you, need to be prudent in this World.

serpintine101

newbie

Activity: 58

Merit: 0

When I go to use the latest Wolf xmr miner it won't start mining. It posts the error -63 kernel error. I don't have this in front of me atm. The first try it couldn't see my devices. I believe it was that it couldn't see the opencl devices, error opencldeviceID's. At this point I then did a complete driver uninstall using GURU, and then reinstalled. This fixed that error, and now I get the error about the kernel. Specifically it was saying kernel '3'. So I can't get his latest to work at all.

Also to add I tried the older miners Arux compiled and they won't work either. Now I do have a rig with the RX 470's and I am going to try with it since people apparently can mine with them. Also as I said earlier all other gpu's work fine. So it seems that the 470 is ok but not the 480? Is that possible?

V3n0m

member

Activity: 67

Merit: 10

It works well quite well - had some issues with invalid shares but figured out my drivers had crashed and I needed to re-install.

Arux

hero member

Activity: 500

Merit: 500

Quote from: serpintine101 on September 07, 2016, 11:50:30 AM

Whats the difference in the two miners?

the miner that i sent you is almost the same as the one on my repo. i only compiled it against a newer verson of opencl.dll
As you experimented it, that's not the cause of the problem

Arux

hero member

Activity: 500

Merit: 500

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: serpintine101 on September 07, 2016, 11:50:30 AM

So you can mine on a RX 470 with the older miner? Can this be adapted to the current one Arux? Had no luck witj the new compiled miner sent. Whats the difference in the two miners?

Yup, it works. But less hashrate. The source is there, and Arux can just try to recompile it with the latest opencl. Or even merge some useful improvement from the last two releases.

it's surprising, i used the same toolchain to build every win64 aeon miner. so that means that the original code (I think specifically about cryptonight-lite.cl) was polaris compatible then the following optimizations broke it.
And opencl version can be exonerated, i don't believe that the problem is on the driver side.

could you confirm if the problem occurs with latest wolf-xmr-miner too. win64 build here https://github.com/Arux-BTT/wolf-xmr-miner/releases or compile yourself on linux. thanks

serpintine101

newbie

Activity: 58

Merit: 0

So you can mine on a RX 470 with the older miner? Can this be adapted to the current one Arux? Had no luck witj the new compiled miner sent. Whats the difference in the two miners?

gambadamba

member

Activity: 110

Merit: 11

http://aeon.sumominer.com/ WELCOME!!!!!

ping 100ms 1 %

Lafu

legendary

Activity: 3220

Merit: 3509

Wallet no connections Huh

?

smooth

legendary

Activity: 2968

Merit: 1198

Quote from: Andretti83 on September 07, 2016, 12:27:31 AM

Quote from: Wexfgy12 on September 06, 2016, 08:56:04 PM

Thanks. I do this in the console of the wallet?

If I want to send from an exchange to my wallet, do I need a payment ID from my wallet also?

You can sent from exchange to wallet without payment ID.
Payment ID only needed when sending to exchange, so it can distinguish your payment from others, sent to the same address.

Small correction. Needed when sending to an exchange or any other service with a shared wallet.

Not sure we have any right now, but still important to understand when it is needed.

Andretti83

full member

Activity: 297

Merit: 112

PRIVATE AND NOT PREMINED: MONERO, AEON, KARBO

Quote from: Wexfgy12 on September 06, 2016, 08:56:04 PM

Thanks. I do this in the console of the wallet?

If I want to send from an exchange to my wallet, do I need a payment ID from my wallet also?

You can sent from exchange to wallet without payment ID.
Payment ID only needed when sending to exchange, so it can distinguish your payment from others, sent to the same address.

Wexfgy12

full member

Activity: 204

Merit: 100

Thanks. I do this in the console of the wallet?

If I want to send from an exchange to my wallet, do I need a payment ID from my wallet also?

Wexfgy12

full member

Activity: 204

Merit: 100

Is there an FAQ on how the wallet works? There are some complicated features like you need an extra code if sending to an exchange or something? (I read that in some comment a few pages back?) Just want to make sure I dont mess up /lose coins

Arux

hero member

Activity: 500

Merit: 500

Quote from: Arux on September 06, 2016, 03:19:51 PM

Quote from: serpintine101 on September 04, 2016, 02:43:09 PM

Arux, does the opencl miner nees to be recompiled with anything newer for the RC 470/480 to work? I really hope it can be as i just aquires quite a few. 😕

I also tested all my other cards, pictarin, tahiti, hawaii, all working fine.

good question! i don't known.
i can provide you a build compiled against the latest opencl.dll from 16.8.3 amd driver.
as i don't own a polaris gpu, could you test it please? see PM

first report confirm that rx470/480 don't mine correctly (share rejected) ...

is someone who's able to mine xmr on polaris with wolf-xmr-miner?
until xmr miner is not rx470/480 friendly, aeon miner will not.

myagui

legendary

Activity: 1154

Merit: 1001

Quote from: estenity on September 06, 2016, 10:32:14 AM

Quote from: myagui on September 06, 2016, 10:07:54 AM

On what grounds are you claiming that it is not a fake alarm? ... Roll Eyes

This binary has been used by other folks for nearly a year without any account of issues or malware at all.

I'll be happy to investigate if you have anything going beyond 'its not fake alarm'. Err... Not nice buddy. Undecided

OK, thank you, how to proceed ?

If you trust the person providing the miner (which is me in this case), and/or if you have a "disposable" environment, meaning, a box where you can safely run the miner without risk of compromising any wallets/coins/data, then by all means run it and evaluate the behavior, to see if there's anything at all looking abnormal.

You'll need to add some exception/exclusion to your anti-malware software, otherwise I presume it will block and/or delete the miner before you get to do anything with it.

In any instance, take caution with posts being quoted, as this is a common practice used to replace the original download link with a malicious one!

Better yet, you can easily compile ccminer yourself, in which case you don't need to trust anyone, you can inspect the sources and verify them to be clean. IIRC, you really just need Visual Studio 2013 w/Cuda 6.5 or 7.5 to build it. I'll only add that you'll get the same false alarm regarding the trojan though Grin

qwep1

hero member

Activity: 610

Merit: 500

Quote from: Arux on September 06, 2016, 03:49:28 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: Arux on September 06, 2016, 03:19:51 PM

Quote from: serpintine101 on September 04, 2016, 02:43:09 PM

Arux, does the opencl miner nees to be recompiled with anything newer for the RC 470/480 to work? I really hope it can be as i just aquires quite a few. 😕

I also tested all my other cards, pictarin, tahiti, hawaii, all working fine.

good question! i don't known.
i can provide you a build compiled against the latest opencl.dll from 16.8.3 amd driver.
as i don't own a polaris gpu, could you test it please? see PM

Arux, pm me one too. I will try it out on a few of my rigs.

check PM

recompiled for drivers 16.8.3

Arux

hero member

Activity: 500

Merit: 500

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: Arux on September 06, 2016, 03:19:51 PM

Quote from: serpintine101 on September 04, 2016, 02:43:09 PM

Arux, does the opencl miner nees to be recompiled with anything newer for the RC 470/480 to work? I really hope it can be as i just aquires quite a few. 😕

I also tested all my other cards, pictarin, tahiti, hawaii, all working fine.

good question! i don't known.
i can provide you a build compiled against the latest opencl.dll from 16.8.3 amd driver.
as i don't own a polaris gpu, could you test it please? see PM

Arux, pm me one too. I will try it out on a few of my rigs.

check PM

Arux

hero member

Activity: 500

Merit: 500

Quote from: kohonez on September 05, 2016, 07:59:32 PM

i'm getting more hashrate on windows build, in linux is about 25-30% less hashrate..

radeon r7 265 on Windows is 845MH/s, same card on linux is 545MH/s using same aeon.conf Huh

when you compile for linux from my repo, it's important to switch on the branch "substantial_performance_increase"

Code:

git clone https://github.com/Arux-BTT/wolf-aeon-miner.git
cd wolf-aeon-miner
git checkout substantial_performance_increase
make

this branch contains some improvements (hyc's code from xmr miner), the master branch is the original wolf's code (slower hasrate)

Arux

hero member

Activity: 500

Merit: 500

Quote from: serpintine101 on September 04, 2016, 02:43:09 PM

Arux, does the opencl miner nees to be recompiled with anything newer for the RC 470/480 to work? I really hope it can be as i just aquires quite a few. 😕

I also tested all my other cards, pictarin, tahiti, hawaii, all working fine.

good question! i don't known.
i can provide you a build compiled against the latest opencl.dll from 16.8.3 amd driver.
as i don't own a polaris gpu, could you test it please? see PM

Arux

hero member

Activity: 500

Merit: 500

min diff was too low and lead http://54.153.36.187:8080 to overheating.
the min diff is now at 10k (instead of 2k), i will see if it solve the problem.

xiaokele

member

Activity: 80

Merit: 10

Quote from: jdlr on September 06, 2016, 02:03:55 PM

guys and devs, if this coin has any potential for the future, like shadow exploded, at least do the basics; like website for example Huh

these things are important

See below ...

Quote from: smooth on September 04, 2016, 04:27:23 AM

Quote from: xiaokele on September 04, 2016, 04:12:53 AM

Quote from: sammy007 on September 03, 2016, 12:51:10 PM

Quote from: xiaokele on September 03, 2016, 10:25:53 AM

Does anyone know something about the current status of the website?
All there's left is a proper domain, right? Since Sammy already did a great job designing it.

Once we have a proper domain we could start reaching out to other exchanges or wallet providers, as well as planning other PR initiatives.

There is a repo with a website, smooth need to investigate how to make github to host it and adjust DNS records.
I occasionally deleted nginx from my spare server so demo gone.

Alright. I just quickly looked it up and found the following overview of the different types of domains that can be setup with Github https://help.github.com/articles/using-a-custom-domain-with-github-pages/ &
more specifically, how to setup a www subdomain https://help.github.com/articles/setting-up-a-www-subdomain/

Now it's just about registering a domain or do we already have one?
Smooth, would this be something that can be deducted from the development fund or shall we put together a small amount in order to realize this?

In case we don't have a domain how should we proceed from here?
I could recommend Namecheap as a registrar. It's very cheap (a couple of bucks per year), offers free DNS services and WHOIS guard is about 2,50$ per year.

The domain is already registered and under my control. I'll set it up soon.

Topic: [ANN] AEON [2019-09-27: Upgrade to version 0.13.0.0 ASAP HF@1146200 Oct 25] - page 169. (Read 625884 times)