I have reviewed the changes from Coinwisper. It is good work and should help for sure. I still believe the min stake days should be changed to help for faster block movement. But otherwise it looks good by me. Many of those changes are in just about every other PoS coin.
Topic: [ANN] Androids Tokens v2.0 [Proof of Stake] - page 40. (Read 115857 times)
he's talking about the unofficial wallet. dont play dumb
if it wasn't clear I was letting him know that there is no new official wallet encase it was downloaded without him knowing it wasn't official
Considering it wasnt in the OP and it wasnt you or ADT that posted it. im sure it was pretty obvious.
some people blindly download anything and don't loo at who made it
Why not use Testnet to test the patches? you could base the patch off of Mullick's, see if Tx42 can do anything to help improve it and test a final copy? Maybe Mullick's patch alone would be better. Don't fret Zack, the more people trolling your thread the better, it means that people are interested in what you have to say. There's some quality coders floating around here, that's for sure.
TX's postings don't look to be a threat to me either however I would only consider it as a temporary fix until the official patch is done. Saying that I am still not 100% convinced as there were heaps of people who wanted ADT off the planet not so long ago now they want to help. That does not add up to me. Apologies for being skeptical but I have invested large $ amounts as well into this so I am playing careful.
Well we still waiting official wallet release, hope you get it soon released. Mean while I test this unofficial client.
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #0VgeQzKnzMtdAhSx
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #0VgeQzKnzMtdAhSx
he's talking about the unofficial wallet. dont play dumb
if it wasn't clear I was letting him know that there is no new official wallet encase it was downloaded without him knowing it wasn't official
Considering it wasnt in the OP and it wasnt you or ADT that posted it. im sure it was pretty obvious.
some people blindly download anything and don't loo at who made it
he's talking about the unofficial wallet. dont play dumb
if it wasn't clear I was letting him know that there is no new official wallet encase it was downloaded without him knowing it wasn't official
Considering it wasnt in the OP and it wasnt you or ADT that posted it. im sure it was pretty obvious.
he's talking about the unofficial wallet. dont play dumb
if it wasn't clear I was letting him know that there is no new official wallet encase it was downloaded without him knowing it wasn't official
he's talking about the unofficial wallet. dont play dumb
Great Job! New wallet is working like a charm! Thank you!
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #8QEEY9PXLQBz5w4X
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #8QEEY9PXLQBz5w4X
you do know there is no new official wallet yet
Great Job! New wallet is working like a charm! Thank you!
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #8QEEY9PXLQBz5w4X
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #8QEEY9PXLQBz5w4X
Hey Zack, can you change the wallet DL on the website. Making people sign up on the forms to get the wallet seems like an unnecessary step, no other coin does anything like it...(for good reason, we are all inherently lazy). 
you don't need to sign up to download the wallet its a direct download link that is hosted on the same server as the forum
Hey Zack, can you change the wallet DL on the website. Making people sign up on the forms to get the wallet seems like an unnecessary step, no other coin does anything like it...(for good reason, we are all inherently lazy).
No one is asking you to trust anything. Zack needs to stop being a bully and let the guy live. Both me, the CRC guy, and Tranz have agreed to look at the code before it is merged into the main repo. However zack keeps deleting his posts. Anyone siding with zack at this point regarding the fixes imo is wrong. TX42 has provided us with the fixes and wallet's if we wish to use it (not that i would but thats beside the point). Tx43 also explained earlier on why he chose to make the patches which was to protect his investment in ADT.
Ahmed
Ahmed
the only posts that were deleted had download links to unofficial clients or quotes of those links I have already said that he should make a thread then post a link here
but he must make it clear that the clients are not made by the ADT dev team and are not official i am having people look over the code and i have asked mullick to take a look and make sure it dosent cause issues if people swap from that client to his one
all tx43 had to do was talk to me about the requirements / the things that needed doing and there wouldn't be any issues
instead he decided to make a patch that changes things he wanted instead of what the users wanted
i am not being unreasonable by rejecting a patch that changes things that the users don't support as changing the POW to stop is not something that the majority of ADT users want
ahmed if you change the main repo without my approval i will move the main repo into my github account
i am not bulling anyone if anything its people trying to bully me into changing ADT to what they want
tx43 brought less than 20 LTC worth of ADT and is doing more work than you did for 5 BTC ! maybe tx43 should talk to me rather than go against me as he could even earn some money
Ahmed
This isn't looking like a takeover at all....
Altough tx42 does seem to want to help, zach already had a fix in the works, so is it that odd that he turned him down? But if mullick looks over the fix and thinks it's ok it should be good, he has been with it since adtv1 after all.~Nobody adt follower.
I would have been happy to work with him just not on this fix ( I was writing a message to ask about some stuff when I received the last 3 messages but once I saw them I decided not to send it )
No one is asking you to trust anything. Zack needs to stop being a bully and let the guy live. Both me, the CRC guy, and Tranz have agreed to look at the code before it is merged into the main repo. However zack keeps deleting his posts. Anyone siding with zack at this point regarding the fixes imo is wrong. TX42 has provided us with the fixes and wallet's if we wish to use it (not that i would but thats beside the point). Tx43 also explained earlier on why he chose to make the patches which was to protect his investment in ADT.
Ahmed
Ahmed
the only posts that were deleted had download links to unofficial clients or quotes of those links I have already said that he should make a thread then post a link here
but he must make it clear that the clients are not made by the ADT dev team and are not official i am having people look over the code and i have asked mullick to take a look and make sure it dosent cause issues if people swap from that client to his one
all tx43 had to do was talk to me about the requirements / the things that needed doing and there wouldn't be any issues
instead he decided to make a patch that changes things he wanted instead of what the users wanted
i am not being unreasonable by rejecting a patch that changes things that the users don't support as changing the POW to stop is not something that the majority of ADT users want
ahmed if you change the main repo without my approval i will move the main repo into my github account
i am not bulling anyone if anything its people trying to bully me into changing ADT to what they want
tx43 brought less than 20 LTC worth of ADT and is doing more work than you did for 5 BTC ! maybe tx43 should talk to me rather than go against me as he could even earn some money
Ahmed
This isn't looking like a takeover at all....
Altough tx42 does seem to want to help, zach already had a fix in the works, so is it that odd that he turned him down? But if mullick looks over the fix and thinks it's ok it should be good, he has been with it since adtv1 after all.~Nobody adt follower.
As requested by some of the ADT users here is all the contact I had between myself and tx42 via pm ( he sent me 1 message then I replied and he then sent 3 messages )
i am not commenting on the content as its just the raw messages
I'm the coin whisperer.
I can fix your coin. I know what is going on.
I'll throw in coin control to boot.
I can do it without a fork, easily, and without a bounty unless you insist on a tip.
I've already taken a position on this coin.
PM me back here. I know what I am doing.
I did the NRS wallet and others. My questions on the forum are naive, but don't let that throw you.
I want to improve the investment I've already made.
I can fix your coin. I know what is going on.
I'll throw in coin control to boot.
I can do it without a fork, easily, and without a bounty unless you insist on a tip.
I've already taken a position on this coin.
PM me back here. I know what I am doing.
I did the NRS wallet and others. My questions on the forum are naive, but don't let that throw you.
I want to improve the investment I've already made.
I'm the coin whisperer.
I can fix your coin. I know what is going on.
I'll throw in coin control to boot.
I can do it without a fork, easily, and without a bounty unless you insist on a tip.
I've already taken a position on this coin.
PM me back here. I know what I am doing.
I did the NRS wallet and others. My questions on the forum are naive, but don't let that throw you.
I want to improve the investment I've already made.
I can fix your coin. I know what is going on.
I'll throw in coin control to boot.
I can do it without a fork, easily, and without a bounty unless you insist on a tip.
I've already taken a position on this coin.
PM me back here. I know what I am doing.
I did the NRS wallet and others. My questions on the forum are naive, but don't let that throw you.
I want to improve the investment I've already made.
mullick is working on the patch at this time and the patch will include the changes to the POS that's why it needs a hard fork
thank you for your offer but mullick is dealing with it at this time
The big green bar here is my buy: https://www.cryptsy.com/markets/view/94
I put my money where my mouth is.
If you let me fix this coin, I will be responsible for bigger, greener bars.
Blade is up about 300% since I fixed it, and that is with cryptorush going down.
I put my money where my mouth is.
If you let me fix this coin, I will be responsible for bigger, greener bars.
Blade is up about 300% since I fixed it, and that is with cryptorush going down.
mullick is working on the patch at this time and the patch will include the changes to the POS that's why it needs a hard fork
thank you for your offer but mullick is dealing with it at this time
thank you for your offer but mullick is dealing with it at this time
Alright, what are the changes? Where's the repo?
Fine. The rest of this message is a friendly advisory.
I'm going to fork the ADT repo and make minimal changes to this coins parameters and end PoW rather quickly.
I'll get my changes out faster than your team, I guarantee you.
I'll have full Qts for all platforms and the network will function beautifully.
I'll make an ANN and let the community decide. A few will try and see how a real coin functions.
That's the deal I made with the blade dev and he eventually came around. NRS us up about 10x since I did their wallets. Buys have outnumbered sells on Blade by about 20 to 1.
I mean the best for ADT, but I won't wait for others to fix it now that I have taken a position.
I'll do it without forking the chain too. You can fork the chain with whatever your devs come up with. The community will go with the pristine blockchain in the end.
I'll get my first release out in 36 hours. Let's see how long your team takes. My wallets will have coin control too.
PM me with any questions.
I'm going to fork the ADT repo and make minimal changes to this coins parameters and end PoW rather quickly.
I'll get my changes out faster than your team, I guarantee you.
I'll have full Qts for all platforms and the network will function beautifully.
I'll make an ANN and let the community decide. A few will try and see how a real coin functions.
That's the deal I made with the blade dev and he eventually came around. NRS us up about 10x since I did their wallets. Buys have outnumbered sells on Blade by about 20 to 1.
I mean the best for ADT, but I won't wait for others to fix it now that I have taken a position.
I'll do it without forking the chain too. You can fork the chain with whatever your devs come up with. The community will go with the pristine blockchain in the end.
I'll get my first release out in 36 hours. Let's see how long your team takes. My wallets will have coin control too.
PM me with any questions.
No one is asking you to trust anything. Zack needs to stop being a bully and let the guy live. Both me, the CRC guy, and Tranz have agreed to look at the code before it is merged into the main repo. However zack keeps deleting his posts. Anyone siding with zack at this point regarding the fixes imo is wrong. TX42 has provided us with the fixes and wallet's if we wish to use it (not that i would but thats beside the point). Tx43 also explained earlier on why he chose to make the patches which was to protect his investment in ADT.
Ahmed
Ahmed
the only posts that were deleted had download links to unofficial clients or quotes of those links I have already said that he should make a thread then post a link here
but he must make it clear that the clients are not made by the ADT dev team and are not official i am having people look over the code and i have asked mullick to take a look and make sure it dosent cause issues if people swap from that client to his one
all tx43 had to do was talk to me about the requirements / the things that needed doing and there wouldn't be any issues
instead he decided to make a patch that changes things he wanted instead of what the users wanted
i am not being unreasonable by rejecting a patch that changes things that the users don't support as changing the POW to stop is not something that the majority of ADT users want
ahmed if you change the main repo without my approval i will move the main repo into my github account
i am not bulling anyone if anything its people trying to bully me into changing ADT to what they want
tx43 brought less than 20 LTC worth of ADT and is doing more work than you did for 5 BTC ! maybe tx43 should talk to me rather than go against me as he could even earn some money
Ahmed
No one is asking you to trust anything. Zack needs to stop being a bully and let the guy live. Both me, the CRC guy, and Tranz have agreed to look at the code before it is merged into the main repo. However zack keeps deleting his posts. Anyone siding with zack at this point regarding the fixes imo is wrong. TX42 has provided us with the fixes and wallet's if we wish to use it (not that i would but thats beside the point). Tx43 also explained earlier on why he chose to make the patches which was to protect his investment in ADT.
Ahmed
Ahmed
the only posts that were deleted had download links to unofficial clients or quotes of those links I have already said that he should make a thread then post a link here
but he must make it clear that the clients are not made by the ADT dev team and are not official i am having people look over the code and i have asked mullick to take a look and make sure it dosent cause issues if people swap from that client to his one
all tx43 had to do was talk to me about the requirements / the things that needed doing and there wouldn't be any issues
instead he decided to make a patch that changes things he wanted instead of what the users wanted
i am not being unreasonable by rejecting a patch that changes things that the users don't support as changing the POW to stop is not something that the majority of ADT users want
ahmed if you change the main repo without my approval i will move the main repo into my github account
i am not bulling anyone if anything its people trying to bully me into changing ADT to what they want
tx43 brought less than 20 LTC worth of ADT and is doing more work than you did for 5 BTC ! maybe tx43 should talk to me rather than go against me as he could even earn some money
No one is asking you to trust anything. Zack needs to stop being a bully and let the guy live. Both me, the CRC guy, and Tranz have agreed to look at the code before it is merged into the main repo. However zack keeps deleting his posts. Anyone siding with zack at this point regarding the fixes imo is wrong. TX42 has provided us with the fixes and wallet's if we wish to use it (not that i would but thats beside the point). Tx43 also explained earlier on why he chose to make the patches which was to protect his investment in ADT.
Ahmed
Ahmed
wondering is 1 thing. if he can deliver and the code looked over by numerous people and determined to be of a high standard then whats the harm?
sure understand but surely if its all that genuine help you should not mind sharing your reasons as opposed to denying it not so long ago (and don't blame it on Zach please). Don't misunderstand me I am just trying to understand who to trust with my hard earned cash.
unofficial clients do not belong here not that anyone would trust it anyway.
Jump to: