Here is what is under consideration, deleted by Zack because he feels threatened somehow:
they were removed due to posting unofficial clients in the main thread nothing more make your own thread and link to it from here
Topic: [ANN] Androids Tokens v2.0 [Proof of Stake] - page 41. (Read 115857 times)
they were removed due to posting unofficial clients in the main thread nothing more make your own thread and link to it from here
Now deleting my posts is not a clever move to make zack.
your post was only deleted as i quoted something that should not be on this thread feel free to repost the other part
For the first time I have had to use the privileges given to me by self moderation as posting unofficial clients in the main ADT thread is unacceptable you are free to start your own topic with it in but you must state that there unofficial clients and are not indorsed by me at this time
once that is done feel free to post a link to that thread on here
I was hoping to post this right after deleting the 2 posts but there is a crazy long delay between actions on this account
once that is done feel free to post a link to that thread on here
I was hoping to post this right after deleting the 2 posts but there is a crazy long delay between actions on this account
i have pm'd the PR from tx42 to Tranz he will look over it and then if its approved it will be added
And one last thing.
I'm off your thread. Later!
I'm off your thread. Later!
yet another alt account
I recently was victim to a keylogger, and it led to sabotages on all of my exchange accounts (lost about 2.5 BTC in total), but the hacker also got into my forum account here on BTC Talk. He then posted a thread in the Russian forums that contained links to trojans disguised as trader bots.
This was caught by a moderator, and my account was banned here on bitcointalk.org
I appealed the ban, but I received a generic answer for the admin 'theymos' that said:
"I very rarely recover accounts if you can't prove ownership as described above. There are alternative ways of proving ownership, but they take too much time. If I point you to this thread, you can't prove ownership properly, and then I ignore your future PMs, this means that I'm not going to recover your account. Create a new one."
All ban appeal requests are given the same answer, and it is a link to a thread with that ^ line. Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/recovering-hacked-accounts-or-accounts-with-lost-passwords-497545
So I followed the advice given by 'theymos' and I made a new account.
It really sucks because now I have a very low Activity number and thus it is easy for silly ignorant people to discredit me and make accusations of being an "alt account".
So I ask you, Zack Clark, are you silly or ignorant?
Now deleting my posts is not a clever move to make zack.
I redownload the blockchain and the ADT v2.0 is work fine.
Synced and the transfer coin fine.
Synced and the transfer coin fine.
Thanks for that. i have made a few suggestions. However i'd advise to wait until i finish with the pull tester
Sure. Do with it what you like.
I think it will make a nice wallet.
wondering is 1 thing. if he can deliver and the code looked over by numerous people and determined to be of a high standard then whats the harm?
I agree
Based on what people have already gained from his work with fixing the Blade code and upgrading the Noirshares code (I am a big fan of NRS so thank you for that), I am convinced that tx42 can deliver to us a solid patch. And soon by the looks of it, which is great.
Since anything he submits will be proof-read by the existing team of developers, I don't see anything wrong with giving it a chance and trying out what he offers.
And furthermore, I don't really care about his personal reasoning behind providing us with a patch. I do care about ADT and the health thereof, however, so I am definitely going to try the solution he provides.
yet another alt account
precisely. I certainly appreciate you posting 
the more people who can voice against this clampdown against help on ADT the better. @Zack & Co. When you needed developers you couldnt find developers. Now you have a developer willing to work free of charge to fix ADT. Dont ruin it.
the more people who can voice against this clampdown against help on ADT the better. @Zack & Co. When you needed developers you couldnt find developers. Now you have a developer willing to work free of charge to fix ADT. Dont ruin it. wondering is 1 thing. if he can deliver and the code looked over by numerous people and determined to be of a high standard then whats the harm?
I agree
Based on what people have already gained from his work with fixing the Blade code and upgrading the Noirshares code (I am a big fan of NRS so thank you for that), I am convinced that tx42 can deliver to us a solid patch. And soon by the looks of it, which is great.
Since anything he submits will be proof-read by the existing team of developers, I don't see anything wrong with giving it a chance and trying out what he offers.
And furthermore, I don't really care about his personal reasoning behind providing us with a patch. I do care about ADT and the health thereof, however, so I am definitely going to try the solution he provides.
wondering is 1 thing. if he can deliver and the code looked over by numerous people and determined to be of a high standard then whats the harm?
I am just wondering why someone suddenly offering. A fix for free when we really needed it noone would do it??
Guys. STOP! You have someone here who is creating a Pull Request aka a patch to the official repo for people to use. That means we can tweak it and edit it as much as we see fit or even reject the full thing. WHY are you people so against someone who can possibly fix ADT as fast and as well as mullick?
what tx 45 is doing is dropping POW when there was no plans at this time and forcing change that have not been fully approved by the majority of users
Now that I'm logged in as me...
Look, the patch is designed to be neutral relative to the function of the coin. Patched clients and not patched clients can coexist on the same network. The blockchain is good. The difference is that patched clients will not reject valid blocks, making the synchronization go smoother and strengthen the network. If you don't like that or some of the features out of fear of the unknown, then don't apply them.
You have several real devs here, it seems like, that can look over the changes. They'll verify that I didn't change anything about the core parameters of the coin. The real thing I changed was some validation code that was causing problems.
Now that you've forced you way in, everything is just a "suggestion".
How do you force your way into an open source project?
Just a couple pages ago you were threating to take over. Probably deleted/revised by now though.
No, the only thing I deleted were the posts where I mistakenly posted with the dev team account. I do not speak for the dev team of the other coin, so I had to delete those posts.
Jesus christ another alt account
Sorry, that wasn't meant to be with the other account. That's a dev team account. My bad.
What the post said was that the devs here should read my post again.
Nothing is being forced. Everything is a suggestion and it's all being submitted as a pull request.
Why does everyone go nuts at every suggestion?
I'm testing my patches thoroughly now.
Now that you've forced you way in, everything is just a "suggestion". Get fucking real. Just a couple pages ago you were threating to take over. Probably deleted/revised by now though.
Its not very appealing when you give deadlines and threaten to take over the coin... Not to mention trying to get zacks coins blacklisted.
What are you talking about?
I accidentally posted from a dev team account and I regret it, trust me.
Jump to: