Topic: [ANN] Androids Tokens v2.0 [Proof of Stake] - page 42. (Read 115857 times)

Sorry, that wasn't meant to be with the other account. That's a dev team account. My bad.

What the post said was that the devs here should read my post again.

Nothing is being forced. Everything is a suggestion and it's all being submitted as a pull request.

Why does everyone go nuts at every suggestion?

I'm testing my patches thoroughly now.

Its not very appealing when you give deadlines and threaten to take over the coin... Not to mention trying to get zacks coins blacklisted.

Edit: The dude (tx42) posted from his "ebt" alt account then deleted his shit when i called it out.

Jesus christ another alt account

this coin wallet problem has been fixed?

There's no point to this patch if mullick has one in the works already.  It's also bullshit how it's basically being forced upon us.

what tx 45 is doing is dropping POW when there was no plans at this time and forcing change that have not been fully approved by the majority of users

doing another patch just a few days after this one is going to cause hassle with users not being on the right new client 

there has been no real info given to the users on how all the changes are going to affect ADT

what if this patch screws ADT up even more and makes the patch mullick has been working on no longer work

there is so many things wrong with a user just showing up and forcing a patch with settings that are not approved by the majority of ADT holders

did anyone agree to the potential security risk of going pure POS ? ( pure POS is not totally proven YET )

right now anyone can download the windows QT and use it normally ( its just advisable to make sure your on the right blockchain when you send coins but that should be the case for any alt coin not just ADT )

so all this patch is suppose to do is fix the stain while out of sync add coin control and remove the POW that hasn't been approved by most users 


if I let this patch happen and it messes up ADT I will be the one that has to deal with it and if it does work there will be another patch in the next few days causing confusion the benefits do not out weigh the consequences

cryptsy would take a few days to update that's if they do agree to it by then there will be another patch causing an issue there 


 

This is a good honest post however lets see what Zach says. Zach please be constructive and if this has any benefits we want to see your honest unbiased opinion. Thanks

In about 5 hours, I will release a fix with some cool features and submit the entire thing as a pull request. My vote won't matter, but I vote to put it in. It's up to the long term ADT devs to figure out what to do with it.

At the same time, I'll release unofficial wallets for Windows and Mac. It's up to users to use them if they trust me. If not, they can build themselves. I wouldn't have changed parameters of the coin except to drop PoW in a month. The wallets will still be useful and behave exactly as all others in the short term (except that they will build a better network). If the ADT devs don't like my removing PoW, it's easy enough to comment out after they pull. But PoW is a security liability and it is only good for pump and dumpers. That's my 2 cents.

Along with dropping PoW, I suggest upping the APR (yearly) interest to 20 - 25% for PoS. The current rate is 3%, which is a bit low. Changing the APR is one or two changes in the code depending on how responsive they want the interest to be to the total number of minters. They'd need to make one change to make the rate really responsive and encourage adoption, or two changes to make the rate unresponsive and encourage bag holding. For the long term value of the coin and rewarding current ADT holders, probably the former (one change, responsive) is the better option.

I will probably submit my ideal changes as a separate pull request.

I've had a good look at ADT, and it's a good coin. Outside of ending PoW and raising the interest rate, I wouldn't change much else except to add wallet features.

as requested no politics and crap please just answer the queries.

This is an alt of saveadt. He posted the same thing... Gtfo, no one is blocking any coins.

please take over ADT I will personally pay you 250,000,000 ADT to do so

in return all you need to do is block zackclark70s 2+ bill coins from the blockchain

I'll Q/C it as well. I can read and understand the code.

hmm I understand why Zach is not willing to try/risk it but it would be nice to have a fix as the patch could be some time away. Zach would this be possible to get these guys do this fix or is it too risky in any way? No politics and emotions anymore please just black and white facts. Thanks

correct. however zack seems to be against tx42. as the owner of the adt repo i will provide an unbiased opinion on the patch when its made and pulled into the main repo

sorry for not reading this entirely but are you guys saying you have a fix for the sync issue and that is to correct the previous faulty clients that were released until Mullick finishes the patch? Zack what nodes should we be on to fully sync as I have tried manual as well but does not work.

Dont forget the CRC repo consists of around 5 members as it is. When something is added into there or a project is taken up it takes a majority approval.

changes shouldn't be made to the main ADT repo without at lest 2 people looking over it as it means there is less likely to be any problems but you already know that as i had mullick and someone else look over your work it is nothing personal against anyone as i even get people to look over mullicks work
 

i am the owner of the repo and after looking over the patch i will gladly accept it

Well, I've got a fix for exactly this problem that I'll submit as a pull request to your repo at the time I originally said. If Mullick is busy, you should use my pull. I've been really teasing you guys, but all that aside, just put in the fix and the other features and make this a better coin.

that is what mullick is working on and that is why its taking time and why it shouldn't be rushed