Author

Topic: [ANN] [ASIC-RESISTANT] UltraCoin (UTC) - Ultrafast 6 second transactions!! - page 540. (Read 946654 times)

SxC
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
Bingo on my 280xs... running 130+ each no HW errors.. still trying to figure out how it can increase more..

yes please do share setting's
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
ugh...had to set -I 12 to get rid of HW errors. I have 3x 7950s each at 66kh right now.

put:  -G 1 -I 18 -W 512 --thread-concurrency 35840   rest of your setting should be fine.
                                                           (1792 x 20)
See if that gets you to 120Kh/s range


I have sapphire reference (4L's)  doing 125Kh/s .
Also, Powercolor reference doing 125 Kh/s  <<<<< arguably one of the worst cooled GPU on market.
Vddc on both in the 1.080 range.
Temps @ 65C appx
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
Lucky you. My 290 only work with I12, down from I20.

It may be result of me running 4gb or ram. I cannot get 28k+ TC.


I'm only running 24000 TC on all of mine.

I reset my miner and now it's all HW errors....
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
Bingo on my 280xs... running 130+ each no HW errors.. still trying to figure out how it can increase more..

what are your settings?
legendary
Activity: 1537
Merit: 1005
Lucky you. My 290 only work with I12, down from I20.

It may be result of me running 4gb or ram. I cannot get 28k+ TC.


I'm only running 24000 TC on all of mine.

But you have 8gb of ram right?
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
Bingo on my 280xs... running 130+ each no HW errors.. still trying to figure out how it can increase more..
newbie
Activity: 16
Merit: 0


okay I have my 7950's doing 125 Kh/s each no HW errors

I'm running -w 512  -I 18 -TC 35k-40k    1050/1500 and 1080/1600 clocks

Really just changed the TC and dropped intensity as I was running 19.   Tc in the 35k -40K range not changing WU yet.   Can't say whats optimal there atm

Ye, with g2 I=11 is too low and I=12 too high(HW errors).

Maybe your method with g1 and I=18 is the only doable at this particular N-factor stage.

Yeah sorry I forgot to say G1, I assumed with that High TC all would know.  It's G1

7950 with 3Gb ram here, after the new N factor I've changed the following:

Thread concurrency from 16384 to 32768

Intensity from 17 to 15

No Hw errors

Hash dropped from 205 to 95

Tips welcome Wink

95 is pretty low for 7950



okay I have my 7950's doing 125 Kh/s each no HW errors

I'm running -w 512  -I 18 -TC 35k-40k    1050/1500 and 1080/1600 clocks

Really just changed the TC and dropped intensity as I was running 19.   Tc in the 35k -40K range not changing WU yet.   Can't say whats optimal there atm

What's your WU?

WU is 120 per card 343 (for 3) .  Pool varying shown rate between 650-850  (6 total gpu)

Yes 95Khs is low, but it's a Sapphire card with inadequate cooling.Temp is around 57 and I'm fine with these temps.
Don't want to fry the GPU.It's also undervolted to VDCC 0.962 with std clock speeds.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
Lucky you. My 290 only work with I12, down from I20.

It may be result of me running 4gb or ram. I cannot get 28k+ TC.


I'm only running 24000 TC on all of mine.
newbie
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
ugh...had to set -I 12 to get rid of HW errors. I have 3x 7950s each at 66kh right now.
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
Both the 270 and 280x needed to go to i11 to run...

atleast there running..

where did coinbase go!!

I went to withdraw my btc.. its pending.. then it got cancelled only they could do that..
then i put the request in again.. waiting.. waiting.. now the site is gone!
legendary
Activity: 1537
Merit: 1005
Lucky you. My 290 only work with I12, down from I20.

It may be result of me running 4gb or ram. I cannot get 28k+ TC.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
I can only comment on 290/290x cards right now. but they didn't seem to require any changes.  

I'm getting 194 at 1070/1500 out of one 290x.  The other two I'm getting 205.6 at 1100/1500.  The 290 is runnung at 180 at 1050/1500.  

Intensity still 19 on all of them.  0 hardware errors.  Difficulty is falling off a cliff right now which makes me think most people mine with 7970/280x.  
hero member
Activity: 668
Merit: 500


okay I have my 7950's doing 125 Kh/s each no HW errors

I'm running -w 512  -I 18 -TC 35k-40k    1050/1500 and 1080/1600 clocks

Really just changed the TC and dropped intensity as I was running 19.   Tc in the 35k -40K range not changing WU yet.   Can't say whats optimal there atm

What's your WU?
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10


okay I have my 7950's doing 125 Kh/s each no HW errors

I'm running -w 512  -I 18 -TC 35k-40k    1050/1500 and 1080/1600 clocks

Really just changed the TC and dropped intensity as I was running 19.   Tc in the 35k -40K range not changing WU yet.   Can't say whats optimal there atm

Ye, with g2 I=11 is too low and I=12 too high(HW errors).

Maybe your method with g1 and I=18 is the only doable at this particular N-factor stage.
newbie
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
7950 with 3Gb ram here (no OC, 850 core,1200 mem speed, undervolted to 0.962), after the new N factor I've changed the following:

Thread concurrency from 16384 to 32768

Intensity from 17 to 15

No Hw errors

Hash dropped from 205 to 95

--intensity 15 --lookup-gap 2 --worksize 256 --expiry 10 --scan-time 1 --gpu-threads 1 --vectors 1 --thread-concurrency 32768 --shaders 1792 --no-submit-stale
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100


okay I have my 7950's doing 125 Kh/s each no HW errors

I'm running -w 512  -I 18 -TC 35k-40k    1050/1500 and 1080/1600 clocks

Really just changed the TC and dropped intensity as I was running 19.   Tc in the 35k -40K range not changing WU yet.   Can't say whats optimal there atm
SxC
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
my 280x is @ 80 hash and my 7850 is @ 72 hash
sr. member
Activity: 951
Merit: 252
Only way I'm not getting HW errors on 270x is by dropping intensity to 11 ... but I'm only getting 37kh now.. any other settings I could change?

--scrypt-jane --sj-nfmin 4 --sj-nfmax 30 --sj-time 1388361600 -I 11 --gpu-powertune 20
legendary
Activity: 1537
Merit: 1005
Anyone knows if operating tc and lookup gap will do anything good? Or we better try sgminer - it has more intensity options to find the best one?
Jump to: