No offense but this looks like the next project that sounds cool and stuff but will get zero actual real time use because nobody really wants to have their pension fund hacked.
Hello, thanks for giving us feedback to work on.
No offense taken. My opinion is that these security concerns are very important, and this holds true for both traditional pension funds and any project related to blockchain and cryptocurrencies in general. Nobody wants to have anything hacked, not just pension funds.
Traditional pension funds are often fraud/scam targets and one of our goals in bringing them to the blockchain is to improve this. Of course this brings a new kind of risk, especially with recent hacks occurring in other ICOs and a vast history of other problems that have happened in the past.
But it is our team's responsability to address those risks by following a few important steps such as:
- Thoroughly testing the smart contracts that will be used in the pre-sale and in the ICO;
- Having security audits;
- Disclosing contract address previously and using ENS;
And after the ICO, before publicly launching our platform, spend even more effort and resources to assure security, hiring security specialists, promoting bug bounty campaigns, extensively testing the platform on test net before launching it on main net, gradually releasing our products to beta testers before releasing them publicly for everyone, and a lot of other measures that can be taken to reduce the risks to near zero.
The risk is not exclusive to our project, it exists in every cryptocurrencies exchange, in every ICO and in every system that handles users' assets. Even traditional banking systems are not completely safe against hacks, so it depends on the team's competence to ensure that the platform built is safe.