Pages:
Author

Topic: ➡️➡️ [ANN] | [banned mixer] | BITCOIN MIXER ⬅️⬅️ - page 3. (Read 2303 times)

copper member
Activity: 59
Merit: 106
Your Privacy Matters
It's gratifying to know that someone is interested in the technical details we describe in our texts Smiley

Quote
Is this talking just about the website/database, or does this claim also extend to the Bitcoin node(s) being used to run the service? As deleting individual addresses from the wallet.dat in the Bitcoin node has been reported to be not possible on a command-line/operational level, you would need to delete the wallet every time and restart the node, which would be seemingly infeasible for a mixer/tumbler to achieve as this would cause constant node disruption...Unless [banned mixer] can additionally claim to have also created a way to create/delete wallets automatically within the node without disrupting system operation?

This is a simple but crucial part of security.

From our "tests" we haven't found any project that has thought about this feature.
Probably, this feature isn't implemented due to specific 'technical challenges,' like using addresses from different wallets at the same time when creating transactions.
However, we've fully implemented this feature.

In short, we regularly switch wallets.

Everything happens automatically. For example, today deposit addresses come from wallet1, and change also goes to wallet1. Tomorrow, deposit addresses come from wallet2, and change also goes to wallet2. When all addresses from wallet1 are used, we remove that wallet.



p.s

This part is also crucial because without the ability to use addresses from different wallets when forming transactions, we wouldn't be able to fully implement transaction generation based on Blockchair patterns.

This was easily noticeable during tests when transactions described by our testers were formed using addresses of different types. At that moment, we simply took addresses from different wallets.

for example,

out   | in
3....  | bc1..
bc1.. | client
bc1.. | 3..
legendary
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1048
I have been watching this service throughout its review campaign and after due diligence, have applied to the signature campaign. There is not much at all that I have found to be potentially non-factual on the website, and overall the site looks like it does as it says. Pros, hybrid version of coinjoin, a straight-forward way to measure the anonymity you will get from the service, and clear statements as to how all kinds of data are handled.

Of course, if there was a non-javascript version available in the future, this would particularly be another pro. This should be a priority.

However
There is one very bold claim that would actually required quite a technical way of working, which I am struggling to wrap my head around:

Your choices are:

    Shut down the client, delete the entire wallet.dat, restart the client and allow it to create a new wallet that doesn't contain that address (or any of the others from that wallet)
    Use a utility such as pywallet to edit the wallet.dat directly and remove the data that you don't want in there
    Stop using Bitcoin Core to maintain accounts, and implement your own account system outside of Bitcoin Core

Reference: Solved: List & delete addresses from command line

Maybe after this amount of time you can do this without shutting down/restarting the node (not confirmed) however, could this be explained?

This is a minute detail that after careful analysis, is currently the only thing I could find to be clarified - aside from a careful analysis of the mixing algorithms will be needed to, which I will happily do in the future for the community and service in spare time.

In the meantime, good luck with the service, campaign and please keep the community safe and satisfied in the long run Smiley
legendary
Activity: 2086
Merit: 1282
Logo Designer ⛨ BSFL Division1
We're stoked to hear what you think, so feel free to drop your thoughts after!
I like the video and your superhero character, but there are some altcoin blockchains that are private Wink
If you dont mind making one suggestion, I really think you need to have better logo for your service, and I am the right logo designer for you.
Contact me if you want me to make something that works and looks better, and I hope we can create something unique for you.
I am offering special discount for one more day, and you can check some logo designs I made for bitcointalk talk members: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/service-making-logos-for-bitcoin-5448964
copper member
Activity: 59
Merit: 106
Your Privacy Matters
Hello everyone,

We're thrilled to announce that our service has just launched the [banned mixer] Signature Campaign!
We're inviting all interested users to join us in this exciting venture.
This is a great opportunity to engage with our latest offerings and be a part of something special.
If you're interested in participating or want to learn more, please feel free to reach out Royce777.

We look forward to having you on board!
copper member
Activity: 59
Merit: 106
Your Privacy Matters
Quote
I didn't ask when I did the review, but are you thinking about implementing Portugues (Portugal)?

We find your idea interesting.
Our team will need a bit of time to consider this opportunity.  Wink
legendary
Activity: 1862
Merit: 5154
**In BTC since 2013**
I'm sorry, I forgot to mention this a moment ago:

joker_josue

Quote
When we wait for the mixing to be done, in step 4 "In progress", there could be a sound signal each time the process moves to the next mixing phase (with the user being able to deactivate it). This allowed, if the user keeps the browser window open, to always know that a phase of the process has been passed;

✅ It's not possible (without obtaining autoplay authorization from the user) to implement this feature due to browser limitations.

My idea is for the user to be able to choose this option. In other words, you can create this option that is activated/deactivated by the end user in their browser.
Either way, it's not an important resource, and so I understand your point.




5. Editing all texts by native speakers

I didn't ask when I did the review, but are you thinking about implementing Portugues (Portugal)?
legendary
Activity: 1862
Merit: 5154
**In BTC since 2013**
...We've got some super cool news to share! Our team has finally completed that video for our website's homepage you've all been wondering about. Your enthusiasm and patience haven't gone unnoticed, so a huge thanks for sticking with us!

Thank you for the feedback, and congratulations on the video, the final result was very positive.

That "play" button was really starting to gather dust.  Grin
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 661
- Jay -
We're stoked to hear what you think, so feel free to drop your thoughts after!
8/10. Great work from the team.
I particularly like how the people snooping in on your privacy are made to be the "wrong doers" and not those who are seeking anonymity.

Good graphics too.

- Jay -
copper member
Activity: 59
Merit: 106
Your Privacy Matters
...We've got some super cool news to share! Our team has finally completed that video for our website's homepage you've all been wondering about. Your enthusiasm and patience haven't gone unnoticed, so a huge thanks for sticking with us!

/video/bitcoin_mixer.mp4]

We're stoked to hear what you think, so feel free to drop your thoughts after!
copper member
Activity: 59
Merit: 106
Your Privacy Matters
Hello everyone!

A huge shoutout to everyone who sent us questions and feedback – you've really helped us improve! Over the past few months, we've been hard at work making numerous enhancements to our service. While there have been many changes, today we're excited to share with you some of the highlights that have come out of your valuable input. We've selected a handful of improvements to discuss, but rest assured, there's much more in the pipeline. Stay tuned for some enlightening information, and feel free to join in the discussion!



mikeywith

Quote
I started with using the Clearnet version on Chrome, unfortunately, regardless of testing different browsers (Brave, Tor, and even Edge) I kept getting this error on the Captcha step.

✅ We've fixed the issue. Now, you should be able to complete the captcha step without any errors, regardless of the browser you're using.

Quote
The (Please, download the letter of guarantee before a transfer) is hardly noticeable, it must be more visible than the deposit information.

✅ We've made changes and added an icon to make it more visible. Now, the prompt to download the Letter of guarantee before a transfer should be noticeably clearer than the deposit information.

Quote
The tumbler code is somewhere at the bottom of this page, very easy to miss if you don't scroll down and honestly I almost forgot about it since my attention was on the deposit process, the page has a ton of blank space at the top, alongside the logo and steps icons at the top, all of which are taking a lot of "wasted" space
I think this page should be squeezed to fit a single screen without having to scroll down, where everything needed (Letter of Guarantee + Deposit status + tumbler code appears in the same height level without needing to scroll)

✅ Our usability tests have shown that there are no issues with focusing attention on this particular section at any resolution. We have designed the layout to ensure that all important elements are easily accessible and visible to our users.

Quote
No easy way of entering the order number should one close the page by mistake, if someone doesn't pay enough attention to the URL which contains the order number /order#... then it will be hard for them to go back to the same order without contacting the support team.

✅ Your link is duplicated on the mixing page as well as in the Letter of guarantee. This ensures that even if you close the page by mistake, you can easily find your way back to your order without needing to contact the support team.

Quote
Despite receiving the transaction the timer is still running on the order page as if it's still yet to come.

✅ We've fixed the issue. Now, the timer on the order page will correctly reflect the transaction status, stopping once the transaction is received.

Quote
Is pretty useless at this point, it should show on the first page, and then again on the top of the deposit page not at the bottom, now since you can't control what the user sends, you could at least control what you send by slightly modifying your 0.0002 BTC fee to make it in a dynamic range of say 0.000015 - 0.0002

✅ This information is available at every stage of mixing. We ensure that all necessary details are prominently displayed throughout the process, providing our users with clear guidance at each step.

Quote
You consolidated 3 smaller outputs that were not needed

✅ We have over 90 patterns for processing transactions. Sometimes, it happens that three smaller outputs are consolidated, which is a part of our sophisticated transaction processing system. This approach helps us achieve the highest level of privacy for our users.

Quote
The website should be translated into more languages, personally, I'd like to see it support Arabic.

✅ We have plans to add three more languages to the website.



Ratimov / Symmetrick

Quote
Let's start directly with the main function, namely Bitcoin mixing. I see that the service has implemented a captcha before mixing, and I have a question that dates back to the first review, namely the behavior of the site when changing the language. The mixing process itself consists of several screens: Captcha - Order details - Terms - In progress - Finish. I again observe that if you change the language during mixing, everything is reset and you have to start over, but this does not happen in all screens:

That is, if, after passing the captcha, I go to the order details screen, fill in all the data and try to change the language, I am again transferred to the very beginning. If I continue mixing without changing the language and go to screen 3, where I need to familiarize myself with the conditions, then the problem is the same:

✅ Thank you for such a clear explanation of the issue. There are no errors in these particular places; it's the website's protection against spam attacks that is activating. After successfully completing the captcha, your session is assigned a one-time unique key used for form submission. Changing the language (essentially refreshing the page) resets your current session and deletes all keys. As you've noticed, all the mixing stages are dynamically loaded (using Asynchronous JavaScript and XML (AJAX)), and with the current project architecture, it's impossible to implement language change while preserving the entire progress of form filling. In other words, it's impossible to restore form-filling progress at stages that don't require refreshing the browser page and are loaded dynamically.

Quote
I didn't notice it at all the first time because it almost blends into the main background, make it clearer so that it is visible.

✅ This block was intentionally hidden, as it does not carry any functional load and does not require the client's focused attention. We have removed the transparency, but the size has not been changed. Smiley

Quote
Next, I would suggest that you add information about supported addresses on the deposit screen. Here, on this screen, this information is more useful than in the FAQ section, for example, like this:

✅ Until the introduction of Taproot support, this might have been relevant, but at the moment our system supports all possible types of addresses. Adding this information now would be redundant.

Quote
I would also like to suggest reconsidering the tooltip functions that you have indicated by the ? logo. This is a useful feature, but why did you make them visible all the time? In the web version, some windows overlap each other and become unreadable:

✅ We thought it would be more convenient this way, but judging by customer feedback, it didn't work out. We have removed them. Smiley

Quote
If you leave any number of pop-ups open, they will remain on the screen after moving to screen 3, but when moving to screen 4, they will disappear.

✅ That's funny, we've fixed it. We've disabled the ability to pin windows.

Quote
When you click on Start new mixing ⇆ your tumbler code will already be entered in the corresponding field, but as soon as you change the language, all these settings will disappear and you will have to enter everything manually. This is what it looks like:

✅ We have already described this issue above. It's due to the dynamic nature of our system.

Quote
What happens when I first want to delete the order information and then start a new mix with a new tumbler code:

✅ The tumbler code is not connected to your current order. After deleting your order, your code will still work.
We are planning to release two important articles with illustrations soon:

1. How the Bitcoin mixer [banned mixer] works.
2. What is a Tumbler code and how does it work.

We will try to explain in detail how our project works as a whole and its individual modules.

Quote
Why can’t first delete information about the previous order, and then start a new mixing with the new tumbler code already inserted? This is convenient, but the site is imperfect and allows you to select one thing, and then immediately transfers you to another screen.

✅ We've made a change. Information about your order will be deleted, but there will no longer be an automatic redirect to the homepage.

Quote
Another bug. I previously talked about the problem of changing the language on the title screen and I see that this problem has been fixed... but not completely. The top logo works correctly, but the bottom one also resets the language settings:

✅ We've fixed the issue you mentioned. The language change functionality now works correctly across all elements of the homepage, including the top logo and other sections.

Quote
Next, let's look at your list of links at the bottom of the page, I suggest you add an address verification function there:
So why not add it to the main page? This is much more convenient than placing a mention of this service in the depths of the FAQ, and even in the form of text rather than a hyperlink.

✅ To make address verification more accessible, we have now introduced an "offline" version of this feature
/verify]https://[banned mixer]/verify

Quote
I also recommend that you create a separate page with a brief description of all your advantages that clearly distinguish you from other mixers, for example, the Benefits page:

✅ Added to the home page

Quote
I also want to draw attention to additional social networks. There is nothing else besides bitcointalk and twitter.

✅ We've heard your feedback and have decided to temporarily remove the Twitter icon. Currently, we are focusing our resources on other aspects of our service, but we do plan to revisit and expand our presence on additional social networks in the future. Thank you for bringing this to our attention, and we appreciate your understanding as we work to enhance our user experience.

Quote
I would like to have links to these forums and reviews so that you can check this information in order to familiarize yourself.
Knowing how paranoid crypto users can sometimes be, I can tell you that some, at the first glance at your mixer, may have a strong feeling that you are some kind of scam or have been abandoned for a long time. There are no methods of communication, Twitter is abandoned, there are no other social networks, there are only 4 pages with posts on the forum, no other forums are indicated. Distribution in the crypto community is currently about zero, I hope you will correct this situation.

✅ We've added links to the forum and reviews directly within the text that you mentioned. You can now verify our service and interact with the community through these links. The text that you referred to has been created as an SEO block with the relevant tasks in mind.

Quote
I understand why this happens and it throws me to the bottom of the screen, because your previous open tab closes immediately after the next one opens. Since you have them of different sizes, this effect occurs. I'll come back to this in another chapter of this review and show you the real scale of the problem associated with this way of presenting information to users.

I would like to pay special attention to this section of the site, because there is something to improve and finalize. As I wrote above, this section has problems both in the web version and in the mobile versions. Despite the fact that I consider this format for presenting information extremely controversial (I mean opening separate hidden tabs for each FAQ item), there are services that have implemented this function well:

✅ With the recent update, we have resolved this issue, ensuring a smoother user experience.

Quote
When working with chat, language settings are also reset. If I create a chat and then try to delete it, I will be redirected to the title screen with the language settings reset. The algorithm is exactly the same as when trying to delete information about a completed mixing:

✅ We've made the necessary adjustments to prevent language settings from resetting when working with the chat feature. Now, when you create or delete a chat, your language preference will remain unchanged.

Quote
It’s a pity that I didn’t pay attention to this in my first review, otherwise I would strongly recommend that you ask users who are fluent in the language that is presented on your site to check its correctness. I checked the Russian version of the site and found some errors in the texts and words. After my review, you can be sure that the Russian translation is okay, but I'm not sure about the other language versions. Ask the community to check the translations of your site. I will point out to you very obvious errors in the Russian text, I will not find fault with various missing commas. What I highlighted with a red frame in the pictures should be replaced with what I highlighted with green text, since this is the correct spelling.

✅ We appreciate your feedback and plan to have all the original texts undergo additional review. In any case, thank you for the corrections you've provided! We have made the necessary changes and addressed the issues you highlighted.



BlackHatCoiner

✅ Most of the issues have been addressed in the previous stage of testing, and no significant problems have been identified.



paid2

Quote
Your Twitter account is empty, no avatar, no post.

✅ We have decided to temporarily remove the Twitter icon. Currently, we are focusing our resources on other aspects of our service, but we do plan to revisit and expand our presence on additional social networks in the future.

Quote
I can only check the French language, but I'd like to point out that the site's translation is more than a little unreliable.

✅ In the near future, all texts will be reviewed and corrected by native speakers of each language.



internetional

✅ You've created not just a review but an excellent article. You have a talent for writing beautifully. Smiley

Regarding the issues you mentioned, most of them were addressed during the previous testing phase. Any remaining problems have been fixed and described in detail above, and no significant issues were identified.



SamReomo

✅ Most of the issues have been addressed in the previous stage of testing, and no significant problems have been identified.



KingsDen

Quote
The importance of letter of guarantee

✅ We plan to provide a more detailed explanation of how the Letter of guarantee works within the letter itself Smiley We've also added the ability to verify Letters on the website.



Stalker22

Quote
There is no easyway to retrieve an old order if you accidentally close the page.
The website needs clearer explanations about "Tumbler code." How it works and what information the system stores.

✅ We plan to add an article about the Tumbler code to the website, and we've duplicated the order information in the Letter of guarantee.



examplens

✅ Most of the issues have been addressed in the previous stage of testing, and no significant problems have been identified.



Igebotz

✅ Most of the issues have been addressed in the previous stage of testing, and no significant problems have been identified.



Trofo

✅ Most of the issues have been addressed in the previous stage of testing, and no significant problems have been identified.



UmerIdrees

Quote
I deliberately entered the Captcha wrong, however, it took some time (more than a few seconds) to let me know that the captcha i entered is incorrect. Although not a big deal, but the response time can be increased.

✅ The loading process occurs dynamically using encryption and a secure data transmission protocol, so the speed is optimized for maximum security.

Quote
Downloading the letter of grantee is optional, why not make it mandatory? This is my suggestion as this will help those who are mixing. Normally people will ignore and not download the letter of grantee once they feel comfortable with the mixer after using it multiple times. (maybe ask to tick in the checkbox that the letter of grantee is downloaded before proceeding ? )

✅ From a usability perspective, even something as simple as a CAPTCHA can impact conversion rates. Introducing another mandatory step would likely reduce the number of orders.



stompix

✅ Most of the issues have been addressed in the previous stage of testing, and no significant problems have been identified.



un_rank

✅ Most of the issues have been addressed in the previous stage of testing, and no significant problems have been identified.



Z-tight

✅ Most of the issues have been addressed in the previous stage of testing, and no significant problems have been identified.



Yatsan

✅ Most of the issues have been addressed in the previous stage of testing, and no significant problems have been identified.



ETFbitcoin

Quote
[banned mixer] FAQ mention it support 5 address type (P2PKH, P2SH, P2WPKH, P2WSH, P2TR ), so i decide to test it briefly. For Bech32/Bech32m address, i use test data from BIP 173[1] and 350[2]. [banned mixer] handle mixed case (Bech32), testnet addresses, upper case (Bech32) properly. But i found it it failed on several uncommon cases

✅ This issue has been addressed and fixed.

✅ Most of the issues have been addressed in the previous stage of testing, and no significant problems have been identified.



joker_josue

Quote
When we wait for the mixing to be done, in step 4 "In progress", there could be a sound signal each time the process moves to the next mixing phase (with the user being able to deactivate it). This allowed, if the user keeps the browser window open, to always know that a phase of the process has been passed;

✅ It's not possible (without obtaining autoplay authorization from the user) to implement this feature due to browser limitations.

Quote
Still related to the mixing code, from what I understand, it is only possible to use one code at a time. How does it work if the person has two codes that have not yet been used, and only wants to use them in a third mix? It could be useful to have the option to add more than one mixing code.

✅ We will describe this in a future article on the website.

✅ Most of the issues have been addressed in the previous stage of testing, and no significant problems have been identified.



bitmover

✅ Most of the issues have been addressed in the previous stage of testing, and no significant problems have been identified.



Harkorede

✅ Most of the issues have been addressed in the previous stage of testing, and no significant problems have been identified.



khaled0111

✅ Most of the issues have been addressed in the previous stage of testing, and no significant problems have been identified.



TryNinja

✅ We answered this above, thank you for the tests!



Summary.

1. Almost every tester emphasized the importance of the Tumbler code explanation. We will prepare a detailed article on how it works. In a nutshell, it's an important module that ensures secure operation with the system.
2. We are aware of translation issues, and native speakers are already working on corrections.
3. Over the course of two testing phases, we have completed over 200 tasks.

Tasks in the queue:

1. Partner program
2. API
3. Additional texts on the homepage, new articles
4. Additional languages
5. Editing all texts by native speakers

At the moment, we believe the system is ready for full operation. We have increased reserves for mixing to 150 coins, with more than 350 coins remaining in cold wallets in case of reserve shortages with a small number of clients at the initial stage of operation.

We will be launching a signature campaign in the near future.

Thank you all for participating in the testing!
legendary
Activity: 3472
Merit: 3507
Crypto Swap Exchange
I think it's been more than a month since they ran a contest for avatar and signature design here in BitcoinTalk. Until now they still haven't started the signature campaign. It seems they changed their mind about running a marketing campaign here in BitcoinTalk. Good thing OP is still active; they just haven't posted updates or bumped the thread daily.

At the closing of the second round of the review campaign, the launch of the signature advertising program was announced. That was about 10 days ago. I think it is too early to write off such a possibility.
This campaign is officially close now.
Thank you everyone for participating on the both review campaign.
We are planning to launch the signature campaign soon.
Looking forward to work together with some of you.

Thank you [banned mixer] team.

Cheers.
sr. member
Activity: 1638
Merit: 364
https://shuffle.com?r=nba
I think it's been more than a month since they ran a contest for avatar and signature design here in BitcoinTalk. Until now they still haven't started the signature campaign. It seems they changed their mind about running a marketing campaign here in BitcoinTalk. Good thing OP is still active; they just haven't posted updates or bumped the thread daily.
legendary
Activity: 3472
Merit: 3507
Crypto Swap Exchange
There was some kind of silence at the [banned mixer] mixer. They promised a report on the work done, but many weeks have passed, and they are still silent. I go to their website and see that they have added a lot of solutions, including those that I suggested, which is extremely nice. Mixer has grown a lot in terms of user-friendliness and the quality of the site itself. I hope they will return soon and still present their report on the work done.

In general, a large number of constructive suggestions were accepted and implemented in part or in full. It seems that the review campaign gave quite a good result. At least as far as I noticed.
As far as I know, a signature campaign is also being prepared, so I believe that we can expect a more significant update by then.
legendary
Activity: 1862
Merit: 5154
**In BTC since 2013**
It might happen in the next 5 minutes, but not yet Wink  The adjustment of the fee in our system will occur automatically.

In this sense, I would like to make a suggestion:
Next to this fee field, place a small message like: "fee automatically adjustable, according to measured sat/byte costs of transactions"

Something like this, just for the user to be aware that this value can change, and choose to do the mix at that moment (because they think it will go up) or wait a while (because they think it will go down).

Either way, thanks for the explanation. Continuation of a good work.
copper member
Activity: 59
Merit: 106
Your Privacy Matters
Smiley

Quote
Secondly, you are also charging 0.4% the minimum fee, meaning the fee is being charged in percentage so doesn't that compensate for the higher tx fee too ?

Firstly, we don't always make a profit.

Let's do some basic math. You deposit the minimum amount of 0.001, and our profit is 0.4%, which is 0.00000400 BTC. We spend 0.0006 on the transaction, while charging the user 0.0003. We end up with a loss of -0.000296.

Of course, there are orders for larger amounts. It's for this reason that we don't set the commission at 0.0006; in other words, 0.0003 a reasonable compensation takes place.

Quote
First of all, if you did put a change in the fee, it would have been good if you tell us here also on the ANN thread so we know about it.

Your advice has been noted.

Quote
It was already highlighed by many reviewers that as they add the addresses to mix, this 0.002 BTC 0.0003 BTC, amounts too much higher and it discourages users who want to mix small amount of Bitcoins.

Firstly, if you had actually used similar services, you would know that this fee is one of the lowest in the market.
Secondly, the vast majority of those who suggested reducing the commission from testers, claiming that they are large, also did not use similar services before because there was no elementary comparison of the service parameters with competitors.

In other words, unfortunately, some testers did not perform well in the testing task, and not everything that testers write should be taken into account.

Quote
From 200+ tx fee, we are now back to around 25-26 bytes

Our system does not rely on https://mempool.space. I was just trying to point out the weekly trend, which was hard to ignore if you use cryptocurrencies.
For obtaining the recommended fee, we use other, more reliable methods. At the moment, we do not observe a significant decrease under conditions of guaranteed confirmation in 2 blocks.

It might happen in the next 5 minutes, but not yet Wink  The adjustment of the fee in our system will occur automatically.

---

We are very busy and working hard to improve the system. Sorry. It's not always possible to respond promptly to forum questions.
In the coming week (hopefully), we will prepare a detailed report.
hero member
Activity: 2464
Merit: 877
As you may have noticed, over the past week, transaction fees in the Bitcoin network have increased approximately tenfold.
On average, the recommended fee in recent days has been over 200 satoshis per byte.

https://mempool.space/block/00000000000000000003d77c88d89022c1a4be6271cef2511883228277bcaa14

Considering the size of our average transaction at 250-300 bytes, we find that we occasionally pay over 0.0006 BTC for a transfer, while charging the user 0.0003 BTC.


First of all, if you did put a change in the fee, it would have been good if you tell us here also on the ANN thread so we know about it.

Secondly, you are also charging 0.4% the minimum fee, meaning the fee is being charged in percentage so doesn't that compensate for the higher tx fee too ?
It was already highlighed by many reviewers that as they add the addresses to mix, this 0.002 BTC 0.0003 BTC, amounts too much higher and it discourages users who want to mix small amount of Bitcoins.


Once transaction fees normalize, we will reduce the fee in our system.

From 200+ tx fee, we are now back to around 25-26 bytes,

https://mempool.space/block/00000000000000000003b38d5b19bc529acf344e2447b81c2e2f9263be5ff896
copper member
Activity: 59
Merit: 106
Your Privacy Matters
Quote
I recently made a review for Tumbler and at that time the fee for every receiving address was 0.0002 BTC but today when I checked it again it is increased to 0.0003 BTC.

As you may have noticed, over the past week, transaction fees in the Bitcoin network have increased approximately tenfold.
On average, the recommended fee in recent days has been over 200 satoshis per byte.

https://mempool.space/block/00000000000000000003d77c88d89022c1a4be6271cef2511883228277bcaa14

Considering the size of our average transaction at 250-300 bytes, we find that we occasionally pay over 0.0006 BTC for a transfer, while charging the user 0.0003 BTC.

Once transaction fees normalize, we will reduce the fee in our system.
hero member
Activity: 2464
Merit: 877
Hello everyone,

A detailed roundup of the enhancements made, all inspired by your feedback to [banned mixer] Bitcoin Mixer Review#2 is postponed to next week.
It will take a little bit more time to bring your proposed ideas to perfection.



I recently made a review for Tumbler and at that time the fee for every receiving address was 0.0002 BTC but today when I checked it again it is increased to 0.0003 BTC.



https://[banned mixer]/fee

I wonder if you announced this change and what could be the reason for increasing this fee  Huh
copper member
Activity: 59
Merit: 106
Your Privacy Matters
Hello everyone,

A detailed roundup of the enhancements made, all inspired by your feedback to [banned mixer] Bitcoin Mixer Review#2 is postponed to next week.
It will take a little bit more time to bring your proposed ideas to perfection.

copper member
Activity: 59
Merit: 106
Your Privacy Matters
After reading some observations, I had a doubt:
If the user chooses the Security level Premium option, does this mean that all their coins come from an exchange? If yes, which one?
As it was mentioned before in this thread, "When a user opts for the "premium" level, investor coins are added to the pool". The premium pool contains the system's private resources and investor's bitcoins.
Pages:
Jump to: