Topic: [ANN] BEAM | Mimblewimble | Private | Scalable | No ICO | No Pre Mine - page 37. (Read 77231 times)
March 01, 2019, 02:06:12 AM
How many coins mined per day? As I see circulati increasing a lot day by day, and price falling... With 260 mln total supply price may fall much more
March 01, 2019, 02:03:19 AM
~snip
~snip
~snip
I can't even read what you're saying.... please use width or height in your img tags! (like [ img width=300 ] )
Next time, I think you should apply my guide here., Tips for newbies, who want to avoid over-quoting
I believed you known it, but a little bit lazy to delete unnecessary stuffs to avoid pyramid quote.
In fact, your thread is not pyramid quote, but un-necessary part should be deleted, and you should only focus on what you wanted to mention, images and width option.
I took only one image as an example.
February 28, 2019, 06:39:58 PM
Android TESTNET mobile wallet v 1.0.9 community test results:
from:
https://discordapp.com/channels/481833926697156611/545682507304009730/550709332724154378
Recent testing of v 1.0.9 android testnet Beam wallet results as follows:
From the outset, this release felt exceptionally more rigid, from loading up to transacting Beams between our testers, everything went fine. In testing receiving Beams whilst phone is locked, it was found that background refresh works only for limited time, presumable due to the wallet logging out inactive after a while - which is more than acceptable at this stage of development.
The scrutiny was made with locked device and found that 2 out of 3 tx's were completed whilst device was locked and wallet running on background refresh only.
You can see the completed tx's and failed tx on this screenshot from senders wallet (thanks to @DanGB ), where even though wallet was left running in the background, only the first two (earlier) txs were completed.
receiving wallet did not interact with the tx until receiver device was unlocked, much later on:
of course, the two wallets on each device are in different time-zones.
from:
https://discordapp.com/channels/481833926697156611/545682507304009730/550709332724154378
Recent testing of v 1.0.9 android testnet Beam wallet results as follows:
From the outset, this release felt exceptionally more rigid, from loading up to transacting Beams between our testers, everything went fine. In testing receiving Beams whilst phone is locked, it was found that background refresh works only for limited time, presumable due to the wallet logging out inactive after a while - which is more than acceptable at this stage of development.
The scrutiny was made with locked device and found that 2 out of 3 tx's were completed whilst device was locked and wallet running on background refresh only.
You can see the completed tx's and failed tx on this screenshot from senders wallet (thanks to @DanGB ), where even though wallet was left running in the background, only the first two (earlier) txs were completed.
receiving wallet did not interact with the tx until receiver device was unlocked, much later on:
of course, the two wallets on each device are in different time-zones.
I can't even read what you're saying.... please use width or height in your img tags! (like [ img width=300 ] )
There, I've fixed the quote for you.
Other than that, that's very nice and stylish UI!
February 28, 2019, 11:07:59 AM
Android TESTNET mobile wallet v 1.0.9 community test results:
from:
https://discordapp.com/channels/481833926697156611/545682507304009730/550709332724154378
Recent testing of v 1.0.9 android testnet Beam wallet results as follows:
From the outset, this release felt exceptionally more rigid, from loading up to transacting Beams between our testers, everything went fine. In testing receiving Beams whilst phone is locked, it was found that background refresh works only for limited time, presumable due to the wallet logging out inactive after a while - which is more than acceptable at this stage of development.
The scrutiny was made with locked device and found that 2 out of 3 tx's were completed whilst device was locked and wallet running on background refresh only.
You can see the completed tx's and failed tx on this screenshot from senders wallet (thanks to @DanGB ), where even though wallet was left running in the background, only the first two (earlier) txs were completed.
receiving wallet did not interact with the tx until receiver device was unlocked, much later on:
of course, the two wallets on each device are in different time-zones.
from:
https://discordapp.com/channels/481833926697156611/545682507304009730/550709332724154378
Recent testing of v 1.0.9 android testnet Beam wallet results as follows:
From the outset, this release felt exceptionally more rigid, from loading up to transacting Beams between our testers, everything went fine. In testing receiving Beams whilst phone is locked, it was found that background refresh works only for limited time, presumable due to the wallet logging out inactive after a while - which is more than acceptable at this stage of development.
The scrutiny was made with locked device and found that 2 out of 3 tx's were completed whilst device was locked and wallet running on background refresh only.
You can see the completed tx's and failed tx on this screenshot from senders wallet (thanks to @DanGB ), where even though wallet was left running in the background, only the first two (earlier) txs were completed.
receiving wallet did not interact with the tx until receiver device was unlocked, much later on:
of course, the two wallets on each device are in different time-zones.
February 28, 2019, 03:19:44 AM
Why so dump ?
i bought it 2.5$...
i bought it 2.5$...I have also been buying and mining since launch and I am happy with prices today...
So HODL, year 1 emissions are designed to assist accumulation and adoption.
I'm not overly concerned and will keep mining and buying Beam.
February 28, 2019, 03:07:09 AM
Why so dump ? i bought it 2.5$...
i bought it 2.5$... 
February 27, 2019, 04:19:22 AM
Exchanges and Pools integration guide: https://github.com/BeamMW/beam/wiki/Exchange-Pool-integration-guide
Command Line wallet user guide: https://github.com/BeamMW/beam/wiki/Exchange-Pool-integration-guide
Dev Support channels: https://t.me/BeamDevSupport & https://gitter.im/beamprivacy/Lobby
https://twitter.com/vcorem/status/1100585470231306241
Command Line wallet user guide: https://github.com/BeamMW/beam/wiki/Exchange-Pool-integration-guide
Dev Support channels: https://t.me/BeamDevSupport & https://gitter.im/beamprivacy/Lobby
https://twitter.com/vcorem/status/1100585470231306241
February 26, 2019, 01:41:55 PM
BEAM Meetup
London 9th March 2019
"The Year Ahead"
It is with great pleasure that we introduce the second London BEAM Meetup.
We invite everyone with interest in cryptocurrency and satoshi's vision for
privacy in personal finance. For crypto-veterans and new-community members alike.
Discuss the hottest topic in crypto today - privacy and the mimblewimble protocol.
With Beam launching it’s mainnet on January 3rd 2019, it is a great chance to meet others
interested in Beam's privacy protocol and learn what we have in the works for the rest of
the year. We will talk about Beam wallets, mining, the Roadmap, and have a QNA session
direct with our team in HQ.
The event is located at The Vault, just a five minute walk from Temple station in central London.
The Vault, South East Wing, Bush House
300 Strand
Strand
WC2R 1AE
Hosted by Beam Community Manager Angus
Schedule
Intro/networking: 14:30 - 14:40
Beam in 2019: 14:40 -15:00
Wallet / mining information: 15:20 - 15:30
QNA: 15:30 - 15:40
Networking: 15:40 - 16:30
More info on BEAM
https://www.beam.mw/
https://medium.com/beam-mw
https://github.com/BeamMW/beam
You can confirm your attendance here:
https://www.meetup.com/BEAM-London-Meetup/events/259189616/
We are keen to encourage up to 150 attendees, and should we reach 50 attendees confirmed via the above meetup link,
we will provide a free drink upon arrival - either a glass of fizz or a glass of orange juice. So come along for a relaxed
discussion on the future one of the world's most technologically advanced privacy cryptocurrency - BEAM and the
Mimblewimble Protocol.
February 26, 2019, 12:55:17 PM
Because someone asked me, "Will there be any nodes, masternodes or supernodes for purchase?"
no.
February 26, 2019, 12:03:46 PM
Because someone asked me, "Will there be any nodes, masternodes or supernodes for purchase?"
February 26, 2019, 05:33:15 AM
February 25, 2019, 02:52:06 PM
reminder of Beam London Meetup happening on 9th March 2019
If you are in or near London, pop along and find out more about mimblewimble and Beam.
https://www.meetup.com/BEAM-London-Meetup/events/259189616/
If you are in or near London, pop along and find out more about mimblewimble and Beam.
https://www.meetup.com/BEAM-London-Meetup/events/259189616/
February 25, 2019, 03:25:01 AM
Meet Team Beam in Beijing and let's speak about #Mimblewimble and the way $Beam sees the future of Privacy-enhancing technologies.
February 24, 2019, 01:03:41 PM
I heard thatthere is a team of developers behind this cryptocurrency... they get a part of the transaction fee for their work. I think this is absolutely ok... noone wants to work for free!
But I have one question: Does this mean this cryptocurrency is dependent on their team? If the team would stop working one day for some reason, would this cryptocurrency still work? Or would there then be problems, e. g. that the network would partially stop working, no more updates for security and so on... so without the people from this team... could beam survive as cryptocurrency?
But I have one question: Does this mean this cryptocurrency is dependent on their team? If the team would stop working one day for some reason, would this cryptocurrency still work? Or would there then be problems, e. g. that the network would partially stop working, no more updates for security and so on... so without the people from this team... could beam survive as cryptocurrency?
Team are committed to making Beam a success. This scenario isn't going to happen.
Yes, I also think so... Team Beam does a good job and I believe there is a big need for this privacy coin. The best thing here is the low inflation rate - compared to Grin! it was just a theoretical question- I wanted to know if this cryptocurrency is fully dependent on this team or if other people also can add features, updates etc. to this cryptocurreny... ?
Beam is still open-source code so if you see anything in it that could use improvement or advancement, feel free to join in the discussion with dev team on chat channels
February 24, 2019, 12:23:41 PM
I heard thatthere is a team of developers behind this cryptocurrency... they get a part of the transaction fee for their work. I think this is absolutely ok... noone wants to work for free!
But I have one question: Does this mean this cryptocurrency is dependent on their team? If the team would stop working one day for some reason, would this cryptocurrency still work? Or would there then be problems, e. g. that the network would partially stop working, no more updates for security and so on... so without the people from this team... could beam survive as cryptocurrency?
But I have one question: Does this mean this cryptocurrency is dependent on their team? If the team would stop working one day for some reason, would this cryptocurrency still work? Or would there then be problems, e. g. that the network would partially stop working, no more updates for security and so on... so without the people from this team... could beam survive as cryptocurrency?
Team are committed to making Beam a success. This scenario isn't going to happen.
Yes, I also think so... Team Beam does a good job and I believe there is a big need for this privacy coin. The best thing here is the low inflation rate - compared to Grin! it was just a theoretical question- I wanted to know if this cryptocurrency is fully dependent on this team or if other people also can add features, updates etc. to this cryptocurreny... ?
February 24, 2019, 09:26:23 AM
I heard thatthere is a team of developers behind this cryptocurrency... they get a part of the transaction fee for their work. I think this is absolutely ok... noone wants to work for free!
But I have one question: Does this mean this cryptocurrency is dependent on their team? If the team would stop working one day for some reason, would this cryptocurrency still work? Or would there then be problems, e. g. that the network would partially stop working, no more updates for security and so on... so without the people from this team... could beam survive as cryptocurrency?
But I have one question: Does this mean this cryptocurrency is dependent on their team? If the team would stop working one day for some reason, would this cryptocurrency still work? Or would there then be problems, e. g. that the network would partially stop working, no more updates for security and so on... so without the people from this team... could beam survive as cryptocurrency?
Team are committed to making Beam a success. This scenario isn't going to happen.
February 24, 2019, 08:02:41 AM
I heard thatthere is a team of developers behind this cryptocurrency... they get a part of the transaction fee for their work. I think this is absolutely ok... noone wants to work for free!
But I have one question: Does this mean this cryptocurrency is dependent on their team? If the team would stop working one day for some reason, would this cryptocurrency still work? Or would there then be problems, e. g. that the network would partially stop working, no more updates for security and so on... so without the people from this team... could beam survive as cryptocurrency?
But I have one question: Does this mean this cryptocurrency is dependent on their team? If the team would stop working one day for some reason, would this cryptocurrency still work? Or would there then be problems, e. g. that the network would partially stop working, no more updates for security and so on... so without the people from this team... could beam survive as cryptocurrency?
February 23, 2019, 02:11:01 PM
BEAM is traded in so few exchanges and all of them small... I don't understand why GRIN is taking all the love!
Personally, as an investor at least, not as a user, wouldn't call one better than the other. Both coins have equally good potential and many similar features. Where's the hype BEAM community?
Personally, as an investor at least, not as a user, wouldn't call one better than the other. Both coins have equally good potential and many similar features. Where's the hype BEAM community?
Regarding Exchanges:
- We don't comment on specific exchanges, per a strict legal guidance we are working under.
- We did say that we don't pay listing fees (not an issue these days, most tier 1 and tier 2 exchanges doesn't require listing fees)
- We are assisting any Exchange that contact us and ask for help.
- We are about to complete an Exchange integration guide to make it easier to integrate with Beam: https://github.com/BeamMW/beam/wiki/Exchange-integration-guide
- Patience is a good virtue
Free listing for Cryptopia coins:
https://twitter.com/altillycom/status/1093159271049629696
Cryptopia might reopen in February NZ police says
https://www.newsroom.co.nz/2019/01/30/422537/cryptopia-might-reopen-in-february-nz-police-says?amp=1&__twitter_impression=true
February 23, 2019, 01:30:25 PM
No ICO , No Premine but 20% DEV TAX
I don't mind DEV fund, although this made disadvantage compared to other projects. This isn't disadvantage from a different perspective though, for example, funds in support of getting big exchanges (and other activities, dev, advertise etc). When a project is known for its reputation such that exchanges list it on their own, a project with funds should contain a market team who actively try to get to exchanges. These aren't being seen yet here. I hope these will be strengthened later, or no doubt GRIN takes all the LOVES!
February 23, 2019, 09:03:48 AM
BEAM is traded in so few exchanges and all of them small... I don't understand why GRIN is taking all the love!
Personally, as an investor at least, not as a user, wouldn't call one better than the other. Both coins have equally good potential and many similar features. Where's the hype BEAM community?
Personally, as an investor at least, not as a user, wouldn't call one better than the other. Both coins have equally good potential and many similar features. Where's the hype BEAM community?
Regarding Exchanges:
- We don't comment on specific exchanges, per a strict legal guidance we are working under.
- We did say that we don't pay listing fees (not an issue these days, most tier 1 and tier 2 exchanges doesn't require listing fees)
- We are assisting any Exchange that contact us and ask for help.
- We are about to complete an Exchange integration guide to make it easier to integrate with Beam: https://github.com/BeamMW/beam/wiki/Exchange-integration-guide
- Patience is a good virtue
Jump to: