Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] BetKing.io ICO - Bitcoin Gambling website - 581.4 BTC raised so far - page 18. (Read 29757 times)

legendary
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000
To clear things up, of course there will be no escrow. It is not needed at all in this case. This is not a new untrusted player in the game.

That's all existing bankroll investors divested now and I just divested 5000 Bitcoin which is much more than I'm trying to raise here Wink




Smart decision. I think a lot of the people clamoring for escrow either are sig spammers or have no idea what BetKing is. Adding an escrow agent would be a negative in my opinion, there is no added value to having an escrow despite adding a third party risk and an unnecessary expense. If you think this ICO needs escrow, you probably do not know what BetKing is: in that case you shouldn't invest. Invest in what you know. Dean literally just let 5k BTC leave his site today (2.5x what he is trying to raise in this ICO).

Disclaimer: I will personally not be investing in this ICO, but I trust Dean.
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1021
To clear things up, of course there will be no escrow. It is not needed at all in this case. This is not a new untrusted player in the game.

That's all existing bankroll investors divested now and I just divested 5000 Bitcoin which is much more than I'm trying to raise here Wink

hero member
Activity: 675
Merit: 513
:)
Why there's no escrow for this ICO?

You invest in the website, this website runs for year, and this project is hosted by the owner of website itself, therefore i guess no escrow needed maybe

I think it's also a coin
Quote
BetKing will create 100,000,000 tokens (100 million) to represent 100% shares of BetKing.

Escrow is the only protection against scam, so any ICO without escrow is just more risky.



But the difference here is that in the first place, a lot of people are investing in betking site previously with up to 4000 btc. So in this case, betking is quite confidence that he is able to rise a significant amount without any escrow as he already have proven that he has handle the btc well for yrs.

Well, there's no evidence for anything published in the ANN, so better safe than sorry.
Web archive has no copy before 2016, so there's no evidence the site was launched in 2013
https://web.archive.org/web/20130101000000*/http://betking.io
If you go to dicesites.com and press the date then you get the history:
Apr '13: pocketrocketscasino.eu
Jan '14: Invest in casino
Feb '14: Dice game
May '14: prcdice.eu domain
Jan '15: back to pocketrocketscasino.eu
Nov '15: betking.io domain

Sorry, but my confidence is very limited if there's no Escrow.
There're too many changes, and ambiguous information, ie. pocketrocketscasino.eu launched in Apr 2013 but first snapshot in webarchive is March 2014
https://web.archive.org/web/20140101000000*/http://pocketrocketscasino.eu

and first snapshot of dicesites.com is Nov 2014
https://web.archive.org/web/20141113082619/http://dicesites.com/

Without Escrow this ICO is just too risky (at least for me)


Dean's site has been a major player in the Bitcoin gambling sphere for a few years now. Right now Dean is holding thousands of BTC of customer funds without escrow. Escrow is absolutely not needed in this case.


I don't know who is Dean. I've only expressed my doubts, and I understand each of us has different level of acceptable risk.

BTW, I don't like the words "absolutely", "always", "never", etc. Smiley
I am sure you are very familiar with the word "absolutely"! Did u invest into the waves ICO?
The best solution is that the owner Dean gets an escrow, I think dooglus would perfectly fit as an escrow in this case, since he is the owner of just dice, which also is an gambling site. Look people who don't know Dean, will not invest unless u use an escrow, it is as simple as that.
hero member
Activity: 1022
Merit: 507
Why there's no escrow for this ICO?

You invest in the website, this website runs for year, and this project is hosted by the owner of website itself, therefore i guess no escrow needed maybe

I think it's also a coin
Quote
BetKing will create 100,000,000 tokens (100 million) to represent 100% shares of BetKing.

Escrow is the only protection against scam, so any ICO without escrow is just more risky.



But the difference here is that in the first place, a lot of people are investing in betking site previously with up to 4000 btc. So in this case, betking is quite confidence that he is able to rise a significant amount without any escrow as he already have proven that he has handle the btc well for yrs.

Well, there's no evidence for anything published in the ANN, so better safe than sorry.
Web archive has no copy before 2016, so there's no evidence the site was launched in 2013
https://web.archive.org/web/20130101000000*/http://betking.io
If you go to dicesites.com and press the date then you get the history:
Apr '13: pocketrocketscasino.eu
Jan '14: Invest in casino
Feb '14: Dice game
May '14: prcdice.eu domain
Jan '15: back to pocketrocketscasino.eu
Nov '15: betking.io domain

Sorry, but my confidence is very limited if there's no Escrow.
There're too many changes, and ambiguous information, ie. pocketrocketscasino.eu launched in Apr 2013 but first snapshot in webarchive is March 2014
https://web.archive.org/web/20140101000000*/http://pocketrocketscasino.eu

and first snapshot of dicesites.com is Nov 2014
https://web.archive.org/web/20141113082619/http://dicesites.com/

Without Escrow this ICO is just too risky (at least for me)


Dean's site has been a major player in the Bitcoin gambling sphere for a few years now. Right now Dean is holding thousands of BTC of customer funds without escrow. Escrow is absolutely not needed in this case.


I don't know who is Dean. I've only expressed my doubts, and I understand each of us has different level of acceptable risk.

BTW, I don't like the words "absolutely", "always", "never", etc. Smiley
member
Activity: 87
Merit: 10
Quote
Dividends:
We will pay dividends as a share of the total profit (revenue-expenses) generated by BetKing in Bitcoin every 3 months.
This may change to be more frequent, e.g. a month, after the first dividend payment.

How would this be calculated? is 30% of the profit going to the share holders minus the expenses?

If so, will all the expenses be payed from that 30% profit? or are the expenses shared over the whole profit?
full member
Activity: 178
Merit: 100
Without Escrow this ICO is just too risky (at least for me)
Just to understand, what difference do you see between trusting an escrow and any other site?
An escrow is an escrow because he is trusted and has a long solid trade history. I believe OP is trustworthy, but I will prefer an escrow for 2000BTC if I am interested.
So you trust an escrow because it is trusted. Same reason why several BetKing investors trust it.
legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1006
I ♥ BitcoinTalk
A large number of ICO at the end of the year have a negative impact on investor activity. You offer a low percentage for the early investors. This will cause their low activity. I think but get 2000 will be very difficult.
hero member
Activity: 675
Merit: 513
:)
What is the bankroll after a successful ICO - the funds from ICO or more? 1BTC investment buys a maximum of 0.05% share or 0.0005BTC per 100BTC wagered?
How is the profit from slot games distributed?



Without Escrow this ICO is just too risky (at least for me)
Just to understand, what difference do you see between trusting an escrow and any other site?

An escrow is an escrow because he is trusted and has a long solid trade history. I believe OP is trustworthy, but I will prefer an escrow for 2000BTC if I am interested.
I don't think an ICO is the right idea to achieve his goal. First he wants to sell his site and now he start an ICO because he couldn't sell his site for the price he wanted. Also he talks about if he exited what would happen, but if u exit and take all the btc, what are the guarantees?
legendary
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000
Why there's no escrow for this ICO?

You invest in the website, this website runs for year, and this project is hosted by the owner of website itself, therefore i guess no escrow needed maybe

I think it's also a coin
Quote
BetKing will create 100,000,000 tokens (100 million) to represent 100% shares of BetKing.

Escrow is the only protection against scam, so any ICO without escrow is just more risky.



But the difference here is that in the first place, a lot of people are investing in betking site previously with up to 4000 btc. So in this case, betking is quite confidence that he is able to rise a significant amount without any escrow as he already have proven that he has handle the btc well for yrs.

Well, there's no evidence for anything published in the ANN, so better safe than sorry.
Web archive has no copy before 2016, so there's no evidence the site was launched in 2013
https://web.archive.org/web/20130101000000*/http://betking.io
If you go to dicesites.com and press the date then you get the history:
Apr '13: pocketrocketscasino.eu
Jan '14: Invest in casino
Feb '14: Dice game
May '14: prcdice.eu domain
Jan '15: back to pocketrocketscasino.eu
Nov '15: betking.io domain

Sorry, but my confidence is very limited if there's no Escrow.
There're too many changes, and ambiguous information, ie. pocketrocketscasino.eu launched in Apr 2013 but first snapshot in webarchive is March 2014
https://web.archive.org/web/20140101000000*/http://pocketrocketscasino.eu

and first snapshot of dicesites.com is Nov 2014
https://web.archive.org/web/20141113082619/http://dicesites.com/

Without Escrow this ICO is just too risky (at least for me)


Dean's site has been a major player in the Bitcoin gambling sphere for a few years now. Right now Dean is holding thousands of BTC of customer funds without escrow. Escrow is absolutely not needed in this case.
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1005
New Decentralized Nuclear Hobbit
What is the bankroll after a successful ICO - the funds from ICO or more? 1BTC investment buys a maximum of 0.05% share or 0.0005BTC per 100BTC wagered?
Any fee on profit or bets? How is the profit from slot games calculated?



Without Escrow this ICO is just too risky (at least for me)
Just to understand, what difference do you see between trusting an escrow and any other site?

An escrow is an escrow because he is trusted and has a long solid trade history. I believe OP is trustworthy, but I will prefer an escrow for 2000BTC if I am interested.
full member
Activity: 178
Merit: 100
Without Escrow this ICO is just too risky (at least for me)
Just to understand, what difference do you see between trusting an escrow and any other site?
hero member
Activity: 1022
Merit: 507
Why there's no escrow for this ICO?

You invest in the website, this website runs for year, and this project is hosted by the owner of website itself, therefore i guess no escrow needed maybe

I think it's also a coin
Quote
BetKing will create 100,000,000 tokens (100 million) to represent 100% shares of BetKing.

Escrow is the only protection against scam, so any ICO without escrow is just more risky.



But the difference here is that in the first place, a lot of people are investing in betking site previously with up to 4000 btc. So in this case, betking is quite confidence that he is able to rise a significant amount without any escrow as he already have proven that he has handle the btc well for yrs.

Well, there's no evidence for anything published in the ANN, so better safe than sorry.
Web archive has no copy before 2016, so there's no evidence the site was launched in 2013
https://web.archive.org/web/20130101000000*/http://betking.io
If you go to dicesites.com and press the date then you get the history:
Apr '13: pocketrocketscasino.eu
Jan '14: Invest in casino
Feb '14: Dice game
May '14: prcdice.eu domain
Jan '15: back to pocketrocketscasino.eu
Nov '15: betking.io domain

Sorry, but my confidence is very limited if there's no Escrow.
There're too many changes, and ambiguous information, ie. pocketrocketscasino.eu launched in Apr 2013 but first snapshot in webarchive is March 2014
https://web.archive.org/web/20140101000000*/http://pocketrocketscasino.eu

and first snapshot of dicesites.com is Nov 2014
https://web.archive.org/web/20141113082619/http://dicesites.com/

Without Escrow this ICO is just too risky (at least for me)
legendary
Activity: 930
Merit: 1010
Is this legal in your juristiction?
member
Activity: 87
Merit: 10
Why there's no escrow for this ICO?

You invest in the website, this website runs for year, and this project is hosted by the owner of website itself, therefore i guess no escrow needed maybe

I think it's also a coin
Quote
BetKing will create 100,000,000 tokens (100 million) to represent 100% shares of BetKing.

Escrow is the only protection against scam, so any ICO without escrow is just more risky.



But the difference here is that in the first place, a lot of people are investing in betking site previously with up to 4000 btc. So in this case, betking is quite confidence that he is able to rise a significant amount without any escrow as he already have proven that he has handle the btc well for yrs.

Well, there's no evidence for anything published in the ANN, so better safe than sorry.
Web archive has no copy before 2016, so there's no evidence the site was launched in 2013
https://web.archive.org/web/20130101000000*/http://betking.io
If you go to dicesites.com and press the date then you get the history:
Apr '13: pocketrocketscasino.eu
Jan '14: Invest in casino
Feb '14: Dice game
May '14: prcdice.eu domain
Jan '15: back to pocketrocketscasino.eu
Nov '15: betking.io domain
hero member
Activity: 1022
Merit: 507
This is the place where the wife is the casino.
Can always be invested with the sense of winning projects.
If you did not scam.

I think I'm investing in the smallest.  Grin Grin Grin

Ebitz is now confirmed scam, so you never know Wink
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/warning-ebitz-is-confirmed-scam-1699385
hero member
Activity: 1022
Merit: 507
Why there's no escrow for this ICO?

You invest in the website, this website runs for year, and this project is hosted by the owner of website itself, therefore i guess no escrow needed maybe

I think it's also a coin
Quote
BetKing will create 100,000,000 tokens (100 million) to represent 100% shares of BetKing.

Escrow is the only protection against scam, so any ICO without escrow is just more risky.



But the difference here is that in the first place, a lot of people are investing in betking site previously with up to 4000 btc. So in this case, betking is quite confidence that he is able to rise a significant amount without any escrow as he already have proven that he has handle the btc well for yrs.

Well, there's no evidence for anything published in the ANN, so better safe than sorry.
Web archive has no copy before 2016, so there's no evidence the site was launched in 2013
https://web.archive.org/web/20130101000000*/http://betking.io
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
This is the place where the wife is the casino.
Can always be invested with the sense of winning projects.
If you did not scam.

I think I'm investing in the smallest.  Grin Grin Grin
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1002
Why there's no escrow for this ICO?

You invest in the website, this website runs for year, and this project is hosted by the owner of website itself, therefore i guess no escrow needed maybe

I think it's also a coin
Quote
BetKing will create 100,000,000 tokens (100 million) to represent 100% shares of BetKing.

Escrow is the only protection against scam, so any ICO without escrow is just more risky.



But the difference here is that in the first place, a lot of people are investing in betking site previously with up to 4000 btc. So in this case, betking is quite confidence that he is able to rise a significant amount without any escrow as he already have proven that he has handle the btc well for yrs.
hero member
Activity: 1022
Merit: 507
Why there's no escrow for this ICO?

You invest in the website, this website runs for year, and this project is hosted by the owner of website itself, therefore i guess no escrow needed maybe

I think it's also a coin
Quote
BetKing will create 100,000,000 tokens (100 million) to represent 100% shares of BetKing.

Escrow is the only protection against scam, so any ICO without escrow is just more risky.

hero member
Activity: 1568
Merit: 511
Why there's no escrow for this ICO?

You invest in the website, this website runs for year, and this project is hosted by the owner of website itself, therefore i guess no escrow needed maybe
Pages:
Jump to: