I'm intrigued by this ICO and more in particular the possibility of having
Cryptoshares. Or maybe a better word: a
Stockchain. I did read you're not sure yet about how to implement it exactly, but I'd love to see this succeed, and hopefully this idea can eventually expand to many other stocks.
Regarding the second statement. You just have to trust me. I'm one of the most trusted members of the forum and have looked after 6000 Bitcoin of other peoples money for a few years now.
Is there a plan in case something happens to you? Let's hope not, but you're talking big money here. Even Satoshi suddenly disappeared from the forum.
I think 0.01 or 0.001 could be a good minimum amount. Would like feedback on that.
Also should there be refunds allowed in the 1st 3 weeks of ICO if > 2000 is reached?
I remember from Mt.Gox-data that many people owned very small amounts, and only a few people owned almost everything. I do like a low minimum, but I'd be surprised if the small investors make up even 1% of the total amount raised.
With the structure of the investment, Will you accept cancellations before Jan 1st for early investors?
That is my biggest issue, A BTC2000 investment makes a valuation of BTC6666 for the total site, A BTC5000 total investment means the site needs to be worth BTC16,667 to make it a break even investment?
I am not going to allow cancelations or refunds.
If the site raises more than the 2000 then that is more money to use on marketing and dev.
Which means products are released faster and more traffic is generated which means faster ROI.
I think it's clear that there's more money for new developments. But what "win win win" means (in my opinion) is that the ROI from buying 30% of the current dice site gets worse when more money is raised. Say someone invests 1000 Bitcoin. If 2000 Bitcoin is raised, he ownes 50%, meaning he'll get 15% of all revenue. But if 10,000 Bitcoins are raised, this guy's 1000 Bitcoin is only 10%, and he'll only get 3% of all revenue.
At any "traditional" IPO, the share price is fixed upfront, so you know what percentage of the company you're buying.
That's a bit confusing: you pay upfront without knowing what percentage you get.
I will be keeping an eye on this ICO. It does seem strange that a site that has had 7000btc profit would need to start an ICO though so some digging is needed I think.
The way I see it: after working on it for years, the owner wants some cash. He tried to sell it, but not many people who can afford it also want the "hassle" of running a dice site. That leaves very few buyers.
Now he sells 30%, gets to keep 70%, and still gets enough cash to start other projects. And he'll own those projects for 70%.