Topic: [ANN] Binary-Chain - VeriCoin and Verium - The First Dual-Blockchain Protocol - page 24. (Read 47841 times)
December 14, 2017, 02:52:09 PM
Not sure if this is the right place to ask, but anyway... Decided to give mining a shot, so downloaded a Verium Vault program. However, it needs literally forever to fully synchronize with the network. Sitting at 86.1% for the entire day now, with 18-20 connections. Is there anything I can do to speed things up?
December 14, 2017, 02:25:20 PM
I been asking Poloniex support since june 28th but they do nothing. After 6 tickets and no help they blow me off. Now they do not even answer my tickets on the subject anymore. I been very patient but 6 months is VERY long time .
It seems like exchanges are set up for 1 output and 1 address and 1 TXid if you have 2 outputs to the same address and the same txid and address you can not claim the second output.
This only has happened to me with this VRC transaction but is IMPOSSIBLE to fix
It seems like exchanges are set up for 1 output and 1 address and 1 TXid if you have 2 outputs to the same address and the same txid and address you can not claim the second output.
This only has happened to me with this VRC transaction but is IMPOSSIBLE to fix
December 14, 2017, 01:54:56 PM
I have 2 outputs to same address with same txid. How is this possible? Is this a double not-spend? This went to an exchange and they will not honor the first output. Careful with VRC its making me problems.
TXid:14f63ec6d96e34e1e090a67ffb419f2c22558e2ce3047ef7f81ba9476889bd84
Inputs
Index Previous output Address Amount
0 ae19cf0fc5bd4657...:0 VY1QN5QgX3nPqEZpwHVMURaxxYF6Sf5xtq 2,893.44922598 VRC
Outputs
Index Redeemed in Address Amount
0 1b40381e38bb69a9... VSSqiHYpesuCM6q8yqgj5TjAj9kMujc3et 2,393.39922598 VRC
1 0adf6b0a62aba0a6... VSSqiHYpesuCM6q8yqgj5TjAj9kMujc3et 500.0 VRC
Sorry for 2 posts
TXid:14f63ec6d96e34e1e090a67ffb419f2c22558e2ce3047ef7f81ba9476889bd84
Inputs
Index Previous output Address Amount
0 ae19cf0fc5bd4657...:0 VY1QN5QgX3nPqEZpwHVMURaxxYF6Sf5xtq 2,893.44922598 VRC
Outputs
Index Redeemed in Address Amount
0 1b40381e38bb69a9... VSSqiHYpesuCM6q8yqgj5TjAj9kMujc3et 2,393.39922598 VRC
1 0adf6b0a62aba0a6... VSSqiHYpesuCM6q8yqgj5TjAj9kMujc3et 500.0 VRC
Sorry for 2 posts
This transaction was done in June 2017, why are you asking now? The transaction completed on Poloniex's address and shows to be received at the right address, the inputs where split but sent to the same address and received. Poloniex are the only ones that correct this if it didn't show a proper balance on Poloniex's side.
December 14, 2017, 01:02:54 PM
Whats up everyone, noob here. I've recently been researching these alt coins and came across VeriCoin and Verium. It seems pretty straightforward to "mine" VeriCoin. Download the VeriCoin-Qt software, and start staking/mining. But my question is; is it possible/safe to mine VeriCoin through the app with a 2014 Macbook pro 1TB memory? Will it even work/will it damage computer in anyway? Sorry if sounding silly, but whats a forum without noobs like me, am i right?
Staking with VeriCoin on a Macbook Pro would be fine. I would be a little nervous to mine Verium though, Macbooks get pretty hot as is and if the heat sink is clogged (dust & hair) you can damage the CPU in the long run. If the Macbook stays cool with good ventilation you'll probably be fine.
Thank you for the information. Now, my question is. Once I open and start staking, it says "Waiting for network connection" .... "0 connections". I have very high speed internet connect to my computer, so I am not sure why it is saying this? Is there anything I can do for it to connect and start staking (Waited for an hour and still says waiting for network connection).
File -> Reload Blockchain -> Check the box to download the vericoin.conf file. That should resolve that!
You're the man! Got it. It's been an hour since it's working and here's where I am at: I've got 35 connections, my block number is 2089683. My next question is.
My stacked blocks within (hours) says 0, why?
What is a block/what does it mean to be in number 2089683? Do I want a lower or higher number?
Is 30+ connections efficient?
If I closed my computer/stop stacking, is all my progress lost?
What does the interest rate/inflations/network coin staking rate mean? (11% 2% 8%)
December 14, 2017, 12:54:53 PM
I have 2 outputs to same address with same txid. How is this possible? Is this a double not-spend? This went to an exchange and they will not honor the first output. Careful with VRC its making me problems.
TXid:14f63ec6d96e34e1e090a67ffb419f2c22558e2ce3047ef7f81ba9476889bd84
Inputs
Index Previous output Address Amount
0 ae19cf0fc5bd4657...:0 VY1QN5QgX3nPqEZpwHVMURaxxYF6Sf5xtq 2,893.44922598 VRC
Outputs
Index Redeemed in Address Amount
0 1b40381e38bb69a9... VSSqiHYpesuCM6q8yqgj5TjAj9kMujc3et 2,393.39922598 VRC
1 0adf6b0a62aba0a6... VSSqiHYpesuCM6q8yqgj5TjAj9kMujc3et 500.0 VRC
Sorry for 2 posts
TXid:14f63ec6d96e34e1e090a67ffb419f2c22558e2ce3047ef7f81ba9476889bd84
Inputs
Index Previous output Address Amount
0 ae19cf0fc5bd4657...:0 VY1QN5QgX3nPqEZpwHVMURaxxYF6Sf5xtq 2,893.44922598 VRC
Outputs
Index Redeemed in Address Amount
0 1b40381e38bb69a9... VSSqiHYpesuCM6q8yqgj5TjAj9kMujc3et 2,393.39922598 VRC
1 0adf6b0a62aba0a6... VSSqiHYpesuCM6q8yqgj5TjAj9kMujc3et 500.0 VRC
Sorry for 2 posts
December 14, 2017, 07:59:12 AM
I like this.
Bought some Vericoin from Poloniex.. amazed at the speed of the send.
brillinat idea, I am certainly HODL.
Bought some Vericoin from Poloniex.. amazed at the speed of the send.
brillinat idea, I am certainly HODL.
December 13, 2017, 10:24:01 PM
So, making a hole in firewall for port 36988 (and forwarding it) did the trick, however as the program does not advertise that this is necessary and average user may not be tech-savyy enough to use netstat and figure out by itself ... then I see it as a quite an ugly flaw of the wallet.
Or, if they are behind NAT over they which has no control (ie. they can't set up any port forwarding) ... then they might be out of luck even if they know exactly what is the problem.
Most other coins can work quite well without the port forwarding (I can't remember of having to forward ports for any of the other coins actually ...), so this is what might be unexpected even to more advanced users.
Or, if they are behind NAT over they which has no control (ie. they can't set up any port forwarding) ... then they might be out of luck even if they know exactly what is the problem.
Most other coins can work quite well without the port forwarding (I can't remember of having to forward ports for any of the other coins actually ...), so this is what might be unexpected even to more advanced users.
That's interesting, I've never had to open any ports on any wallet I've ever used. Is your network double NAT'ed? Behind two firewall/routers by chance? One other thing you can verify is that you have the most update .conf file which has the most updated nodes. You can find that here: http://resources.vericoin.info/category/technical-support-files/
Me neither, this one was the first. As soon as I opened the port, the wallet synced within a minute.
I don't have double NAT, the router at which I've opened the port has a public IPv4 address.
December 13, 2017, 08:05:55 PM
Whats up everyone, noob here. I've recently been researching these alt coins and came across VeriCoin and Verium. It seems pretty straightforward to "mine" VeriCoin. Download the VeriCoin-Qt software, and start staking/mining. But my question is; is it possible/safe to mine VeriCoin through the app with a 2014 Macbook pro 1TB memory? Will it even work/will it damage computer in anyway? Sorry if sounding silly, but whats a forum without noobs like me, am i right?
Staking with VeriCoin on a Macbook Pro would be fine. I would be a little nervous to mine Verium though, Macbooks get pretty hot as is and if the heat sink is clogged (dust & hair) you can damage the CPU in the long run. If the Macbook stays cool with good ventilation you'll probably be fine.
Thank you for the information. Now, my question is. Once I open and start staking, it says "Waiting for network connection" .... "0 connections". I have very high speed internet connect to my computer, so I am not sure why it is saying this? Is there anything I can do for it to connect and start staking (Waited for an hour and still says waiting for network connection).
File -> Reload Blockchain -> Check the box to download the vericoin.conf file. That should resolve that!
December 13, 2017, 07:17:58 AM
Whats up everyone, noob here. I've recently been researching these alt coins and came across VeriCoin and Verium. It seems pretty straightforward to "mine" VeriCoin. Download the VeriCoin-Qt software, and start staking/mining. But my question is; is it possible/safe to mine VeriCoin through the app with a 2014 Macbook pro 1TB memory? Will it even work/will it damage computer in anyway? Sorry if sounding silly, but whats a forum without noobs like me, am i right?
Staking with VeriCoin on a Macbook Pro would be fine. I would be a little nervous to mine Verium though, Macbooks get pretty hot as is and if the heat sink is clogged (dust & hair) you can damage the CPU in the long run. If the Macbook stays cool with good ventilation you'll probably be fine.
Thank you for the information. Now, my question is. Once I open and start staking, it says "Waiting for network connection" .... "0 connections". I have very high speed internet connect to my computer, so I am not sure why it is saying this? Is there anything I can do for it to connect and start staking (Waited for an hour and still says waiting for network connection).
December 13, 2017, 02:33:46 AM
Whats up everyone, noob here. I've recently been researching these alt coins and came across VeriCoin and Verium. It seems pretty straightforward to "mine" VeriCoin. Download the VeriCoin-Qt software, and start staking/mining. But my question is; is it possible/safe to mine VeriCoin through the app with a 2014 Macbook pro 1TB memory? Will it even work/will it damage computer in anyway? Sorry if sounding silly, but whats a forum without noobs like me, am i right?
Staking with VeriCoin on a Macbook Pro would be fine. I would be a little nervous to mine Verium though, Macbooks get pretty hot as is and if the heat sink is clogged (dust & hair) you can damage the CPU in the long run. If the Macbook stays cool with good ventilation you'll probably be fine.
December 12, 2017, 11:50:30 PM
Whats up everyone, noob here. I've recently been researching these alt coins and came across VeriCoin and Verium. It seems pretty straightforward to "mine" VeriCoin. Download the VeriCoin-Qt software, and start staking/mining. But my question is; is it possible/safe to mine VeriCoin through the app with a 2014 Macbook pro 1TB memory? Will it even work/will it damage computer in anyway? Sorry if sounding silly, but whats a forum without noobs like me, am i right?
December 12, 2017, 07:02:13 PM
So, making a hole in firewall for port 36988 (and forwarding it) did the trick, however as the program does not advertise that this is necessary and average user may not be tech-savyy enough to use netstat and figure out by itself ... then I see it as a quite an ugly flaw of the wallet.
Or, if they are behind NAT over they which has no control (ie. they can't set up any port forwarding) ... then they might be out of luck even if they know exactly what is the problem.
Most other coins can work quite well without the port forwarding (I can't remember of having to forward ports for any of the other coins actually ...), so this is what might be unexpected even to more advanced users.
Or, if they are behind NAT over they which has no control (ie. they can't set up any port forwarding) ... then they might be out of luck even if they know exactly what is the problem.
Most other coins can work quite well without the port forwarding (I can't remember of having to forward ports for any of the other coins actually ...), so this is what might be unexpected even to more advanced users.
That's interesting, I've never had to open any ports on any wallet I've ever used. Is your network double NAT'ed? Behind two firewall/routers by chance? One other thing you can verify is that you have the most update .conf file which has the most updated nodes. You can find that here: http://resources.vericoin.info/category/technical-support-files/
December 12, 2017, 06:30:09 PM
Hello!
I cannot compile vericoind-1.7 and veriumd-1.1 with USE_AVX=1 USE_AVX2=1. The following errors are printed when linking:
Does anyone know what the problem?
I cannot compile vericoind-1.7 and veriumd-1.1 with USE_AVX=1 USE_AVX2=1. The following errors are printed when linking:
Code:
obj/scrypt.o: In function `scrypt_N_1_1_256_multi(void*, uint256, int*, unsigned char*)':
scrypt.cpp:(.text+0xc76): undefined reference to `sha256_transform_8way'
scrypt.cpp:(.text+0xc96): undefined reference to `sha256_init_8way'
scrypt.cpp:(.text+0xcf8): undefined reference to `sha256_transform_8way'
scrypt.cpp:(.text+0xd04): undefined reference to `sha256_init_8way'
...
scrypt.cpp:(.text+0xc76): undefined reference to `sha256_transform_8way'
scrypt.cpp:(.text+0xc96): undefined reference to `sha256_init_8way'
scrypt.cpp:(.text+0xcf8): undefined reference to `sha256_transform_8way'
scrypt.cpp:(.text+0xd04): undefined reference to `sha256_init_8way'
...
Does anyone know what the problem?
I may not know for sure, but I think Verium is mined using the SSE instruction set, not AVX/2. I would just compile with default options, should take care of the issue assuming there aren't any package dependency issues.
December 12, 2017, 03:12:05 PM
What hashrate supposed to be on i5/i7?
which miner is faster?
which miner is faster?
December 12, 2017, 10:56:28 AM
Hello!
I cannot compile vericoind-1.7 and veriumd-1.1 with USE_AVX=1 USE_AVX2=1. The following errors are printed when linking:
Does anyone know what the problem?
I cannot compile vericoind-1.7 and veriumd-1.1 with USE_AVX=1 USE_AVX2=1. The following errors are printed when linking:
Code:
obj/scrypt.o: In function `scrypt_N_1_1_256_multi(void*, uint256, int*, unsigned char*)':
scrypt.cpp:(.text+0xc76): undefined reference to `sha256_transform_8way'
scrypt.cpp:(.text+0xc96): undefined reference to `sha256_init_8way'
scrypt.cpp:(.text+0xcf8): undefined reference to `sha256_transform_8way'
scrypt.cpp:(.text+0xd04): undefined reference to `sha256_init_8way'
...
scrypt.cpp:(.text+0xc76): undefined reference to `sha256_transform_8way'
scrypt.cpp:(.text+0xc96): undefined reference to `sha256_init_8way'
scrypt.cpp:(.text+0xcf8): undefined reference to `sha256_transform_8way'
scrypt.cpp:(.text+0xd04): undefined reference to `sha256_init_8way'
...
Does anyone know what the problem?
December 12, 2017, 09:27:41 AM
Dual chain will make VRC/VRM scalable, and therefore ready for mass adoption. Coins can be mined(VRM) and staked(VRC). VRC/VRM are pioneers, and offer better alternative for BTC (scalability issues).
Yes the dual chain has a massive potential. The PR of the coin needs alot of work though.
Would be nice to have signatures made so we can use it while not in any signature campaign to support it. But this thread needs more attention aswell.
Even now that is is not live with dual chain, investors would usualy be interested because of the potential.
December 12, 2017, 08:10:59 AM
Dual chain will make VRC/VRM scalable, and therefore ready for mass adoption. Coins can be mined(VRM) and staked(VRC). VRC/VRM are pioneers, and offer better alternative for BTC (scalability issues).
December 11, 2017, 10:16:23 PM
I thought I point my 12 core server to mining this coin, but whats benefit of having binary ledger? Please enlighten dumber than dumber VRC holder.
December 11, 2017, 07:45:54 PM
December 10, 2017, 03:49:29 PM
So, making a hole in firewall for port 36988 (and forwarding it) did the trick, however as the program does not advertise that this is necessary and average user may not be tech-savyy enough to use netstat and figure out by itself ... then I see it as a quite an ugly flaw of the wallet.
Or, if they are behind NAT over they which has no control (ie. they can't set up any port forwarding) ... then they might be out of luck even if they know exactly what is the problem.
Most other coins can work quite well without the port forwarding (I can't remember of having to forward ports for any of the other coins actually ...), so this is what might be unexpected even to more advanced users.
Or, if they are behind NAT over they which has no control (ie. they can't set up any port forwarding) ... then they might be out of luck even if they know exactly what is the problem.
Most other coins can work quite well without the port forwarding (I can't remember of having to forward ports for any of the other coins actually ...), so this is what might be unexpected even to more advanced users.
Jump to: