Topic: [ANN] Bitcoin Cash - Pro on-chain scaling - Cheaper fees - page 138. (Read 704812 times)
I assume ABC and nChain will go their seperate ways. Anyone have any information on this?
BCH is going to be forked?
BCH is going to be forked?
Hey all, question in regards to WHC. There's no telegram for it correct? Also, since it's forked off of Omni does it have the same circulating supply as Omni? I figured I would ask here as it's related to BCH.
The development of the Bitcoin Cash coin project will bring good opportunities for reform to the payment industry in the future, and the development prospects of the project are worth looking forward to.
Compared to bitcoin, its still in its infancy stage, just about 1 year, whereas bitcoin withstand the test of time for somewhat like 9 years
More people uses bitcoin increases its adoption rate, this also bring more awareness to altcoins such as ether, neo, Icon, bcash, litecoin,etc...
The development of the Bitcoin Cash coin project will bring good opportunities for reform to the payment industry in the future, and the development prospects of the project are worth looking forward to.
Compared to bitcoin, its still in its infancy stage, just about 1 year, whereas bitcoin withstand the test of time for somewhat like 9 years
The development of the Bitcoin Cash coin project will bring good opportunities for reform to the payment industry in the future, and the development prospects of the project are worth looking forward to.
Compared to bitcoin, its still in its infancy stage, just about 1 year, whereas bitcoin withstand the test of time for somewhat like 9 years
my perfect project support, me it will be become a other platform of the virtual virtuality
I saw a great project, perfect
someone needs to shut Ver up and kill this turd coin
heheh... 'someone' .... heh heh
The development of the Bitcoin Cash coin project will bring good opportunities for reform to the payment industry in the future, and the development prospects of the project are worth looking forward to.
Hello. Your post inspired me. It would be interesting to know if It will be translated into other languages?
someone needs to shut Ver up and kill this turd coin
Quote
Sounds interesting, but I don't see how this translates as a threat to BCH.
4MB * 3600 = 14.4GB
Core has already shown an incredible irrational resistance to scaling on-chain.
Conspiracy theorists were insisting it was blockstream being behind the stopping of scaling bitcoin onchain yet here we have someone well associated with blockstream proposing this.
Your quoting is broken.
No proposal as of yet. So far, all that we have is a tweet announcing the topic of a presentation to be given at an upcoming conference.
Demonstrably, Blockstream employees and contractors indeed argued vociferously against a simple block size increase leading up to the grand schism. Are you attempting to deny this reality?
If indeed Blockstream intends to create 14.4GB blocks, how ever will that run on a Raspberry Pi? What will it do to non-mining validator centralization? (not that that is an actual negative to the Bitcoin system, but Coreans have been insisting that it is).
More interesting yet is what they may plan on doing with that block size. As it stands today, due to the Core client's crappy multithreading design, the client bogs down at about 100 tx/s on today's commodity hardware. Maybe they'll finally get around to fixing that.
Quote
Sounds interesting, but I don't see how this translates as a threat to BCH.
4MB * 3600 = 14.4GB
Core has already shown an incredible irrational resistance to scaling on-chain.
Conspiracy theorists were insisting it was blockstream being behind the stopping of scaling bitcoin onchain yet here we have someone well associated with blockstream proposing this.
I think that in any project there are those who always negatively concern him. So those who will support it regardless of any news. The fact that this team is one of the best both financially and in terms of who is behind it is generally without any questions. On account of what the future of the project?
Everything depends in many ways on the market and on how much it will be possible to increase the bandwidth of the network itself.
Hi, in your document is very useful information about your site. I'm interested in what languages you can translate it and how soon?
Quote
Sounds interesting, but I don't see how this translates as a threat to BCH.
4MB * 3600 = 14.4GB
Core has already shown an incredible irrational resistance to scaling on-chain.
Conspiracy theorists were insisting it was blockstream being behind the stopping of scaling bitcoin onchain yet here we have someone well associated with blockstream proposing this.
"I will be giving a talk at #ScalingBitcoin on how a block size increase up to 3600x the present size and a change of proof-of-work can be achieved with a fully backwards compatible soft-fork—old clients see all transactions and valid SHA256 block headers."
Sounds interesting, but I don't see how this translates as a threat to BCH.
Core has already shown an incredible irrational resistance to scaling on-chain. The ugly hack of adopting SegWit as a so-called 'soft fork' has proven to have been the mechanism by which new security vulnerabilities have been introduced to BTC - will this 'soft fork' be any different? Lastly, experience with other chains has already conclusively demonstrated the folly of jettisoning $Billions of USD worth of dedicated security appliances.
While the capacity increase is attractive, this looks to be facing at least a trifecta of real implementation problems.
I must admit that as far as technical details, I am quivering with antici...
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
...pation.
If Lukejr... If Back... If Vays...
Funny how you fell you need to trot out personalities - rather than discuss concrete aspects of the chains and the implementations built thereupon.
The difference is you have the two biggest douchebags in all of crypto ...
Small minds discuss people.
Quote
But if you want to discuss "concrete aspects," let's discuss how the popularity of bcash is concretely waning while the popularity of bitcoin is concretely growing.
https://i.imgur.com/3b9AR3E.png
On January 1st, BTC had a 38% dominance of the total market cap while BCH had 7%.
Today, BTC has grown to a 52% dominance while BCH has slipped to 4.4%.
https://i.imgur.com/3b9AR3E.png
On January 1st, BTC had a 38% dominance of the total market cap while BCH had 7%.
Today, BTC has grown to a 52% dominance while BCH has slipped to 4.4%.
Indeed it is. I find this disappointing. However, popularity is not a proper basis for determination of superiority. And popularity metrics can turn on a dime. I am confident this trend will turn. If your only concrete aspect you wish to discuss is popularity, I guess I'm done with this branch of this conversation.
Quote
BTC has proved it can scale to demand.
It most certainly has not proven so. In the last test of BTC's scaling properties -- 4q17-Jan18 -- BTC failed miserably.
Jump to: