Author

Topic: [ANN] Bitcoin Cash - Pro on-chain scaling - Cheaper fees - page 138. (Read 704506 times)

newbie
Activity: 168
Merit: 0
Honestly, I'm surprised, because you have a very large audience and everyone believes in you. I think that with such successes you will achieve something more in the future.
full member
Activity: 520
Merit: 123
I assume ABC and nChain will go their seperate ways. Anyone have any information on this?
legendary
Activity: 2632
Merit: 2386
$120000 in 2024 Confirmed
hero member
Activity: 1459
Merit: 973




BCH is going to be forked?
sr. member
Activity: 616
Merit: 250
Hey all, question in regards to WHC.  There's no telegram for it correct?  Also, since it's forked off of Omni does it have the same circulating supply as Omni? I figured I would ask here as it's related to BCH.
full member
Activity: 462
Merit: 103
The development of the Bitcoin Cash coin project will bring good opportunities for reform to the payment industry in the future, and the development prospects of the project are worth looking forward to.


Compared to bitcoin, its still in its infancy stage, just about 1 year, whereas bitcoin withstand the test of time for somewhat like 9 years
Bitcoin Cash is more perfect than Bitcoin but BCH price just moves according to BTC. I think both coins will develop in the future.


More people uses bitcoin increases its adoption rate, this also bring more awareness to altcoins such as ether, neo, Icon, bcash, litecoin,etc...
full member
Activity: 378
Merit: 101
The development of the Bitcoin Cash coin project will bring good opportunities for reform to the payment industry in the future, and the development prospects of the project are worth looking forward to.


Compared to bitcoin, its still in its infancy stage, just about 1 year, whereas bitcoin withstand the test of time for somewhat like 9 years
Bitcoin Cash is more perfect than Bitcoin but BCH price just moves according to BTC. I think both coins will develop in the future.
full member
Activity: 462
Merit: 103
The development of the Bitcoin Cash coin project will bring good opportunities for reform to the payment industry in the future, and the development prospects of the project are worth looking forward to.


Compared to bitcoin, its still in its infancy stage, just about 1 year, whereas bitcoin withstand the test of time for somewhat like 9 years
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
my perfect project support, me it will be become a other platform of the virtual virtuality
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
I saw a great project, perfect
legendary
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
someone needs to shut Ver up and kill this turd coin

heheh... 'someone' .... heh heh
full member
Activity: 336
Merit: 100
The development of the Bitcoin Cash coin project will bring good opportunities for reform to the payment industry in the future, and the development prospects of the project are worth looking forward to.
member
Activity: 146
Merit: 10
Hello. Your post inspired me. It would be interesting to know if It will be translated into other languages?
legendary
Activity: 2730
Merit: 1068
Juicin' crypto
someone needs to shut Ver up and kill this turd coin
legendary
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660
lose: unfind ... loose: untight

Quote
Sounds interesting, but I don't see how this translates as a threat to BCH.


4MB * 3600 = 14.4GB

Core has already shown an incredible irrational resistance to scaling on-chain.

Conspiracy theorists were insisting it was blockstream being behind the stopping of scaling bitcoin onchain yet here we have someone well associated with blockstream proposing this.

Your quoting is broken.

No proposal as of yet. So far, all that we have is a tweet announcing the topic of a presentation to be given at an upcoming conference.

Demonstrably, Blockstream employees and contractors indeed argued vociferously against a simple block size increase leading up to the grand schism. Are you attempting to deny this reality?

If indeed Blockstream intends to create 14.4GB blocks, how ever will that run on a Raspberry Pi? What will it do to non-mining validator centralization? (not that that is an actual negative to the Bitcoin system, but Coreans have been insisting that it is).

More interesting yet is what they may plan on doing with that block size. As it stands today, due to the Core client's crappy multithreading design, the client bogs down at about 100 tx/s on today's commodity hardware. Maybe they'll finally get around to fixing that.
sr. member
Activity: 854
Merit: 252


Quote
Sounds interesting, but I don't see how this translates as a threat to BCH.


4MB * 3600 = 14.4GB



Core has already shown an incredible irrational resistance to scaling on-chain.

Conspiracy theorists were insisting it was blockstream being behind the stopping of scaling bitcoin onchain yet here we have someone well associated with blockstream proposing this.

I think that in any project there are those who always negatively concern him. So those who will support it regardless of any news. The fact that this team is one of the best both financially and in terms of who is behind it is generally without any questions. On account of what the future of the project?
Everything depends in many ways on the market and on how much it will be possible to increase the bandwidth of the network itself.
newbie
Activity: 126
Merit: 0
Hi, in your document is very useful information about your site. I'm interested in what languages you can translate it and how soon?
hero member
Activity: 1459
Merit: 973


Quote
Sounds interesting, but I don't see how this translates as a threat to BCH.


4MB * 3600 = 14.4GB



Core has already shown an incredible irrational resistance to scaling on-chain.

Conspiracy theorists were insisting it was blockstream being behind the stopping of scaling bitcoin onchain yet here we have someone well associated with blockstream proposing this.
hv_
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1055
Clean Code and Scale
Jump to: