If Lukejr... If Back... If Vays...
Funny how you fell you need to trot out personalities - rather than discuss concrete aspects of the chains and the implementations built thereupon.
The difference is you have the two biggest douchebags in all of crypto doing everything they can to fud bitcoin and promote bcash, that's the difference.
Wright is a douchebag. He could never even admit outright that his entire "I am Satoshi" bit was an utter hoax. He's a sociopath who won't stop until the world addresses him as "God."
Ver is a douchebag. He uses his control of bitcoin.com to mislead people into buying bcash when they are trying to buy bitcoin. It took a lawsuit for him to stop his atrocious behavior.
Bitcoin doesn't need to resort to such tactics because it is the superior product.
But if you want to discuss "concrete aspects," let's discuss how the popularity of bcash is concretely waning while the popularity of bitcoin is concretely growing.
On January 1st, BTC had a 38% dominance of the total market cap while BCH had 7%.
Today, BTC has grown to a 52% dominance while BCH has slipped to 4.4%.
Now if BCH was seen as "better," "less speculation-based" or simply "more popular" than BTC, this percentage would be on the rise as it could be considered a relatively stable store of value. However, its % dominance has been on the decrease along with every other altcoin because BTC has proved it can scale to demand. The inherent utility over BTC that BCH proposes is no longer necessary because BTC has adapted and evolved to find ways to scale.
Really Roger should have come up with a more original name than "Bitcoin Cash" if he wanted it to succeed. It's confusing to new users and a blatant ripoff / coat-tail ride to veterans.
