[ANN] Bitcoin Cash - Pro on-chain scaling - Cheaper fees - page 20.

gembitz

hero member

Activity: 1834

Merit: 639

*Brute force will solve any Bitcoin problem*

Quote from: Bitbobb on June 25, 2019, 01:58:36 PM

Quote from: gembitz on June 25, 2019, 09:20:16 AM

Quote from: Bitbobb on June 02, 2019, 09:23:46 AM

Quote from: Khaos77 on June 02, 2019, 01:26:00 AM

Clarifications

Bitcoin Cash & Bitcoin SV both offer real scaling potential , as true scaling can only occur ONCHAIN.

Bitcoin Segwit using LN is not scaling, it is Offloading.
As BTC segwit offloads transactions to the LN network because the btc onchain network is inferior due to it's transaction capacity being purposefully limited by it's core devs.

bch dev forced changes into the base layer which caused a split. These changes work incrementally to remove the miner competition from the BitCoin experiment. In other words bch devs do not want BitCoin they want to destroy BitCoin but lock up the name "BitCoin" and associate it with crime etc.

bullshit! Craig and Calvin forked off their BSV shitcoin to dump on n00bies Grin

you new here?

sorry no. the changes BCH planned to add to the base layer seek to remove the parts that make BitCoin unique since day 1. thinks like pre-con (avalanche); ctor; and graphene all work together to make BitCoin a steeming pile of crap and removes miner competition like core wanted all along.

agreed BTI is our only hope ===>

https://freiexchange.com/market/BTI/BTC

hv_

legendary

Activity: 2534

Merit: 1055

Clean Code and Scale

Quote from: Bitbobb on June 25, 2019, 01:58:36 PM

Quote from: gembitz on June 25, 2019, 09:20:16 AM

Quote from: Bitbobb on June 02, 2019, 09:23:46 AM

Quote from: Khaos77 on June 02, 2019, 01:26:00 AM

Clarifications

Bitcoin Cash & Bitcoin SV both offer real scaling potential , as true scaling can only occur ONCHAIN.

Bitcoin Segwit using LN is not scaling, it is Offloading.
As BTC segwit offloads transactions to the LN network because the btc onchain network is inferior due to it's transaction capacity being purposefully limited by it's core devs.

bch dev forced changes into the base layer which caused a split. These changes work incrementally to remove the miner competition from the BitCoin experiment. In other words bch devs do not want BitCoin they want to destroy BitCoin but lock up the name "BitCoin" and associate it with crime etc.

bullshit! Craig and Calvin forked off their BSV shitcoin to dump on n00bies Grin

you new here?

sorry no. the changes BCH planned to add to the base layer seek to remove the parts that make BitCoin unique since day 1. thinks like pre-con (avalanche); ctor; and graphene all work together to make BitCoin a steeming pile of crap and removes miner competition like core wanted all along.

If u go to a bank and order a reverse convertible product (or Bitcoin) and after some time you ve to learn that the product issuer / emitter (devs and miners) has changed that product ( softforked ) u d might to change the product name ( to Segwitcoin ) and thats how the financial worl works.

Cheesy

Tyler.Durden

newbie

Activity: 56

Merit: 0

GAY AF WANKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

HAVE YOU HEARD THE LATEST NEWS!?!?!?!?!

VER WAS CAUGHT SUCKING OFF CRAIG FOR SOME BTC............. INCOMING BCH MEGA DUMP

Bitbobb

hero member

Activity: 1134

Merit: 525

Less hops. More wins.

Quote from: gembitz on June 25, 2019, 09:20:16 AM

Quote from: Bitbobb on June 02, 2019, 09:23:46 AM

Quote from: Khaos77 on June 02, 2019, 01:26:00 AM

Clarifications

Bitcoin Cash & Bitcoin SV both offer real scaling potential , as true scaling can only occur ONCHAIN.

Bitcoin Segwit using LN is not scaling, it is Offloading.
As BTC segwit offloads transactions to the LN network because the btc onchain network is inferior due to it's transaction capacity being purposefully limited by it's core devs.

bch dev forced changes into the base layer which caused a split. These changes work incrementally to remove the miner competition from the BitCoin experiment. In other words bch devs do not want BitCoin they want to destroy BitCoin but lock up the name "BitCoin" and associate it with crime etc.

bullshit! Craig and Calvin forked off their BSV shitcoin to dump on n00bies Grin

you new here?

sorry no. the changes BCH planned to add to the base layer seek to remove the parts that make BitCoin unique since day 1. thinks like pre-con (avalanche); ctor; and graphene all work together to make BitCoin a steeming pile of crap and removes miner competition like core wanted all along.

gembitz

hero member

Activity: 1834

Merit: 639

*Brute force will solve any Bitcoin problem*

Quote from: Bitbobb on June 02, 2019, 09:23:46 AM

Quote from: Khaos77 on June 02, 2019, 01:26:00 AM

Clarifications

Bitcoin Cash & Bitcoin SV both offer real scaling potential , as true scaling can only occur ONCHAIN.

Bitcoin Segwit using LN is not scaling, it is Offloading.
As BTC segwit offloads transactions to the LN network because the btc onchain network is inferior due to it's transaction capacity being purposefully limited by it's core devs.

bch dev forced changes into the base layer which caused a split. These changes work incrementally to remove the miner competition from the BitCoin experiment. In other words bch devs do not want BitCoin they want to destroy BitCoin but lock up the name "BitCoin" and associate it with crime etc.

bullshit! Craig and Calvin forked off their BSV shitcoin to dump on n00bies Grin

you new here?

gembitz

hero member

Activity: 1834

Merit: 639

*Brute force will solve any Bitcoin problem*

Quote from: Bitbobb on June 03, 2019, 08:39:31 AM

Quote from: gembitz on June 02, 2019, 08:41:49 PM

Quote from: Bitbobb on June 02, 2019, 09:23:46 AM

Quote from: Khaos77 on June 02, 2019, 01:26:00 AM

Clarifications

Bitcoin Cash & Bitcoin SV both offer real scaling potential , as true scaling can only occur ONCHAIN.

Bitcoin Segwit using LN is not scaling, it is Offloading.
As BTC segwit offloads transactions to the LN network because the btc onchain network is inferior due to it's transaction capacity being purposefully limited by it's core devs.

bch dev forced changes into the base layer which caused a split. These changes work incrementally to remove the miner competition from the BitCoin experiment. In other words bch devs do not want BitCoin they want to destroy BitCoin but lock up the name "BitCoin" and associate it with crime etc.

lol you finally woke? Cheesy

bwaahaha

yes, feeling woke. good morning gemyyybittzzzz.

*rumour*===> Jihan is going all into BTI Cool

lol weeee

hv_

legendary

Activity: 2534

Merit: 1055

Clean Code and Scale

Quote from: Globb0 on June 20, 2019, 09:03:57 AM

Don't be stupid, these cases are all about CSW not other frauds.

I just read it in your own linked story

The initial was the SW fraud Wink

Globb0

legendary

Activity: 2702

Merit: 2053

Free spirit

Don't be stupid, these cases are all about CSW not other frauds.

I just read it in your own linked story

hv_

legendary

Activity: 2534

Merit: 1055

Clean Code and Scale

Quote from: CoinClarity on June 20, 2019, 06:42:48 AM

Quote from: Globb0 on June 20, 2019, 03:27:59 AM

Let me guess, is that Calvin's website?

Hilariously bias reporting.

Oh no I'm in for a suing now.

I still don't understand how CoinGeek gets cited as an actual news source, picked up by Google News, etc. They make bitcoin.com look like hard-hitting investigative journalism.

Speaking of bitcoin.com, sure has been quiet around here. Not much fun with the drama being monopolized by another camp. Ver needs to engage in some wacky escapades to steal the spotlight back from Wright as most hated man in crypto.

Sure, CSW is most hated, because he Points to all the frauds and their powers. No wonder most shout back even louder.

CSW came here in reactive mode. To help killing SegShitCoin Wink

CoinClarity

member

Activity: 281

Merit: 77

You got questions? We got answers. coinclarity.com

Quote from: Globb0 on June 20, 2019, 03:27:59 AM

Let me guess, is that Calvin's website?

Hilariously bias reporting.

Oh no I'm in for a suing now.

I still don't understand how CoinGeek gets cited as an actual news source, picked up by Google News, etc. They make bitcoin.com look like hard-hitting investigative journalism.

Speaking of bitcoin.com, sure has been quiet around here. Not much fun with the drama being monopolized by another camp. Ver needs to engage in some wacky escapades to steal the spotlight back from Wright as most hated man in crypto.

Globb0

legendary

Activity: 2702

Merit: 2053

Free spirit

Let me guess, is that Calvin's website?

Hilariously bias reporting.

Oh no I'm in for a suing now.

bitcoinPsycho

legendary

Activity: 2632

Merit: 2386

$120000 in 2024 Confirmed

Quote from: hv_ on June 19, 2019, 11:41:25 AM

Yep. Could be bad for btc and bch...

https://coingeek.com/craig-wright-libel-suits-crypto-critics/

Yeah we all know Craig Wright is a liability to crypto

hv_

legendary

Activity: 2534

Merit: 1055

Clean Code and Scale

Yep. Could be bad for btc and bch...

https://coingeek.com/craig-wright-libel-suits-crypto-critics/

cvdesty

member

Activity: 512

Merit: 20

The following is Only my Opinion, NOT financial advice: With Facebook's Libra coin coming out, it could pose a substantial threat to altcoins like BCH. BCH holders better count the cost. BTC has issues, such as being slow and expensive. Therefore, it's not the best choice for business and monetary transactions. However, I believe BTC will continue to be looked at as a store of value and will likely be very valuable in the coming years.

ETH, XRP, and LTC look quite promising. Though LTC will probably remain valuable mostly because it is seen as the silver of Bitcoin.

Cardano (ADA) has potential.

As for Anonymous coins, I won't be surprised if governments outlaw them at some point. Should this happen on a global scale, most if not all exchanges will be forced to remove them, essentially making them nontradeable and therefore worthless.

I don't trust Facebook!

Bitcoin Cash

newbie

Activity: 48

Merit: 0

BCH holders has a reliable coin

DrearyUrbanite

sr. member

Activity: 756

Merit: 250

Quote from: Goxten on May 29, 2019, 03:20:56 AM

Quote from: dineo on May 29, 2019, 03:04:45 AM

We have added Bitcoin Cash to the new Exchange: https://www.dinerocadames.com/exchange/?market=BCH_BTC

It surprises me why this fake-coin is still being listed over to new exchanges. Why?

If there is a large community of traders for a specific coin the incentives aren't too hard to recognize when it comes to the question why new exchanges list these coins.

adamvp

hero member

Activity: 1246

Merit: 708

The Bitcoin Cash fiasco: a reorg or a 51 percent attack?
https://app.algory.io/app/cryptonews/768694/the-bitcoin-cash-fiasco-a-reorg-or-a-51

Interesting article about BCH: 51% issue;
Secondly BSV is now over worth 0,5 BCH (I personally consider BSV as a scam so it is quite worrying that market valuation of bch and bsv is going so close..)

sirsplashalot

full member

Activity: 520

Merit: 123

Quote from: Bitbobb on June 02, 2019, 09:23:46 AM

Quote from: Khaos77 on June 02, 2019, 01:26:00 AM

Clarifications

Bitcoin Cash & Bitcoin SV both offer real scaling potential , as true scaling can only occur ONCHAIN.

Bitcoin Segwit using LN is not scaling, it is Offloading.
As BTC segwit offloads transactions to the LN network because the btc onchain network is inferior due to it's transaction capacity being purposefully limited by it's core devs.

bch dev forced changes into the base layer which caused a split. These changes work incrementally to remove the miner competition from the BitCoin experiment. In other words bch devs do not want BitCoin they want to destroy BitCoin but lock up the name "BitCoin" and associate it with crime etc.

This move officially makes Bitcoin Cash ‘BCash.’ I have no idea why Ver forced this.

Bitbobb

hero member

Activity: 1134

Merit: 525

Less hops. More wins.

Quote from: gembitz on June 02, 2019, 08:41:49 PM

Quote from: Bitbobb on June 02, 2019, 09:23:46 AM

Quote from: Khaos77 on June 02, 2019, 01:26:00 AM

Clarifications

Bitcoin Cash & Bitcoin SV both offer real scaling potential , as true scaling can only occur ONCHAIN.

Bitcoin Segwit using LN is not scaling, it is Offloading.
As BTC segwit offloads transactions to the LN network because the btc onchain network is inferior due to it's transaction capacity being purposefully limited by it's core devs.

bch dev forced changes into the base layer which caused a split. These changes work incrementally to remove the miner competition from the BitCoin experiment. In other words bch devs do not want BitCoin they want to destroy BitCoin but lock up the name "BitCoin" and associate it with crime etc.

lol you finally woke? Cheesy

bwaahaha

yes, feeling woke. good morning gemyyybittzzzz.

gembitz

hero member

Activity: 1834

Merit: 639

*Brute force will solve any Bitcoin problem*

Quote from: Bitbobb on June 02, 2019, 09:23:46 AM

Quote from: Khaos77 on June 02, 2019, 01:26:00 AM

Clarifications

Bitcoin Cash & Bitcoin SV both offer real scaling potential , as true scaling can only occur ONCHAIN.

Bitcoin Segwit using LN is not scaling, it is Offloading.
As BTC segwit offloads transactions to the LN network because the btc onchain network is inferior due to it's transaction capacity being purposefully limited by it's core devs.

bch dev forced changes into the base layer which caused a split. These changes work incrementally to remove the miner competition from the BitCoin experiment. In other words bch devs do not want BitCoin they want to destroy BitCoin but lock up the name "BitCoin" and associate it with crime etc.

lol you finally woke? Cheesy

bwaahaha

Topic: [ANN] Bitcoin Cash - Pro on-chain scaling - Cheaper fees - page 20. (Read 704506 times)