[ANN] Bitcoin Cash - Pro on-chain scaling - Cheaper fees - page 220.

Mrpumperitis

legendary

Activity: 2758

Merit: 1075

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: Mrpumperitis on April 11, 2018, 09:24:49 PM

I see BCH going over $800 and towards the $1k area this week.

Interesting! However, would you mind explaining more about which news led you to such positive predictions on price of Bitcoin Cash, please.
Highly appreciate your helps.

Thanks m8,
sure...check your pm

Mrpumperitis

legendary

Activity: 2758

Merit: 1075

Quote from: xianwei82 on April 11, 2018, 09:07:27 PM

At present, 650$will rise to a high pressure level before BCH, and stop 620$before breaking down. It's not very meaningful to break through buying much

I see BCH going over $800 and towards the $1k area this week.

xianwei82

member

Activity: 322

Merit: 10

At present, 650$will rise to a high pressure level before BCH, and stop 620$before breaking down. It's not very meaningful to break through buying much

jbreher

legendary

Activity: 3038

Merit: 1660

lose: unfind ... loose: untight

Quote from: tekmobile on April 11, 2018, 05:40:03 PM

Quote from: jbreher on April 11, 2018, 05:19:41 PM

Quote from: tekmobile on April 11, 2018, 03:27:27 PM

https://twitter.com/PeterRizun/status/983752297363660800?s=19

Bcash vs Bcash

^^^Diversionary tactic #23. When in an argument, you find yourself bereft of any valid counterpoint, introduce a distraction.

What argument I provided some facts you responded with some nonsense drivel in a counter attempt

That's rich. Seems there are four threads you've dropped. Here's the simplest:

Quote from: jbreher on April 11, 2018, 10:09:00 AM

Quote from: tekmobile on April 11, 2018, 09:48:35 AM

but with one of the proposed BCH fixes this would completely change the security model for a new system and you would not be able to use the one Bitcoin has used for the last 9 years

Tell me which proposed BCH 'fix' and in what manner it changes the Bitcoin security model.

After we dispatch that bit of nonsense, we'll move on to the others.

Mrpumperitis

legendary

Activity: 2758

Merit: 1075

tek & his some facts... Grin

tekmobile

full member

Activity: 392

Merit: 154

Quote from: jbreher on April 11, 2018, 05:19:41 PM

Quote from: tekmobile on April 11, 2018, 03:27:27 PM

https://twitter.com/PeterRizun/status/983752297363660800?s=19

Bcash vs Bcash

^^^Diversionary tactic #23. When in an argument, you find yourself bereft of any valid counterpoint, introduce a distraction.

What argument I provided some facts you responded with some nonsense drivel in a counter attempt

jbreher

legendary

Activity: 3038

Merit: 1660

lose: unfind ... loose: untight

Quote from: tekmobile on April 11, 2018, 03:27:27 PM

https://twitter.com/PeterRizun/status/983752297363660800?s=19

Bcash vs Bcash

^^^Diversionary tactic #23. When in an argument, you find yourself bereft of any valid counterpoint, introduce a distraction.

Ai7xpressTV

sr. member

Activity: 430

Merit: 250

Quote from: jbreher on April 11, 2018, 01:29:06 PM

Quote from: Ai7xpressTV on April 11, 2018, 11:11:20 AM

Do you know how to handle Bitcoin Cash from tax perspective? Is it income or more a gift? What do you think?

No clear statement from the IRS - not like they get the last word anyhow.

I think the closest analogy in more traditional areas would be a corporate spinout - like when hewlett-packard split into HP Inc (HPQ) and Hewlett-Packard Enterprise (HPE). I'm treating it accordingly.

Argh.

Seems like it is really hard to handle that correctly. Every tax consultant out there is overhelmed with this question...

tekmobile

full member

Activity: 392

Merit: 154

https://twitter.com/PeterRizun/status/983752297363660800?s=19

Bcash vs Bcash

jbreher

legendary

Activity: 3038

Merit: 1660

lose: unfind ... loose: untight

Quote from: Ai7xpressTV on April 11, 2018, 11:11:20 AM

Do you know how to handle Bitcoin Cash from tax perspective? Is it income or more a gift? What do you think?

No clear statement from the IRS - not like they get the last word anyhow.

I think the closest analogy in more traditional areas would be a corporate spinout - like when hewlett-packard split into HP Inc (HPQ) and Hewlett-Packard Enterprise (HPE). I'm treating it accordingly.

m3ndi3

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

BCH has had a serious but going on over the last month first you've some of the community heads openly hot debate

Ai7xpressTV

sr. member

Activity: 430

Merit: 250

Do you know how to handle Bitcoin Cash from tax perspective? Is it income or more a gift? What do you think?

axlroses

hero member

Activity: 672

Merit: 500

Quote from: Angel Di on April 11, 2018, 10:27:14 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

this is an interesting project, looking from a roadmap, that I think is very neat and potentially to succeed in the future, I'm interested in seeing the progress of this thread, and not a bad idea to invest, may be a successful project

Perhaps it is all because you're talking about. And perhaps in the future there will be something that you're talking about. It would be great for the supporters, if in the future the project will not die and will live and thrive. While in this world, everything is possible I guess.

actually no one knows for sure about the future, maybe all that you talk about Bch this can be real but still too many possibilities that can not be guessed .. i also hope so always think positive

David48l

hero member

Activity: 600

Merit: 504

Quote from: tekmobile on April 11, 2018, 09:48:35 AM

There is no evidence of.......

you're a fucking troll paid, you only come here to cheat people who are interested in bitcoin cash with false information

People do not need your false help, whoever wants to see both sides can read the pro btc forum.

But in the btc forum they will not find anything, basically because they censor any discussion, the reason, they do not have arguments to debate. They just pay trolls like you and fill the forums with them.

Bitcon Cash

Instant transactions thanks to 0 confirmation

Rates of 1sat / byte in ANY SITUATION, that is 0.002 cents and will continue like this thanks to the increase of 32mb

https://cash.coin.dance/development

Bitcoin Core (paypal 2.0)

1.2mb!

Hold!

Bcash! Bcash!

LN! ... (smoke)

You are a sold

Angel Di

sr. member

Activity: 588

Merit: 251

EVOS

Quote from: ?? on ??

this is an interesting project, looking from a roadmap, that I think is very neat and potentially to succeed in the future, I'm interested in seeing the progress of this thread, and not a bad idea to invest, may be a successful project

Perhaps it is all because you're talking about. And perhaps in the future there will be something that you're talking about. It would be great for the supporters, if in the future the project will not die and will live and thrive. While in this world, everything is possible I guess.

jbreher

legendary

Activity: 3038

Merit: 1660

lose: unfind ... loose: untight

Quote from: tekmobile on April 11, 2018, 09:48:35 AM

Quote from: jbreher on April 11, 2018, 09:32:48 AM

Quote from: tekmobile on April 11, 2018, 04:28:02 AM

One of the proposed malleability fixes for BCH moves the signature out of the transaction area the exact same way as segwit

Not exact but in a similar manner. In that the signature would be divorced from the transaction data. No more so.

Quote

with the only difference being that on BCH it's just moved permanently

Only difference? Au contraire, my undiscerning friend. The major difference is that none of the BCH malleability fix proposals seek to fundamentally undermine Bitcoin's tried and true security model.

Quote

The only reason bitmain etc do not like segwit is that it blocks their use of covert asicboost

smh. That's just stupid. I've already stated the reasons. The so-called 'asicboost advantage' is lost in the noise. To the extent that it is actually employed, for which there is no evidence for its widespread use.

Quote

there is a block explorer here with blocks found using overt asicboost https://asicboost.dance

Ooooh! Scaaaary! a total of.... nine blocks!

There is no evidence of covert being used maybe because it's covert and it's hidden

So... just trust you that it is widespread? Let alone a significant reason for the adoption of BCH? Sorry, no.

Quote

Overt is new and currently only supported my the new halong miners

False and False.

Quote

With segwit you have the option to use the same security model that Bitcoin has used for the last 9 years

Deluded much? Every segwit transaction relies on a gentlemans' handshake between the miners to interpret what is inherently an anyonecanspend transaction as anything other than an anyonecanspend transaction. Strike number one. Further, segwit removes the necessity for miners to validate all signatures in blocks they build atop in order to make an otherwise-valid block. Strike number two. Further yet, segwit removes the incentive for miners to check the validity of signatures, as that would consume time they might more profitably be spending mining. Strike three - you're out.

Quote

but with one of the proposed BCH fixes this would completely change the security model for a new system and you would not be able to use the one Bitcoin has used for the last 9 years

Tell me which proposed BCH 'fix' and in what manner it changes the Bitcoin security model.

hv_

legendary

Activity: 2534

Merit: 1055

Clean Code and Scale

Quote from: xianwei82 on April 11, 2018, 09:22:15 AM

Bitcoincash, the technology development of this coin is worth looking forward to. Maybe one day it will go beyond bitcoin.

Bitcoin Cash is already beyond Wink

And no, (SW+LN+1MB+noHF+UASF+....) is not needed at all and is only tech dept injected into already very complicated protocol code base for orig Bitcoin.

Bitcoin Cash is about to make things rather easier for all, Coder, Merchants, Miners, Users.

tekmobile

full member

Activity: 392

Merit: 154

Quote from: jbreher on April 11, 2018, 09:32:48 AM

Quote from: tekmobile on April 11, 2018, 04:28:02 AM

One of the proposed malleability fixes for BCH moves the signature out of the transaction area the exact same way as segwit

Not exact but in a similar manner. In that the signature would be divorced from the transaction data. No more so.

Quote

with the only difference being that on BCH it's just moved permanently

Only difference? Au contraire, my undiscerning friend. The major difference is that none of the BCH malleability fix proposals seek to fundamentally undermine Bitcoin's tried and true security model.

Quote

The only reason bitmain etc do not like segwit is that it blocks their use of covert asicboost

smh. That's just stupid. I've already stated the reasons. The so-called 'asicboost advantage' is lost in the noise. To the extent that it is actually employed, for which there is no evidence for its widespread use.

Quote

there is a block explorer here with blocks found using overt asicboost https://asicboost.dance

Ooooh! Scaaaary! a total of.... nine blocks!

There is no evidence of covert being used maybe because it's covert and it's hidden

Overt is new and currently only supported my the new halong miners and a couple of pools so no there won't be a huge amount of blocks

With segwit you have the option to use the same security model that Bitcoin has used for the last 9 years but with one of the proposed BCH fixes this would completely change the security model for a new system and you would not be able to use the one Bitcoin has used for the last 9 years

jbreher

legendary

Activity: 3038

Merit: 1660

lose: unfind ... loose: untight

Quote from: David48l on April 11, 2018, 08:13:33 AM

Quote from: tekmobile on April 11, 2018, 04:06:46 AM

<...blah blah blah...>

you're a fucking troll paid

Perhaps part of our esteemed Dr. Back's 'large teams', albeit on the weaker end of the scale.

https://twitter.com/adam3us/status/943876564856348673

jbreher

legendary

Activity: 3038

Merit: 1660

lose: unfind ... loose: untight

Quote from: tekmobile on April 11, 2018, 04:28:02 AM

One of the proposed malleability fixes for BCH moves the signature out of the transaction area the exact same way as segwit

Not exact but in a similar manner. In that the signature would be divorced from the transaction data. No more so.

Quote

with the only difference being that on BCH it's just moved permanently

Only difference? Au contraire, my undiscerning friend. The major difference is that none of the BCH malleability fix proposals seek to fundamentally undermine Bitcoin's tried and true security model.

Quote

The only reason bitmain etc do not like segwit is that it blocks their use of covert asicboost

smh. That's just stupid. I've already stated the reasons. The so-called 'asicboost advantage' is lost in the noise. To the extent that it is actually employed, for which there is no evidence for its widespread use.

Quote

there is a block explorer here with blocks found using overt asicboost https://asicboost.dance

Ooooh! Scaaaary! a total of.... nine blocks!

Topic: [ANN] Bitcoin Cash - Pro on-chain scaling - Cheaper fees - page 220. (Read 704531 times)