Now isnt this interesting...no trolls lol
They cant trash talk a coin that they are buying lol
Nope you lot have just been quiet not trying to spread false information
lol, so tek be honest, are you back in?, have you bought BCH.
Not a chance I sold not long after the fork for more than its worth now
No probs, you will buy higher up then
In a few months time, you will be telling people to buy 8mb BCH because your troll friends will try to keep the old chain alive.
Im sure you will do the same thing you did before, tell people to buy clashic ...but this time you will say buy the 8mb.
Thing is , everyone has to hodl BCH now till the fork if they want free coins from the soon to be previous fork.
To say 0.17 has been available for a few days i'm not seeing any 0.17 nodes lets see how many don't upgrade there are a lot of non supporters for enabling the OP_CODES
We will fork to 32mb BCH
You will promote 8mb BCH once we move on
Do you like the feeling knowing the ABC devs will implement whatever they want and push it as a forced fork every 6 months
The main ABC dev deadalnix is supposed to have been pain by bitmain for 12 months work this is just a rumor but if this is true lets see if he carries on working for free if bitmain don't continue to fund him
lol Its open source bro...im sure bitmain cant pay him more than what he can earn by using his brain and being innovative.
Also when a coin is improving, upgrading,updating, yes it may require regular forks.
Ive been through so many forks bro , i dont fear them...Darkcoin forked weekly for months to implement the masternode system, eth forks regularly to add upgrades too.
Right heres the thing, og btc was stagnent since 2011, once satoshi left, nothing happened, no innovation, innovation requires HARD FORKS.
Thanks to core btc lost its dominance because innovation moved to altcoins...we got smart contracts on eth and privacy coins and faster cheaper coins.
All this innovation is now coming back to bitcoin via Bitcoin Cash...so yes regular hard forks will be essential for BCH to become #1
biggger blocks, privacy options and more are part of BCH roadmap and the community is 100% behind it.
Not even 1 long term bitcoin cash hodler on this forum has complained about the upgrades.
A hard fork is necessary sometimes but shouldn't be on a fixed schedule it should only be done when absolutely necessary bitcoin users are not against increasing the blocksize it will happen but right now with segwit almost all upgrades can happen with a soft fork or sidechain/drivechain where some bad code cannot affect the main chain.
What happens once all opcodes get re-enabled and some smart hackers find a way to do serious damage or some bug gets passed that effectively kills the chain BTC1 (S2X) had a huge bug that caused the chain to stall prematurely something like this can happen again at ANY scheduled HF its still a high risk just because it's never happened don't mean it won't happen
The EDA was supposed to be the greatest difficulty adjustment and it got gaimed to hell and the same dev is responsible for code breaking changes
Bugs, hacks, exploits, badly designed features, etc. are (and will be) present in all systems. Ethereum had its DAO, but ultimately every problem can be solved one way or another.
EDA was gamed and was finally changed, DAO failure is now behind us and nobody gives a shit. If anything will go wrong I'm pretty sure there will be a solution, and if not then it's even better, right?
The DAO hack required the chain to be rolled back something that is easy to do with a centralised system
The more you add the more points of failure gets created it's best to keep the lowest layer (in this case the blockchain) as simple as possible and add features as additional layers that can more easily be be fixed or nuked if it's proven to be fundementally broken
Lightning is one such example it can have huge bugs that have no impact whatsoever on the main chain and if it's proven that it does not work as expected but currently it's working just fine at the protocol level and once simple bugs get worked out will see mass adoption and unlimited scalability
Bitcoin has the ability to do smart contracts through RSK while I don't really like or support RSK with it being separate I don't need to touch it