Topic: [ANN] Bitcoin Cash - Pro on-chain scaling - Cheaper fees - page 705. (Read 704406 times)

i can't believe the developer was dumb enough not to see this coming. miners will game whatever they can get their hands on. they're crapping all over its credibility.

btc block time is returning to normal despite profitability being pretty similar.

and if there's a halving for a coin that's supposed to have tiny fees that's not gonna help its sustainability.

they should've done some more theorising and testing. there wasn't any hurry.

I belive BCH holders will be as happy as BTC holders in the end, if not happier.

so many laugh look at them all lol  its you thats the fool around here.
if im in your ignore list then how do you see my comments ? lol your full of shit as usual m8

Says who is licking Roger the Ver aka " selling illegal explosives" convicted criminal's balls.

charlie sheen lol aka cobbles..is in bed with ....segshit

The whole forum laughs at you and i don't know i bother to respond to a retarded piece of shit like you who is in my ignore list for decades.

edit: jonald fyookball, lol. Another fucktard shill. You listen to him? Your brain is probably dead.

Why so many guys like charlee sheen from litecoin  hate BCH? They seems dont want BCH to succeed!

^ im not going to report you, im going to laugh at you and your stupidity...lol

https://medium.com/@jonaldfyookball/mathematical-proof-that-the-lightning-network-cannot-be-a-decentralized-bitcoin-scaling-solution-1b8147650800

http://veekyforums.com/thread/3186191/business/the-lighting-network-requires-a-subscription-fee.html

mindrust...shut your mouth, know your role and read

your so fkn dumb.   gtfo please

Keeping the system secure should have given them any rights to change the network whatever they liked. LN is going to fix this. (probably)

i hope your talking about segwit ,blockstream
if your mean the miners..the people that have poured so much money into keeping the system secure since its creation...mining at a loss many times (me inc)..then you have lost the plot completely.
You have no understanding of how bitcoin got and will get value.

if you want a coin without miners..theres many to choose from, go there

^^^^ This exactly 1000%

Both have their purpose and both will succeed. The world is big enough for BCH and BCS (and even B2X).

Someday you can tell your grandkids about what life was like when you used to own good ole BTC Bitcoins. And yes, your grandkids will think you're nucking futs when you tell them about when BTC was under $1000

^^^^ This exactly 1000%

Both have their purpose and both will succeed. The world is big enough for BCH and BCS (and even B2X).

Someday you can tell your grandkids about what life was like when you used to own good ole BTC Bitcoins. And yes, your grandkids will think you're nucking futs when you tell them about when BTC was under $1000

And finally, what one considers Bitcoin is now open to interpretation and simply because one fork managed to politically keep the ticker BTC does not mean that it is in some way more or less inherently entitled to the name of the main chain.
____________________________

BCH is Bitcoin

BTC is Bitcoin

If a tree has two branches, you do not consider the two branches to be separate from the tree. At the time of the split, there was no "correct" main chain, just the one which was perceived to be the main chain because they used their political positioning to maintain the original ticker of btc. The valuation of these two forks is in flux, people are still struggling to grasp the technological, political, and economic concepts at play here. There is no clear winner yet, this will take months to settle.
_____________________________

BTC split from "The" Bitcoin chain via segwit.

BCH split from "The" Bitcoin chain via raising the block size.

Both forks implemented changes, thus while one kept the stock ticker of BTC and the infrastructure built around the BTC ticker on trade platforms, it is not inherently the defacto Bitcoin.

If BCH manages to maintain the majority hashing power and prices rise to support it, it will become the chain which is used and referred to as the main Bitcoin.

Obviously, this could not happen within the same day of launch, or week, or maybe even month or months. This will take some time to play out. Right now there is a great deal of uncertainty among investors, traders, and miners.

A great deal hold both of their coins, BTC and BCH and use BTC + BCH to calculate the overall bitcoin price, which is a sensible way of understanding this.
____________________________

Finally, when somebody says Bitcoin, it is now a general term which could be perceived to mean BCH or BTC.

There is a lot of doublespeak around this situation, many people are vocal about supporting one side while others are silent and willing to follow whichever appears to be 'winning'. This is like poker, people may not want to telegraph their moves because there is no clear advantage in doing so. Only time can tell where this leads.

Yes, both chains should be considered forks of the original chain and both should change their names.
There're 2 types of Bitcoin now: Cash and Segwit.