Topic: [ANN] Bitfury ASIC sales in EU and Europe - page 113. (Read 250465 times)
Well, bitfury chips delivered in July are 40% cheaper than avalon chips delivered in the very same July and almost 10 times more power efficient. I mention this power eficiency difference every time because finally all this asic race will result in miners paying all their bitcoins for electricity bills. So bitfury chip is cheaper, not more expensive and yet its drastically more power efficient. Honestly, you can't compare prices of something inefficient with something 10 times more efficient. Normally it costs 10 times more as well.
I can have units or chips delivered to my Europe address then forwarded to U.S. in maybe 1-3 days. This project seems quite promising as long as we can put it together with no issues.
The ASIC device is called 5GHASH. It was the projected and simulated performance, which might still be achievable with a good board and proper cooling. Currently best achieved and optimal (COP) performance has been 2.7GH/s.
So your 1000 euro 25ghash miner has 16 ASICs, 16*2.7 = 43.2ghash/sec. Sounds kinda good to me.
Just to clarify...the picture of the 5GH/s reel does not mean the chips are 5GH/s. The product is for 3000 pieces of 2.7 GH/s chips, right?
The ASIC device is called 5GHASH. It was the projected and simulated performance, which might still be achievable with a good board and proper cooling. Currently best achieved and optimal (COP) performance has been 2.7GH/s.
So your 1000 euro 25ghash miner has 16 ASICs, 16*2.7 = 43.2ghash/sec. Sounds kinda good to me.
Just to clarify...the picture of the 5GH/s reel does not mean the chips are 5GH/s. The product is for 3000 pieces of 2.7 GH/s chips, right?
The ASIC device is called 5GHASH. It was the projected and simulated performance, which might still be achievable with a good board and proper cooling. Currently best achieved and optimal (COP) performance has been 2.7GH/s.
It's more expensive than avalon chip's solution.
Is there anyone notice that？
Is there anyone notice that？
No, it's not. Few times cheaper and about 10 times more power efficient.
Hint: $/Gh is important, not $/chip
Can you show me your calculate process.
cheers.
Sure
2.7 GH for about $20 makes 135MH/$
282 MH for about $7 makes 40MH/$
Three times cheaper
And 0.8 W/GH << 7 W/GH
How should I get "2.7 GH for about $20 makes 135MH/$" ?
I think it's not true.
October delivery chips, not July.
Okay.
So one should know that calculation implies Oct delivery.
It's more expensive than avalon chip's solution.
Is there anyone notice that？
Is there anyone notice that？
No, it's not. Few times cheaper and about 10 times more power efficient.
Hint: $/Gh is important, not $/chip
Can you show me your calculate process.
cheers.
Sure
2.7 GH for about $20 makes 135MH/$
282 MH for about $7 makes 40MH/$
Three times cheaper
And 0.8 W/GH << 7 W/GH
How should I get "2.7 GH for about $20 makes 135MH/$" ?
I think it's not true.
October delivery chips, not July.
2700 / 20 = 135
It's more expensive than avalon chip's solution.
Is there anyone notice that？
Is there anyone notice that？
No, it's not. Few times cheaper and about 10 times more power efficient.
Hint: $/Gh is important, not $/chip
Can you show me your calculate process.
cheers.
Sure
2.7 GH for about $20 makes 135MH/$
282 MH for about $7 makes 40MH/$
Three times cheaper
And 0.8 W/GH << 7 W/GH
How should I get "2.7 GH for about $20 makes 135MH/$" ?
I think it's not true.
It's more expensive than avalon chip's solution.
Is there anyone notice that？
Is there anyone notice that？
No, it's not. Few times cheaper and about 10 times more power efficient.
Hint: $/Gh is important, not $/chip
Can you show me your calculate process.
cheers.
Need psu, heat sinks, heat sink compound or pads as well as fans and you are good to go in August.
Now go ahead and compare that to BFL, Klondikes, BitBurner XX, Avalon, Avalon Clones.
Guessing it is a GAME CHANGER this. Considering you only need 400 W power supply.
Overclocking? Interested in upper limits as I want to use oil submersion.
We actually think this could be run without heatsinks at normal room temperatures. The board will run hot, but not too hot. A little fanning will go a long way. (remember those GPU times
Without heat sinks are you mad? Really? If you are ordering in density 400 GH/s 16 boards at a time?
Wow that be "cool". Pun intended.
So overclocking? Heat sink and fans and you are good to go?
This one 46.5 Euros per GH/s ≈0.75BTC/G
Avalon Clone ≈ 0.51BTC/G （320chips=24.96,other fees≈20,output=88g)
So tell me the answer?
Avalon Clone ≈ 0.51BTC/G （320chips=24.96,other fees≈20,output=88g)
So tell me the answer?
Just to clarify...the picture of the 5GH/s reel does not mean the chips are 5GH/s. The product is for 3000 pieces of 2.7 GH/s chips, right?
I just love the bloody and fallen butterflies on the frontpage, so true 
i fly to where the hardware is
. Nevermind though. I probably have a EU address I can ship to :pdo you have specifications on dimensions and weight of devices?
BTW....damn the low BTC/EURO exchange rate.
Perhaps we should get a group buy going? Also, congrats bitfury and his team members.
Thanks. I remember about your pvt. msg, but don't yet know what we can do.
Perhaps we should get a group buy going? Also, congrats bitfury and his team members.
It's more expensive than avalon chip's solution.
Is there anyone notice that？
Is there anyone notice that？
No, it's not. Few times cheaper and about 10 times more power efficient.
Hint: $/Gh is important, not $/chip
Can you show me your calculate process.
cheers.
Need psu, heat sinks, heat sink compound or pads as well as fans and you are good to go in August.
Now go ahead and compare that to BFL, Klondikes, BitBurner XX, Avalon, Avalon Clones.
Guessing it is a GAME CHANGER this. Considering you only need 400 W power supply.
Overclocking? Interested in upper limits as I want to use oil submersion.
We actually think this could be run without heatsinks at normal room temperatures. The board will run hot, but not too hot. A little fanning will go a long way. (remember those GPU times
It's more expensive than avalon chip's solution.
Is there anyone notice that？
Is there anyone notice that？
No, it's not. Few times cheaper and about 10 times more power efficient.
Hint: $/Gh is important, not $/chip
Can you show me your calculate process.
cheers.
Sure
2.7 GH for about $20 makes 135MH/$
282 MH for about $7 makes 40MH/$
Three times cheaper
And 0.8 W/GH << 7 W/GH
So it looks like the chips on the 25GH/s miner are running at 1.5625Gh each, is this correct? I suppose this is because there is no dedicated cooling system provided. Meaning, if you care to cool the chips properly, the 25Gh model becomes a 43.2Gh one?
It's more expensive than avalon chip's solution.
Is there anyone notice that？
Is there anyone notice that？
No, it's not. Few times cheaper and about 10 times more power efficient.
Hint: $/Gh is important, not $/chip
Can you show me your calculate process.
cheers.
400 GH/s divided by 18600 Euros includes VAT and shipping inside the EU.
46.5 Euros per GH/s for a complete system...
What’s included:
1 Master board
16 hashing boards with 16 Bitfury 55nm ASIC chips for total of 256 chips
Raspberry Pi Model B with SD card and software pre-installed
2 x Ring terminal to Molex-Jr adapter cable
Instructions for assembly and setup
Need psu, heat sinks, heat sink compound or pads as well as fans and you are good to go in August.
Now go ahead and compare that to BFL, Klondikes, BitBurner XX, Avalon, Avalon Clones.
Guessing it is a GAME CHANGER this. Considering you only need 400 W power supply.
Overclocking? Interested in upper limits as I want to use oil submersion.
Local pick up available?
Jump to: