I understand your point, but I dont fully agree. E.g. what do you mean with "market stabilization"? One could argue that even bitcoin is not stabilized yet.
Also, as stated the amount of PoA coins is very limited (~9K?) comparing the total amount of purchased coins (600K) or the total amount of coins (30M). And even if people would dump the coins the investors could by new tokens with even cheaper than the original prize.
You could also first release the first PoA coins then the second etc.
I agree 100% bitcoin isn't "stabilized" if such a thing is even possible with Bitcoin. Bitcoin is not meant to be "stable".
If Bitcoin were meant to be stable, you wouldn't have all these people losing their minds about the block reward halving driving up the price...
Bitcoin is a deflationary currency with a capped supply, that is meant to attempt to drastically increase in value...not be "stable"...
Dogecoin is meant to be "stable"...it has an open ended supply, but a burning mechanism to counter balance the supply. THAT is a "stabilization" strategy.
All tokens aren't meant to be "stable".
When you have few buy orders on the books, and give people "free tokens", they have no incentive not to dump those tokens.
There are NOT 600k tokens "for sale"...
The order books barely top 100k "for sale"...
There is a HUGE difference.
I am not going to let those people dump the price of the coin. Period.
This is not really a debate.
They will get their tokens when there are enough buy orders on the books so that they can't temporarily destroy the price in a few sales.
It's just smarter this way.
This is protecting the INVESTORS.
The people who get tokens for free come second to people who paid. Period.
Also, if you won tokens for free and AREN'T simply trying to dump them, what I am doing right now should make you happy, as it will keep the value of the tokens from being dropped.
Shouldn't it?
Chris