I know that, you already repeated that many times, including the pdf and videos
it's not my point, it's not about the project, it's about the ico, how it's planned and executed
I like the project, it's no criticism to the project
But the organization of the ico is very unprofessional and people will or will not invest based on this thread, look at the OP, no picture has the same size and they look like the got downloaded at random even if they're not
you can just ignore that or start working on a solution and maybe extend the first phase of the ico until you get it right
I already invested a small amount in this project and do not regret it but if you want the ico to be a success, this thread won't bring it, not how it is now, not how you arranged the escrow
Thanks for your input. We literally arranged the escrow like this at the request of the community. You don't HAVE to follow this method, as there are two ways to participate.
The alternative we just offered was a solution to the problems that people originally had. Now if you're saying that either method of using the escrow won't work, then I don't really know what to tell you.
Considering I am currently writing two white papers for the Synereo team, I don't believe any work I do is unprofessional personally. I am open to criticism, but at a certain point I have to stick by my work.
Cheers!
Chris
your biggest problem is that you don't seem to know how to handle sincere criticism that's not in any way directed at you, don't make it personal
it's not about you, for sure, without any doubt I believe you have great competences and you are an asset to the team
but maybe organizing and running an ico is not something you or your team is capable of
I mean, take a look at the op, what is your first impression?
some introspection is needed here, not self defence
and i'm not saying i can do it any better, i'm saying that i see other project doing it better and with a very good results like waves,eth,lisk
He needs somebody more united.
