Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] Bitland - ICO - Decentralized Land Registry - page 56. (Read 84802 times)

sr. member
Activity: 399
Merit: 250
legendary
Activity: 1310
Merit: 1000
Bounty for german translation?
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
Are we living a new era of ICO coins mates?
hero member
Activity: 729
Merit: 513
Okay, color me stupid, but I have sent BTC to my wallet I downloaded - https://bitshares.org/download/ . Everything is running fine, but at instruction #6: http://www.bitland.world/how-to-purchase-cadastrals/   - I do not see the FEE field dropdown arrow as indicated in the screenshot. My wallet is unlocked, as I thought that may be the issue. No go. I can send BTC to ccedk.escrow but it is showing 2.64174 as my fee in the OPEN.BTC field. I have only sent .02102494 BTC to my wallet to test how it works.  This is the exact error I get when I try to confirm send of .02BTC: delta.amount > 0: Insufficient Balance: kidyubyub2's balance of 0 BTS is less than required 2.64174 BTS

Surely the .00102494 left in wallet is enough to pay the 2.64174 BTS fee. What am I doing wrong? Sorry if I have overlooked something. Maybe I'm a simpleton?!?!

I am not sure if you are on a Mac or not, but some people have said that the first time they use the interface on a Mac, the "fee" option won't let them change it from BTS to Open.Btc.  Also, it doesn't automatically deduct the Open.btc fee, so you have to subtract .00004403 btc from whatever you are trying to send, then manually add the fee into the box.

If the problem persists, please let me know.

Cheers!


Chris

I can't change either of the things circled in this screenshot. I am on a PC, by the way.



as the error says, "required 2.64174 BTS " - not BTC, BT"S".

for may case, while I thought OL takes transmission free in BTS, I prepared approx. 5BTS separately when I send 1BTC. Then, it worked. Fee was charged in BTS(not BTC) seat as default.

I had the same error, then I subtracted .00004403 btc from the amount I was trying to send and it worked.
legendary
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1050
openledger is too difficult for me, passing this one out Sad

yeah, OL was new to me n made me recall Windows 3.1...

when you send 1BTC, you need few extra BTS as a charge.

Chris, you may better to add an instruction "how you can transfer your BTC to OPEN.BTC inside OpenLedger account".

Cheers.


Here's our new tutorial video that shows how you can fund your OpenLeder account with Bitcoin. That's a step you need to take before you can buy Cadastrals ( Bitland's token )



click the image to watch the video!
legendary
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1001
I buy in this pilot project and it's okay even if my pitched 1 BTC become ruin as a result. I am moved what Chris said "This project is not about the land, it's about people live on the land" and that one is good enough for me to invest.

doesn't matter even some team members have an experience of unsuccessful crypto business.
"failure is a stepping-stone to success" - just cross finger, and willing bitcoin org forum community give them good advise to the project making a miracle again.

Go Bitland!!

 

Thank you for the kind words!  The team has been working very hard to make this project a success.  All we can do is our best.


Cheers!


Chris

I can see in the OP that there"s seven of you,why are the rest of the crew so silent? I mean, at least here in this thread,it wouldnt hurt them to visit this thread and offer some info to anyone who has any questions
newbie
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
i will watch this.
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
I buy in this pilot project and it's okay even if my pitched 1 BTC become ruin as a result. I am moved what Chris said "This project is not about the land, it's about people live on the land" and that one is good enough for me to invest.

doesn't matter even some team members have an experience of unsuccessful crypto business.
"failure is a stepping-stone to success" - just cross finger, and willing bitcoin org forum community give them good advise to the project making a miracle again.

Go Bitland!!

 

Thank you for the kind words!  The team has been working very hard to make this project a success.  All we can do is our best.


Cheers!


Chris
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250

as the error says, "required 2.64174 BTS " - not BTC, BT"S".

for may case, while I thought OL takes transmission free in BTS, I prepared approx. 5BTS separately when I send 1BTC. Then, it worked. Fee was charged in BTS(not BTC) seat as default.

Yes, as I have seen sending like 5 BTS to an account unfreezes the "fee" option, but I have also seen where you don't need to send BTS to the account to get it active.  I have forwarded this information to the Blocktrade team, and will know within 24 hours if it is a problem with their protocol or not.


Cheers!


Chris
sr. member
Activity: 324
Merit: 250
Okay, color me stupid, but I have sent BTC to my wallet I downloaded - https://bitshares.org/download/ . Everything is running fine, but at instruction #6: http://www.bitland.world/how-to-purchase-cadastrals/   - I do not see the FEE field dropdown arrow as indicated in the screenshot. My wallet is unlocked, as I thought that may be the issue. No go. I can send BTC to ccedk.escrow but it is showing 2.64174 as my fee in the OPEN.BTC field. I have only sent .02102494 BTC to my wallet to test how it works.  This is the exact error I get when I try to confirm send of .02BTC: delta.amount > 0: Insufficient Balance: kidyubyub2's balance of 0 BTS is less than required 2.64174 BTS

Surely the .00102494 left in wallet is enough to pay the 2.64174 BTS fee. What am I doing wrong? Sorry if I have overlooked something. Maybe I'm a simpleton?!?!

I am not sure if you are on a Mac or not, but some people have said that the first time they use the interface on a Mac, the "fee" option won't let them change it from BTS to Open.Btc.  Also, it doesn't automatically deduct the Open.btc fee, so you have to subtract .00004403 btc from whatever you are trying to send, then manually add the fee into the box.

If the problem persists, please let me know.

Cheers!


Chris

I can't change either of the things circled in this screenshot. I am on a PC, by the way.



as the error says, "required 2.64174 BTS " - not BTC, BT"S".

for may case, while I thought OL takes transmission free in BTS, I prepared approx. 5BTS separately when I send 1BTC. Then, it worked. Fee was charged in BTS(not BTC) seat as default.
sr. member
Activity: 440
Merit: 250
http://taas.fund
Okay, color me stupid, but I have sent BTC to my wallet I downloaded - https://bitshares.org/download/ . Everything is running fine, but at instruction #6: http://www.bitland.world/how-to-purchase-cadastrals/   - I do not see the FEE field dropdown arrow as indicated in the screenshot. My wallet is unlocked, as I thought that may be the issue. No go. I can send BTC to ccedk.escrow but it is showing 2.64174 as my fee in the OPEN.BTC field. I have only sent .02102494 BTC to my wallet to test how it works.  This is the exact error I get when I try to confirm send of .02BTC: delta.amount > 0: Insufficient Balance: kidyubyub2's balance of 0 BTS is less than required 2.64174 BTS

Surely the .00102494 left in wallet is enough to pay the 2.64174 BTS fee. What am I doing wrong? Sorry if I have overlooked something. Maybe I'm a simpleton?!?!

I am not sure if you are on a Mac or not, but some people have said that the first time they use the interface on a Mac, the "fee" option won't let them change it from BTS to Open.Btc.  Also, it doesn't automatically deduct the Open.btc fee, so you have to subtract .00004403 btc from whatever you are trying to send, then manually add the fee into the box.

If the problem persists, please let me know.

Cheers!


Chris

I can't change either of the things circled in this screenshot. I am on a PC, by the way.

sr. member
Activity: 324
Merit: 250
The same Chris Bates from the prozcoin ico?  That sure doesn't give anyone any confidence in this.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/announcing-prozcoin-proof-of-action-poa-740383

I believe anyone who looks objectively at that project will see that it was extremely underfunded.

Also, while you took that quote extremely out of context, I stand by it 100%.

At the point in the thread in which that had been posted, all of the tokens had been bought back off the market.  There were no people holding Prozcoin at that point.


Cheers!

Chris

I buy in this pilot project and it's okay even if my pitched 1 BTC become ruin as a result. I am moved what Chris said "This project is not about the land, it's about people live on the land" and that one is good enough for me to invest.

doesn't matter even some team members have an experience of unsuccessful crypto business.
"failure is a stepping-stone to success" - just cross finger, and willing bitcoin org forum community give them good advise to the project making a miracle again.

Go Bitland!!

 
sr. member
Activity: 358
Merit: 251
Come on people!

You don't have to be a whale to get in!

It's not Waves or Lisk, your amount doesn't shrink during the ICO!

LISK and Waves drag a lot of attention, but i think this could be huge too, i will watch this closely and surely i will drop some coins on this.
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
Okay, color me stupid, but I have sent BTC to my wallet I downloaded - https://bitshares.org/download/ . Everything is running fine, but at instruction #6: http://www.bitland.world/how-to-purchase-cadastrals/   - I do not see the FEE field dropdown arrow as indicated in the screenshot. My wallet is unlocked, as I thought that may be the issue. No go. I can send BTC to ccedk.escrow but it is showing 2.64174 as my fee in the OPEN.BTC field. I have only sent .02102494 BTC to my wallet to test how it works.  This is the exact error I get when I try to confirm send of .02BTC: delta.amount > 0: Insufficient Balance: kidyubyub2's balance of 0 BTS is less than required 2.64174 BTS

Surely the .00102494 left in wallet is enough to pay the 2.64174 BTS fee. What am I doing wrong? Sorry if I have overlooked something. Maybe I'm a simpleton?!?!

I am not sure if you are on a Mac or not, but some people have said that the first time they use the interface on a Mac, the "fee" option won't let them change it from BTS to Open.Btc.  Also, it doesn't automatically deduct the Open.btc fee, so you have to subtract .00004403 btc from whatever you are trying to send, then manually add the fee into the box.

If the problem persists, please let me know.

Cheers!


Chris
sr. member
Activity: 440
Merit: 250
http://taas.fund
Okay, color me stupid, but I have sent BTC to my wallet I downloaded - https://bitshares.org/download/ . Everything is running fine, but at instruction #6: http://www.bitland.world/how-to-purchase-cadastrals/   - I do not see the FEE field dropdown arrow as indicated in the screenshot. My wallet is unlocked, as I thought that may be the issue. No go. I can send BTC to ccedk.escrow but it is showing 2.64174 as my fee in the OPEN.BTC field. I have only sent .02102494 BTC to my wallet to test how it works.  This is the exact error I get when I try to confirm send of .02BTC: delta.amount > 0: Insufficient Balance: kidyubyub2's balance of 0 BTS is less than required 2.64174 BTS

Surely the .00102494 left in wallet is enough to pay the 2.64174 BTS fee. What am I doing wrong? Sorry if I have overlooked something. Maybe I'm a simpleton?!?!
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
The same Chris Bates from the prozcoin ico?  That sure doesn't give anyone any confidence in this.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/announcing-prozcoin-proof-of-action-poa-740383

I believe anyone who looks objectively at that project will see that it was extremely underfunded.

Also, while you took that quote extremely out of context, I stand by it 100%.

At the point in the thread in which that had been posted, all of the tokens had been bought back off the market.  There were no people holding Prozcoin at that point.


Cheers!

Chris
legendary
Activity: 896
Merit: 1001
The same Chris Bates from the prozcoin ico?  That sure doesn't give anyone any confidence in this.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/announcing-prozcoin-proof-of-action-poa-740383


We would like to officially announce the Coin Proz project is coming to an end. We appreciated all the support we had for the project but we are unable to continue working on it. The bitcoin we raised from the token sale was used to re-develop coinproz.com Until recently we have tried to find ways to keep the project alive. Now the entire team has decided to close the project officially.

In October we were starting to run low on Bitcoin to help fund our Developer. The team continued to look for additional ways to raise capital to continue developing coinproz.com. Unfortunately we were unsuccessful in raising significant additional development capital.
 
We had ambitious plans of creating an all encompassing social media site for the crypto community and we were stretched too thin financially. We appreciate all the support from the community and we are sorry we could not deliver the project we had envisioned.

The team cannot afford to keep working on the Coin Proz project but we open up the offer to let someone from the community to take it over what Shannon has created. If interested or you have questions please email Tim Frost at [email protected] or Shannon Code at [email protected] regarding taking over the project.

Here is a breakdown on how the bitcoin was distributed.
We received a total of 56.6 Bitcoin from Prozcoin token sale.
31 Bitcoin worth $12,000 Shannon Code received to develop coinproz.com
12 Bitcoin was used for refunds and buyback for Proz
5.5 Bitcoin was compensation to other team members for contribution
The balance was used to pay for operational costs and payment of debt

Anyone who has any Prozcoin needs to remove it from C-CEX by June 30. Any prozcoin remaining on there will never be recovered. An email will be sent out to all accounts that hold Prozcoin on C-CEX to notify them.


You all killed this project.

You are not "shareholders", and to act like you are is either disingenuous or displays an extreme lack of understanding. 

After all this time, only two people have ever contacted our team beyond this thread.  None of you ever wanted this project to succeed, so stop pretending.



You don't talk to grown men like this, and expect a positive response right?


As far as I'm concerned, anyone still posting in this thread is just doing it out of pure malice.

Chris
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
Come on people!

You don't have to be a whale to get in!

It's not Waves or Lisk, your amount doesn't shrink during the ICO!

It has been great to see people contributing small amounts so far!  While it may not seem like we have amounted a lot, it's because a lot of people have given small amounts.  Thank you all for the support, and we are hoping that it will be an avalanche of support to reach our goal. 

Cheers!

Chris
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1002
Waves | 3PHMaGNeTJfqFfD4xuctgKdoxLX188QM8na
Come on people!

You don't have to be a whale to get in!

It's not Waves or Lisk, your amount doesn't shrink during the ICO!
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250

Crypto economics :

People invest in crowdsale and at phase 1 get 10.000 CADASTRAL per  BTC invested then 20% of profits made by bitland will be given to share holders proportionally to their share (The token has no value else than to get these 20% profit, thought price can vary depending on the succes of bitland).

This part seems understood on my side.


Real world economics :

Bitland will register land title on blockchain to get the trust of the bockchain and a way to lower the cost.

You will physically see people and register their home on the blockchain and owners will pay you to do this job (this is how the company will get rewarded), you will actually act as a a notary . On this part I am wondering if government has already confirmed that the land title on the blockchain will be recognized?

I will think for few days about this project but I am pretty enthusiastic to invest for that kind of project.

You skipped phase 2 in your crypto economics.

Also, I believe you are missing a MAJOR element of what it means to have Bitland acting as the government liaison.

After the pilot project is complete, Bitland will be looking to get more government contracts.  This means that if Bitland gets a government contract for 20 million, 4 million goes towards supporting the Cadastral (20% of profits).  THAT is what the 20% profits towards the Cadastrals means.  It has nothing to do with the market trading.  Bitland will be seeking many government contracts.  THAT is where the profits will come from.

Also, the only way these types of projects will work is with the cooperation of government.  A land title registry would NOT work or be legal if it did not have government oversight.  We have been working with the Land Administration Project, and this project is a pilot because it is in the running for a contract with the Ghanaian government.  As I said, the ONLY way these types of projects can work is with government.  Blockchain solutions like these are dependent on government cooperation to work.  Hope that clears it up!


Cheers!


Chris



Pages:
Jump to: