Today Binance and Shapeshift delisted BSV,
And Kraken asking in a pool if they should delist BSV.
Now, independently if BSV is a scam and if CW is Satoshi or not, this seems to be coordinated to manipulate the price.
An exchange do not control the price, is not a market for a coin so it dsnt matter if get listed or delisted, the real value is on using the coin.
Now, back to the markets, if more exchanges continue to delist BSV the price should keep drooping right?
And BSV will have its own exchange by the end of the week, FloatSV with the collaboration of OkEX.
I am not a BSV, BTC, BCH lover or hater, i am here just for the trading, and how to profit from things like this.
I believe that BSV price will continue to drop and then will go back where it was yesterday.
I also wander if all this BSV drama is because something else is going on and they want a diversion.
Keep an eye on markets, this is pure market manipulation.
Topic: [ANN] [BSV] [Bitcoin SV] Original Satoshi Vision - page 120. (Read 225834 times)
Good night Sweet Prince
Lol CZ will do what he says, and BCHSV is not an exception. Despite being listed on many major exchanges, being delist from Binance will make SV prices much lower.
I love the fear towards BSV right now, great publicity. I’m bullish.
How much have you personally invested in BSV? More than zero, or zero?
Please don’t bring this shit here, this is a serious accusation, not a game
I am Satoshi Nakamoto. Don't listen to anyone
Bitcoin SV - is an Original Bitcoin!
Bitcoin SV - is an Original Bitcoin!
"Anyone" includes you too, right? Don't worry, not listening. But your claim does hold as much water as CSW's.
I have personally invested ‘more than zero’ into Bitcoin SV.
Restoring licence incoming
https://github.com/bitcoin-sv/bitcoin-sv/pull/61/commits/6a6db4da832a49a2a8c8ae768f6e82f2a6ef4887
Original version had no cap on blocksize ( except inherent 32MB for network packages)
How much have you personally invested in BSV? More than zero, or zero?
A media source nobody's ever heard of issues an apology for an article nobody read. That's great. Those girls don't have to be "pre teen" for him to be guilty of child abuse. 13, 14, 15, 16, and even up to 17 are considered minors in many countries.
"Anyone" includes you too, right? Don't worry, not listening. But your claim does hold as much water as CSW's.
Thats ur english
https://medium.com/@cryptoshoppe/op-ed-anonymity-is-the-shield-of-cowards-ce4fd67d3994
Nice Bitcoin content
https://youtu.be/xSd1fIqbOm8
SPV works
https://medium.com/@craig_10243/patent-wars-24929b73f381
https://github.com/bitcoin-sv/bitcoin-sv/pull/61/commits/6a6db4da832a49a2a8c8ae768f6e82f2a6ef4887
The original version worked fine
Original version is not worked fine until block sizes was not increasedOriginal version had no cap on blocksize ( except inherent 32MB for network packages)
I love the fear towards BSV right now, great publicity. I’m bullish.
How much have you personally invested in BSV? More than zero, or zero?
A media source nobody's ever heard of issues an apology for an article nobody read. That's great. Those girls don't have to be "pre teen" for him to be guilty of child abuse. 13, 14, 15, 16, and even up to 17 are considered minors in many countries.
I am Satoshi Nakamoto. Don't listen to anyone
Bitcoin SV - is an Original Bitcoin!
Bitcoin SV - is an Original Bitcoin!
"Anyone" includes you too, right? Don't worry, not listening. But your claim does hold as much water as CSW's.
Thats ur english
https://medium.com/@cryptoshoppe/op-ed-anonymity-is-the-shield-of-cowards-ce4fd67d3994
Nice Bitcoin content
https://youtu.be/xSd1fIqbOm8
SPV works
https://medium.com/@craig_10243/patent-wars-24929b73f381
Bitcoin SV and the roadmap to Genesis
https://coingeek.com/bitcoin-sv-and-the-roadmap-to-genesis
https://coingeek.com/bitcoin-sv-and-the-roadmap-to-genesis
Things and trolls are getting sorted out
https://coinrivet.com/calvin-ayre-an-apology
This make sense in Bitcoin Satoshi Vision thread.
The original version worked fine until a lot of no Satoshis tried to be wannabees and messed it up. Speculators helped a lot.
https://coinrivet.com/calvin-ayre-an-apology
I am Satoshi Nakamoto. Don't listen to anyone
Bitcoin SV - is an Original Bitcoin!
Bitcoin SV - is an Original Bitcoin!
This make sense in Bitcoin Satoshi Vision thread.
The original version worked fine until a lot of no Satoshis tried to be wannabees and messed it up. Speculators helped a lot.
I love the fear towards BSV right now, great publicity. I’m bullish.
Jimmy Nguyen: Bitcoin SV is about a viable blockchain ecosystem
https://coingeek.com/jimmy-nguyen-bitcoin-sv-is-about-a-viable-blockchain-ecosystem
https://coingeek.com/jimmy-nguyen-bitcoin-sv-is-about-a-viable-blockchain-ecosystem
About Craig Wright: at least this guy is acting honestly and bravely.
did you miss this bit?
./
sorry cant find original atm,
is from recent transcript of court case kleimann vs wright
This is just one side out of the middle - why u want to prejudge here ?
This shitcoin is delisted from Binance. Jbear probably is crying in a corner right now.
https://twitter.com/cz_binance/status/1116563034476957699
I'd like him to remove BcashABC too but I guess it'll be the next one if they keep that Bcash is bitcoin thing going.
https://twitter.com/cz_binance/status/1116563034476957699
I'd like him to remove BcashABC too but I guess it'll be the next one if they keep that Bcash is bitcoin thing going.
hm - decent industries all had (Keep) delisted BTC ... what's ur point here ?
About Craig Wright: at least this guy is acting honestly and bravely.
Dr. Craig Wright says he is Satoshi and wishes to address the CFTC.
Official letter on:
https://comments.cftc.gov/PublicComments/ViewComment.aspx?id=61969
..
Wright explained that he would make himself available for questioning by the TCRC, whether to discuss this DR or any subject related to crypto - currencies or blockchains. He told the CFTC that the blockchain can work in conjunction with "existing legislation, laws and rules" and that anyone who claims otherwise is committing fraud.
By signing his answer, Wright makes it clear that he is not afraid to appear before the whole world and make his true self known. He concluded by stating: "I am prepared to testify under oath".
Official letter on:
https://comments.cftc.gov/PublicComments/ViewComment.aspx?id=61969
..
Wright explained that he would make himself available for questioning by the TCRC, whether to discuss this DR or any subject related to crypto - currencies or blockchains. He told the CFTC that the blockchain can work in conjunction with "existing legislation, laws and rules" and that anyone who claims otherwise is committing fraud.
By signing his answer, Wright makes it clear that he is not afraid to appear before the whole world and make his true self known. He concluded by stating: "I am prepared to testify under oath".
i just thought it 'd be fun to juxtapose with this snippet from the ongoing wright/kleimann case
https://i.imgur.com/6chlU0I.jpg
You distort my dear, here is the original quote with the source, appreciate it.
Dr. Craig Wright says he is Satoshi and wishes to address the CFTC.
Official letter on:
https://comments.cftc.gov/PublicComments/ViewComment.aspx?id=61969
here is the transcript of the CG post: Craig Wright, Chief Scientist of nChain and Intellectual of Bitcoin SV (BSV), is not satisfied with the path taken by crypto-currencies in general. In an effort to help reorient the cryptographic vision and bring things back into order with what they were originally intended to be, he became more vivid by making public the fact that he is, in reality, Satoshi Nakamoto. It is now formalized by the US Commodity Futures Traiding Commission (CFTC) in response to a request for seizure (RFI) from the Commission regarding encryption assets.
In particular, the CFTC request for information refers to Federal Register (FR) 64563, Request for Contribution on the Mechanics of Cryptographic Assets and Markets, published on December 17, 2018. In this document, the Commission states that it is seeking information that could better help'to inform the Commission of its understanding of the technology, mechanics and markets of virtual currencies beyond Bitcoin, including here Ether and its use on the Ethereum network'.
Wright responded to the request for information by opening his remarks by stating: "This is a generalized response to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, a request for information on the mechanics of cryptographic assets and markets. My name is Craig Wright and, under the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto, I completed a project I started in 1997 that was submitted to the Australian government in part as part of an AusIndustry project registered with the Department of Innovation under the name BlackNet.
"The amount of erroneous and misleading information that has been spread about Bitcoin and any derived blockchain-based system (such as Ethereum) has pushed my choice to become more public. The system I created was designed in part to fight fraud in the best possible way with any technology. The lack of understanding of how blockchains work has led to widespread misinformation and the spread of old scams. Many ex-USENET scams and web IPOs have been spread with re-badging as an initial offer of ICO coins. ”
Wright explained that he would make himself available for questioning by the TCRC, whether to discuss this DR or any subject related to crypto - currencies or blockchains. He told the CFTC that the blockchain can work in conjunction with "existing legislation, laws and rules" and that anyone who claims otherwise is committing fraud.
By signing his answer, Wright makes it clear that he is not afraid to appear before the whole world and make his true self known. He concluded by stating: "I am prepared to testify under oath".
https://coingeek.com/dr-craig-wright-affirms-hes-satoshi-wants-address-cftc/
Official letter on:
https://comments.cftc.gov/PublicComments/ViewComment.aspx?id=61969
here is the transcript of the CG post: Craig Wright, Chief Scientist of nChain and Intellectual of Bitcoin SV (BSV), is not satisfied with the path taken by crypto-currencies in general. In an effort to help reorient the cryptographic vision and bring things back into order with what they were originally intended to be, he became more vivid by making public the fact that he is, in reality, Satoshi Nakamoto. It is now formalized by the US Commodity Futures Traiding Commission (CFTC) in response to a request for seizure (RFI) from the Commission regarding encryption assets.
In particular, the CFTC request for information refers to Federal Register (FR) 64563, Request for Contribution on the Mechanics of Cryptographic Assets and Markets, published on December 17, 2018. In this document, the Commission states that it is seeking information that could better help'to inform the Commission of its understanding of the technology, mechanics and markets of virtual currencies beyond Bitcoin, including here Ether and its use on the Ethereum network'.
Wright responded to the request for information by opening his remarks by stating: "This is a generalized response to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, a request for information on the mechanics of cryptographic assets and markets. My name is Craig Wright and, under the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto, I completed a project I started in 1997 that was submitted to the Australian government in part as part of an AusIndustry project registered with the Department of Innovation under the name BlackNet.
"The amount of erroneous and misleading information that has been spread about Bitcoin and any derived blockchain-based system (such as Ethereum) has pushed my choice to become more public. The system I created was designed in part to fight fraud in the best possible way with any technology. The lack of understanding of how blockchains work has led to widespread misinformation and the spread of old scams. Many ex-USENET scams and web IPOs have been spread with re-badging as an initial offer of ICO coins. ”
Wright explained that he would make himself available for questioning by the TCRC, whether to discuss this DR or any subject related to crypto - currencies or blockchains. He told the CFTC that the blockchain can work in conjunction with "existing legislation, laws and rules" and that anyone who claims otherwise is committing fraud.
By signing his answer, Wright makes it clear that he is not afraid to appear before the whole world and make his true self known. He concluded by stating: "I am prepared to testify under oath".
https://coingeek.com/dr-craig-wright-affirms-hes-satoshi-wants-address-cftc/
Dr. Craig Wright says he is Satoshi and wishes to address the CFTC.
Official letter on:
https://comments.cftc.gov/PublicComments/ViewComment.aspx?id=61969
..
Wright explained that he would make himself available for questioning by the TCRC, whether to discuss this DR or any subject related to crypto - currencies or blockchains. He told the CFTC that the blockchain can work in conjunction with "existing legislation, laws and rules" and that anyone who claims otherwise is committing fraud.
By signing his answer, Wright makes it clear that he is not afraid to appear before the whole world and make his true self known. He concluded by stating: "I am prepared to testify under oath".
Official letter on:
https://comments.cftc.gov/PublicComments/ViewComment.aspx?id=61969
..
Wright explained that he would make himself available for questioning by the TCRC, whether to discuss this DR or any subject related to crypto - currencies or blockchains. He told the CFTC that the blockchain can work in conjunction with "existing legislation, laws and rules" and that anyone who claims otherwise is committing fraud.
By signing his answer, Wright makes it clear that he is not afraid to appear before the whole world and make his true self known. He concluded by stating: "I am prepared to testify under oath".
i just thought it 'd be fun to juxtapose with this snippet from the ongoing wright/kleimann case
Bitcoin mining migrating from China to the United States
https://cryptoslate.com/bitcoin-mining-migrating-china-united-states
https://cryptoslate.com/bitcoin-mining-migrating-china-united-states
In the meantime cobra's comments killed LN (thread)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4638321.msg50504914;topicseen#msg50504914
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4638321.msg50504914;topicseen#msg50504914
Right. You don't understand how commit fees work. They are held in a temporary balance in case the channel is closed when both parties are not online, and not necessarily permanently deducted from the user's balance. It's not new:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/8scfr2/lightning_channel_commit_fees/
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/8scfr2/lightning_channel_commit_fees/
Pretty lame attempt at FUD. But at least you are doing it in the right place.
Meanwhile the capacity of LN is up 43% in the last 30 days. Obviously its users aren't having a problem with it. You have a problem with it because it renders BSV irrelevant.
Yeah, 5 million dollars, it’s up there with YoBit.
BSV is ready for global scale adoption here and now.
Listo amigo
We cannot educate all the trolls - the real use cases and economics will sort that out for free.
Time to do things ...
Right. You don't understand how commit fees work. They are held in a temporary balance in case the channel is closed when both parties are not online, and not necessarily permanently deducted from the user's balance. It's not new:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/8scfr2/lightning_channel_commit_fees/
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/8scfr2/lightning_channel_commit_fees/
Pretty lame attempt at FUD. But at least you are doing it in the right place.
Meanwhile the capacity of LN is up 43% in the last 30 days. Obviously its users aren't having a problem with it. You have a problem with it because it renders BSV irrelevant.
Yeah, 5 million dollars, it’s up there with YoBit.
BSV is ready for global scale adoption here and now.
Listo amigo
Right. You don't understand how commit fees work. They are held in a temporary balance in case the channel is closed when both parties are not online, and not necessarily permanently deducted from the user's balance. It's not new:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/8scfr2/lightning_channel_commit_fees/
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/8scfr2/lightning_channel_commit_fees/
Really controversial discussion happening over on reddit regarding the lightning network for all you anti BSV trolls.
https://reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/b9ec4v/lightning_channel_losing_funds_for_no_reason/
https://reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/b9ec4v/lightning_channel_losing_funds_for_no_reason/
Dude. You didn't even read the thread. You just thought, "oh this looks like potential LN fud, lets throw it to the wall and see if it sticks.
OP resolved his problem within an hour of asking the question. There's no "controversy", there was only his misunderstanding of how commit fees worked:
"Thank you
someone else also posted this before. You're right that the screen only shows the amount of sats that I can use. Until today I wasn't even aware that commit fees even existed so I got rather confused when the balance shrank more and more.Thanks for helping to clarify the situation!"
Jump to: