The guy has a reputation with blockchain developers but he's far from being a jerk.
Here is the Medium channel of the guy, to understand the research and educate the "public", for non-bilingual people and therefore to translate I suggest google chrome + google extension translation or deepl.com
https://medium.com/@craig_10243
His twitter is: https://twitter.com/ProfFaustus private access, that being said, he accepts everyone if you ask for it unless you become insulting the directly excluded guy... He posts consistent information very regularly and innovative ideas every week.
One of his patents against Jp Morgan bank coins and others (copies?):
https://github.com/bitcoin-sv/bitcoin-sv/files/2859947/WO2017145048A1.pdf
https://github.com/bitcoin-sv/bitcoin-sv/files/2859948/EP3295350B1.pdf
https://github.com/bitcoin-sv/bitcoin-sv/files/2859949/US20190043048A1.pdf
https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2017145048A1/en
https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2017145048A1/fr
There are still more than 666 patents pending for ideas and the blockchain, yes it is very heavy focus.
One of its first actions is obviously to "brake" JP Morgan bank [...] legally.
One of his messages is to make the blockchain universal in its application to enable the deployment of incorruptible systems to companies and administrations. [...]
Here is a summarized example:
"In almost every country, it is jokingly said that governments in power are ineffective and, in many cases, waste their resources. Towards the end of the fiscal year, departments will spend more money than expected to maintain or increase their budget allocations, spend unnecessarily and cost taxpayers a lot of money. To overcome this, design the creation of a government as a service; and which includes a set of applications capable of providing a chain of blocks to a number of government-managed services. Blocking chain technology can make governments "extremely efficient, inexpensive and unable to corrupt themselves".
All countries could really benefit from the new conception of a flawless and incorruptible government that with six laptops it is possible to create not only a functional society, but also a society with the most advanced government systems in the world. It is quite possible to create a universal central bank on the Internet. Everyone downloads a free application and you suddenly get the most advanced money system on the planet for a significantly lower energy cost thanks to Bitcoin SV technology that can be audited, offers privacy (liftable) and is an immutable proof system, a fraud-proof registry in which each node could replace the entire global accounting and financial system right now!"
Here is a chain from one of his speeches: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5rgaU3sd-zE
After we don't like the character or his ideas, it's up to everyone to choose.
Have a good discovery!
Topic: [ANN] [BSV] [Bitcoin SV] Original Satoshi Vision - page 124. (Read 226361 times)
Dr. Craig Wright says he is Satoshi and wishes to address the CFTC.
Official letter on:
https://comments.cftc.gov/PublicComments/ViewComment.aspx?id=61969
here is the transcript of the CG post: Craig Wright, Chief Scientist of nChain and Intellectual of Bitcoin SV (BSV), is not satisfied with the path taken by crypto-currencies in general. In an effort to help reorient the cryptographic vision and bring things back into order with what they were originally intended to be, he became more vivid by making public the fact that he is, in reality, Satoshi Nakamoto. It is now formalized by the US Commodity Futures Traiding Commission (CFTC) in response to a request for seizure (RFI) from the Commission regarding encryption assets.
In particular, the CFTC request for information refers to Federal Register (FR) 64563, Request for Contribution on the Mechanics of Cryptographic Assets and Markets, published on December 17, 2018. In this document, the Commission states that it is seeking information that could better help'to inform the Commission of its understanding of the technology, mechanics and markets of virtual currencies beyond Bitcoin, including here Ether and its use on the Ethereum network'.
Wright responded to the request for information by opening his remarks by stating: "This is a generalized response to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, a request for information on the mechanics of cryptographic assets and markets. My name is Craig Wright and, under the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto, I completed a project I started in 1997 that was submitted to the Australian government in part as part of an AusIndustry project registered with the Department of Innovation under the name BlackNet.
"The amount of erroneous and misleading information that has been spread about Bitcoin and any derived blockchain-based system (such as Ethereum) has pushed my choice to become more public. The system I created was designed in part to fight fraud in the best possible way with any technology. The lack of understanding of how blockchains work has led to widespread misinformation and the spread of old scams. Many ex-USENET scams and web IPOs have been spread with re-badging as an initial offer of ICO coins. ”
Wright explained that he would make himself available for questioning by the TCRC, whether to discuss this DR or any subject related to crypto - currencies or blockchains. He told the CFTC that the blockchain can work in conjunction with "existing legislation, laws and rules" and that anyone who claims otherwise is committing fraud.
By signing his answer, Wright makes it clear that he is not afraid to appear before the whole world and make his true self known. He concluded by stating: "I am prepared to testify under oath".
https://coingeek.com/dr-craig-wright-affirms-hes-satoshi-wants-address-cftc/
Official letter on:
https://comments.cftc.gov/PublicComments/ViewComment.aspx?id=61969
here is the transcript of the CG post: Craig Wright, Chief Scientist of nChain and Intellectual of Bitcoin SV (BSV), is not satisfied with the path taken by crypto-currencies in general. In an effort to help reorient the cryptographic vision and bring things back into order with what they were originally intended to be, he became more vivid by making public the fact that he is, in reality, Satoshi Nakamoto. It is now formalized by the US Commodity Futures Traiding Commission (CFTC) in response to a request for seizure (RFI) from the Commission regarding encryption assets.
In particular, the CFTC request for information refers to Federal Register (FR) 64563, Request for Contribution on the Mechanics of Cryptographic Assets and Markets, published on December 17, 2018. In this document, the Commission states that it is seeking information that could better help'to inform the Commission of its understanding of the technology, mechanics and markets of virtual currencies beyond Bitcoin, including here Ether and its use on the Ethereum network'.
Wright responded to the request for information by opening his remarks by stating: "This is a generalized response to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, a request for information on the mechanics of cryptographic assets and markets. My name is Craig Wright and, under the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto, I completed a project I started in 1997 that was submitted to the Australian government in part as part of an AusIndustry project registered with the Department of Innovation under the name BlackNet.
"The amount of erroneous and misleading information that has been spread about Bitcoin and any derived blockchain-based system (such as Ethereum) has pushed my choice to become more public. The system I created was designed in part to fight fraud in the best possible way with any technology. The lack of understanding of how blockchains work has led to widespread misinformation and the spread of old scams. Many ex-USENET scams and web IPOs have been spread with re-badging as an initial offer of ICO coins. ”
Wright explained that he would make himself available for questioning by the TCRC, whether to discuss this DR or any subject related to crypto - currencies or blockchains. He told the CFTC that the blockchain can work in conjunction with "existing legislation, laws and rules" and that anyone who claims otherwise is committing fraud.
By signing his answer, Wright makes it clear that he is not afraid to appear before the whole world and make his true self known. He concluded by stating: "I am prepared to testify under oath".
https://coingeek.com/dr-craig-wright-affirms-hes-satoshi-wants-address-cftc/
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Here are some news to recap
Here are some news to recap
HandCash is the best wallet I’ve ever used. Meanwhile Blockstream took exactly 3 years (October 12th, 2015-October 11th, 2018) to develop......
Drum roll please....
Liquid Sidechain
$PayTheKid
Blockstream blocks everything except their own shit.
Uhhh such trolling by me
HandCash is the best wallet I’ve ever used. Meanwhile Blockstream took exactly 3 years (October 12th, 2015-October 11th, 2018) to develop......
Drum roll please....
Liquid Sidechain
$PayTheKid
I’m sure it’s not in Satish is best interest to face multi-national legal issues and over a billion dollars in taxes to satisfy the average retail investor on their identity. Revealing his identity in private to relative indicviduals can be benificial.
Again, signing a message from an address that holds 50 or less coins is _not_ a tax liability unless you sell the coins. Only after the coins are sold does it become a taxable event. How can you pay taxes on something if no transaction has occurred?
Besides, we're not talking about an "average retail investor," we're talking about the thousands of people who will continue to believe he is a fraud until he does such.
Why hasn't @Lauda red tagged you yet?
Looks like u need to be really outspoken critical against BScore dictatorship. Not all have that honor.
Wow, How is what hv_ said regarded as negative trust Lauda? Are you a full on dictator only allowing one view? Clearly you are a piece of shit and Bitcointalk is going nowhere for this exact reason,
I’m sure it’s not in Satish is best interest to face multi-national legal issues and over a billion dollars in taxes to satisfy the average retail investor on their identity. Revealing his identity in private to relative indicviduals can be benificial.
Again, signing a message from an address that holds 50 or less coins is _not_ a tax liability unless you sell the coins. Only after the coins are sold does it become a taxable event. How can you pay taxes on something if no transaction has occurred?
Besides, we're not talking about an "average retail investor," we're talking about the thousands of people who will continue to believe he is a fraud until he does such.
Why hasn't @Lauda red tagged you yet?
Looks like u need to be really outspoken critical against BScore dictatorship. Not all have that honor.
Let the trolls and haters do their work. Btc is doomed
https://twitter.com/byongho/status/1055511091005087749
https://twitter.com/byongho/status/1055511091005087749
I'm not a 'troll'. No one is 'trolling' here. I've been on this forum since 2010. I'm certainly not a 'hater' either. I don't 'hate' anyone.
It is however increasingly amusing to watch BSV proponents assert that 'Bitcoin BSV' is the original Bitcoin - when historical reference sources from all over the internet prove otherwise, along with the timestamps in the original Bitcoin (BTC) blockchain.
CSW could (supposedly) make all of this nonsense 'go away', by simply signing some original Satoshi mined blocks, considering that he still claims to be 'Satoshi', however he still hasn't done this.
You should all be asking CSW to fully prove (unequivocally / without doubt) ... that he is 'Satoshi' ... otherwise everything is completely baseless. It is way past that time already. To date CSW has only ever provided false proofs. More evidence is mounting in this regard.
Again, ....
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epistemology
"... definition of knowledge: S knows that P if and only if:
P;
S believes that P;
if P were false, S would not believe that P; <<<<< HINT: YOU ARE HERE <<<<<
if P were true, S would believe that P. ..."
I trust that you all understand Preposition and Supposition. Lawyers do.
I’m sure it’s not in Satish is best interest to face multi-national legal issues and over a billion dollars in taxes to satisfy the average retail investor on their identity. Revealing his identity in private to relative indicviduals can be benificial.
Let the trolls and haters do their work. Btc is doomed
https://twitter.com/byongho/status/1055511091005087749
https://twitter.com/byongho/status/1055511091005087749
Thats all ur very private perception.
BSV is true clean Bitcoin from the very start.
No issues with fungibility that segshit - non segshit ...
No issues with dsv and 6monthly changes
BSV just stays Botcoin as the white paper recommends
No not my perception, historical facts ...
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitcoin (BTC)
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_bitcoin (BTC)
Meanwhile, here is only HISTORY of Bitcoin released by the actual creator of Bitcoin: not some third party website describing the history of bitcoin:
https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
I highly beg to differ on historical facts.
Thats all ur very private perception.
BSV is true clean Bitcoin from the very start.
No issues with fungibility that segshit - non segshit ...
No issues with dsv and 6monthly changes
BSV just stays Botcoin as the white paper recommends
No not my perception, historical facts ...
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitcoin (BTC)
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_bitcoin (BTC)
Have fun with ur self written history. Even this forum gets it better.
I bet u never get that ^ not after reading twice or more.
Causality + Facts ...
BSV was not created before BTC. The BSV blockchain is the same as BTC > BCH > at the forked block i.e. a copy.
- https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/the-paradox-of-bitcoin-cash-4663094
BTC was/is not an airdrop ... Herewith, BTC mined blocks from 2010 ...
- https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/verifying-my-old-zero-balance-wallet-address-for-blockchain-research-etc-4630066
BTC is not a 'sham'.
BTC is the original Bitcoin.
...
Are you going to try and convince me that you were born before your father next ?
Thats all ur very private perception.
BSV is true clean Bitcoin from the very start.
No issues with fungibility that segshit - non segshit ...
No issues with dsv and 6monthly changes
BSV just stays Botcoin as the white paper recommends
I bet u never get that ^ not after reading twice or more.
Bitcoin SV is looking very strong at the moment, especially when most of the alts are down.
Looking at the daily chart, it seems that the 0.02 area is major resistance since it was support back in January before it broke under.
If the 0.02 ratio is broken, then I expect a quick rise to the 0.03 ATH area and over there will most likely be profit taking.
Looking at the daily chart, it seems that the 0.02 area is major resistance since it was support back in January before it broke under.
If the 0.02 ratio is broken, then I expect a quick rise to the 0.03 ATH area and over there will most likely be profit taking.
Due to protocol stability and proper expectation management real use cases are incoming to Bitcoin
https://coingeek.com/unisot-uses-bitcoin-sv-help-companies-reduce-supply-chain-costs/
https://coingeek.com/unisot-uses-bitcoin-sv-help-companies-reduce-supply-chain-costs/
Again, what you're talking about applies to a thousand different coins. BSV is just yet another bitcoin fork (or fork of a fork to be technically correct) and the market is treating it as such. Bitcoin mining isn't in any danger of shutting down or ceasing to be. A huge uptick in LN usage won't be the end of mining.
I definitely agreed with you.Bitcoin SV, in fact, is another fork coin, or more exactly I would like to call it as pyramid fork coin.
Do you think about the pyramid fork coin term?
I thought the new term is relevant to describe such a fork of fork coin.
BSV is the real Bitcoin and has the real value of it. So it is money and has best store of value as such.
Well, its lost 50% of its value in the past 2 months. That's quite a feat, given that most other coins were flat in that time period. If that's your idea of a "store of value", you must really hate money.
Ur mixing up price and value. Grow up.
How can it be a store of value when its price keeps going down?
U re too much in speculation mode. Value comes from usability and stability of its underlying, mainly the base protocol. Legal acceptance is major filter for world wide adoption- one of the killers for all other crap we still see in that speculation bubble.
How can it be a store of value when its price keeps going down?
Because 0.1 BSV is still 0.1 BSV regardless of trading price.
So? 0.0001 TIT is still 0.0001 TIT... the same can be said for any altcoin. just replace the coin symbol. Not exactly a selling point.
Yeah but bsv has a system of miners backing the project (literally working by mining - this is called proof of work). I don’t think anyone’s mining titties. This is the whole economic model that the LN wishes to destroy.
Again, what you're talking about applies to a thousand different coins. BSV is just yet another bitcoin fork and the market is treating it as such. Bitcoin mining isn't in any danger of shutting down or ceasing to be. A huge uptick in LN usage won't be the end of mining.
That’s sustainable thinking.
How can it be a store of value when its price keeps going down?
Because 0.1 BSV is still 0.1 BSV regardless of trading price.
So? 0.0001 TIT is still 0.0001 TIT... the same can be said for any altcoin. just replace the coin symbol. Not exactly a selling point.
Yeah but bsv has a system of miners backing the project (literally working by mining - this is called proof of work). I don’t think anyone’s mining titties. This is the whole economic model that the LN wishes to destroy.
Jump to: