Topic: [ANN] [BSV] [Bitcoin SV] Original Satoshi Vision - page 66. (Read 226361 times)
Ouch
Hope ppl see that cluster fcu
BSV not affected. Unfuckening!
BSV is the true BitCoin.
As designed
Working stable
Not Tether Pumped Ponzi
The Satoshi round table without Satoshi
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GKV_WM6ohlg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GKV_WM6ohlg
More businesses seeing the light
https://mobile.twitter.com/The_Cryptoh_Pro/status/1199344256357298177
Tutuuut
BSV is BitCoin
https://mobile.twitter.com/The_Cryptoh_Pro/status/1199344256357298177
Tutuuut
BSV is BitCoin
CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin
After Segwit, BTC is not Original Bitcoin anymore. Only BSV - is Original Bitcoin Now. Because it is Original Satoshi VisionFraudvision, fakevision.
Proof ? Steve Shadder ("nChain solutions and engineering director") own bullshit.
https://bitcoinsv.io/2019/11/24/on-the-future-of-bitcoin-transaction-fees/
"There is no particular reason for this price level and it appears to be widely agreed among the BSV ecosystem that rate is currently too high for data transactions (as compared to payment transactions)."
Bitcoin purpose is to be a peer to peer electronic cash system.
BSV purpose is to become a peer to peer electronic data transactions system.
-> It's not Bitcoin.
It is becoming !
Yes
P2P electronic data transactions system
Ok
By cash
Yes. Fine. U ll need money to transact.
We call Bitcoin
Ian Brown wants to be a door.
Jim Morrison was one.
- https://youtu.be/4D2qcbu26gs
...
Craig Wright wants to be Satoshi Nakamoto.
Satoshi Nakamoto was Satoshi Nakamoto.
Jim Morrison was one.
- https://youtu.be/4D2qcbu26gs
...
Craig Wright wants to be Satoshi Nakamoto.
Satoshi Nakamoto was Satoshi Nakamoto.
"CSW claims to have kissed Jim Morrison at a party in the 90s, despite him having died in 1971."
- https://twitter.com/fluffypony/status/1197022040777281537
CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin
- https://youtu.be/NSD11dnphg0
Do BTC supporters understand that they are communists yet?
In a sense that the rather love their own power rules, than Satoshi's rules.
Than tell ppl they did Bitcoin, not Satoshi
Cause of ... (brain wash + need sales colors to promote things that do not need promoting)
Plain Hard Facts:
BSV is more BitCoin than any other implementation
CSW is more likely ...
LMAO.
0 conf shitcoin is anything but Bitcoin.
Closed source dev is anything but Bitcoin.
The face of the project calling for the possibility to "reverse or undo" Tx is anything but Bitcoin.
.. the only closed thing here seems to be ur own washed mind
BSV is fully about opencompetition - if you cannot read / understand simple Bitcoin code - u cannot compete.
try harder
Ian Brown wants to be a door.
Jim Morrison was one.
- https://youtu.be/4D2qcbu26gs
...
Craig Wright wants to be Satoshi Nakamoto.
Satoshi Nakamoto was Satoshi Nakamoto.
Jim Morrison was one.
- https://youtu.be/4D2qcbu26gs
...
Craig Wright wants to be Satoshi Nakamoto.
Satoshi Nakamoto was Satoshi Nakamoto.
"CSW claims to have kissed Jim Morrison at a party in the 90s, despite him having died in 1971."
- https://twitter.com/fluffypony/status/1197022040777281537
CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin
- https://youtu.be/NSD11dnphg0
Do BTC supporters understand that they are communists yet?
In a sense that the rather love their own power rules, than Satoshi's rules.
Than tell ppl they did Bitcoin, not Satoshi
Cause of ... (brain wash + need sales colors to promote things that do not need promoting)
Plain Hard Facts:
BSV is more BitCoin than any other implementation
CSW is more likely ...
Ian Brown wants to be a door.
Jim Morrison was one.
- https://youtu.be/4D2qcbu26gs
...
Craig Wright wants to be Satoshi Nakamoto.
Satoshi Nakamoto was Satoshi Nakamoto.
Jim Morrison was one.
- https://youtu.be/4D2qcbu26gs
...
Craig Wright wants to be Satoshi Nakamoto.
Satoshi Nakamoto was Satoshi Nakamoto.
"CSW claims to have kissed Jim Morrison at a party in the 90s, despite him having died in 1971."
- https://twitter.com/fluffypony/status/1197022040777281537
CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin
- https://youtu.be/NSD11dnphg0
Do BTC supporters understand that they are communists yet?
Your assertion seems inaccurate to me. Let us follow the thread backwards to this point:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-bsv-bitcoin-sv-original-satoshi-vision-4985868
hv_ spake thusly:
Note the use of _protocol_.
To which BitcoinFX replied:
Quite clearly talking about _implementation_.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-bsv-bitcoin-sv-original-satoshi-vision-4985868
hv_ spake thusly:
My advice: Look into the Version 0.1
Set in Stone.
No - there is no Change needed that enables anything new here in protocol level
Set in Stone.
No - there is no Change needed that enables anything new here in protocol level
Note the use of _protocol_.
To which BitcoinFX replied:
*With Sarcasm* ... Not Set in Stone ..., instead consensus based ...
Bitcoin 0.2 released!
- https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/posts/bitcointalk/25/#selection-5.11-9.21
Bitcoin 0.3 released!
- https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/posts/bitcointalk/168/#selection-9.0-9.21
Bitcoin 0.2 released!
- https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/posts/bitcointalk/25/#selection-5.11-9.21
Bitcoin 0.3 released!
- https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/posts/bitcointalk/168/#selection-9.0-9.21
Quite clearly talking about _implementation_.
So you're implying that 0.1 isn't an implementation of the protocol but 0.2 and 0.3 are?
I’m not implying anything. I am explicitly stating that the client version 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 are all implementations of client code that run the same version of the same protocol.
Learn about BitCoin how it worked / BSV will work
directly from the devs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lUDosU8UA2I
directly from the devs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lUDosU8UA2I
Holey Moley
Is this a thing?
Chinese MoneyButton?
Opens today
https://mobile.twitter.com/Fastpaybutton/status/1197700932957376512
Watching...
Is this a thing?
Chinese MoneyButton?
Opens today
https://mobile.twitter.com/Fastpaybutton/status/1197700932957376512
Watching...
Satoshi released the Bitcoin client up to 0.3.19
You seem to be confusing implementation with protocol. Again.
Completely irrelevant. What your illiterate fellow cult member was inferring was that Satoshi's last version of Bitcoin was 0.1, which is simply not true. Focusing on 0.1 as if it were the end-all version of Bitcoin is just a talking point used by Craig, and nothing more.
Your assertion seems inaccurate to me. Let us follow the thread backwards to this point:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-bsv-bitcoin-sv-original-satoshi-vision-4985868
hv_ spake thusly:
My advice: Look into the Version 0.1
Set in Stone.
No - there is no Change needed that enables anything new here in protocol level
Set in Stone.
No - there is no Change needed that enables anything new here in protocol level
Note the use of _protocol_.
To which BitcoinFX replied:
*With Sarcasm* ... Not Set in Stone ..., instead consensus based ...
Bitcoin 0.2 released!
- https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/posts/bitcointalk/25/#selection-5.11-9.21
Bitcoin 0.3 released!
- https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/posts/bitcointalk/168/#selection-9.0-9.21
Bitcoin 0.2 released!
- https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/posts/bitcointalk/25/#selection-5.11-9.21
Bitcoin 0.3 released!
- https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/posts/bitcointalk/168/#selection-9.0-9.21
Quite clearly talking about _implementation_.
Google’s patent library confirms nChain has been granted the patent for Blockchain-enforced Smart Contracts.
While nChain has a total of 826 filed patents, 1,450 in the pipeline and around 200 granted
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBbN2dy_uWg&feature=youtu.be
While nChain has a total of 826 filed patents, 1,450 in the pipeline and around 200 granted
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBbN2dy_uWg&feature=youtu.be
All good to protect BitCoin
Incl BitCoin Script and it's Turing Completness
All good to ensure the only open blockchain will be used properly
Scalable
Transparent
-> will trigger lots of haters
something else to rise blood pressure
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4Lb4xClEYY
https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/kaching-secure-bitcoin-wallet#/
Oh - more potential haters down the list
https://www.ledgerinsights.com/blockchain-patents-global-china-dominates-caict/
I'm really happy top one is for BitCoin exclusive!!!
--- And, No - there is now way to be stopped at all
Google’s patent library confirms nChain has been granted the patent for Blockchain-enforced Smart Contracts.
While nChain has a total of 826 filed patents, 1,450 in the pipeline and around 200 granted
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBbN2dy_uWg&feature=youtu.be
While nChain has a total of 826 filed patents, 1,450 in the pipeline and around 200 granted
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBbN2dy_uWg&feature=youtu.be
All good to protect BitCoin
Incl BitCoin Script and it's Turing Completness
All good to ensure the only open blockchain will be used properly
Scalable
Transparent
-> will trigger lots of haters
something else to rise blood pressure
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4Lb4xClEYY
https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/kaching-secure-bitcoin-wallet#/
Google’s patent library confirms nChain has been granted the patent for Blockchain-enforced Smart Contracts.
While nChain has a total of 826 filed patents, 1,450 in the pipeline and around 200 granted
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBbN2dy_uWg&feature=youtu.be
While nChain has a total of 826 filed patents, 1,450 in the pipeline and around 200 granted
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBbN2dy_uWg&feature=youtu.be
All good to protect BitCoin
Incl BitCoin Script and it's Turing Completness
All good to ensure the only open blockchain will be used properly
Scalable
Transparent
-> will trigger lots of haters
Google’s patent library confirms nChain has been granted the patent for Blockchain-enforced Smart Contracts.
While nChain has a total of 826 filed patents, 1,450 in the pipeline and around 200 granted
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBbN2dy_uWg&feature=youtu.be
While nChain has a total of 826 filed patents, 1,450 in the pipeline and around 200 granted
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBbN2dy_uWg&feature=youtu.be
Go challenge urself on highest levels
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0DcxG1tWuBg
eternal students welcome in BitCoin - for ever
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0DcxG1tWuBg
eternal students welcome in BitCoin - for ever
U re jsut about names and ppl
The protocol 0.1 works - so why change ?
There is no reason why, except u want to say sth / dev sth / Feature sth - ON THE BASE LAYER
-> go & change TCP/IP - have fun
The protocol 0.1 works - so why change ?
There is no reason why, except u want to say sth / dev sth / Feature sth - ON THE BASE LAYER
-> go & change TCP/IP - have fun
What? You can barely type words. You're not fit for the discussion of improvements between builds, of which there are several.
Satoshi released the Bitcoin client up to 0.3.19
You seem to be confusing implementation with protocol. Again.
Completely irrelevant. What your illiterate fellow cult member was inferring was that Satoshi's last version of Bitcoin was 0.1, which is simply not true. Focusing on 0.1 as if it were the end-all version of Bitcoin is just a talking point used by Craig, and nothing more.
Completely irrelevant.
Stay on RBF coin - have fun
how is the shit that is vagineeee coin doing? lmao.
No
Good things go all in:
https://twitter.com/Fastpaybutton/status/1196664123657875456
WOW
Satoshi released the Bitcoin client up to 0.3.19
You seem to be confusing implementation with protocol. Again.
Thx - I bet it wasn't really interested. But great you came up with - cause it is really a tricky Thing - all that Bitcoin stuff
Jump to: