Forward and up, BSV Year 1 Look-back
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GXfJNVGCZQs&feature=emb_logo
Topic: [ANN] [BSV] [Bitcoin SV] Original Satoshi Vision - page 68. (Read 226361 times)
Finally, well, I must admit that BSV is perfect!
I recommend BSV to everyone!
Careful - now Lauda will tag you with a scammer accusation.
Very nice discussion here about money
https://twitter.com/zbingledack/status/1194954628892282880?s=19
And BitCoin
https://twitter.com/zbingledack/status/1194954628892282880?s=19
And BitCoin
November 15 marks #BitcoinIndependence Day.
Let’s celebrate #BSVYear1 and rebirth of the original Bitcoin!
Let’s celebrate #BSVYear1 and rebirth of the original Bitcoin!
Yes - we got lot's of things done, explained and developed (also on top of the protocol!)
Let's see if Jimmy could collect some nice presents
https://twitter.com/JimmyWinMedia/status/1194825739180351488
November 15 marks #BitcoinIndependence Day.
Let’s celebrate #BSVYear1 and rebirth of the original Bitcoin!
Let’s celebrate #BSVYear1 and rebirth of the original Bitcoin!
Independence day celebration incoming
Like 30 y ago a few sane ppl broke the Berlin wall against self elected rule makers and stream blockers
A year ago we broke the BitCoin rule maker walls of small blockers against the troll stream
Like 30 y ago a few sane ppl broke the Berlin wall against self elected rule makers and stream blockers
A year ago we broke the BitCoin rule maker walls of small blockers against the troll stream
No you didn't. You broke away from Bcash to make an even bigger block version of Bcash. Way to try to rewrite history though. Have you ever said something that wasn't a lie?
Again you re wrong - ABC ppl enforced the split - and did a hell of funny protection into their code
BSV kept CLEAN on track to remove Magic numbers and refactor code
Are ur bags hurting that strong? Or u never start thinkin .... cannot fix that .
Easy lesson: Clean, stable - on purpose protocols are needed (most critical in finance) - easy risk assessed and really used Long term
Tech dept and funny governance will kill everything else in the LONG run
Independence day celebration incoming
Like 30 y ago a few sane ppl broke the Berlin wall against self elected rule makers and stream blockers
A year ago we broke the BitCoin rule maker walls of small blockers against the troll stream
https://mobile.twitter.com/JimmyWinMedia/status/1193876027019333634
Back to what simple and origin rules of BitCoin are
Happy days
Like 30 y ago a few sane ppl broke the Berlin wall against self elected rule makers and stream blockers
A year ago we broke the BitCoin rule maker walls of small blockers against the troll stream
https://mobile.twitter.com/JimmyWinMedia/status/1193876027019333634
Back to what simple and origin rules of BitCoin are
Happy days
ETH and all other smart contract platforms getting trouble?
https://patents.google.com/patent/EP3257191B1/en
https://patents.google.com/patent/EP3257191B1/en
No.
ETH was on July 20th, 2015, well before the patent was filed.
What do you think is gonna happen? Craig is gonna sue Ethereum?
Spoiler alert: Vitalik already patented everything related to Ethereum back in 2014:
https://patents.google.com/scholar/7384049674951822602
Lol, nutiboy tries and tries, but cannot read / get it.
It is GRANTED
Put that idiot on ignore.
What about BTC has altered the "core design" of Bitcoin? The core features of Bitcoin work in today's BTC just as they did in Satoshi's 0.1 version of Bitcoin..
BTC today contains numerous alterations of the Bitcoin protocol. Changes that prevent core Bitcoin features of old working today. As but one example, RBF has totally broken the model where a direct P2P tx can be used, with settlement deferred to an arbitrary time in the future.
Quote
If BSV is "set in stone" the way that Bitcoin 0.1 was, fire up a Bitcoin 0.1 client and try connecting to the BSV network with it. The reality is that you will only stand a chance of connecting the 0.1 client to the Bitcoin Network (BTC, the real bitcoin that you constantly troll with a passion).
This assertion of yours directly contradicts the assertion you make above. Funny.
Paymail might be one of the great killer apps for use of true BitCoin
https://mobile.twitter.com/_unwriter/status/1194283584879779842
Happy Using
https://mobile.twitter.com/_unwriter/status/1194283584879779842
Happy Using
Agsin u know only af hominem. Fine boy
Calling Craig a proven fraud isn't an ad hominem attack, nor is calling you a liar. They are both demonstrable logically and pertain directly to your inability to make an honest argument.
What it boils down to is you are relying on a fraud's definition of what "set in stone" means. Let's look at the quote you are referencing:
The nature of Bitcoin is such that once version 0.1 was released, the core design was set in stone for the rest of its lifetime.
What about BTC has altered the "core design" of Bitcoin? The core features of Bitcoin work in today's BTC just as they did in Satoshi's 0.1 version of Bitcoin.
Craig has convinced you that his new fork of a fork is actually closer to Bitcoin because he says so -- not because the code says so. The BSV code says a bunch of things Satoshi never had in mind, just as BTC's code does as well.
If BSV is "set in stone" the way that Bitcoin 0.1 was, fire up a Bitcoin 0.1 client and try connecting to the BSV network with it. The reality is that you will only stand a chance of connecting the 0.1 client to the Bitcoin Network (BTC, the real bitcoin that you constantly troll with a passion).
the Goal is clear now - BSV will be able to run with 0.1
You might get that so far without ur funny style.
Best ignore all ur crappy stuff
Faketoshi's Vision: "Set in stone, until we change it, again."
The White Paper doesn't Change - it's set in Stone as well.
Digg out Satoshi's comments - he told us - it is set in Stone already
He never said that, you liar. The white paper is simply an outline of an idea. Its a very basic blueprint and is largely void of technical details. How you create the end product based on the idea in the white paper could have taken a hundred different paths, including SegWit.
Faketoshi's Vision is based on the lie that Craig is Satoshi, ergo he should know what Bitcoin was really all about. One small problem: Craig isn't Satoshi. He's Faketoshi. Your coin is based on fraud.
Didn t expect u r capable of google. But only know to attack ad hominem
Here
Read
Stop whining
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.1611
You're referring to a famous comment he left about the protocol, which has changed immensely since vers 0.1, with several changes made by Satoshi himself. Your code contains even more changes made by Bcash developers that aren't included in today's actual Bitcoin (BTC). The "core design" of bitcoin has been altered more by Bcash and BSV than it has in BTC.
Funny you linked that comment, because he also said this in it:
I don't believe a second, compatible implementation of Bitcoin will ever be a good idea. So much of the design depends on all nodes getting exactly identical results in lockstep that a second implementation would be a menace to the network. The MIT license is compatible with all other licenses and commercial uses, so there is no need to rewrite it from a licensing standpoint.
The main problem is your are relying on a proven fraud's definition of what "set in stone" refers to.
And why was need for change it - except for bug fix?
Agsin u know only af hominem. Fine boy
Faketoshi's Vision: "Set in stone, until we change it, again."
The White Paper doesn't Change - it's set in Stone as well.
Digg out Satoshi's comments - he told us - it is set in Stone already
He never said that, you liar. The white paper is simply an outline of an idea. Its a very basic blueprint and is largely void of technical details. How you create the end product based on the idea in the white paper could have taken a hundred different paths, including SegWit.
Faketoshi's Vision is based on the lie that Craig is Satoshi, ergo he should know what Bitcoin was really all about. One small problem: Craig isn't Satoshi. He's Faketoshi. Your coin is based on fraud.
Didn t expect u r capable of google. But only know to attack ad hominem
Here
Read
Stop whining
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.1611
Faketoshi's Vision: "Set in stone, until we change it, again."
The White Paper doesn't Change - it's set in Stone as well.
Digg out Satoshi's comments - he told us - it is set in Stone already
If some ppl dont understand why and how that could work / have other ideas: copy the code, alter it and build ur own coin
Wait, call it SegWitCoin ?
It gets bigger and better
Almost 4 million (780mb, 8 Bitcoin in fees)
https://stn.satoshi.io/block-height/4775
Almost 4 million (780mb, 8 Bitcoin in fees)
https://stn.satoshi.io/block-height/4775
Good - more fees than coinbase reward after next halving.
Sustainable for eternity ?
It gets bigger and better
Almost 4 million (780mb, 8 Bitcoin in fees)
https://stn.satoshi.io/block-height/4775
Almost 4 million (780mb, 8 Bitcoin in fees)
https://stn.satoshi.io/block-height/4775
Anyone who says BSV isn’t “good tech,” is criticizing BTC from 2009 until late 2017.
BSV simply didn’t add the technical bloat of Core. Today, BTC has exponential more lines of code, but less than .01% of BSV’s throughput. THAT is “bad tech.”
The secret history of BitCoin.
RBF crap is not part of BitCoin SV afaik
But good plot.
Anyone who says BSV isn’t “good tech,” is criticizing BTC from 2009 until late 2017.
BSV simply didn’t add the technical bloat of Core. Today, BTC has exponential more lines of code, but less than .01% of BSV’s throughput. THAT is “bad tech.”
The secret history of BitCoin.
I just had a transaction confirmed for $0.05 in 6 minutes. There is no reason to use bitcoin imitators, now, or ever.
#scaling
#winning
#thanksSegWit
#thanksLightning
#scaling
#winning
#thanksSegWit
#thanksLightning
SegShit LN BSCore Coin falls into this dilemma
https://cointelegraph.com/news/why-blockchain-startups-fail
It works for the moment, for some nerds in a niche
..............patented everything related to Ethereum .......
Just a little giggle
How many patents did it take to patent-en everything ?
Jump to: