Topic: [ANN] [BSV] [Bitcoin SV] Original Satoshi Vision - page 98. (Read 226359 times)

bsv to BTC -8.8%

BSV's average block size is around 200 - 400 kb... Less than one half of 1 MB. What does it need 2 GB blocks for? To tell you more about the weather? LOL.

Frankly I hope BSV's blocks get filled all the way. That's the equivalent of 288 GB a day added to the blockchain. That's 2 terabytes a week, or 102 petabytes a year. Good luck invoking Moore's law to help you there.

Still, OP_RETURN data can only go up to 100 KB in size, so that means you need 20,000 transactions being sent with 100 kb of data a piece (well, a bit less than that because of other transaction data not related to OP_RETURN) every 10 minutes to reach the max. Currently, BSV has 3110 transactions per hour, so that would be a spam attack of epic proportions.

Probably be worth it to see their node count drop from 445 to zero. To put things in proportion, BCH currently has 1493 nodes, and BTC has over 10,000.

bsv to BTC -10.1%

Poor people need coins that will not appreciate in value, right?  Namely BSV.  That makes a lot of sense.    

Wouldn't poor people need sound money as well as rich people, and bitcoin is the most sound of money ever known to man.. at least so far.  BSV is not even going to come close to bitcoin when it comes to sound money principles... could go on and on and on about their lack of vision, except perhaps a vision to play a game of smoke and mirrors, even though they have vision in their name.. go figure?

bsv to BTC -10.1%

There is something else going on with this blockalypse description and implied threat from jbreher...

He is trying to leave some kind of impression that bitcoin is broken in some kind of way and that the spam attacks that were going on between about December 2017 and January 2018 have some kind of persistence in bitcoin that resulted from bitcoin deficiencies and supposed organic growth that bitcoin cannot handle, rather than some nutjobs spending a lot of money to purposefully fill up the bitcoin blocks in order to perpetuate their dumb ass narrative (about supposed high fees and slow transaction times on bitcoin). 

Furthermore, the big blocker, altcoin pumpers, bitcoin naysayers are likely trying to figure out a way to engage in such a spam attack again that would be strategically timed, if they can figure it out and if they are given the right opportunity where they are not going to lose their asses on it, and possibly be able to profit in comparison to how much money it is going to cost them to carry out another attack while describing their dumbass clogging attempts of the bitcoin blockchain (assuming that they achieve some modicum of success) had been due to deficiencies in bitcoin... rather than their purposeful effort to engage in intentional sabotage efforts. 

Sure bitcoin is likely to survive these ongoing attacks and likely to thrive too, but the nutjob bigblockers are going to attempt to pump it for as much as they can in order to spread their misleading narrative to trap as many innocent bystanders into their narrative as they can.. so they can sell their bags onto a few more people -possibly bordering on dumb money - who likely buy into their stories.

Quality twetches can earn some good income.

BSV = dawn of age of data and accountability

Now people give away for free or even pay to give data to Facebook, Google and Co and they sell it then

BSV, Metanet changes it all, people manage and can sell there own data for whatever time-frame specified and just about receive 100% of it.
Even the slowest of the slow will eventually realize it, data is the new oil.
BTC has no skin in the game.



Edit:
White paper outlining Escrow Document Storage and Secure Signing Registry
https://craigwright.net/blog/bitcoin-blockchain-tech/operating-an-escrow-document-storage-and-secure-signing-registry/

BSV TO BTC -20.1%

The biggest misconception about the blockalypse is that it ever...

Hahaha - Twetch the Twitter with

https://twitter.com/twetchapp

cool and fun

https://twetch.app/welcome

We are shivering in our boots about the almighty faketoshi and his little clan of non-deli

BSV TO BTC  -6%

They use both the name of the coin and the ticker.

So please enlighten me, which exchange uses "Bitcoin, BSV" to label their BSV trading pairs?

Bitcoin is allowed to evolve. It doesn't need Craig's permission to do so. Everyone in the world except for a tiny subset of deluded freaks knows that bitcoin = BTC. I've said it before and I'll say it again: things will end badly for everyone heavily invested in BSV. Don't know when, but I do know how.

You forgot to answer my question. Which exchanges list BSV as "Bitcoin" and not BSV? If BSV is bitcoin, why wouldn't they do this?

Metanet is up there on its own dimension. When you see it, everything else will look like a toy. If you don’t believe me or don’t get it, just ignore and keep playing with your amateur calculator. We will obliterate with a supercomputer.

Bitcoin is allowed to evolve. It doesn't need Craig's permission to do so. Everyone in the world except for a tiny subset of rich deluded freaks knows that bitcoin = BTC. I've said it before and I'll say it again: things will end badly for everyone heavily invested in BSV. Don't know when, but I do know how.

You forgot to answer my question. Which exchanges list BSV as "Bitcoin" and not BSV? If BSV is bitcoin, why wouldn't they do this?

Care to explain how this makes sense in the current universe in which both you and I reside? Your diagram proposes there are two universes, one in which BTC is BTC and one which BTC is BSV. I am supposing you live in the second universe (where nobody else lives).

Bonus question: what exchanges list BSV as "Bitcoin" and not "Bitcoin SV"?