I've had a payment stuck on "processing" for a few days now, I was just notified it was going to be late tomorrow.
Can you please cheeck on that thanks
( bitcointalk name verified )
Topic: [ANN] BTCJam - Peer to Peer Bitcoin Lending - page 37. (Read 204974 times)
People that have loans BEFORE the judge.me implementation, are they subject to judge.me or anything of the likes? It wouldn't make sense if they are, since they didn't agree to that contract.
Yes, it is only after the terms change.
Will check the exact date and post it here.
It goes to arbitration after default (120 days late).
You didn't really explicitly specify. Only people that agree to judge.me are allowed to be judged, or ALL defaulted loans whether agreed or not go to judge.me?
People that have loans BEFORE the judge.me implementation, are they subject to judge.me or anything of the likes? It wouldn't make sense if they are, since they didn't agree to that contract.
Yes, it is only after the terms change.
Will check the exact date and post it here.
It goes to arbitration after default (120 days late).
You didn't really explicitly specify. Only people that agree to judge.me are allowed to be judged, or ALL defaulted loans whether agreed or not go to judge.me?
People that have loans BEFORE the judge.me implementation, are they subject to judge.me or anything of the likes? It wouldn't make sense if they are, since they didn't agree to that contract.
Yes, it is only after the terms change.
Will check the exact date and post it here.
It goes to arbitration after default (120 days late).
Why not just display all verified records if people default?
Hell, I would lend money just so I can screw fraudster. With his records all over the internet, people would think twice to do business.
If the record is fraudulent then it's fraud. A criminal offense. In US, you can get years for that.
Hell, I would lend money just so I can screw fraudster. With his records all over the internet, people would think twice to do business.
If the record is fraudulent then it's fraud. A criminal offense. In US, you can get years for that.
Because privacy laws.
Why not just display all verified records if people default?
Hell, I would lend money just so I can screw fraudster. With his records all over the internet, people would think twice to do business.
If the record is fraudulent then it's fraud. A criminal offense. In US, you can get years for that.
Hell, I would lend money just so I can screw fraudster. With his records all over the internet, people would think twice to do business.
If the record is fraudulent then it's fraud. A criminal offense. In US, you can get years for that.
It is looking ever more likely that Ziggap has defaulted on their loan. Where do we all stand in terms of their info being released to the lenders, to an arbitration company etc? It is definitely the biggest default on BTCJam by a long stretch.
By my reckoning they owe over 900BTC including interest, or around 500BTC to pay off the capital. Either way that's a considerable amount of money.
By my reckoning they owe over 900BTC including interest, or around 500BTC to pay off the capital. Either way that's a considerable amount of money.
People that have loans BEFORE the judge.me implementation, are they subject to judge.me or anything of the likes? It wouldn't make sense if they are, since they didn't agree to that contract.
Obviously not?Would like to hear it specified, despite obviousness these technicalities are of importance.
People that have loans BEFORE the judge.me implementation, are they subject to judge.me or anything of the likes? It wouldn't make sense if they are, since they didn't agree to that contract.
Obviously not?Would like to hear it specified, despite obviousness these technicalities are of importance.
People that have loans BEFORE the judge.me implementation, are they subject to judge.me or anything of the likes? It wouldn't make sense if they are, since they didn't agree to that contract.
Obviously not?
People that have loans BEFORE the judge.me implementation, are they subject to judge.me or anything of the likes? It wouldn't make sense if they are, since they didn't agree to that contract.
Hi,
Is there a problem with the automatically payment?
This morning when I checked, my loan was not paid, and I did have enough funds on my account, I also have enabled the automatically payment in my settings.
There was no problem when I clicked the button manually to pay my load for this week.
/AlexC
Is there a problem with the automatically payment?
This morning when I checked, my loan was not paid, and I did have enough funds on my account, I also have enabled the automatically payment in my settings.
There was no problem when I clicked the button manually to pay my load for this week.
/AlexC
What determines what gets passed to judge.me? Would it have to be above a certain amount? Do you recover any of the fees from anything recovered through arbitration?
I'm hoping this will make a big dent in the amount of scammers on this site.
I'd imagine that loans under the fees for judge.me would not go to arbitration as it would be a waste of financial resources (1 BTC loans going to arbitration costing $299 would seem silly), but I will leave it to Tulkas to define those terms (and specify in the terms of use).
Who pays the judge.me fees? I believe it is $298
The fees are paid by BTCJam.
What determines what gets passed to judge.me? Would it have to be above a certain amount? Do you recover any of the fees from anything recovered through arbitration?
I'm hoping this will make a big dent in the amount of scammers on this site.
How do I put a loan up for judgment? As I have a load of missed payments on loans I made.
Phil
Phil
I don't think you can do this on past loans. It only applies to loans created from now onwards.
How do I put a loan up for judgment? As I have a load of missed payments on loans I made.
Phil
Phil
Boonies4u, the payments are now updated, please verify!
Confirmed.
Speaking of the motion. Under the approved field it is still listed as "voting in progress" when the voting period should have expired two days ago.
The motion is now listed as approved but my remaining payments/installments have not reflected the change.
Thank you for working with me on this Tulkas.
Boonies4u, the payments are now updated, please verify!
Speaking of the motion. Under the approved field it is still listed as "voting in progress" when the voting period should have expired two days ago.
The motion is now listed as approved but my remaining payments/installments have not reflected the change.
Thank you for working with me on this Tulkas.
Yes, the system to automatically change the terms is being finished
Thanks for helping on our first motion. The payments should change shortly.
Jump to: