I'm using Ubuntu 14.04 and Cuda 7.5 trying to mine LBRY
GPU #0: scanhash_lbry:140 invalid device function
I also tried 3.0 and got the same error.
Topic: [ANN] ccminer 2.3 - opensource - GPL (tpruvot) - page 127. (Read 500113 times)
How can i compile that source code ?!! 
is gtx 760 optimized?
cause i have one and im getting only 19.75 hashrate, while banchmarks here http://yiimp.ccminer.org/bench?algo=lbry&chip=0
says that a gtx 750 ti has more hasrate than my card :/
cause i have one and im getting only 19.75 hashrate, while banchmarks here http://yiimp.ccminer.org/bench?algo=lbry&chip=0
says that a gtx 750 ti has more hasrate than my card :/
Despite the lower model number the 750ti uses a newer architecture, faster and more efficient.
is gtx 760 optimized?
cause i have one and im getting only 19.75 hashrate, while banchmarks here http://yiimp.ccminer.org/bench?algo=lbry&chip=0
says that a gtx 750 ti has more hasrate than my card :/
cause i have one and im getting only 19.75 hashrate, while banchmarks here http://yiimp.ccminer.org/bench?algo=lbry&chip=0
says that a gtx 750 ti has more hasrate than my card :/
@Epsylon3
Is there any stat for how lucky your pools has been for LBRY? It seems we have terrible luck finding blocks.
Is there any stat for how lucky your pools has been for LBRY? It seems we have terrible luck finding blocks.
yep, i powered on my last machines, didnt had the time to update/compile before
but its only 3x 970 more :p damn rush, look like mining is more and more popularbut the pool works perfectly else, not a single block rejected... just miners not sending shares high enough
yep, even if it was not enough to limit the 2x nethash and difficulty increase per day that should help a bit
ive also some other "finitions" to do.. for a final 1.8 release... no big/perf changes in the algo
that should help a bitive also some other "finitions" to do.. for a final 1.8 release... no big/perf changes in the algo
Maybe add support for this coin:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/lbryio-dicussion-thread-1541268
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/lbryio-dicussion-thread-1541268
Here is your chance: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.15567168
he will not sell you anything anymore, until 20 of this month, where it will be released
@Epsylon3
Is there any stat for how lucky your pools has been for LBRY? It seems we have terrible luck finding blocks.
Is there any stat for how lucky your pools has been for LBRY? It seems we have terrible luck finding blocks.
Maybe add support for this coin:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/lbryio-dicussion-thread-1541268
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/lbryio-dicussion-thread-1541268
Here is your chance: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.15567168
Maybe add support for this coin:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/lbryio-dicussion-thread-1541268
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/lbryio-dicussion-thread-1541268
strange, i can reproduce it with "-a blake", "-a blakecoin" beside "-a decred" (even with --benchmark)
blake2s, vanilla and other algos are fine
well, i'll stick with alexis78's ccminer for decred...
blake2s, vanilla and other algos are fine
well, i'll stick with alexis78's ccminer for decred...
Are you waiting long enough for the cards to start? I've seen cards take up to 2 minutes before they report any hash.
strange, i can reproduce it with "-a blake", "-a blakecoin" beside "-a decred" (even with --benchmark)
blake2s, vanilla and other algos are fine
well, i'll stick with alexis78's ccminer for decred...
blake2s, vanilla and other algos are fine
well, i'll stick with alexis78's ccminer for decred...
Are you waiting long enough for the cards to start? I've seen cards take up to 2 minutes before they report any hash.
should be the same with alexis one
this is on linux if you really don't believe me
Code:
[2016-07-04 21:59:16] GPU #2: MSI GTX 960, 982.33 MH/s
[2016-07-04 21:59:17] decred block 42664, diff 831049.304
[2016-07-04 21:59:20] GPU #0: ASUS GTX 970, 1557.27 MH/s
[2016-07-04 21:59:21] GPU #2: MSI GTX 960, 982.29 MH/s
[2016-07-04 21:59:22] GPU #1: EVGA GT 740, 103.48 MH/s
[2016-07-04 21:59:22] accepted: 29/29 (diff 7.369), 2627.27 MH/s yes!
[2016-07-04 21:59:22] GPU #0: ASUS GTX 970, 1554.41 MH/s
this is on linux if you really don't believe me
strange, i can reproduce it with "-a blake", "-a blakecoin" beside "-a decred" (even with --benchmark)
blake2s, vanilla and other algos are fine
well, i'll stick with alexis78's ccminer for decred...
blake2s, vanilla and other algos are fine
well, i'll stick with alexis78's ccminer for decred...
i only have one pc on windows most are on linux so...
most are on linux so... never seen a problem like that...
maybe it happens just on linux? i don't have windows rigs to try...
it require the nvapi which is only on windows... but maybe i could trace what is doing the nvapi dll
looks like you're having fun with leds :-)
do you think it may work on linux as well?
do you think it may work on linux as well?
never seen a problem like that...
else playing with leds... (windows only)
https://youtu.be/xFso96j7y1M
else playing with leds... (windows only)
https://youtu.be/xFso96j7y1M
That looks cool!
Jump to: