Topic: [ANN] ccminer 2.3 - opensource - GPL (tpruvot) - page 43. (Read 500193 times)
Hi guys, any news for new algo "PHI1612" support??
this api is disabled for abuse
That's why we can't have nice things
could you show the worker name on wallet page? I have a few workers, don't know each worker's hashrate.
EDIT: I got a workaround, put the worker name into password field and it is shown in extra field on the wallet page,
EDIT: I got a workaround, put the worker name into password field and it is shown in extra field on the wallet page,
this api is disabled for abuse
Epsylon3, I'm using your yiimp pool, can I get all my workers' current hashrate via json api?
tried /api/wallerEx, it doesn't contain hashrate.
tried /api/wallerEx, it doesn't contain hashrate.
i pushed a commit for that
Got a quick question
I am testing a Asrock H110 with a fresh build on Ubuntu and I have 11 cards installed.
I can run the miner with no specific devices set in config and the miner will run all 11 gpus/threads.
The problem is when I try to set a device in config over id 9, if I try to run device 10 (-d 10) it spits a no cuda device found error.
is there anyway that i can set device above 9?
cheers
I am testing a Asrock H110 with a fresh build on Ubuntu and I have 11 cards installed.
I can run the miner with no specific devices set in config and the miner will run all 11 gpus/threads.
The problem is when I try to set a device in config over id 9, if I try to run device 10 (-d 10) it spits a no cuda device found error.
is there anyway that i can set device above 9?
cheers
Hi, what would be best ccminer version for scrypt algo for 1070?
There is scrypt asic miner (eg. antminer l3+). Your 1070 should mine something else.
Hi, what would be best ccminer version for scrypt algo for 1070?
yiimp is down again. Another ddos?
i know... watching and trying to temp ban some chinese farms automatically, but not easy
bitcore trouble @ yiimp again...
< the new kids still don't know how difficulty works >
lol that is true though, they got farms of nvidia cards, mining these small coins...and for what ? a bit more profit than zec maybe. nah, those smaller coins, you control the supply, corner the coin, and pump it but hey what do i know i dont have a lambo
lol that is true though, they got farms of nvidia cards, mining these small coins...and for what ? a bit more profit than zec maybe. nah, those smaller coins, you control the supply, corner the coin, and pump it
but hey what do i know i dont have a lambo Epsylon3,
If i need to start from a random extranonce2.......... should i just change in this line in ccminer.cpp
or any other file change needed ?
If i need to start from a random extranonce2.......... should i just change in this line in ccminer.cpp
Code:
for (i = 0; i < (int)sctx->xnonce2_size && !++sctx->job.xnonce2[i]; i++);
as i = rand(); or any other file change needed ?
Why must it be random? Regardless, your proposed change is way off base.
Take a look at util.cpp:stratum_notify for the start value.
Hi,
Api isn't workng in my system, although I specify api bind as a current ip in the local network, set allow remote and api allow as 0/0. Ebfw works fine in the same system.
Thanks!
Api isn't workng in my system, although I specify api bind as a current ip in the local network, set allow remote and api allow as 0/0. Ebfw works fine in the same system.
Thanks!
Epsylon3,
If i need to start from a random extranonce2.......... should i just change in this line in ccminer.cpp
or any other file change needed ?
If i need to start from a random extranonce2.......... should i just change in this line in ccminer.cpp
Code:
for (i = 0; i < (int)sctx->xnonce2_size && !++sctx->job.xnonce2[i]; i++);
as i = rand(); or any other file change needed ?
if you want to talk about xevan, go in BSD or XLR threads... i already answered about that
I see a lot of people are looking for xevan algorithm to work at ccminer, and some developers sell ccminer copy for 0.5BTC.
Does these people know what xevan algo coins have very shall hashrate? 200+ pcs gpus like gtx 1070 and profit almost goneI don't quite get you... Actually any algo with large miners, surely the profit will be lesser...
You don't know how much I'm paying. Despite leaving open ended amounts to those I wish to employ they don't even look to do business with you.
True, I don't. I guess it's safe to say money isn't the reason for your recruiting problems, it must be something else...
Mister Pruvot, I have a request for ccminer:please add a second benchmark mode -precise when I not use -a switch with benchmark and miner makes benchmarks for all algirithms in a bunch
That change should not be hard to do, but it should make benchmarking a lot easier and accurate.
My vision:
Code:
ccminer-x64 --benchmark --no-color > ccminer-x64.txt
Code:
[2017-10-01 08:00:57] Benchmark results for GPU #0 - EVGA GTX 1060 6GB:
[2017-10-01 08:00:57] blakecoin : 2980887.7 kH/s, -5955 MB, 67108864 thr.
[2017-10-01 08:00:57] blake : 1704596.5 kH/s, 2 MB, 67108864 thr.
[2017-10-01 08:00:57] blake2s : 2610601.3 kH/s, 2 MB, 33554432 thr.
[2017-10-01 08:00:57] bmw : 1183760.6 kH/s, 66 MB, 2097152 thr.
[2017-10-01 08:00:57] bastion : 8165.2 kH/s, 234 MB, 1048576 thr.
[2017-10-01 08:00:57] deep : 26029.9 kH/s, 34 MB, 524288 thr.
[2017-10-01 08:00:57] decred : 1773028.7 kH/s, 2 MB, 33554432 thr.
For now benchmark mode is making a few seconds measurements and some are inaccurate (for example tribus benchark shows 20Mh, but with switch -a tribus it shows 40Mh). With this mode miner could in addition make power measurement for each algorithm during the test - we know, that some of algorithms are less power hungry and that measurement could help to better calculate profit. Now with those 2-5 seconds measurements when I try to observe power on GPU-Z it is imposible because when GPU-Z shows power, miner is going to switch to another algo.[2017-10-01 08:00:57] blakecoin : 2980887.7 kH/s, -5955 MB, 67108864 thr.
[2017-10-01 08:00:57] blake : 1704596.5 kH/s, 2 MB, 67108864 thr.
[2017-10-01 08:00:57] blake2s : 2610601.3 kH/s, 2 MB, 33554432 thr.
[2017-10-01 08:00:57] bmw : 1183760.6 kH/s, 66 MB, 2097152 thr.
[2017-10-01 08:00:57] bastion : 8165.2 kH/s, 234 MB, 1048576 thr.
[2017-10-01 08:00:57] deep : 26029.9 kH/s, 34 MB, 524288 thr.
[2017-10-01 08:00:57] decred : 1773028.7 kH/s, 2 MB, 33554432 thr.
That change should not be hard to do, but it should make benchmarking a lot easier and accurate.
My vision:
Code:
[2017-10-01 08:00:57] Benchmark results for GPU #0 - EVGA GTX 1060 6GB:
[2017-10-01 08:00:57] blakecoin : 2980887.7 kH/s, -5955 MB, 90W, 67108864 thr.
[2017-10-01 08:00:57] blake : 1704596.5 kH/s, 2 MB, 90W, 67108864 thr.
[2017-10-01 08:00:57] blake2s : 2610601.3 kH/s, 2 MB, 95W, 33554432 thr.
[2017-10-01 08:00:57] bmw : 1183760.6 kH/s, 66 MB, 93W, 2097152 thr.
[2017-10-01 08:00:57] bastion : 8165.2 kH/s, 234 MB, 90W, 1048576 thr.
[2017-10-01 08:00:57] deep : 26029.9 kH/s, 34 MB, 93W, 524288 thr.
[2017-10-01 08:00:57] decred : 1773028.7 kH/s, 2 MB, 69W, 33554432 thr.
[2017-10-01 08:00:57] blakecoin : 2980887.7 kH/s, -5955 MB, 90W, 67108864 thr.
[2017-10-01 08:00:57] blake : 1704596.5 kH/s, 2 MB, 90W, 67108864 thr.
[2017-10-01 08:00:57] blake2s : 2610601.3 kH/s, 2 MB, 95W, 33554432 thr.
[2017-10-01 08:00:57] bmw : 1183760.6 kH/s, 66 MB, 93W, 2097152 thr.
[2017-10-01 08:00:57] bastion : 8165.2 kH/s, 234 MB, 90W, 1048576 thr.
[2017-10-01 08:00:57] deep : 26029.9 kH/s, 34 MB, 93W, 524288 thr.
[2017-10-01 08:00:57] decred : 1773028.7 kH/s, 2 MB, 69W, 33554432 thr.
Jump to: