Suse leap 42.3 64bit.
Thanks
Topic: [ANN] ccminer 2.3 - opensource - GPL (tpruvot) - page 46. (Read 500113 times)
stas260385, forget about this algo.
xevan coin's network hashrate very small!
xevan coin's network hashrate very small!
So no one didn't even want to try to make ccminer with XEVAN algo?
Version 1.8.2 is faster 15% than 2.0 in lbry.
it's likely to depend on different cuda version.
but you can try yourself 2.2.1 win x64 cuda version 6.5, 7, 7.5, 8, for SM5 and up.
some algos don't work with certain cuda version, don't blame me, I just build and upload it
ccminerX64.zip
Version 1.8.2 is faster 15% than 2.0 in lbry.
A quick test with neoscrypt told me that Cuda 8 compiled is 10% faster than Cuda 9 compiled.
True, i test also cuda 9 and it's about 18% slower than cuda 7.5.
On which OS?
Suse leap 42.3 64bit.
Someone is making good money now while we are on the sidelines:
http://piccy.info/view3/11617591/dc2472d7f4d6636edd996a00dc5461d0/
http://piccy.info/view3/11617596/f30bdb10e2128a149e5ea58ef6bd2096/
We need Ccminer with xevan algo support!
http://piccy.info/view3/11617591/dc2472d7f4d6636edd996a00dc5461d0/
http://piccy.info/view3/11617596/f30bdb10e2128a149e5ea58ef6bd2096/
We need Ccminer with xevan algo support!
Yeah, xevan mining with AMD is not looking good right now. Supposedly the guy that was selling a purported Nvidia Xevan miner for 0.5 BTC said he will release it to the public 1 month after the buyer gets it. I have no confidence that it will actually happen that way, but I expect someone will eventually leak it or make their own for the combined bounties that BitSend and Solaris are offering since it's worth over $1,800 right now.
Where do you find this guy selling a miner for .5?
He created a thread several days ago in this section of the forums. He claimed to be selling it to 2 buyers and then he would close the thread. If I recall it was a newbie account...
Someone is making good money now while we are on the sidelines:
http://piccy.info/view3/11617591/dc2472d7f4d6636edd996a00dc5461d0/
http://piccy.info/view3/11617596/f30bdb10e2128a149e5ea58ef6bd2096/
We need Ccminer with xevan algo support!
http://piccy.info/view3/11617591/dc2472d7f4d6636edd996a00dc5461d0/
http://piccy.info/view3/11617596/f30bdb10e2128a149e5ea58ef6bd2096/
We need Ccminer with xevan algo support!
Yeah, xevan mining with AMD is not looking good right now. Supposedly the guy that was selling a purported Nvidia Xevan miner for 0.5 BTC said he will release it to the public 1 month after the buyer gets it. I have no confidence that it will actually happen that way, but I expect someone will eventually leak it or make their own for the combined bounties that BitSend and Solaris are offering since it's worth over $1,800 right now.
Where do you find this guy selling a miner for .5?
Hi! Please help.
I want to change to next miner in my batch file if "--max-diff=x" is higher than i want.
But if diff is too high for that algo ccminer dosn't exit, just saying "diff too high, waiting...."
How can i make that to exit after diff too high?
Thanks for help
I want to change to next miner in my batch file if "--max-diff=x" is higher than i want.
But if diff is too high for that algo ccminer dosn't exit, just saying "diff too high, waiting...."
How can i make that to exit after diff too high?
Thanks for help
A quick test with neoscrypt told me that Cuda 8 compiled is 10% faster than Cuda 9 compiled.
True, i test also cuda 9 and it's about 18% slower than cuda 7.5.
On which OS?
Someone is making good money now while we are on the sidelines:
http://piccy.info/view3/11617591/dc2472d7f4d6636edd996a00dc5461d0/
http://piccy.info/view3/11617596/f30bdb10e2128a149e5ea58ef6bd2096/
We need Ccminer with xevan algo support!
http://piccy.info/view3/11617591/dc2472d7f4d6636edd996a00dc5461d0/
http://piccy.info/view3/11617596/f30bdb10e2128a149e5ea58ef6bd2096/
We need Ccminer with xevan algo support!
is that profit on btc and not mbtc? 0.18 btc per MH? that guy with 50MH is doing almost all the emission rate
A quick test with neoscrypt told me that Cuda 8 compiled is 10% faster than Cuda 9 compiled.
True, i test also cuda 9 and it's about 18% slower than cuda 7.5.
Someone is making good money now while we are on the sidelines:
http://piccy.info/view3/11617591/dc2472d7f4d6636edd996a00dc5461d0/
http://piccy.info/view3/11617596/f30bdb10e2128a149e5ea58ef6bd2096/
We need Ccminer with xevan algo support!
http://piccy.info/view3/11617591/dc2472d7f4d6636edd996a00dc5461d0/
http://piccy.info/view3/11617596/f30bdb10e2128a149e5ea58ef6bd2096/
We need Ccminer with xevan algo support!
Yeah, xevan mining with AMD is not looking good right now. Supposedly the guy that was selling a purported Nvidia Xevan miner for 0.5 BTC said he will release it to the public 1 month after the buyer gets it. I have no confidence that it will actually happen that way, but I expect someone will eventually leak it or make their own for the combined bounties that BitSend and Solaris are offering since it's worth over $1,800 right now.
Does cuda9 make a difference with any of the implemented algos? I just compiled some test code from me with some basic calculations, and speed was about the same as with cuda8 :/
Welcome to fucking mining dude. This is why you don't rip the developers we have in the community off... Then they take their shit private. Ethbabies are still fucking retarded.
And now it's like someone monopoly - it's not wright!
Someone is making good money now while we are on the sidelines:
http://piccy.info/view3/11617591/dc2472d7f4d6636edd996a00dc5461d0/
http://piccy.info/view3/11617596/f30bdb10e2128a149e5ea58ef6bd2096/
We need Ccminer with xevan algo support!
http://piccy.info/view3/11617591/dc2472d7f4d6636edd996a00dc5461d0/
http://piccy.info/view3/11617596/f30bdb10e2128a149e5ea58ef6bd2096/
We need Ccminer with xevan algo support!
A quick test with neoscrypt told me that Cuda 8 compiled is 10% faster than Cuda 9 compiled.
there is a cuda-9 branch on github
I mean: I already cloned your 2.2.1 sources and I compiled them against Cuda 8.
I have to keep Cuda 8 in order to compile for my customers with old NVidia GPU which do not have required drivers for Cuda 9.
At the same time I have some Pascal GPUs which I'd like to test against Cuda 9 final.
Solution?
Then just clone needed branch from github - it should have proper setting for cuda version.
there is a cuda-9 branch on github
I mean: I already cloned your 2.2.1 sources and I compiled them against Cuda 8.
I have to keep Cuda 8 in order to compile for my customers with old NVidia GPU which do not have required drivers for Cuda 9.
At the same time I have some Pascal GPUs which I'd like to test against Cuda 9 final.
Solution?
Jump to: