Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] ccminer 2.3 - opensource - GPL (tpruvot) - page 95. (Read 500113 times)

legendary
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028
thats how it looks when an GT730 works on Linux with CUDA 8.0 , Driver :375.39

Code:
*** ccminer 2.0 for nVidia GPUs by tpruvot@github ***
    Built with the nVidia CUDA Toolkit 8.0 64-bits

  Originally based on Christian Buchner and Christian H. project
  Include some algos from alexis78, djm34, sp, tsiv and klausT.

BTC donation address: 1AJdfCpLWPNoAMDfHF1wD5y8VgKSSTHxPo (tpruvot)

[2017-03-23 19:02:44] NVML GPU monitoring enabled.
[2017-03-23 19:02:44] Starting on stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:5766
[2017-03-23 19:02:44] 1 miner thread started, using 'blake2s' algorithm.
[2017-03-23 19:02:49] Stratum difficulty set to 1
[2017-03-23 19:02:49] blake2s block 1750, diff 85317.874
[2017-03-23 19:02:49] GPU #0: Intensity set to 28, 268435456 cuda threads
[2017-03-23 19:02:55] GPU #0: GeForce GT 730, 318.21 MH/s
[2017-03-23 19:02:57] accepted: 1/1 (diff 1.623), 324.03 MH/s yes!
[2017-03-23 19:03:02] GPU #0: GeForce GT 730, 333.68 MH/s
[2017-03-23 19:03:02] GPU #0: 901 MHz 69C FAN 50%
[2017-03-23 19:03:06] GPU #0: GeForce GT 730, 331.64 MH/s
[2017-03-23 19:03:06] accepted: 2/2 (diff 1.170), 328.34 MH/s yes!
[2017-03-23 19:03:07] accepted: 3/3 (diff 2.724), 329.28 MH/s yes!

I LOOKED UP THE CARD MODEL--

With that generation of card, any model lesser than a GTX 750 was designated with only a "GT" prefix.  If there is a problem with the mining code in the Windows version, the problem is beyond me.

The GT 730 is a low-profile, low-energy, and low-cost card.  Conceivably, it could be utilized in a rack-mount system.  Still, it is an older card.  I have a PNY GT9800+ (top of  the model line) that will mine scrypt at 14kh/s, but the CPU on my mobile phone will do it faster, and at the risk of catching fire in my pocket.

A rack of 36 GT 730 cards may cost less than $3000, and run on household current.  Would it be worth it?  I don't know.  I wasn't able to find a hashrate/reward calculator after a quick search.       --scryptr
full member
Activity: 144
Merit: 100
Eager to learn
thats how it looks when an GT730 works on Linux with CUDA 8.0 , Driver :375.39
Power Consumtion around 40Watts
arch 3.5
GK208
isnt that old  but more for office use  but you can mine too on them , sure another cards are more powerfull compared to them

Code:
*** ccminer 2.0 for nVidia GPUs by tpruvot@github ***
    Built with the nVidia CUDA Toolkit 8.0 64-bits

  Originally based on Christian Buchner and Christian H. project
  Include some algos from alexis78, djm34, sp, tsiv and klausT.

BTC donation address: 1AJdfCpLWPNoAMDfHF1wD5y8VgKSSTHxPo (tpruvot)

[2017-03-23 19:02:44] NVML GPU monitoring enabled.
[2017-03-23 19:02:44] Starting on stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:5766
[2017-03-23 19:02:44] 1 miner thread started, using 'blake2s' algorithm.
[2017-03-23 19:02:49] Stratum difficulty set to 1
[2017-03-23 19:02:49] blake2s block 1750, diff 85317.874
[2017-03-23 19:02:49] GPU #0: Intensity set to 28, 268435456 cuda threads
[2017-03-23 19:02:55] GPU #0: GeForce GT 730, 318.21 MH/s
[2017-03-23 19:02:57] accepted: 1/1 (diff 1.623), 324.03 MH/s yes!
[2017-03-23 19:03:02] GPU #0: GeForce GT 730, 333.68 MH/s
[2017-03-23 19:03:02] GPU #0: 901 MHz 69C FAN 50%
[2017-03-23 19:03:06] GPU #0: GeForce GT 730, 331.64 MH/s
[2017-03-23 19:03:06] accepted: 2/2 (diff 1.170), 328.34 MH/s yes!
[2017-03-23 19:03:07] accepted: 3/3 (diff 2.724), 329.28 MH/s yes!
legendary
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028
THE GTX 730 IS AN OLD CARD--

There are older CudaMiner softwares that may work on the GTX 730 card.  But, as previously posted on this page, a GTX 750ti would be a better choice.  The Maxwell series chips (750ti) brought in a new era.  I believe that the 730 is a Kepler chip.  You will need an older software, and it will be less efficient.  Likely, it will cost more in electricity than any income generated by the older, smaller card.

A new, or new-old-stock, or used 750ti is still a good investment.  I haven't purchased a GTX 1050ti, but it is likely a good starter card.  I earned a LiteCoin with a GTX 550ti using CBuchner's CudaMiner.  it took several weeks, and was worth $20 or so at the time (2014).       --scryptr
newbie
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
Trying to get this to work on Nvidia GT730 Cuda 8.0 information below... Any help would be greatly appreciated.. No matter which pool i choose i can't get any of them to work. Please help...

Steps:

wget https://developer.nvidia.com/compute/cuda/8.0/Prod2/local_installers/cuda-repo-rhel6-8-0-local-ga2-8.0.61-1.x86_64-rpm
sudo rpm -i cuda-repo-rhel6-8-0-local-ga2-8.0.61-1.x86_64.rpm
sudo yum clean all
sudo yum install cuda
wget https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/archive/1.8.4-tpruvot.tar.gz
./autogen.sh
./build.sh
make && make install


System Info

# uname -a
Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.32-642.3.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Jul 12 18:30:56 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

# lspci | grep -i VGA
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GK208 [GeForce GT 730] (rev a1)

# rpm -qa | grep -i nvidia
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-gl-375.26-1.el6.x86_64
nvidia-kmod-375.26-2.el6.x86_64
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-libs-375.26-1.el6.x86_64
nvidia-detect-375.39-1.el6.elrepo.x86_64
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-375.26-1.el6.x86_64
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-devel-375.26-1.el6.x86_64

# rpm -qa | grep -i cuda
cuda-cublas-8-0-8.0.61-1.x86_64
cuda-core-8-0-8.0.61-1.x86_64
cuda-visual-tools-8-0-8.0.61-1.x86_64
cuda-nvrtc-dev-8-0-8.0.61-1.x86_64
cuda-command-line-tools-8-0-8.0.61-1.x86_64
cuda-8.0.61-1.x86_64
cuda-nvml-dev-8-0-8.0.61-1.x86_64
cuda-nvgraph-dev-8-0-8.0.61-1.x86_64
cuda-cufft-8-0-8.0.61-1.x86_64
cuda-cusolver-dev-8-0-8.0.61-1.x86_64
cuda-runtime-8-0-8.0.61-1.x86_64
cuda-repo-rhel6-8-0-local-ga2-8.0.61-1.x86_64
cuda-nvgraph-8-0-8.0.61-1.x86_64
cuda-npp-dev-8-0-8.0.61-1.x86_64
cuda-cusolver-8-0-8.0.61-1.x86_64
cuda-drivers-375.26-1.x86_64
cuda-driver-dev-8-0-8.0.61-1.x86_64
cuda-curand-dev-8-0-8.0.61-1.x86_64
cuda-misc-headers-8-0-8.0.61-1.x86_64
cuda-documentation-8-0-8.0.61-1.x86_64
cuda-license-8-0-8.0.61-1.x86_64
cuda-curand-8-0-8.0.61-1.x86_64
cuda-cufft-dev-8-0-8.0.61-1.x86_64
cuda-samples-8-0-8.0.61-1.x86_64
cuda-demo-suite-8-0-8.0.61-1.x86_64
cuda-cublas-dev-8-0-8.0.61-1.x86_64
cuda-cusparse-dev-8-0-8.0.61-1.x86_64
cuda-cudart-8-0-8.0.61-1.x86_64
cuda-toolkit-8-0-8.0.61-1.x86_64
cuda-cusparse-8-0-8.0.61-1.x86_64
cuda-npp-8-0-8.0.61-1.x86_64
cuda-nvrtc-8-0-8.0.61-1.x86_64
cuda-cudart-dev-8-0-8.0.61-1.x86_64
cuda-8-0-8.0.61-1.x86_64

running CCMINER gives me the below....

ccminer -o stratum+tcp://nyc-1.xmrpool.net -u 42uGK1HXuTWbF2hDrXD5WSacU79aM2jax9E94MtHayTCTxT2wioj84y1VCBLSC3icvU26MCtNxPCJMU PJxJKYo2nDWj3yKH -p x -D -P
*** ccminer 1.8.4 for nVidia GPUs by tpruvot@github ***
    Built with the nVidia CUDA Toolkit 8.0

  Originally based on Christian Buchner and Christian H. project
  Include some algos from alexis78, djm34, sp, tsiv and klausT.

BTC donation address: 1AJdfCpLWPNoAMDfHF1wD5y8VgKSSTHxPo (tpruvot)

[2017-03-22 22:17:35] POOL 0: nyc-1.xmrpool.net USER 42uGK1HXuTWbF2hDrXD5WSacU79aM2jax9E94MtHayTCTxT2wioj84y1VCBLSC3icvU26MCtNxPCJMU PJxJKYo2nDWj3yKH -s 10
[2017-03-22 22:17:35] Starting on stratum+tcp://nyc-1.xmrpool.net
[2017-03-22 22:17:35] restart_threads
[2017-03-22 22:17:35] CUDA GPU 0 matches NVML GPU 0 by busId 1
[2017-03-22 22:17:35] NVML GPU monitoring enabled.
[2017-03-22 22:17:35] 1 miner thread started, using 'auto' algorithm.
* About to connect() to nyc-1.xmrpool.net port 80 (#0)
*   Trying 104.140.201.42... * TCP_NODELAY set
* connected
* Connected to nyc-1.xmrpool.net (104.140.201.42) port 80 (#0)
* Connection #0 to host nyc-1.xmrpool.net left intact
[2017-03-22 22:17:35] > {"id": 1, "method": "mining.subscribe", "params": ["ccminer/1.8.4"]}
[2017-03-22 22:17:36] sleeptime: 500 ms
[2017-03-22 22:17:37] GPU #0: no data
[2017-03-22 22:17:37] sleeptime: 500 ms
[2017-03-22 22:17:38] GPU #0: no data
[2017-03-22 22:17:39] sleeptime: 500 ms
[2017-03-22 22:17:40] GPU #0: no data
[2017-03-22 22:17:40] sleeptime: 500 ms
[2017-03-22 22:17:41] GPU #0: no data
[2017-03-22 22:17:42] sleeptime: 500 ms
[2017-03-22 22:17:43] GPU #0: no data
[2017-03-22 22:17:44] sleeptime: 500 ms
[2017-03-22 22:17:45] GPU #0: no data
[2017-03-22 22:17:45] stratum_subscribe timed out
* Closing connection #0
[2017-03-22 22:17:45] ...retry after 30 seconds
[2017-03-22 22:17:45] sleeptime: 500 ms
^C[2017-03-22 22:17:46] SIGINT received, exiting
[2017-03-22 22:17:46] restart_threads
[2017-03-22 22:17:46] GPU #0: no data

For monero hash i get the below....

ccminer -o stratum+tcp://monerohash.com:3333 -u 42uGK1HXuTWbF2hDrXD5WSacU79aM2jax9E94MtHayTCTxT2wioj84y1VCBLSC3icvU26MCtNxPCJMU PJxJKYo2nDWj3yKH -p x -D -P
*** ccminer 1.8.4 for nVidia GPUs by tpruvot@github ***
    Built with the nVidia CUDA Toolkit 8.0

  Originally based on Christian Buchner and Christian H. project
  Include some algos from alexis78, djm34, sp, tsiv and klausT.

BTC donation address: 1AJdfCpLWPNoAMDfHF1wD5y8VgKSSTHxPo (tpruvot)

[2017-03-22 22:20:11] POOL 0: monerohash.com:3333 USER 42uGK1HXuTWbF2hDrXD5WSacU79aM2jax9E94MtHayTCTxT2wioj84y1VCBLSC3icvU26MCtNxPCJMU PJxJKYo2nDWj3yKH -s 10
[2017-03-22 22:20:11] Starting on stratum+tcp://monerohash.com:3333
[2017-03-22 22:20:11] restart_threads
[2017-03-22 22:20:11] CUDA GPU 0 matches NVML GPU 0 by busId 1
[2017-03-22 22:20:11] NVML GPU monitoring enabled.
[2017-03-22 22:20:11] 1 miner thread started, using 'auto' algorithm.
* About to connect() to monerohash.com port 3333 (#0)
*   Trying 107.191.99.95... * TCP_NODELAY set
* connected
* Connected to monerohash.com (107.191.99.95) port 3333 (#0)
* Connection #0 to host monerohash.com left intact
[2017-03-22 22:20:11] > {"id": 1, "method": "mining.subscribe", "params": ["ccminer/1.8.4"]}
[2017-03-22 22:20:11] < {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-1,"message":"invalid method"}}
[2017-03-22 22:20:11] JSON-RPC call failed: {
   "message": "invalid method",
   "code": -1
}
[2017-03-22 22:20:11] > {"id": 1, "method": "mining.subscribe", "params": []}
[2017-03-22 22:20:11] < {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-1,"message":"invalid method"}}
[2017-03-22 22:20:11] JSON-RPC call failed: {
   "message": "invalid method",
   "code": -1
}
* Closing connection #0
[2017-03-22 22:20:11] ...retry after 30 seconds
[2017-03-22 22:20:12] sleeptime: 500 ms
[2017-03-22 22:20:13] GPU #0: no data
[2017-03-22 22:20:13] sleeptime: 500 ms
[2017-03-22 22:20:14] GPU #0: no data
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
btw nist5 isn't working, getting invalid argument...
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082
ccminer/cpuminer developer
yep sorry, but even a 750Ti do 2x better with 10x less watts... So please.. save a panda and stop trying to mine with that
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1046
"im in the regret to inform you that your cards are from another century"
:-)
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082
ccminer/cpuminer developer
"im in the regret to inform you that your cards are from another century"
newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
I am new to mining with Linux.  I am using Ubuntu 16.04  with a GTX 570 and I am getting the following error.  Does anyone have any idea what I did wrong?  Thanks in advance for your help.


[2017-03-18 17:04:51] Using JSON-RPC 2.0
[2017-03-18 17:04:51] Starting on stratum+tcp://xmr.pool.minergate.com:45560
[2017-03-18 17:04:51] NVML GPU monitoring enabled.
[2017-03-18 17:04:51] 1 miner thread started, using 'cryptonight' algorithm.
[2017-03-18 17:04:51] Stratum difficulty set to 1063 (1.063)
[2017-03-18 17:04:51] GPU #0: EVGA GTX 570, 1021 MB available, 15 SMX
[2017-03-18 17:04:51] GPU #0: 240 threads (7.875) with 30 blocks
[2017-03-18 17:04:51] GPU #0: invalid device function cryptonight_extra_cpu_prepare line 217


Brandon


:::::Update:::::
 I read posts above and using the compatability guide, I was able to get it working. 
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
a few lines under

https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/wiki/Compatibility
says
Quote
So, basically, if you have a nVidia GeForce GTX 470, and that's all you're using, then you'd want to comment out the other nvcc_ARCH lines and make sure that only nvcc_ARCH += -gencode=arch=compute_20,code=\"sm_20,compute_20\" was uncommented.
for GeForce GTX 560 Ti   2.1   
nvcc_ARCH += -gencode=arch=compute_20,code=\"sm_21,compute_20\"
should be added?
Or only
nvcc_ARCH = -gencode=arch=compute_20,code=\"sm_21,compute_20\"
should be added and uncommented?

==========================================

compiled with only one line uncommented:
Code:
nvcc_ARCH = -gencode=arch=compute_20,code=\"sm_21,compute_20\"

no more errors.

thanks!

[2017-03-17 16:59:09] Starting benchmark mode with blakecoin
[2017-03-17 16:59:09] NVML GPU monitoring enabled.
[2017-03-17 16:59:09] 1 miner thread started, using 'blakecoin' algorithm.
[2017-03-17 16:59:09] GPU #0: Intensity set to 22, 4194304 cuda threads
[2017-03-17 16:59:19] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 560 SE, 398.75 MH/s
[2017-03-17 16:59:29] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 560 SE, 397.87 MH/s
[2017-03-17 16:59:29] GPU #0: blakecoin hashrate = 397.87 MH/s
[2017-03-17 16:59:29] GPU #0: 1601 MHz 44C FAN 40%
[2017-03-17 16:59:29] Benchmark algo blake...
[2017-03-17 16:59:30] GPU #0: Intensity set to 22, 4194304 cuda threads
[2017-03-17 16:59:39] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 560 SE, 226.81 MH/s
[2017-03-17 16:59:49] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 560 SE, 226.79 MH/s
[2017-03-17 16:59:49] GPU #0: blake hashrate = 226.79 MH/s
[2017-03-17 16:59:49] Benchmark algo blake2s...
[2017-03-17 16:59:49] GPU #0: Intensity set to 28, 268435456 cuda threads
[2017-03-17 16:59:59] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 560 SE, 384.54 MH/s
[2017-03-17 17:00:09] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 560 SE, 383.95 MH/s
[2017-03-17 17:00:09] GPU #0: blake2s hashrate = 383.95 MH/s

[2017-03-17 17:06:24] Benchmark algo bastion...
[2017-03-17 17:06:24] GPU #0: Intensity set to 20, 1048576 cuda threads
[2017-03-17 17:06:34] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 560 SE, 953.91 kH/s
[2017-03-17 17:06:35] GPU #0: bench_algo_switch_next:133 invalid device pointer
[2017-03-17 17:06:35] GPU #0: bastion hashrate = 961.05 kH/s

still some errors
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082
ccminer/cpuminer developer
a few lines under
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
read the first post
It says
Quote
My releases are generally tuned for the Geforce GTX 750Ti
Does that mean GTX 560 SE is not supported?
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082
ccminer/cpuminer developer
read the first post
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
SMP PREEMPT Mon Mar 13 17:13:41 CET 2017 x86_64 GNU/Linux

[root@archlinux ccminer-2.0-rc2]# gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 6.3.1 20170306
Copyright (C) 2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.  There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

[root@archlinux ccminer-2.0-rc2]#./ccminer --version
cminer v2.0
libcurl/7.53.1 OpenSSL/1.0.2k zlib/1.2.11 libpsl/0.17.0 (+libicu/58.2) libssh2/1.8.0

[root@archlinux ccminer-2.0-rc2]# ./ccminer --benchmark
*** ccminer 2.0 for nVidia GPUs by tpruvot@github ***
    Built with the nVidia CUDA Toolkit 8.0 64-bits

  Originally based on Christian Buchner and Christian H. project
  Include some algos from alexis78, djm34, sp, tsiv and klausT.

BTC donation address: 1AJdfCpLWPNoAMDfHF1wD5y8VgKSSTHxPo (tpruvot)

[2017-03-17 16:15:51] Starting benchmark mode with blakecoin
[2017-03-17 16:15:51] NVML GPU monitoring enabled.
[2017-03-17 16:15:51] 1 miner thread started, using 'blakecoin' algorithm.
[2017-03-17 16:15:51] GPU #0: Intensity set to 22, 4194304 cuda threads
Cuda error in func 'blake256_cpu_setBlock_16' at line 467 : invalid device symbol.


[root@archlinux ccminer-2.0-rc2]# ./ccminer --benchmark -a sib
*** ccminer 2.0 for nVidia GPUs by tpruvot@github ***
    Built with the nVidia CUDA Toolkit 8.0 64-bits

  Originally based on Christian Buchner and Christian H. project
  Include some algos from alexis78, djm34, sp, tsiv and klausT.

BTC donation address: 1AJdfCpLWPNoAMDfHF1wD5y8VgKSSTHxPo (tpruvot)

[2017-03-17 16:22:18] NVML GPU monitoring enabled.
[2017-03-17 16:22:18] 1 miner thread started, using 'sib' algorithm.
[2017-03-17 16:22:18] GPU #0: Intensity set to 18, 262144 cuda threads
[2017-03-17 16:22:18] GPU #0: aes_cpu_init invalid device symbol
[2017-03-17 16:22:19] GPU #0: aes_cpu_init invalid device symbol
[2017-03-17 16:22:20] GPU #0: quark_blake512_cpu_setBlock_80:318 invalid device symbol
Cuda error in func 'cuda_check_cpu_setTarget' at line 41 : invalid device symbol.


[root@archlinux ccminer-2.0-rc2]# sudo lshw -c display
  *-display                
       description: VGA compatible controller
       product: GF114 [GeForce GTX 560 SE]
       vendor: NVIDIA Corporation
       physical id: 0
       bus info: pci@0000:01:00.0
       version: a1
       width: 64 bits
       clock: 33MHz
       capabilities: pm msi pciexpress vga_controller bus_master cap_list rom
       configuration: driver=nvidia latency=0
       resources: irq:29 memory:fc000000-fdffffff memory:d8000000-dfffffff memory:d4000000-d7ffffff ioport:cc00(size=128) memory:c0000-dffff


[spoiler]
[root@archlinux ccminer-2.0-rc2]# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor   : 0
vendor_id   : GenuineIntel
cpu family   : 6
model      : 23
model name   : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU     E8400  @ 3.00GHz
stepping   : 10
microcode   : 0xa07
cpu MHz      : 2003.000
cache size   : 6144 KB
physical id   : 0
siblings   : 2
core id      : 0
cpu cores   : 2
apicid      : 0
initial apicid   : 0
fpu      : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level   : 13
wp      : yes
flags      : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good nopl aperfmperf pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm sse4_1 xsave lahf_lm tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority dtherm
bugs      :
bogomips   : 6022.92
clflush size   : 64
cache_alignment   : 64
address sizes   : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor   : 1
vendor_id   : GenuineIntel
cpu family   : 6
model      : 23
model name   : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU     E8400  @ 3.00GHz
stepping   : 10
microcode   : 0xa07
cpu MHz      : 2003.000
cache size   : 6144 KB
physical id   : 0
siblings   : 2
core id      : 1
cpu cores   : 2
apicid      : 1
initial apicid   : 1
fpu      : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level   : 13
wp      : yes
flags      : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good nopl aperfmperf pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm sse4_1 xsave lahf_lm tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority dtherm
bugs      :
bogomips   : 6022.87[spoiler]
clflush size   : 64
cache_alignment   : 64
address sizes   : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
[/spoiler]


 Undecided

legendary
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1024
@Epsylon3 - Do you know of a .bat file setting to get the proper hash rate to show up on a pool?  I should get around 18 mh/s but my specs constantly show 7-12 mh/s.  Is there something I should do different?

I currently use:

ccminer-x64 -a lyra2Z -o stratum+tcp://us-east.zcoin.miningpoolhub.com:20581 -u ****** -p ****** --show-diff
pause    

Thanks - pokeytex

Zcoin is a PoS. If you're talking about Suprnova, you'll never get normal speed there and it'll payout half of what it says it should. Not sure if it's the pool or the coin. I don't mine on Suprnova if I can all but help it. Zpool is in the same boat, only worse. Really wish Epsylon would put up a ZXC pool.
ZCoin is not PoS.

Pile of Shit, not Proof of Stake. ~_~

While the calculators are wrong, I'm going to reiterate that I still don't know if this is being caused by there not being any good pools available or the coin just being really bad. That's why it would've been nice if Epsylon put up a Zcoin pool as I assume the pool would be good.

Monacoin is another one that has similiar issues, all the pools suck or the coin itself really sucks and it's hard to get a consistent payout and earnings from it.
legendary
Activity: 1504
Merit: 1002
@Epsylon3 - Do you know of a .bat file setting to get the proper hash rate to show up on a pool?  I should get around 18 mh/s but my specs constantly show 7-12 mh/s.  Is there something I should do different?

I currently use:

ccminer-x64 -a lyra2Z -o stratum+tcp://us-east.zcoin.miningpoolhub.com:20581 -u ****** -p ****** --show-diff
pause    

Thanks - pokeytex

You've touched on a pet peeve of mine, please excuse the following rant.

Mining performance is measured by hash rate. The miner measures the hash rate of all scans. The pool measures
the hash rate of submitted shares. The problem is not 100% of the scans result in a submitted share. There are therefore
time gaps that reducethe effective hash rate. The miner needs to factor the failed scans to get an accurate effective
hash rate.

Latency is also a source of error. The pool measure the time from when it sent the work until the share was received.
The miner measures the time when it started hashing until it found the solution. It does not include processing or
network transmission.

There is also the issue of averaging. Most pools use a 5 minute average hash rate. If share submissions are regular the
displayed hash rate should be consistent but if shares are submitted infrequently the displayed hash rate can vary
wildly from zero to 2 or 3 times the actual hash rate depending on how many shares were submitted in the window.

@joblo - I have never had it explained to me like that before.  That makes a world of sense now.  Thank you so much for the insight! - pokeytex
legendary
Activity: 1901
Merit: 1024
zcoin mining calculator is just wrong, you just get 50% less, so its not profitable to mine, its being ruled by huge AWS farms still
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1046
@Epsylon3 - Do you know of a .bat file setting to get the proper hash rate to show up on a pool?  I should get around 18 mh/s but my specs constantly show 7-12 mh/s.  Is there something I should do different?

I currently use:

ccminer-x64 -a lyra2Z -o stratum+tcp://us-east.zcoin.miningpoolhub.com:20581 -u ****** -p ****** --show-diff
pause    

Thanks - pokeytex

Zcoin is a PoS. If you're talking about Suprnova, you'll never get normal speed there and it'll payout half of what it says it should. Not sure if it's the pool or the coin. I don't mine on Suprnova if I can all but help it. Zpool is in the same boat, only worse. Really wish Epsylon would put up a ZXC pool.
ZCoin is not PoS.
legendary
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1024
@Epsylon3 - Do you know of a .bat file setting to get the proper hash rate to show up on a pool?  I should get around 18 mh/s but my specs constantly show 7-12 mh/s.  Is there something I should do different?

I currently use:

ccminer-x64 -a lyra2Z -o stratum+tcp://us-east.zcoin.miningpoolhub.com:20581 -u ****** -p ****** --show-diff
pause    

Thanks - pokeytex

Zcoin is a PoS. If you're talking about Suprnova, you'll never get normal speed there and it'll payout half of what it says it should. Not sure if it's the pool or the coin. I don't mine on Suprnova if I can all but help it. Zpool is in the same boat, only worse. Really wish Epsylon would put up a ZXC pool.
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
Mismatched hashrates can result from wrong target/difficulty/bits calculation by the miner or the pool.
Then there are duplicate shares, stale shares, etc.
Can't even count all the possible causes.
Pages:
Jump to: