That another nvidia thread got flooded (
) so I will ask here:
980ti. I don't care about power, heat, noise just pure hash/ €. I have very limited time to test os/miner/algo combinations. Dualmining, equihash, lbry maybe?
Good answer and I will send some ethbeer.
NVIDIA CAPACITY FOR SECONDARY COIN IS GOOD--
With Claymore's miner, if you turn the intensity up for the secondary coin it can increase the yield of the secondary coin a significant amount, at least 2X compared to default intensity values. The primary coin is not affected a great deal; you will need to experiment.
If energy and heat are not a concern, you can really increase your earnings. Short answer, and off topic. Epsylon3 likes a clean thread. --scryptr
With the memory bus on AMD cards, that's not really all that true. The performance ratios on 480s are pretty ridiculous when you match them with Ethereum. Nvidia got it's niche from being obscure, it's no longer obscure and it no longer has a niche because of it.
You can earn $3.27 mining Eth+Dcr on a 480 or $3.36 per day mining Zcash on a 1070 or $3.54 mining Eth+Dcr. Nvidia is trash right now. Too many people bought in on their cards because they had higher profits on certain things, but those were all niche coins and there really isn't a mega coin that is computationally hardy enough to make Nvidia hardware stretch it's legs. Dual mining depends too heavily on memory bus to make it work and Nvidia doesn't have that.
Furthermore the computationally hardy algos eventually end up with FPGAs on them, which trash the profits... Like SIA for instance. DCR as well, although not nearly as bad. Cryptonote is too hardy and resulted in CPUs still being competitive and botnets took over.
Comparatively speaking. Lyra2v2 is the 'best' coin Nvidia is good at compared to AMD and there is only a handful of really small coins on it. The deck is stacked against Nvidia and too many people flapped their gums in forum threads preaching about the holy efficiency of Nvidia, collectively destroying what we had.
You sure do complain a lot.
One day you will figure it out.
No dev wants to do their work for free without people donating or donating to anther dev for "improving" on their work. And don't start with the crap about adding a fee. From what I can see all of these Nvidia dev except for one follow the rule of the spirit of using open software and will not violate it.
Keep the crap over in sp's thread. Or better yet since you have so much negative to say sell your Nvidia and move over to AMD. Sure they would love to hear you every day asking for this or that.
Yuh and I've donated to SP and Epsylon, I also mine on Epsylons pool.
Weird, you're talking about paying devs, yet 'fees', which pay developers are silly? LOL... I also like how you're telling me to donate as if I don't in addition to not wanting something that will actually impact your mining operation (a fee). Hypocrite much?
You definitely sound like a dumbass. I literally had to read two sentences before finding something that was wrong and any of the above can easily be disproved by looking at some of my posts (or based off what you know about mining). You can have a fee and the work can still be open source, having it built into the source someone has to take out or have a toggle is one example. Epsylons pool is another example of a fee. Instead of paying a fee to some random pool owner, I'm paying them to him.
Just the way it goes bro. I'm not going to bury my head in the sand like you and pretend Nvidia is doing great when it's not. I go back and forth based on what's doing well - Nvidia right now isn't doing well. I'm not going to sugar coat that, hide that, pretend it doesn't exist (which is terrible from a professional perspective), or not talk about it when other people try to play pretend.
And nou go to SPs thread, this isn't the first time I've been in Epsylons thread. This isn't the 'hidden area no one knows about'. I've posted in this thread and been monitoring it for a few years.