Topic: [ANN] Cinni | Mandatory: Convert your Cinni to Stakecoin. Instuctions posted. - page 237. (Read 739185 times)

Those are bots, and not REAL people. It is to scam people into believing....

Now, there are services which are legit. And, because they are real, are more pricey, and more realistically priced.

Fiverr has other options which are cheap, yes, yet hold some promise if WE THE PEOPLE HERE retweet what those innovative people create for us to retweet!! That IS viable, yet ONLY if we retweet collectively. But, I am really not seeing any response for that to work. Not much interest here to actually "put the arm to the oar"....

~darylluke.

Yeah this is a pretty funny post. No one ever said 2015 on anything ever.

Disagree, zerocash ETA is in 3-6 months.

Disagree, zerocash ETA is in 3-6 months.

My hope is that people understand the significance of the 100% true anon transfer feature that we are actively developing on the EM platform just released today.  100% true anonymity is something speculated to NOT be developed until 2015 or later.  This is a BIG DEAL.

I was thinking, for spreading the word via Twitter and other social media, there are people on fiverr.com who will do this.

http://www.fiverr.com/want2b/post-your-links-3-times-facebooktwitter-160000?context=best_match&context_type=auto

"I will tweet your link to 250,000 two times with proof for $5"

Could somebody with more knowledge on these features than me assemble a message to post to them with all the facts and future projects and then there are people on fiverr.com who will promote the hell out of it. Could be an idea. There are a lot of people on fiverr.com who can do similar.

WOW!!
The new wallet is working great! Looks good to!

I just finished reading the "white paper" about the anon transaction/messaging. Something stood out that really concerns me...
When someone wants to send a payment from their wallet, that transaction is then routed to the "Reserve Relay Node" which is a wallet holding 15k Cinni and then is split to 4 other addresses.
So... if you want to become a "Reserve Relay Node" you must keep 15k of Cinni in your wallet, in which you'll get paid transaction fee's as the incentive to do such, which will in turn make you more CINNI.
That's cool! I like the idea. But here is the rub as I see it...
If a lot of people want to try to become a "Node" to make more money, along with regular POS mining... there is only enough room for 1,000 wallets to do such. (15M total Cinni Supply divided by 15k = 1,000).
If this were to happen, then the available CINNI supply can not be distributed to other users!!! It'll all be "Froze Up" in these 1,000 wallets.
How will anyone be able to purchase goods... buy Cinni off the exchanges... etc etc.
20,000+ (or Millions) of potential future users that will want to use CINNI, because of it's success and ease of use... won't have a chance!!
Retailers won't adopt it either! Even with BTC integrated into the CINNI wallet.

I'm not trying to be pessimistic... I really like CINNI and have been all in since launch, but this needs to be re-thunked imo 
Is 15k Cinni for "Nodes" a final dev set number? or is there flexibility in that number? Was this just a random number you used as an example?

Now, I also understand that 3.5% is minted annually and the supply will grow over the years...but short term, with what I'm bringing up, will suffocate near future adoption. Ecspecially when you have thousands of ppl racing to become a "Reserved Relay Node"
Available CINNI will be hard to come by, even if it can be broken down to 1 satoshi.

It's late, so I hope this makes sense and others can see the context I'm trying to get at.