Author

Topic: [ANN] [CLOAK] Cloakcoin | No Premine | X13 | Decentralized Market and PoSA - page 715. (Read 1266574 times)

full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
How many people are there in CLOAK development team?


There are 6 people on CLOAK team.

4 full time.

Very powerful.
However, I would like to know, 4 full time staff in how to receive wages?
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
Why my wallet can't connect the network, how to add nodes?


Did you try closing it and starting again!!

nodes are added in cloakcoin.conf in appdata/roaming - you will have to create this file- for more help go to irc channel and ask for help

thanks

now my wallet ok
full member
Activity: 148
Merit: 100
everything goes to plan but the price  Smiley Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
THE PRICE!!! WHY?!?!

Last minute smash and grabs Smiley

With 8 days till PoSA we could drift way lower over that time. Accumulate if you're smart.

Someone is hungry for more. Once he's hit his mark the price will go back up - not something to be worried about. He's been at it all day more power to him xD He's doing us all a favor by shaking down the weakhanded.
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 500
THE PRICE!!! WHY?!?!

Last minute smash and grabs Smiley

With 8 days till PoSA we could drift way lower over that time. Accumulate if you're smart.
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
BitcoinFX - "Bringing you tomorrow's technology, today!"  Grin

Herewith, 2 Cloakcoin .onion Tor nodes:

jm5qligbzm2a5hmn.onion:29662
dtqtz4rxwewp4jgh.onion:29662

Example Tor cloakcoin.conf

Code:
gen=0
socks=5
proxy=127.0.0.1:9150
maxconnections=8
addnode=jm5qligbzm2a5hmn.onion:29662
addnode=dtqtz4rxwewp4jgh.onion:29662

You can also add the nodes from the OP. Note that the Tor Relay and Exit Bundle's use port :9050 instead of :9150

Ensure that: Cloakcoin - Wallet > Settings > Network > Connect through SOCKS proxy: is ticked and restart the wallet.

maxconnections=8 is recommended for a good balance between connectivity vs anonymity - obviously the more connections you make through Tor the less anonymous you might be to an adversary. 8 connections is enough to ensure sufficient broadcast of network transactions.

If you need a guide on how to get this working - See: http://darkproxy.eu/darknet.php - which is a similar guide for my darkcoin Tor .onion nodes.

The following additions will be useful in your torrc file for increased connectivity:

Code:
ClientOnly 1

EnforceDistinctSubnets 0

ExcludeSingleHopRelays 0

LongLivedPorts 21,22,80,443,706,1863,5050,5190,5222,5223,6523,6667,6697,8080,8300,9001,9030,29662

NumEntryGuards 8

UseNTorHandshake 1

Note that the current 'default' cloakcoin p2p port 29662 has been added to LongLivePorts - which helps a lot with connectivity.

I'd recommend that the dev team look to change the port number in a future wallet release to make connectivity more Tor friendly.

See: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7465395

Reasons for other suggested settings can be found via the Tor manual - https://www.torproject.org/docs/tor-manual.html

Also see: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.3562794 - which I'll get around to updating sometime.

N.B. This is an 'unofficial' - although fully working guide for Cloakcoin connectivity via Tor.

The dev teams implementation of Tor into the Clockcoin wallet in future updates will in theory render this guide mostly obsolete.

However, having fully functional Cloakcoin .onion addresses is always useful moving forward - especially as the PoSA implementation seems to be making good progress. I'll look to add a further 2 nodes in the next couple of days.

Any donations towards upkeep of these Clockcoin .onion nodes would be appreciated: CAXVRFjvddzd9d3QTaxTY6zbTZbgX1shHG

Cheers!

Bravo FX! Well Done!
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
Why my wallet can't connect the network, how to add nodes?


Did you try closing it and starting again!!

nodes are added in cloakcoin.conf in appdata/roaming - you will have to create this file- for more help go to irc channel and ask for help
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
Why my wallet can't connect the network, how to add nodes?
sr. member
Activity: 522
Merit: 266
Guys,

having constant issues loosing sync. Either wallet (1.9.4 / 1.9.5). Is it the same out there for you guys or? If this is a common issue it will cause some FUD and will hold us back until resolved or at least understood
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
hero member
Activity: 786
Merit: 1000
BitcoinFX - "Bringing you tomorrow's technology, today!"  Grin

Herewith, 2 Cloakcoin .onion Tor nodes:

jm5qligbzm2a5hmn.onion:29662
dtqtz4rxwewp4jgh.onion:29662

Example Tor cloakcoin.conf

Code:
gen=0
socks=5
proxy=127.0.0.1:9150
maxconnections=8
addnode=jm5qligbzm2a5hmn.onion:29662
addnode=dtqtz4rxwewp4jgh.onion:29662

You can also add the nodes from the OP. Note that the Tor Relay and Exit Bundle's use port :9050 instead of :9150

Ensure that: Cloakcoin - Wallet > Settings > Network > Connect through SOCKS proxy: is ticked and restart the wallet.

maxconnections=8 is recommended for a good balance between connectivity vs anonymity - obviously the more connections you make through Tor the less anonymous you might be to an adversary. 8 connections is enough to ensure sufficient broadcast of network transactions.

If you need a guide on how to get this working - See: http://darkproxy.eu/darknet.php - which is a similar guide for my darkcoin Tor .onion nodes.

The following additions will be useful in your torrc file for increased connectivity:

Code:
ClientOnly 1

EnforceDistinctSubnets 0

ExcludeSingleHopRelays 0

LongLivedPorts 21,22,80,443,706,1863,5050,5190,5222,5223,6523,6667,6697,8080,8300,9001,9030,29662

NumEntryGuards 8

UseNTorHandshake 1

Note that the current 'default' cloakcoin p2p port 29662 has been added to LongLivePorts - which helps a lot with connectivity.

I'd recommend that the dev team look to change the port number in a future wallet release to make connectivity more Tor friendly.

See: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7465395

Reasons for other suggested settings can be found via the Tor manual - https://www.torproject.org/docs/tor-manual.html

Also see: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.3562794 - which I'll get around to updating sometime.

N.B. This is an 'unofficial' - although fully working guide for Cloakcoin connectivity via Tor.

The dev teams implementation of Tor into the Clockcoin wallet in future updates will in theory render this guide mostly obsolete.

However, having fully functional Cloakcoin .onion addresses is always useful moving forward - especially as the PoSA implementation seems to be making good progress. I'll look to add a further 2 nodes in the next couple of days.

Any donations towards upkeep of these Clockcoin .onion nodes would be appreciated: CAXVRFjvddzd9d3QTaxTY6zbTZbgX1shHG

Cheers!

Translation: Moon
newbie
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
Multipool payouts need to remain consistently every 24 hours or else people will quickly stop mining...The x11 hashrate has dropped 1/3rd since the time when payment was supposed to come. Please find a way to get this working!
legendary
Activity: 2646
Merit: 1722
https://youtu.be/DsAVx0u9Cw4 ... Dr. WHO < KLF
BitcoinFX - "Bringing you tomorrow's technology, today!"  Grin

Herewith, 2 Cloakcoin .onion Tor nodes:

jm5qligbzm2a5hmn.onion:29662
dtqtz4rxwewp4jgh.onion:29662

Example Tor cloakcoin.conf

Code:
gen=0
socks=5
proxy=127.0.0.1:9150
maxconnections=8
addnode=jm5qligbzm2a5hmn.onion:29662
addnode=dtqtz4rxwewp4jgh.onion:29662

You can also add the nodes from the OP. Note that the Tor Relay and Exit Bundle's use port :9050 instead of :9150

Ensure that: Cloakcoin - Wallet > Settings > Network > Connect through SOCKS proxy: is ticked and restart the wallet.

maxconnections=8 is recommended for a good balance between connectivity vs anonymity - obviously the more connections you make through Tor the less anonymous you might be to an adversary. 8 connections is enough to ensure sufficient broadcast of network transactions.

If you need a guide on how to get this working - See: http://darkproxy.eu/darknet.php - which is a similar guide for my darkcoin Tor .onion nodes.

The following additions will be useful in your torrc file for increased connectivity:

Code:
ClientOnly 1

EnforceDistinctSubnets 0

ExcludeSingleHopRelays 0

LongLivedPorts 21,22,80,443,706,1863,5050,5190,5222,5223,6523,6667,6697,8080,8300,9001,9030,29662

NumEntryGuards 8

UseNTorHandshake 1

Note that the current 'default' cloakcoin p2p port 29662 has been added to LongLivePorts - which helps a lot with connectivity.

I'd recommend that the dev team look to change the port number in a future wallet release to make connectivity more Tor friendly.

See: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7465395

Reasons for other suggested settings can be found via the Tor manual - https://www.torproject.org/docs/tor-manual.html

Also see: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.3562794 - which I'll get around to updating sometime.

N.B. This is an 'unofficial' - although fully working guide for Cloakcoin connectivity via Tor.

The dev teams implementation of Tor into the Clockcoin wallet in future updates will in theory render this guide mostly obsolete.

However, having fully functional Cloakcoin .onion addresses is always useful moving forward - especially as the PoSA implementation seems to be making good progress. I'll look to add a further 2 nodes in the next couple of days.

Any donations towards upkeep of these Clockcoin .onion nodes would be appreciated: CAXVRFjvddzd9d3QTaxTY6zbTZbgX1shHG

Cheers!
hero member
Activity: 1470
Merit: 521
No more Rekt and Bust
"giving this coin marketing were many of it's features are still being tried out is in my mind unnecessary" - broseph

*golf clap*

What's that one about the old bull, the young bull and the herd of heifers in the field below?

full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
Can someone explain to me what is POSA please? I'm new to cryptos sry  Undecided  Grin

Proof of stake anon.

if you read the white paper on OP, you'll understand.
it's kinda hard to explain in few words.

basically, decentralized anonymous transaction is achieved via proof of stake.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100

CoinDesk: Darkcoin Battles New Setback to Anonymous Transaction System
http://www.coindesk.com/darkcoin-battles-anonymous-transaction-system-setback/

Why there's nothing about CloakCoin?

Honestly it's best if it doesn't get media coverage until the bugs are worked out. That way the devs can work without the pressure that inevitable FUDders will create.


Luckely this is a moderated thread.

Yeah it's moderated but some fudders are just relentless, they don't care about discussion they just want to watch the world burn as long as they can sell a few matches.  Keep in mind that FUD doesn't stay in a thread, it's like a sickness that goes around. Devs don't need to deal with that, at least not until they finish the PoSA come July.

FUD accusations have been used so many times in these altcoin threads, it's the boy that cried wolf fallacy. If you dismiss everything as FUD, how would you know when a genuine concern or problem is actually valid?

People were being labeled trolls and fudders when they warned that SilkCoin was having internal problems with it's dev team. Those that dismissed it as FUD are now bagholding a coin that is half the value.

It's not all black and white....your ideology leaves no room for rational discussion.

+1

Healthy criticism sparks intelligent debate and makes the coin's community stronger.
+1
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250

CoinDesk: Darkcoin Battles New Setback to Anonymous Transaction System
http://www.coindesk.com/darkcoin-battles-anonymous-transaction-system-setback/

Why there's nothing about CloakCoin?

Honestly it's best if it doesn't get media coverage until the bugs are worked out. That way the devs can work without the pressure that inevitable FUDders will create.


Luckely this is a moderated thread.

Yeah it's moderated but some fudders are just relentless, they don't care about discussion they just want to watch the world burn as long as they can sell a few matches.  Keep in mind that FUD doesn't stay in a thread, it's like a sickness that goes around. Devs don't need to deal with that, at least not until they finish the PoSA come July.

FUD accusations have been used so many times in these altcoin threads, it's the boy that cried wolf fallacy. If you dismiss everything as FUD, how would you know when a genuine concern or problem is actually valid?

People were being labeled trolls and fudders when they warned that SilkCoin was having internal problems with it's dev team. Those that dismissed it as FUD are now bagholding a coin that is half the value.

It's not all black and white....your ideology leaves no room for rational discussion.

+1

Healthy criticism sparks intelligent debate and makes the coin's community stronger.
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250

CoinDesk: Darkcoin Battles New Setback to Anonymous Transaction System
http://www.coindesk.com/darkcoin-battles-anonymous-transaction-system-setback/

Why there's nothing about CloakCoin?

Honestly it's best if it doesn't get media coverage until the bugs are worked out. That way the devs can work without the pressure that inevitable FUDders will create.


Luckely this is a moderated thread.

Yeah it's moderated but some fudders are just relentless, they don't care about discussion they just want to watch the world burn as long as they can sell a few matches.  Keep in mind that FUD doesn't stay in a thread, it's like a sickness that goes around. Devs don't need to deal with that, at least not until they finish the PoSA come July.

FUD accusations have been used so many times in these altcoin threads, it's the boy that cried wolf fallacy. If you dismiss everything as FUD, how would you know when a genuine concern or problem is actually valid?

People were being labeled trolls and fudders when they warned that SilkCoin was having internal problems with it's dev team. Those that dismissed it as FUD are now bagholding a coin that is half the value.

It's not all black and white....your ideology leaves no room for rational discussion.

There are two ways to address a problem; the right way, and the wrong way.

If the community collectively dismisses something as FUD, chances are it's FUD. If there is a legit problem, wouldn't it behoove the person with said problem to address it in a respectful manner to not be considered a FUDDER?

Again, there are two ways to address an issue. If you want to be taken seriously, act serious all the time.
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250

CoinDesk: Darkcoin Battles New Setback to Anonymous Transaction System
http://www.coindesk.com/darkcoin-battles-anonymous-transaction-system-setback/

Why there's nothing about CloakCoin?

Honestly it's best if it doesn't get media coverage until the bugs are worked out. That way the devs can work without the pressure that inevitable FUDders will create.


Luckely this is a moderated thread.

Yeah it's moderated but some fudders are just relentless, they don't care about discussion they just want to watch the world burn as long as they can sell a few matches.  Keep in mind that FUD doesn't stay in a thread, it's like a sickness that goes around. Devs don't need to deal with that, at least not until they finish the PoSA come July.

FUD accusations have been used so many times in these altcoin threads, it's the boy that cried wolf fallacy. If you dismiss everything as FUD, how would you know when a genuine concern or problem is actually valid?

People were being labeled trolls and fudders when they warned that SilkCoin was having internal problems with it's dev team. Those that dismissed it as FUD are now bagholding a coin that is half the value.

It's not all black and white....your ideology leaves no room for rational discussion.
Jump to: