Topic: [ANN] CoinAnalyst – Maximize your trading profits w/ News, Scam Detection & more (Read 19426 times)

The volume comes from bots.


Wow, this release triggers a lot of cheers. People and investors are going crazy here 

Sorry, but no one can validate if the software is really what you are promising (except buying a plan). The website has open placeholders what is not pretty professional.
Also the release was three weeks ago (according to your Medium blog post) and now you post it here? Pretty strange! No news on other media. Seems nobody cares.

BTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTC

Software released!


BTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTCBTC

Fortunately this token is still worth something on the trade.io and people are still buying it at $0.0044 price even after the huge dump while it has almost no volume on exmarkets. Had to withdraw my tokens as there was no open order there and only 1-2 tokens got sold after 3 days.

Somebody dumped and not just that, but also built a whole new Orderbook at "low" prices:



 

The current price of $0.0021 is 0.0018 EUR = - 82% to the ICO-price


Thing is: If we calculate the current price with the current Total Supply of 3.75 bn Token it would still be a Total Value of nearly  $8 Million. Who believes that the Coinanalyst-Economy is worth that much? My guess would be: There is room for lower prices. Plus: "Somebody" has a shit ton of Token to sell.

---

Btw, another example from Twitter and how credible and plausible it is that Coinanalyst sold Token for nearly 20 Million EUR:


A random Tweet from last year - 329 Retweets!





About 6 days ago they announced the Final ICO-Numbers... only 2 (!) Retweets:



The Final ICO Results don't get more attention? Shouldn't it be possible that at least your own people plus the Nexus Guys retweet your Tweets if you don't have any real Investors? Only two retweets looks pathetic.

@Coinanalyst: Maybe it is you dumping on the market, extending your ICO a fourth time, because in reality you didn't even sell close to what you claim?



Btw, it's not just me who believes you are dishonest about the numbers of your ICO if you check the German Thread:

Hi Coinanalyst, it's me again. Seems as if I'm your biggest fan! ;-)


Just saw that you have a new partnership! Congrats!

And the video about it really shows the huge salesman-talent of your CEO:

CoinAnalyst: Why the Kraken/AI partnership is a breakthrough
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FoFBOo3Od5g

- a hot update
- totally excited
- huuuuge
- smartest guys in prediction
- big data & AI
- killer solution
- best product ever
- your satisfaction is our reward (that's what I like most - so new, so wow, never heard before!)
- if we rock, this product rocks, the token rocks, simple thing, win-win-win (also a nice line! Catchy!)


To get that many superlatives in a short video of 1:26 minutes... that's huge. You really killed it! ;-)


But, you claim that you've sold token for nearly 20 Million Euro. Why does nobody care about your new partnership?

Views: 30 after 1 day?
Twitter Storm: Not so much (I saw one Tweet)



Just btw.: And again one Nexus Guy on Twitter tries to give the impression the price would go up like hell. Besides the fact that it's not true, this attempt to keep the price up with 1-buys really is way too obvious:





On trade.io, additionally to the typical tradeio-washtrading, it's done the same but doesn't help much. Price still down - near to zero real volume.



Again I have to say: I don't believe that you really sold token for 20 Million Euro.

About your new partnership: Who is KrakenAI? Never heard of. Is it really that huuuge?

Just minuges ago, a guy from Nexus on Twitter:



Dear NEXUS Family, you who have been with us since the early days or even lately, you guys see now the potential of our products.

Our first ICO, CoinAnalyst just hit 0,0335 Dollars, that more than tripple of the... https://www.facebook.com/599111409/posts/10157475100261410/ …

https://twitter.com/indoormunichnow/status/1134927424448344064




Reality:

Another interesting address:



https://etherscan.io/token/0xa2c1e04aca801da92fa95af161040d37f103d69d?a=0x57240eadc0eb8cf728f196ff1543ad79908142fc


Pay attention to:

• This address got 50,000,000 COY. Calculated with ICO price: 500,000 EUR
• 9 hours and a few minutes ago two transaction to two different addresses
• Interesting coincidence: Both the same amount of 1,154,000 COY

Let's see where it went to:








What does that mean? Is it possible that the first address that held COY for 500,000 EUR is just an address to distribute COY to normal/real Investors?

It is possible, but highly unlikely, because we have weird coincidences here:

• Two different addresses got the same amount of COY (calculated with ICO-price: 11,540 EUR each)
• Two different addresses send 100%, the exact same amount, to trade.io

Does that seem as if it's about different and real Investors who simply want to sell?

Who could that be? @Coinanalyst, any Idea?

Just one example/explanation what is happening on the market right now.


10,000,000 COY were transferred on this address on Feb 22
https://etherscan.io/token/0xa2c1e04aca801da92fa95af161040d37f103d69d?a=0xfd64bbeab701f44e2cdf039c6074aa541daab49b
Calculated with ICO-price of 0.01 EUR: 100,000 EUR ---> just a big (real) Investor? Hmm... I don't think so.

Transaction: 4 hours ago to:
https://etherscan.io/token/0xa2c1e04aca801da92fa95af161040d37f103d69d?a=0x66396b3c3d8446e364e805cb0e8c310dddff685e

That's an interesting address, because it is very active and holds a lot. More interesting: It then distributes to several other addresses. 3 examples:


https://etherscan.io/token/0xa2c1e04aca801da92fa95af161040d37f103d69d?a=0x9a4ec7e6e93ef5e51263b0c2e11fa17cdc143219
https://etherscan.io/token/0xa2c1e04aca801da92fa95af161040d37f103d69d?a=0xfa575e102909876134afb56e3c334a1192a12f3b
https://etherscan.io/token/0xa2c1e04aca801da92fa95af161040d37f103d69d?a=0x19475350e8a8812124a546648615bbdd1b8c149b

---

Now, let's take a look where the COY went to:










 

---

Now... let's think about it for a moment.

1) What we know for sure is that the first address got COY for 100,000 EUR on February 22
2) What we know for sure is that those COY are transacted on an address that also gets COY from several other addresses
3) What we know for sure is that THAT address then transacts COY on several other addresses


Does that look like as if it's just one guy who wants to sell?

---

Scenarios:

1) One big and real Investor who simply likes it complicated. Is that impossible? Nothing is impossible. It's just highly unlikely
2) Nexus Global
3) Coinanalyst



Just btw: I didn't dig deep here... If I would do that for about an hour, I'm pretty sure I would find several examples like that.



@Coinanalyst... you don't want to say anything about that, right? But don't you think it would be a good idea simply to say how much you sold exactly? Have you ever seen an ICO where that is kept as a secret?

Hi Coinanalyst,

I have zero doubts that you will continue with your zero-communication-policy on this platform but some questions can't hurt, right? ;-)



1) Today you've published a blogpost and you say this about the sold supply:

"Following the successful ICO campaign that began on 7th July 2018 and ended on 31st March 2019, CoinAnalyst’s token COY achieved impressive results: In main and pre-sale almost 2 billion COY were sold, which is almost 90% of the set Hard Cap."
https://medium.com/coinanalyst-tech/coinanalyst-starts-trading-on-exmarkets-and-trade-io-following-successful-ico-campaign-9da7e5af5c80

You sold "almost" 90% of the set Hard Cap? Any reason why you don't want to provide exact numbers? It's the first time I see something like that btw..


2) Etherscan shows the number of 3,750,000,000 COY as total supply. On your site you said about the basic distribution: 55% (Pre ICO and ICO) for the sale and 45% for the team (expenses etc.). With other words: The number of sold tokens also determined the number of the team-token. Since you've not generated those tokens before the ICO, but after and also over the last few days, the round number is weird. How is that possible? Do you plan a burning-session after you generated the token? Why isn't there any explanation about that?


3) 55% (Pre- and ICO) of the total supply would be: 2,062,500,000 COY. Is that the number you sold? Because if calculated with the ICO price of 0.01 EUR that would be more and not less than your Hard Cap (20 Million EUR)?  


4)  Really, you should provide exact numbers or this becomes a little bit weird, because at the moment your own numbers don't seem to add up!


5) Since you've partnered with the OneCoin-Guys from Nexus Global: Would you now be transparent about how much was sold to them? Stupid question since you don't even want to say how much you've sold as total, right?


6) Etherscan shows 2,493 addresses now. But the Top 20 hold more than 97% of the total supply. The Top 50 hold more than 98.5%. Any comment on that, especially when it's about question 5: Nexus Global?


7) How is it possible that your token was so wanted that you got so much money but when you tried to sell COY on Exmarkets you sold COY for only about 0.27 BTC over a time period of 5 weeks? At that time that was not even 1000 EUR in 5 weeks...


8 ) How is it possible that your token was so wanted during the ICO but now the highest  buy-order is at 0.00000020 BTC? That is 85% below ICO-price of 0.01 EUR!


9) Any reason why you don't even get a listing on IDEX after such a successful ICO?

---

Oh, and...: Interesting is also that you got hundreds of retweets for random Tweets last year but your last tweets, your announcement of trading-start got... zero retweets? How so?

---

Let me tell you what I believe: I believe that it would be very naive to believe in anything you say, even if you don't say much - your silence has a reason I guess?
I don't believe that you sold a round number and obviously you don't want to say how much you sold - since you don't do it you must have intention to hide exact numbers. I don't believe that your ICO was successful and that you really sold so much, but I believe that Nexus Global got a ton of COY. I don't believe that the number of addresses is equal to the number of Investors and I consider that as a reason why the distribution is so unbelievable fucked up. Top 20 > 97% of the total supply is..... let's call it "special".

I don't believe that you thought about the scenario that you see now, about the question how hard it would be to keep up a (fictional?) marketcap like that, especially if nobody wants to buy the token - as it already was obvious during the ICO. You start your article with "Following the successful ICO campaign that began on 7th July 2018 (...)" but we all know that you needed so much time because nearly nobody wanted to buy your COY. You partnered with Nexus already last year, but even after that you had to extend your ICO. And if that partnership was so successful, why the attempt to sell on Exmarkets where you sold Token for not even 1000 EUR over a 5 week period? This was one of the longest ICO's I've ever seen: 9 months!

What I believe is this, no matter how much exactly you hold and how much you sold: There are nearly no real Investors. You hold a ton of COY and Nexus Global holds a ton of token. There is nearly no trading, near to zero volume and especially: Near to zero buy orders and the few that are there want to buy about 90% below ICO-price to set the bought token as sell right after they've bought.

The few real Investors you have already sell below ICO-price and those who buy about 90% below on the exchange will undercut that right away. Now, let's think about the possibility that your buddies from Nexus Global try to game the market, try to orchestrate a little pump... They should think twice about it because it won't be easy to get buy orders, that's already obvious. If they set them themselves it could very well be that they will own just more COY - and they already have a shitload, right? ;-)

What I would like to know is if you trust the guys from Nexus and if they trust you. Because if not, there is absolutely no way that anyone of you will be able to get a higher price to sell your COY - each party has to be concerned about the possibility that the other one will sell into each pump attempt.

That's what I call a really bad market situation. Listing on small and unknown exchanges but a totally overblown marketcap I will never believe it to be real. But, over time it will go down...

---

Btw: Have you seen that your partner Savedroid is sued now? You are on the safe side regarding the controversial question they seem to have problems with?  

On Telegram the team was made aware of several unanswered questions here. This is their reply:

"We're not really interested paying attention ans answering questions to the same people who talk badly about our project and spreading FUD. Maybe you can understand that."

Let me give you a short lesson about the basics of good communication - it's really simple.

There are basically three kinds of negative informations coming from Crypto-Guys like me. But your reaction could always be the same:

• If somebody asks questions that may or may not imply that there is something wrong with your project ---> you reply with Facts
• If somebody intentionally spreads false Informations ---> you reply with Facts
• If somebody comes up with theories that are not true ---> you reply with Facts

If you read my posts... I ask a lot of questions and if you let them unanswered I come up with different scenarios. But, I'm not the typical guy who wants to spread FUD just to spread FUD, I'm not focused on the worst-possible scenario. I really want to know and I'm somebody who can differ between BS and facts. If you would come up with facts and I would see that I am wrong I would admit it. A reply like the above is bullshit...

It's very much like Trump does it every day and all day long. He doesn't want to show facts, so he tries everything to discredit those who ask. That's Childish. #SAD

Let me also tell you: In my opinion a good team has a responsibility not just to hype a project with the intention to sell as much as possible during an ICO, but  also to take care about their Investors after an ICO. What I mean by that is simple: A good team should reply on pretty much everything, at least everything that is relevant. Do you see anything irrelevant that I've talked about/asked?


1) Number of sold Tokens?
2) Distribution?
3) You friends from Nexus and how much they hold?
4) Exchanges?


Don't you think your Investors also have such questions?

---

Edit:

In case you don't believe me (because you don't like me)  just two posts above somebody else said this:

It's kind of fascinating that a team that has finished an ICO is so consistent when it's about not replying on any (not just mine) questions and not not giving any information out. I don't know if they are more transparent on their channel. I was kicked a long time ago, also because they didn't like questions. But it doesn't matter anyway...

Let's explore the Status Quo a bit:

The ICO has been finished since March 31 and as can be seen in the post above: They didn't know how much they sold.

Question would be, and of course they'll not reply:

1) Do they know now?
2) If yes, why wouldn't they make it public?
3) If no, how is that possible?


Etherescan can give some informations:
https://etherscan.io/token/0xa2c1e04aca801da92fa95af161040d37f103d69d#balances

1. Until now they have issued a total of 902,520,898 COY = about 9 Million Euro if calculated with the ICO-price
2. 100% of token are held by 45 addresses
3. The biggest addresses hold a lot while the smallest addresses hold tiny amounts (about 25 EUR)


There are basically three scenarios now:

1) That's it.. that's what they sold and only 45 addresses hold all Tokens. Of course that's not likely.
2) They'll issue more token and distribute those to more addresses. But: Even if, it wouldn't change much regarding the distribution
3) Some of the 45 addresses are addresses which they use to distribute. That's possible of course but since many of the 45 addresses show a balance of only 2500 token (about 25 EUR) it seems as if most of those addresses are Investor-addresses.


Here is what I believe is weird in any case: Coinanalyst had to extend the ICO again and again because they were not able to sell much. That also was their reason to partner with Nexus Global. But even with so experienced Salesmen (OneCoin-Promoters) they still had to extend their ICO. And not just that, they have tried to sell tokens on Exmarkets. How much did they sell? In about 5 weeks they've sold COY for only 0.2 BTC. I've never seen so little Interest in any ICO.

How is it possible that they have sold Tokens for at least about 12 Million Euro - that's what they claim in their Blog-Post:

(...) between 1.2 billion and 1.8 billion tokens in the Pre and Main ICO.


That's kind of hard to believe.


But, anyway... what I believe is: Some of the big addresses probably belong to Nexus-Global and Nexus-Global may distribute those COY to Nexus-Global-Members. But things become interesting here, because Nexus-Global is a MLM with Leaders who have a shady past. I've warned very early that they may plan a pump and dump



To manipulate a market would be easy if Nexus would control a huge majority of the supply. Now there are only 45 addresses and the Top 10 hold > 90% of the current total supply.


Regarding Exchanges:

Somebody told me that the Coinanalyst-team plans to launch on exchanges end of May. That would be in about 10 to 12 days. At least until then they should have figured out how much they sold to how much people. The confirmed exchanges are small and not likely to help this project any further:

trade.io
ExMarkets
Nebula Exchange
Source: https://medium.com/coinanalyst-tech/the-coinanalyst-ico-is-over-here-is-whats-next-382aa5f2bafb

More interesting as what they have confirmed is: Nearly all ERC20 get a listing on IDEX, but Coinanalyst didn't have confirmation when they wrote their Blog-Post. Why?


Summary:

1) More than 6 weeks after the end of their ICO they still don't know how much they've sold. Or: They just don't want to say it.
2) They don't reply on any question and all social media accounts are very quiet since a long time
3) The current distribution of the current total supply, about 9 Million EUR if calculated with the ICO-price, contains only 45 addresses
4) It seems that they can't find any interesting exchange, maybe not even IDEX
5) Even if the current status regarding token-issuance and distribution should not be final, the probability is high the Nexus Global holds a huge majority of the supply

the team should keep in touch with its users. This is especially true for investors. managers can do it too. it's not that hard. it is worth paying attention to this factor.

Hey Coinanalyst, you see all the questions above? You are online nearly every day but you believe it's not necessary to reply?


I also have a few questions:

One month ago, on March 31, you guys posted that your ICO is over:

The CoinAnalyst ICO is over. Here is what’s next…
https://medium.com/coinanalyst-tech/the-coinanalyst-ico-is-over-here-is-whats-next-382aa5f2bafb


Quote:

Already now I can say that our ICO was a success despite the difficult market. We have spent between 1.2 billion and 1.8 billion tokens in the Pre and Main ICO. Since our token has also been sold through many external portals and marketing campaigns, we still have to determine the exact amount manually. I ask for your understanding that this will take some time. We still have to wait for some feedback.

---

My questions are:

1. How is it possible that you still, 1 month later, don't know how much you've sold?  

2. Is it true that your ICO is in fact not over but that you keep on selling to Nexus-Global? I ask because of this - posted on April 16:

(...) We can still buy and stand a chance to have discounted rates for using the system (...)
https://www.facebook.com/MWGBC/posts/10157350519666410

3. Will you be transparent about the distribution of your token, about how much was sold to Nexus Global?


Why I ask is: I've watched the outcome on Exmarkets-Launchpad... You've sold only a few of your Token for 0.28 BTC to the general public there. That are about 1500 USD in 5 weeks. With other words: If it's true that you've sold between 1.2. and 1.8 billion tokens I would think that a huge majority was sold to Nexus Global and I believe you should be transparent about the numbers and maybe also about the current status, if your ICO is in fact over or if you are still selling to Nexus Global or not.

Any new informations or still nothing?


 

Maybe the team is busy with what they are developing so the team will not respond before their work is complete, but which I hope the team must talk here.

I hope the incident will not get worse and make people feel uncomfortable, maybe the team needs to fix it quickly so that there is no doubt about the community towards the Coinanlyts project

It must be as soon as the team immediately announces it on social media but it is certain that they certainly know the current situation and confront the anxious community.

I hope it will happen, because if they do not improve their social media, it will have a negative impact before the community, so it is immediately corrected so that trust will be stronger with the Coinanalyts project.

Maybe the team will prepare it and to immediately answer about not public trust, we are just waiting for the announcement, maybe after Bounty ends.

yes I saw it but how would the community believe that there is very little information I see on CoinAnalyst's latest social media about the development of this project, what about people's trust if this is not corrected?

The funds raised are still not on display by a team that is clear that CoinAnalysist has confirmed from several exchanges that they can be traded there.