Topic: [ANN] [COINO] KGW ACTIVATED - WALLET UPDATE ▬► COINO -(O)- ◄▬ The fastest Coin - page 64. (Read 233823 times)

How can we help you ?

so i need to stay alive so coino can survive! such resposibility ! much work !

Are you dead ?

If not then coino is fine

No. That's approximately.

The point is I worked in GERMANY for 8 years with some seriously  educated people and they wouldn't even know what the mathematical average sign was.

I lived and worked in Germany for 8 years and not even the techies I worked with understnd the average sign. So I don't think you have much of an argument here

Actually, your right

If they want to dump and bring the price down then it not such bad news for the holders. It means there is a steady stream of cheep coino for the rest of us to buy.

troll much, activity 4...

we've already been discussing it

Because Coino is a long term coin you should ask this question again in a month or three..

Haha, I thought I was stupid for not recognizing this mark as average but if it's only used in German speaking countries, I understand. I also use the x with line above (or another letter).
To answer the previous question, no, Coino is not dead. The discussion has been happening at the coino forum for many days now. But we are getting more active here again.

is coino ded?  discuss.

yep, that signs i recognize

It is only used in German-speaking countries.

Elsewhere it is an x with a bar above it or a =  with ~ above it.

I was never thought that average sign in shool

For some reason they didn't teach this symbol to me through my 11.5yrs of formal education in Australia.
I even did the 2unit maths (being the 2nd level) in 10 and 11.

Funny.

I thought Unicode handled this for us as well.
Create a font and have it override something that is good enough if the person doesn't have that font?
This would work fine on the internet, only run into issues when working offline and not able to include the required font.

Hmm I see a flaw in my idea, once the world caught up with coino then we'd have a conflict and have two characters occupying the same spot in the map, boo.

Got any other existing characters we are able to cannibalise for our purposes???
Else we might have to simply live with the square character showing up until everyone catches up and it is a non issue going forward.
(wanted to paste the square char however everything I Googled showed how to solve the problem)

Please appologise but I don't know where you are living.. Here in Germany every kid after the 6th grade knows the average sign and is normally using it.

You're right.  It's just like the issue of drug policy.  Locking up a drug warlord doesn't solve the problem. Someone else will just step into that role the next day.  Just the same, if one manipulator gets banned, there will be plenty more.  The exchanges just need to be setup better and take into account the volume so that there is no incentive for people to post a bunch of small sell orders at low prices in the first place.

I'm with you on the manipulation part thanks for that perspective. This sort of direction makes sense and I think the focus on these sorts of discussions is a preferred than a simple/blunt reactionary "ban hammer".

The solution to this problem is probably not to ban people. The exchanges just need to redo the way they determine the ticker price and take into account the volume. Then the ticker will reflect the true value and the people that are attempting the manipulation will have no incentive to post all of these small orders undercutting themselves over and over.

SoreGums, you make a good point. The problem is just that most people are too ignorant to understand the manipulation that is taking place and it is bad for the coin as a whole.

I don't agree with censorship but there are certain things that cross the line I think.  Take the internet for example.  I don't think the use of the internet should be regulated, but at the same time, people can use the internet to stage DoS attacks.  I think when there is malicious intent, a line has to be drawn somewhere. In this case, the intent is to trick people out of their coins, and therefor their money.  I do understand the idea of, "if they are dumb enough to be fooled into it then it serves them right to lose their coins". But at the same time, it doesn't just hurt the people that are being tricked.  Everyone's coinos are losing value due to this.

In our free market, it is illegal to participate in insider trading.  All these people are doing is benefiting from information being passed along right?  Wrong.  They are profiting off of other peoples loss due to manipulation and being in the know before hand that it is happening.  In a free market, prices should go up and down based on supply and demand, not market manipulation.

These exchanges that coino is on are not setup very well. They are not taking volume into account when determining ticker prices so they are very easily manipulated.  I do agree that people should educate themselves enough to not get taken advantage of, but it is still no excuse to purposely trick people out of their earnings.

I'm with you though, I hate censorship and regulation. Just not as much as I hate manipulation.

Hmm I think I'm missing something - why ban??

Free markets are suppose to be free...

If someone does this and it works, it is because the market supports it.

If the market is made of up stupid people, then that can't be helped.

If you want total control (any control) then it isn't a free market.

Please Explain to me why you think controls and rules on the "free capitalist market" is the way forward?

(this is like a government wanting to filter the internet)

also lets take this back to BitCoin, everyone is quick to point out how no one can control it unless they own 51% of the hash rate, that is the only place control is enforceable... everything else is agreements between people