Topic: [ANN] ColoredChain - Colorful Blockchain Applications Framework | PPoS | DApps (Read 13952 times)
June 03, 2016, 08:32:52 PM
Dev will never make a comeback, I feel sorry for those who sent the BTC. https://blockchain.info/address/14SXQgMsRU5RV9kXB3wRJVv5LdxzZpEobT
May 30, 2016, 08:52:17 AM
IT IS A SCAM.
WHICH PART OF THAT DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND?
ARE YOU TOO STUPID TO DRILL THIS IN YOUR BRAIN?
HERE IT IS AGAIN
SCAM
WHICH PART OF THAT DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND?
ARE YOU TOO STUPID TO DRILL THIS IN YOUR BRAIN?
HERE IT IS AGAIN
SCAM
May 30, 2016, 08:28:08 AM
Cheat?
May 28, 2016, 01:45:36 AM
You are type about nxt but what with colorful?
May 27, 2016, 09:28:09 PM
Great part of all funtctions are the same as the NXT, the difference is NXT has been here since 2013 And now its adopted for the main exchange in Russia:
https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/russia-s-national-settlement-depository-successfully-tests-blockchain-based-e-voting-system-1464198071
"Rymanov explained that the NSD’s e-proxy voting proof-of-concept (PoC) project specifications required setting up a private permissioned blockchain where every node participating in the network is known, and included a number of specific challenges related to processing capacity and permission-based access to the data. According to Rymanov, other blockchain technologies such as Bitcoin and Ethereum couldn’t meet the project’s requirements with an out-of-the-box solution, which motivated the choice of the NXT platform."
“Using the proof-of-work (PoW) Bitcoin blockchain would have potentially created a situation where a particular node with a superior computing power could gain an unfair advantage over its peers, thus jeopardizing the security of the network and, if being a malicious actor, could rig the results of the vote,” said Rymanov. “Furthermore, we see PoW systems as an unnecessary drain on resources in private permissioned blockchains.”
“With regards to Ethereum, our team has been in touch with the Ethereum core developers and has been informed that the current limit on processing is around 60 transactions per second,” added Rymanov. “However, even though Ethereum offered a huge improvement both in functionality and processing speed over Bitcoin blockchain, it did not match the NSD requirements.”
“After a careful consideration we have selected NXT,” Rymanov said. “The proof-of-stake (PoS) blockchain has provided us with enough flexibility to architect a solution that is scalable, stable and with processing capabilities well in the range of NSD expectations. In the lab environment we have pushed DSX fork of NXT to process up to 800 transactions per second. With the custom developed e-proxy voting module running on top of the NXT fork we have stabilized the system at 80 votes per second, which is 160 transactions per second reaching a notable result in line with NSD expectations.”
Any news about start tihis coin.https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/russia-s-national-settlement-depository-successfully-tests-blockchain-based-e-voting-system-1464198071
"Rymanov explained that the NSD’s e-proxy voting proof-of-concept (PoC) project specifications required setting up a private permissioned blockchain where every node participating in the network is known, and included a number of specific challenges related to processing capacity and permission-based access to the data. According to Rymanov, other blockchain technologies such as Bitcoin and Ethereum couldn’t meet the project’s requirements with an out-of-the-box solution, which motivated the choice of the NXT platform."
“Using the proof-of-work (PoW) Bitcoin blockchain would have potentially created a situation where a particular node with a superior computing power could gain an unfair advantage over its peers, thus jeopardizing the security of the network and, if being a malicious actor, could rig the results of the vote,” said Rymanov. “Furthermore, we see PoW systems as an unnecessary drain on resources in private permissioned blockchains.”
“With regards to Ethereum, our team has been in touch with the Ethereum core developers and has been informed that the current limit on processing is around 60 transactions per second,” added Rymanov. “However, even though Ethereum offered a huge improvement both in functionality and processing speed over Bitcoin blockchain, it did not match the NSD requirements.”
“After a careful consideration we have selected NXT,” Rymanov said. “The proof-of-stake (PoS) blockchain has provided us with enough flexibility to architect a solution that is scalable, stable and with processing capabilities well in the range of NSD expectations. In the lab environment we have pushed DSX fork of NXT to process up to 800 transactions per second. With the custom developed e-proxy voting module running on top of the NXT fork we have stabilized the system at 80 votes per second, which is 160 transactions per second reaching a notable result in line with NSD expectations.”
NXT already exist nxt.org with all those functions:
Alias system-> Uri alias, account alias
Coinshuffle -> decentralized mixing for strong anonimity unique of NXT
Monetary System -> You can do your own colored coin
Message System -> You can send encrypted message or using this feature + account control you can built a type of Dapp
Asset Exchange -> More than a million dollar in assets and growing
decentralized democracy - > Using votings pools NXT devs are doing a decentralized democracy inside NXT
Pools -> You can create a pool
Accont Control -> Better than multisign and allow people who owns asset/colored coins/ accounts to control or vote in pools
Decentralized Market -> Yep on blockchain
Decentralized Storage
3-party apps supported
The roadmap for NXT 2.0 are here http://nxt.org/roadmap/ -> NXT community was the one of the firsts to be created using ICO system, first to LPoS, first and unique to apply coinsuffle protocol, first in colored coins and now they are solving some blockchain trick questions (like blockchain bloat).
Why dont join NXT, Ethereum, Lisk or other similar project and improve it? There are so many projects out there.
May 27, 2016, 11:09:02 AM
Great part of all funtctions are the same as the NXT, the difference is NXT has been here since 2013 And now its adopted for the main exchange in Russia:
https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/russia-s-national-settlement-depository-successfully-tests-blockchain-based-e-voting-system-1464198071
"Rymanov explained that the NSD’s e-proxy voting proof-of-concept (PoC) project specifications required setting up a private permissioned blockchain where every node participating in the network is known, and included a number of specific challenges related to processing capacity and permission-based access to the data. According to Rymanov, other blockchain technologies such as Bitcoin and Ethereum couldn’t meet the project’s requirements with an out-of-the-box solution, which motivated the choice of the NXT platform."
“Using the proof-of-work (PoW) Bitcoin blockchain would have potentially created a situation where a particular node with a superior computing power could gain an unfair advantage over its peers, thus jeopardizing the security of the network and, if being a malicious actor, could rig the results of the vote,” said Rymanov. “Furthermore, we see PoW systems as an unnecessary drain on resources in private permissioned blockchains.”
“With regards to Ethereum, our team has been in touch with the Ethereum core developers and has been informed that the current limit on processing is around 60 transactions per second,” added Rymanov. “However, even though Ethereum offered a huge improvement both in functionality and processing speed over Bitcoin blockchain, it did not match the NSD requirements.”
“After a careful consideration we have selected NXT,” Rymanov said. “The proof-of-stake (PoS) blockchain has provided us with enough flexibility to architect a solution that is scalable, stable and with processing capabilities well in the range of NSD expectations. In the lab environment we have pushed DSX fork of NXT to process up to 800 transactions per second. With the custom developed e-proxy voting module running on top of the NXT fork we have stabilized the system at 80 votes per second, which is 160 transactions per second reaching a notable result in line with NSD expectations.”
Any news about start tihis coin. https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/russia-s-national-settlement-depository-successfully-tests-blockchain-based-e-voting-system-1464198071
"Rymanov explained that the NSD’s e-proxy voting proof-of-concept (PoC) project specifications required setting up a private permissioned blockchain where every node participating in the network is known, and included a number of specific challenges related to processing capacity and permission-based access to the data. According to Rymanov, other blockchain technologies such as Bitcoin and Ethereum couldn’t meet the project’s requirements with an out-of-the-box solution, which motivated the choice of the NXT platform."
“Using the proof-of-work (PoW) Bitcoin blockchain would have potentially created a situation where a particular node with a superior computing power could gain an unfair advantage over its peers, thus jeopardizing the security of the network and, if being a malicious actor, could rig the results of the vote,” said Rymanov. “Furthermore, we see PoW systems as an unnecessary drain on resources in private permissioned blockchains.”
“With regards to Ethereum, our team has been in touch with the Ethereum core developers and has been informed that the current limit on processing is around 60 transactions per second,” added Rymanov. “However, even though Ethereum offered a huge improvement both in functionality and processing speed over Bitcoin blockchain, it did not match the NSD requirements.”
“After a careful consideration we have selected NXT,” Rymanov said. “The proof-of-stake (PoS) blockchain has provided us with enough flexibility to architect a solution that is scalable, stable and with processing capabilities well in the range of NSD expectations. In the lab environment we have pushed DSX fork of NXT to process up to 800 transactions per second. With the custom developed e-proxy voting module running on top of the NXT fork we have stabilized the system at 80 votes per second, which is 160 transactions per second reaching a notable result in line with NSD expectations.”
May 27, 2016, 10:57:02 AM
Great part of all funtctions are the same as the NXT, the difference is NXT has been here since 2013 And now its adopted for the main exchange in Russia:
https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/russia-s-national-settlement-depository-successfully-tests-blockchain-based-e-voting-system-1464198071
"Rymanov explained that the NSD’s e-proxy voting proof-of-concept (PoC) project specifications required setting up a private permissioned blockchain where every node participating in the network is known, and included a number of specific challenges related to processing capacity and permission-based access to the data. According to Rymanov, other blockchain technologies such as Bitcoin and Ethereum couldn’t meet the project’s requirements with an out-of-the-box solution, which motivated the choice of the NXT platform."
“Using the proof-of-work (PoW) Bitcoin blockchain would have potentially created a situation where a particular node with a superior computing power could gain an unfair advantage over its peers, thus jeopardizing the security of the network and, if being a malicious actor, could rig the results of the vote,” said Rymanov. “Furthermore, we see PoW systems as an unnecessary drain on resources in private permissioned blockchains.”
“With regards to Ethereum, our team has been in touch with the Ethereum core developers and has been informed that the current limit on processing is around 60 transactions per second,” added Rymanov. “However, even though Ethereum offered a huge improvement both in functionality and processing speed over Bitcoin blockchain, it did not match the NSD requirements.”
“After a careful consideration we have selected NXT,” Rymanov said. “The proof-of-stake (PoS) blockchain has provided us with enough flexibility to architect a solution that is scalable, stable and with processing capabilities well in the range of NSD expectations. In the lab environment we have pushed DSX fork of NXT to process up to 800 transactions per second. With the custom developed e-proxy voting module running on top of the NXT fork we have stabilized the system at 80 votes per second, which is 160 transactions per second reaching a notable result in line with NSD expectations.”
https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/russia-s-national-settlement-depository-successfully-tests-blockchain-based-e-voting-system-1464198071
"Rymanov explained that the NSD’s e-proxy voting proof-of-concept (PoC) project specifications required setting up a private permissioned blockchain where every node participating in the network is known, and included a number of specific challenges related to processing capacity and permission-based access to the data. According to Rymanov, other blockchain technologies such as Bitcoin and Ethereum couldn’t meet the project’s requirements with an out-of-the-box solution, which motivated the choice of the NXT platform."
“Using the proof-of-work (PoW) Bitcoin blockchain would have potentially created a situation where a particular node with a superior computing power could gain an unfair advantage over its peers, thus jeopardizing the security of the network and, if being a malicious actor, could rig the results of the vote,” said Rymanov. “Furthermore, we see PoW systems as an unnecessary drain on resources in private permissioned blockchains.”
“With regards to Ethereum, our team has been in touch with the Ethereum core developers and has been informed that the current limit on processing is around 60 transactions per second,” added Rymanov. “However, even though Ethereum offered a huge improvement both in functionality and processing speed over Bitcoin blockchain, it did not match the NSD requirements.”
“After a careful consideration we have selected NXT,” Rymanov said. “The proof-of-stake (PoS) blockchain has provided us with enough flexibility to architect a solution that is scalable, stable and with processing capabilities well in the range of NSD expectations. In the lab environment we have pushed DSX fork of NXT to process up to 800 transactions per second. With the custom developed e-proxy voting module running on top of the NXT fork we have stabilized the system at 80 votes per second, which is 160 transactions per second reaching a notable result in line with NSD expectations.”
May 25, 2016, 03:50:50 PM
Ico ends 23 may ,and nothing happend.
May 12, 2016, 01:53:12 AM
May 09, 2016, 11:17:00 PM
1. Unknown newbie "dev"
2. ICO
3. No escrow
4. Evasive answers here in the thread.
Scam. Be warned
2. ICO
3. No escrow
4. Evasive answers here in the thread.
Scam. Be warned
Looks like ppl shoulda listened.
May 09, 2016, 11:00:23 PM
LOL he legged it already!! Hope none of you gave that cunt too much!!!? you were warned! Listen next time! 
May 08, 2016, 10:13:58 AM
DEV any update? Or run away? 
The last time he was here 30 april. May 05, 2016, 10:36:33 PM
DEV any update? Or run away?
May 05, 2016, 07:17:41 AM
there are so many more reliable ICO, why must choose this scam likely project with so much challenge?
May 03, 2016, 02:58:10 PM
1. Unknown newbie "dev"
2. ICO
3. No escrow
4. Evasive answers here in the thread.
Scam. Be warned
2. ICO
3. No escrow
4. Evasive answers here in the thread.
Scam. Be warned
May 03, 2016, 07:55:16 AM
hi ColoredChain! i'm interesting, when twitter followers will be added here in bounty list https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1xea-IaemF16Kbl8JcjbcS8ByD-f_0gKHFz7hjVFD0p0/edit?pref=2&pli=1#gid=0 , and maybe need personal message sending, or you'll do this automaticly in future?
April 30, 2016, 11:09:24 PM
1. In Lisk (just for example) sidechains must confirm their own transaction by yourself, a mainchain don't interract with sidechains (except coins movement between main and sidechains).
In your project only mainchain must confirm transactions from sidechains and a mainchain stores hashes of sidechains.
Can you provide pros and cons of this system? I have some thoughts about it, but it interesting why you choose this way.
2. So, what about CVM code? Can you describe your VM in more technical words?
Can you show part of CMV code? Can you show part of dapp (colored token platfom)?
As example, Lisk/Crypti uses the standart javascript VM, nothing special.
Did you develop a new realisation of VM or you use java VM (same way as Lisk do)?
If you show parts of it, describe it, etc, it's will be good for understanding how things works and publicity.
In your project only mainchain must confirm transactions from sidechains and a mainchain stores hashes of sidechains.
Can you provide pros and cons of this system? I have some thoughts about it, but it interesting why you choose this way.
2. So, what about CVM code? Can you describe your VM in more technical words?
Can you show part of CMV code? Can you show part of dapp (colored token platfom)?
As example, Lisk/Crypti uses the standart javascript VM, nothing special.
Did you develop a new realisation of VM or you use java VM (same way as Lisk do)?
If you show parts of it, describe it, etc, it's will be good for understanding how things works and publicity.
April 30, 2016, 10:36:20 AM
What's up with the odd number of coins?
Total amount of coloredchain tokens is 64,570,081,fixed.
• 52,947,466 (82%) for open ICO.
• 8,394,110 (13%) reserved for supporting third party DApps development and long term marketing of Foundation(Hold
by community).
• 2,582,803(4%) reserved for partners.
- Cloud service deployment
- Exchanges
- PR company
• 645,700(1%) for ICO bounty.
- 193710 for Bitcointalk signature campaign participants.
- 129140 for Coloredchain twitter followers.
- 129140 for joining Coloredchain facebook group/like.
- 193710 for local language translation and management.
Total amount of coloredchain tokens is 64,570,081,fixed.
• 52,947,466 (82%) for open ICO.
• 8,394,110 (13%) reserved for supporting third party DApps development and long term marketing of Foundation(Hold
by community).
• 2,582,803(4%) reserved for partners.
- Cloud service deployment
- Exchanges
- PR company
• 645,700(1%) for ICO bounty.
- 193710 for Bitcointalk signature campaign participants.
- 129140 for Coloredchain twitter followers.
- 129140 for joining Coloredchain facebook group/like.
- 193710 for local language translation and management.
We have to admit that the initial supply is defined randomly.
Important Updates
The initial total supply will be changed from current 100 million to 64,570,081 to conform with Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER.
With this change,there will be no more conversions needed from machine side of IOT area,decrease the burden,and will interactive well with machine built in JavaScript and framework,such as node.js .
Others properties same as before.
OP will be updated soon.
why all ICO nowdays total supply always 100M coins with 13M-15M for develover
It's just for defining the total amount,either 100M or 1Billion is okay. Important Updates
The initial total supply will be changed from current 100 million to 64,570,081 to conform with Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER.
With this change,there will be no more conversions needed from machine side of IOT area,decrease the burden,and will interactive well with machine built in JavaScript and framework,such as node.js .
Others properties same as before.
OP will be updated soon.
April 29, 2016, 10:50:16 PM
What's up with the odd number of coins?
Total amount of coloredchain tokens is 64,570,081,fixed.
• 52,947,466 (82%) for open ICO.
• 8,394,110 (13%) reserved for supporting third party DApps development and long term marketing of Foundation(Hold
by community).
• 2,582,803(4%) reserved for partners.
- Cloud service deployment
- Exchanges
- PR company
• 645,700(1%) for ICO bounty.
- 193710 for Bitcointalk signature campaign participants.
- 129140 for Coloredchain twitter followers.
- 129140 for joining Coloredchain facebook group/like.
- 193710 for local language translation and management.
Total amount of coloredchain tokens is 64,570,081,fixed.
• 52,947,466 (82%) for open ICO.
• 8,394,110 (13%) reserved for supporting third party DApps development and long term marketing of Foundation(Hold
by community).
• 2,582,803(4%) reserved for partners.
- Cloud service deployment
- Exchanges
- PR company
• 645,700(1%) for ICO bounty.
- 193710 for Bitcointalk signature campaign participants.
- 129140 for Coloredchain twitter followers.
- 129140 for joining Coloredchain facebook group/like.
- 193710 for local language translation and management.
April 29, 2016, 10:20:16 PM
I'm gonna post this again.
https://medium.com/@icocountdown/coloredchain-warning-9a373fa8f7b2#.otewrg6tj
https://medium.com/@icocountdown/coloredchain-warning-9a373fa8f7b2#.otewrg6tj
Quote
I think I could make a career out of this …..
Thread reference: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-coloredchain-colorful-blockchain-applications-framework-ppos-dapps-1433220
No Escrow.
No code in github repository.
https://github.com/ColoredChain
Same Thread layout as Lisk.
Reference: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annlsk-lisk-blockchain-application-platform-for-javascript-developers-1346646
Clear addition of Bounties to draw more people into the ICO without proof of technology.
All medium Articles are to do with the ICO and none are based around technological development.
https://blog.coloredchain.com/
Mention of Sidechains: Completely theoretical concept that is not even yet developed.
Generally garbled language with no scientific documentation.
As usual avoid friends.
Thread reference: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-coloredchain-colorful-blockchain-applications-framework-ppos-dapps-1433220
No Escrow.
No code in github repository.
https://github.com/ColoredChain
Same Thread layout as Lisk.
Reference: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annlsk-lisk-blockchain-application-platform-for-javascript-developers-1346646
Clear addition of Bounties to draw more people into the ICO without proof of technology.
All medium Articles are to do with the ICO and none are based around technological development.
https://blog.coloredchain.com/
Mention of Sidechains: Completely theoretical concept that is not even yet developed.
Generally garbled language with no scientific documentation.
As usual avoid friends.
Jump to: