People holding CV2 are still part of our community. It's the same coin, just an older implementation of it, and that's not their fault.
People should not be forced to check up on their coins every 3 months to prevent those coins from being destroyed. They paid real money for their CV2, and at 4 sats, that's still about 1.2 million dollars we're talking about.
The way we deal with CV2 will be an example for how we deal with COLX in the future. Destroying CV2 will also destroy trust in COLX, and dealing with CV2 it in a decent matter will also make COLX a trustworthy and valuable coin.
I don't want you to open your COLX wallet two years from now, expecting lots and lots of value, only to find out that your coins were replaced by some new "COLX2" coin and your value distributed amongst other people. I'm sure you would be pretty upset and angry if that happend. So let's not do that now either.
I hear you but it is a two way street.
Holders have at least half of the burden of keeping up to speed with their portfolios. This includes planning for situations where they may not be able to take action themselves.
The risks that come with having a huge pile of COLX sitting around waiting for a small inactive component of the community to get their acts together is significant.
The crypto community will not trust COLX until the leftovers from the swap are proven burnt, we've already seen FUD from this starting earlier in the thread.
If by the 'small inactive component of the community' you mean the people that haven't swapped yet... so far that turns out the be a big majority, not a minority.
But yes, there are good arguments to both sides of the story, so maybe this will be a good subject to vote on in the end and burn coins accordingly.
