@HTC123, i read what you wrote and i know what you mean
did you get your stake or you are in rejected list?
btw, if everyone here get their stakes, so there will not any coins left for bounties and promotions
they can use those minted coins for promoting (multipool, exchanges, graphic ...)
the Devs cant rely to donations for future promotions since from about 450 stakeholders, you can see max 30 persons are contributing for donations so far (block explorer and multipool)
so, it seems there are reasons why they are keeping the minted coins
@ShXnot
Yes, thank you for your patient reading on my posts.
I don't care about the reason why they will keep the huge interest (maybe 10mil-15mil at the end). Yes , you can say they will use them as the development. I agree there is the possibility.
But you missed the point:
they are planning to kill a lot of early stakeholders in 2nd round distribution. The reason? Because of their silence and "possible" dumping the coins.
Where will these stakes (from rejecting those early stakeholders) go?
As the bounties!!
How many early stakeholders will be killed in the 2nd round? I don't know. Maybe 50, maybe 100.
That means about 5-10% stakes will be in the hand of the dev at the end in the form of "bounties" and "interest" and "development".
The community had voted 0.5% as the bounties fraction.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/pollcommunity-fund-for-communitycoin-bounties-and-giveaway-557616Ok, the dev obviously ignored it. What did the dev plan? Think about it. Nobody is a fool.
EDIT:
see the reason they kill the chance of 2nd round distribution of one early stakeholder:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6108003OK,first of all i think selective distribution is a good thing for POS coins generally in my opinion
and i believe it is every rejected person's right to know why they are rejected
if i get rejected, I'd like to know the reason
maybe i can fix the cause and try again for famous SECOND CHANCE
its the only thing that i've found a little defective for this coin
because the Devs do not clarified rejection reasons for all rejected users
everything else is OK so far
and if the rest stakes of rejected users, distribute equally between earlier stakeholders, it would be fair, even if i was one of those rejected
but as i said, i'd like to know the reason
do you know where this kind of distributions become so hard? i think in judgment part
the Devs have to judge everyone of us by their parameters
i dont know what exactly those parameters are, maybe they are reading all your post or searching your username to see how you treat to cryptocurrency
anyway, i think if everyone of us doing our share to promote COMM instead of attacking it, there will be fair and smooth distribution at the end
i think i get your point and hopefully you've got mine
