Author

Topic: [ANN] CRAVE 1st POS Masternodes | Dark Assets | I2P | Market =Embrace The Dark= - page 238. (Read 826735 times)

hero member
Activity: 546
Merit: 500
Thank you for supporting what i am saying though and i agree that people should be thanking me for my skepticism.

Why the veil? Are you not a wolf in sheeps clothing? Please prove me wrong...
I am confused, what veil? and what am i supposed to prove? lol
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
Thank you for supporting what i am saying though and i agree that people should be thanking me for my skepticism.

Why the veil? Are you not a wolf in sheeps clothing? Please prove me wrong...

A wolf who uses tired fud themes.
hero member
Activity: 546
Merit: 500
I am not a coder myself so it is difficult for me to asses the legitimacy of a project especially if there is so little peer review or information, there is not even a whitepaper explaining the basic tenets of the anonymity.

I've got 2 suggestions to choose from:

1. Learn to code and see for yourself if it's any good (my choice).
2. Hire someone to do it for you.

Don't expect anyone to do it for you for free. That's our comparative advantage, and it's worth money.

Interesting suggestions, I have focused on developing other skills in my life so i am not a coder, but maybe I should consider learning basic coding, not sure how much that would help in assessing cryptocurrencies though, might have to learn cryptography as well lol, and i am not that mathematically minded either lol. I lean more towards philosophy and art. For the amount that i am investing it is also not worth hiring someone to review it. A third option would be not to invest in projects that have not been properly reviewed, but its just to tempting investing in such speculative projects lol. Of course i can not expect a full fledged code review so early in this coins development but even people that are coders that i have asked have told me that it does not reflect well on the project that the contributes can not be traced back on the github, this does not mean that the code is not good of course, however fixing the github would reflect better on CRAVE, and I think that is what most of us here want after all.
sr. member
Activity: 292
Merit: 250
post getting lost on other pages.

can you help me with my nodes.

I have moved my nodes to another computer copied everything accross set up tor exactly the same but now when i try to start the nodes it says unable to connect ajhdlksafasf.oinion.9999.

It is the same setup as i had before on other computer.

I have then gone back and checked to see if they work on the other computer still and they dont! the same again when i type masternode start it says unable to connect ashfladgaf.oinion:9999.

The conf files are the same that were working before.

the wallets them selves on both computer still load and sync and assume they can still send coins i havent tested tho.

thanks

did you change the .onion address to the new one created on the new computer?

ye i tried it a few times thinking it was just a dodgy generated one

perhaps try reinstalling tor? and deleting that address file?

tried that to. Is there sme sort of resync i need to do as i have moved computers and it is different ip or summit like that?

maybe you can try setting up an apache server with like XAMPP or something and see if you can connect to it with your tor .onion address


if you can..maybe its a port issue

but it was working on the other computer at first and then stopped once i installed it on the other one. Is it a tor problem? only thing i can think to try is make whole new wallets for the nodes and see if that works but that seems a pain in the arse

it could be a port issue...i was able to setup tor and i was able to connect to my XAMPP apache server...but was unable to connect to the masternode server...then i did some port scans on 9999 and it was closed...tried to do some port forwarding on my router but for some reason the port forwarding wasnt working for me  and port never became open Sad
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
post getting lost on other pages.

can you help me with my nodes.

I have moved my nodes to another computer copied everything accross set up tor exactly the same but now when i try to start the nodes it says unable to connect ajhdlksafasf.oinion.9999.

It is the same setup as i had before on other computer.

I have then gone back and checked to see if they work on the other computer still and they dont! the same again when i type masternode start it says unable to connect ashfladgaf.oinion:9999.

The conf files are the same that were working before.

the wallets them selves on both computer still load and sync and assume they can still send coins i havent tested tho.

thanks

did you change the .onion address to the new one created on the new computer?

ye i tried it a few times thinking it was just a dodgy generated one

perhaps try reinstalling tor? and deleting that address file?

tried that to. Is there sme sort of resync i need to do as i have moved computers and it is different ip or summit like that?

maybe you can try setting up an apache server with like XAMPP or something and see if you can connect to it with your tor .onion address


if you can..maybe its a port issue

but it was working on the other computer at first and then stopped once i installed it on the other one. Is it a tor problem? only thing i can think to try is make whole new wallets for the nodes and see if that works but that seems a pain in the arse
hero member
Activity: 639
Merit: 503
For those of you that want to compile crave:
Assuming you have all the dependencies.

For libsecp256k1:
Code:
git clone https://github.com/bitcoin/secp256k1.git
cd secp256k1
./autogen.sh
./configure
make
sudo make install
sudo ldconfig
plz help
Code:
@ubu:~/secp256k1$ sudo make install
make[1]: Bxoд в кaтaлoг `/home/user/secp256k1'
 /bin/mkdir -p '/usr/local/lib'
 /bin/bash ./libtool   --mode=install /usr/bin/install -c   libsecp256k1.la '/usr/local/lib'
libtool: install: /usr/bin/install -c .libs/libsecp256k1.so.0.0.0 /usr/local/lib/libsecp256k1.so.0.0.0
libtool: install: (cd /usr/local/lib && { ln -s -f libsecp256k1.so.0.0.0 libsecp256k1.so.0 || { rm -f libsecp256k1.so.0 && ln -s libsecp256k1.so.0.0.0 libsecp256k1.so.0; }; })
libtool: install: (cd /usr/local/lib && { ln -s -f libsecp256k1.so.0.0.0 libsecp256k1.so || { rm -f libsecp256k1.so && ln -s libsecp256k1.so.0.0.0 libsecp256k1.so; }; })
libtool: install: /usr/bin/install -c .libs/libsecp256k1.lai /usr/local/lib/libsecp256k1.la
libtool: install: /usr/bin/install -c .libs/libsecp256k1.a /usr/local/lib/libsecp256k1.a
libtool: install: chmod 644 /usr/local/lib/libsecp256k1.a
libtool: install: /usr/bin/ranlib /usr/local/lib/libsecp256k1.a
libtool: finish: PATH="/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/sbin" ldconfig -n /usr/local/lib
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Libraries have been installed in:
   /usr/local/lib

If you ever happen to want to link against installed libraries
in a given directory, LIBDIR, you must either use libtool, and
specify the full pathname of the library, or use the `-LLIBDIR'
flag during linking and do at least one of the following:
   - add LIBDIR to the `LD_LIBRARY_PATH' environment variable
     during execution
   - add LIBDIR to the `LD_RUN_PATH' environment variable
     during linking
   - use the `-Wl,-rpath -Wl,LIBDIR' linker flag
   - have your system administrator add LIBDIR to `/etc/ld.so.conf'

See any operating system documentation about shared libraries for
more information, such as the ld(1) and ld.so(8) manual pages.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 /bin/mkdir -p '/usr/local/include'
 /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 include/secp256k1.h '/usr/local/include'
 /bin/mkdir -p '/usr/local/lib/pkgconfig'
 /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 libsecp256k1.pc '/usr/local/lib/pkgconfig'
make[1]: Bыxoд из кaтaлoгa `/home/user/secp256k1'
sr. member
Activity: 292
Merit: 250
post getting lost on other pages.

can you help me with my nodes.

I have moved my nodes to another computer copied everything accross set up tor exactly the same but now when i try to start the nodes it says unable to connect ajhdlksafasf.oinion.9999.

It is the same setup as i had before on other computer.

I have then gone back and checked to see if they work on the other computer still and they dont! the same again when i type masternode start it says unable to connect ashfladgaf.oinion:9999.

The conf files are the same that were working before.

the wallets them selves on both computer still load and sync and assume they can still send coins i havent tested tho.

thanks

did you change the .onion address to the new one created on the new computer?

ye i tried it a few times thinking it was just a dodgy generated one

perhaps try reinstalling tor? and deleting that address file?

tried that to. Is there sme sort of resync i need to do as i have moved computers and it is different ip or summit like that?

maybe you can try setting up an apache server with like XAMPP or something and see if you can connect to it with your tor .onion address


if you can..maybe its a port issue
legendary
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1119
It's all mathematics...!
We should request that ICM fixes the github and gives proper credit to the prior contributors of the code base. Could you do this for the community industrialcoinmagic?
This would be a good chance to prove yourself as being a good and competent developer that is responsive to the community.
I would personally buy the rest that i need for a masternode if you did this, since it would greatly increase my confidence in CRAVE and i am sure many others would feel the same way. The way the github looks now is just unprofessional and does not inspire confidence, please fix the github dev and give proper credit to the prior contributors of the code base, it is the right thing to do.
Seems he has disapeared and he broke promise of giving an update today to go watch movies.
Just have a look at the cloak thread. It's the same thing that happened there. Alty a.k.a. ICM a.k.a. whatnotelse will now slowly subside from the community. In a couple of weeks, there will be a minor pump (which won't even get nearly close to previous highs) to get more of your coins (not crave, but the real ones: Bitcoin) and then, the coin will be left to die a slow death.

I know it's hard to realize to have misinvested. Trust me, I know this feeling very, very well. But you (the community in this thread in general, not the user I'm quoting) should at least not bring those into discredit who try to warn you, because they have experienced and witnessed this whole mess over and over again.

I don't know who it was, but telling me "you know where the door is" when all I am doing is telling people the facts which I have seen when cloak happened (heck, they're even using the same forum… all this old crap is being recycled over and over, and nobody even cares!), without attacking anybody personally is either just unthankfulness, ignorance or a shill account of Bobo the clown.
I bought in after the crash in the price, I recognize a bubble when i see one. Thank you for supporting what i am saying though and i agree that people should be thanking me for my skepticism. I want financial privacy and freedom like i am sure many of us here do as well, we are on the same side we should not be attacking each other. For the record i am not a payed troll or an alt of somebody else as has been suggested here. I am not a coder myself so it is difficult for me to asses the legitimacy of a project especially if there is so little peer review or information, there is not even a whitepaper explaining the basic tenets of the anonymity. I want to invest in all real anonymous cryptocurrencies, I just need to be convinced that this is a legitimate project. If the github traces back to the contributors then it should be easier to review the code and most likely more code reviews can be done so that we can all be assured that it does work, I am sure there are many investors here that feel the same way that i do. Fixing the github is in the best interests of CRAVE and we should all be embracing this idea and request that the developer does this IMHO.

Why the veil? Are you not a wolf in sheeps clothing? Please prove me wrong...
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
post getting lost on other pages.

can you help me with my nodes.

I have moved my nodes to another computer copied everything accross set up tor exactly the same but now when i try to start the nodes it says unable to connect ajhdlksafasf.oinion.9999.

It is the same setup as i had before on other computer.

I have then gone back and checked to see if they work on the other computer still and they dont! the same again when i type masternode start it says unable to connect ashfladgaf.oinion:9999.

The conf files are the same that were working before.

the wallets them selves on both computer still load and sync and assume they can still send coins i havent tested tho.

thanks

did you change the .onion address to the new one created on the new computer?

ye i tried it a few times thinking it was just a dodgy generated one

perhaps try reinstalling tor? and deleting that address file?

tried that to. Is there sme sort of resync i need to do as i have moved computers and it is different ip or summit like that?
sr. member
Activity: 292
Merit: 250
post getting lost on other pages.

can you help me with my nodes.

I have moved my nodes to another computer copied everything accross set up tor exactly the same but now when i try to start the nodes it says unable to connect ajhdlksafasf.oinion.9999.

It is the same setup as i had before on other computer.

I have then gone back and checked to see if they work on the other computer still and they dont! the same again when i type masternode start it says unable to connect ashfladgaf.oinion:9999.

The conf files are the same that were working before.

the wallets them selves on both computer still load and sync and assume they can still send coins i havent tested tho.

thanks

did you change the .onion address to the new one created on the new computer?

ye i tried it a few times thinking it was just a dodgy generated one

perhaps try reinstalling tor? and deleting that address file?
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
post getting lost on other pages.

can you help me with my nodes.

I have moved my nodes to another computer copied everything accross set up tor exactly the same but now when i try to start the nodes it says unable to connect ajhdlksafasf.oinion.9999.

It is the same setup as i had before on other computer.

I have then gone back and checked to see if they work on the other computer still and they dont! the same again when i type masternode start it says unable to connect ashfladgaf.oinion:9999.

The conf files are the same that were working before.

the wallets them selves on both computer still load and sync and assume they can still send coins i havent tested tho.

thanks

did you change the .onion address to the new one created on the new computer?

ye i tried it a few times thinking it was just a dodgy generated one
sr. member
Activity: 292
Merit: 250
post getting lost on other pages.

can you help me with my nodes.

I have moved my nodes to another computer copied everything accross set up tor exactly the same but now when i try to start the nodes it says unable to connect ajhdlksafasf.oinion.9999.

It is the same setup as i had before on other computer.

I have then gone back and checked to see if they work on the other computer still and they dont! the same again when i type masternode start it says unable to connect ashfladgaf.oinion:9999.

The conf files are the same that were working before.

the wallets them selves on both computer still load and sync and assume they can still send coins i havent tested tho.

thanks

did you change the .onion address to the new one created on the new computer?
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
I am not a coder myself so it is difficult for me to asses the legitimacy of a project especially if there is so little peer review or information, there is not even a whitepaper explaining the basic tenets of the anonymity.

I've got 2 suggestions to choose from:

1. Learn to code and see for yourself if it's any good (my choice).
2. Hire someone to do it for you.

Don't expect anyone to do it for you for free. That's our comparative advantage, and it's worth money.
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
post getting lost on other pages.

can you help me with my nodes.

I have moved my nodes to another computer copied everything accross set up tor exactly the same but now when i try to start the nodes it says unable to connect ajhdlksafasf.oinion.9999.

It is the same setup as i had before on other computer.

I have then gone back and checked to see if they work on the other computer still and they dont! the same again when i type masternode start it says unable to connect ashfladgaf.oinion:9999.

The conf files are the same that were working before.

the wallets them selves on both computer still load and sync and assume they can still send coins i havent tested tho.

thanks
hero member
Activity: 546
Merit: 500
We should request that ICM fixes the github and gives proper credit to the prior contributors of the code base. Could you do this for the community industrialcoinmagic?
This would be a good chance to prove yourself as being a good and competent developer that is responsive to the community.
I would personally buy the rest that i need for a masternode if you did this, since it would greatly increase my confidence in CRAVE and i am sure many others would feel the same way. The way the github looks now is just unprofessional and does not inspire confidence, please fix the github dev and give proper credit to the prior contributors of the code base, it is the right thing to do.
Seems he has disapeared and he broke promise of giving an update today to go watch movies.
Just have a look at the cloak thread. It's the same thing that happened there. Alty a.k.a. ICM a.k.a. whatnotelse will now slowly subside from the community. In a couple of weeks, there will be a minor pump (which won't even get nearly close to previous highs) to get more of your coins (not crave, but the real ones: Bitcoin) and then, the coin will be left to die a slow death.

I know it's hard to realize to have misinvested. Trust me, I know this feeling very, very well. But you (the community in this thread in general, not the user I'm quoting) should at least not bring those into discredit who try to warn you, because they have experienced and witnessed this whole mess over and over again.

I don't know who it was, but telling me "you know where the door is" when all I am doing is telling people the facts which I have seen when cloak happened (heck, they're even using the same forum… all this old crap is being recycled over and over, and nobody even cares!), without attacking anybody personally is either just unthankfulness, ignorance or a shill account of Bobo the clown.
I bought in after the crash in the price, I recognize a bubble when i see one. Thank you for supporting what i am saying though and i agree that people should be thanking me for my skepticism. I want financial privacy and freedom like i am sure many of us here do as well, we are on the same side we should not be attacking each other. For the record i am not a payed troll or an alt of somebody else as has been suggested here. I am not a coder myself so it is difficult for me to asses the legitimacy of a project especially if there is so little peer review or information, there is not even a whitepaper explaining the basic tenets of the anonymity. I want to invest in all real anonymous cryptocurrencies, I just need to be convinced that this is a legitimate project. If the github traces back to the contributors then it should be easier to review the code and most likely more code reviews can be done so that we can all be assured that it does work, I am sure there are many investors here that feel the same way that i do. Fixing the github is in the best interests of CRAVE and we should all be embracing this idea and request that the developer does this IMHO.
legendary
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1119
It's all mathematics...!
This is standard practice amongst all respectable cryptocurrencies as was pointed out earlier. To give credit to people like Satoshi Nakamoto, Gavin Andresen, Hal Finney, Vertoe and many more. It is you who is making a fool of yourself. If the developer is indeed a class act he should acknowledge the great men who's shoulders he is standing on. Furthermore and more pragmatically it should make it much easier to review the code, which would increase confidence and therefore the price. I would think that as a CRAVE supporter you would welcome such a move, unless you are so blinded that you perceive all skepticism as being negative.

Everyone knows where the code comes from. This is old-style fud: rag on the lack of crediting. If you think the code doesn't adhere to the license say specifically where. If you are here to help and not just be a troll, put in a pull request.

Right now, you look like an unprofessional troll and are clearly not earning your money. Go quote some code snippets and say how you think there is something wrong with it. That works better to make people sell.

If I knew who your handler was, I'd send them a PM and tell them to withhold your $0.23 per post.

And by the way, you are specifically not considered for employment in any of my fud projects. Get some new material.



Veritas Veritas Vertias! I'm sorry you will have to do much better...
You could have read Vertoes posts on the matter the other day but we all know your boss had the BCT mods delete them! So unless you know what your talking about its probably better keeping silent and letting Evan speak for himself!
sr. member
Activity: 270
Merit: 250
Haha this is so bizarre. But i love to come and read here in between studies and tell people that they are idiots. Are you kids 12 or what? People calling for the disappeared dev like they would call mommy
hero member
Activity: 1344
Merit: 502
Because people lost thousands and thousands of dollars. Two days ago the market cap here was over a mil i think? When you are number one on volume you affect everyone in crypto when it all disappears within 24 hours. Makes us all look bad especially when the community tries to play the blame game.

Okay, now you've made a "liar" out of me when I said I'm out. But since you sent me such a civil minded PM, I'm going to answer you here.

Pump teams buy in low, find a good coin that is in the process of delivering, pump it, and sell into the pump.

It has absolutely nothing to do with the dev. That's the nature of this market: volatility. I doubled my money with this coin on the way down because that's how I trade. I trade on volatility and that only happens on the dump. Pumps are pretty much straight up and I never touch them.

Now I'm really out, I hope.


Re: trading volatility

That makes two of us Wink
legendary
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
@allyouracid

You're like people that all believe in fantasy "gods"  

You talk a lot of b.s. but do not offer much solid proof.

This is opensource,  if worse comes to worse..  we can fork and keep with the original design/roadmap/intentions.



legendary
Activity: 1111
Merit: 1000
crypto-enthusiast since 2012
We should request that ICM fixes the github and gives proper credit to the prior contributors of the code base. Could you do this for the community industrialcoinmagic?
This would be a good chance to prove yourself as being a good and competent developer that is responsive to the community.
I would personally buy the rest that i need for a masternode if you did this, since it would greatly increase my confidence in CRAVE and i am sure many others would feel the same way. The way the github looks now is just unprofessional and does not inspire confidence, please fix the github dev and give proper credit to the prior contributors of the code base, it is the right thing to do.

Seems he has disapeared and he broke promise of giving an update today to go watch movies.
Just have a look at the cloak thread. It's the same thing that happened there. Alty a.k.a. ICM a.k.a. whatnotelse will now slowly subside from the community. In a couple of weeks, there will be a minor pump (which won't even get nearly close to previous highs) to get more of your coins (not crave, but the real ones: Bitcoin) and then, the coin will be left to die a slow death.

I know it's hard to realize to have misinvested. Trust me, I know this feeling very, very well. But you (the community in this thread in general, not the user I'm quoting) should at least not bring those into discredit who try to warn you, because they have experienced and witnessed this whole mess over and over again.

I don't know who it was, but telling me "you know where the door is" when all I am doing is telling people the facts which I have seen when cloak happened (heck, they're even using the same forum… all this old crap is being recycled over and over, and nobody even cares!), without attacking anybody personally is either just unthankfulness, ignorance or a shill account of Bobo the clown.

huh Huh  where are the facts?  all I see is your twisted reality with an unclear agenda.  Undecided
Jump to: