Topic: [ANN] Credits(CRDS): CPU-only mining | Argon2d PoW - Masternodes - page 18. (Read 482468 times)
March 11, 2018, 08:22:06 AM
How about listing on a new exchange ? It is becoming worthless. Please do something devs.
March 10, 2018, 01:14:39 AM
I have some 2680V2 CPU. I can't find the pool with thread on home page. Is it the wallet SOLO mode?
March 10, 2018, 01:04:31 AM
We are up to 11 votes now with a very small lead for the rebrand.
I'd even dispute the lead for the rebrand. Yes is always the first option, so there is positional bias. right now 13 votes ,7 vote yes ,6 vote no , the numbers most are equal ,so keep doing nothing is the best option
in my opinion no need to rebrand, because this is to early for crds,,
maybe need a better promotions and marketing strategy on it also being listed on another exchange will be a good idea for crds
Now the result is 6:4. Rebrand takes the lead.
Rebrand should be taken into consideration in early stage. It will help get rid of some confusion between fork and token.
March 09, 2018, 11:47:16 AM
We are up to 11 votes now with a very small lead for the rebrand.
I'd even dispute the lead for the rebrand. Yes is always the first option, so there is positional bias. right now 13 votes ,7 vote yes ,6 vote no , the numbers most are equal ,so keep doing nothing is the best option
in my opinion no need to rebrand, because this is to early for crds,,
maybe need a better promotions and marketing strategy on it also being listed on another exchange will be a good idea for crds
March 09, 2018, 12:08:48 AM
We are up to 11 votes now with a very small lead for the rebrand.
I'd even dispute the lead for the rebrand. Yes is always the first option, so there is positional bias. right now 13 votes ,7 vote yes ,6 vote no , the numbers most are equal ,so keep doing nothing is the best option
March 08, 2018, 09:57:02 PM
We are up to 11 votes now with a very small lead for the rebrand.
I'd even dispute the lead for the rebrand. Yes is always the first option, so there is positional bias. March 08, 2018, 06:50:29 PM
Lets find out, I have created a straw poll.
Please go to :
https://www.strawpoll.me/15223680
To vote. This should give an idea if the name is holding this coin back.
Please go to :
https://www.strawpoll.me/15223680
To vote. This should give an idea if the name is holding this coin back.
there are only 2 people voted ,i voted no ,because we are the first project named CRDS and POW mode ,not ICO . i guessyou voted yes .need more people to vote
We are up to 11 votes now with a very small lead for the rebrand.
March 08, 2018, 07:27:31 AM
how come now there are 2 credits ? any fix for this?
ingore this problem ,one is pow mode ,the other is ico project just erc20 tokens ,not really coins . so they are clear
March 08, 2018, 07:21:59 AM
how come now there are 2 credits ? any fix for this?
March 08, 2018, 04:22:10 AM
Bounty thread opened to resolve an issue with sending CRDS to multisig addresses - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bounty-0025-btc-or-2500-crds-to-find-bug-with-multsig-payments-3078917
0.025 BTC or 2,500 CRDS on offer to the person that finds the code causing the problem.
0.025 BTC or 2,500 CRDS on offer to the person that finds the code causing the problem.
March 07, 2018, 10:49:58 PM
Lets find out, I have created a straw poll.
Please go to :
https://www.strawpoll.me/15223680
To vote. This should give an idea if the name is holding this coin back.
Please go to :
https://www.strawpoll.me/15223680
To vote. This should give an idea if the name is holding this coin back.
there are only 2 people voted ,i voted no ,because we are the first project named CRDS and POW mode ,not ICO . i guessyou voted yes .need more people to vote
March 07, 2018, 10:43:11 PM
Lets find out, I have created a straw poll.
Please go to :
https://www.strawpoll.me/15223680
To vote. This should give an idea if the name is holding this coin back.
Please go to :
https://www.strawpoll.me/15223680
To vote. This should give an idea if the name is holding this coin back.
March 07, 2018, 06:39:06 PM
Quote
http://beastpool.com
Info
fee: 2%
payouts: every 1h
To Start Mining
Miner: https://github.com/BeastPool/cpuminer-argon2d/releases
Code:
-a argon2d-crds -o stratum+tcp://beastpool.com:4334 -u WALLET -p c=CRDS
Explorer
http://beastpool.com/explorer/CRDS
Nodelist
http://beastpool.com/explorer/peers?id=1425
Mined blocks
http://beastpool.com/site/block?id=1425
Pool and miner were tested and we successfully mined block on mainnet.
We are working on avx2 optimization for this algo stay tuned.
Info
fee: 2%
payouts: every 1h
To Start Mining
Miner: https://github.com/BeastPool/cpuminer-argon2d/releases
Code:
-a argon2d-crds -o stratum+tcp://beastpool.com:4334 -u WALLET -p c=CRDS
Explorer
http://beastpool.com/explorer/CRDS
Nodelist
http://beastpool.com/explorer/peers?id=1425
Mined blocks
http://beastpool.com/site/block?id=1425
Pool and miner were tested and we successfully mined block on mainnet.
We are working on avx2 optimization for this algo stay tuned.
Nice One, thx for that. Mining will be more efficient now ;-)
March 07, 2018, 12:54:11 AM
There are currently no plans nor any discussion within the team of re-branding Credits. There is discussion within the wider community which is fine. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and things may change down the track, however for now Credits is staying as Credits.
March 06, 2018, 07:57:16 PM
Coin has a good name, algo, simple feature set and roadmap. Wallet interface is nice and clean.
I'd like to see more updates on how the roadmap and marketing are progressing. Do these conversations
take place outside of the ANN thread?
I'd like to see more updates on how the roadmap and marketing are progressing. Do these conversations
take place outside of the ANN thread?
Name is good, but those new Credits (CS) stole it and hyped their ICO. So I'm wondering if rebranding would be a good idea. For discussion join discord channel, people are very active there.
Rebrand would be good for CRDS. Look Nano and Neo. Both had names which was not very attractive.
I think the name credits is not enough, in addition its been hijacked .
It would be nice to rebrand in accordance with new wallet release.
I would agree, I think a rebranding would be the way to go, I think there should be a new poll to find out if the majority of the community support it
Rebranding could also reduce the confusion between the old and the new website and also confusion between old and new github.
The purpose of marketing is make people remember the brand clearly. The name 'credits' is just not enough than the potential credits has.l
I agree with this as well however I believe some publicity on this could balance things out. Ah heck maybe changing the name and re-announcing might be for the best.
I was looking at the signatures on the bounties thread and saw the incorrect websites linked. Just seems like quite a bit of confusion with CRDS.
Maybe just change the name and keep the logo and designs?
March 06, 2018, 07:43:46 PM
Coin has a good name, algo, simple feature set and roadmap. Wallet interface is nice and clean.
I'd like to see more updates on how the roadmap and marketing are progressing. Do these conversations
take place outside of the ANN thread?
I'd like to see more updates on how the roadmap and marketing are progressing. Do these conversations
take place outside of the ANN thread?
Name is good, but those new Credits (CS) stole it and hyped their ICO. So I'm wondering if rebranding would be a good idea. For discussion join discord channel, people are very active there.
Rebrand would be good for CRDS. Look Nano and Neo. Both had names which was not very attractive.
I think the name credits is not enough, in addition its been hijacked .
It would be nice to rebrand in accordance with new wallet release.
I would agree, I think a rebranding would be the way to go, I think there should be a new poll to find out if the majority of the community support it
Rebranding could also reduce the confusion between the old and the new website and also confusion between old and new github.
The purpose of marketing is make people remember the brand clearly. The name 'credits' is just not enough than the potential credits has.l
March 06, 2018, 03:23:07 PM
How susceptible is CRDS to a 51% attack? Pool is mining way over that limit.
March 06, 2018, 03:12:50 PM
well,I think CRDS does not need rebranding
Agree, no rebranding needed. March 06, 2018, 10:36:42 AM
well,I think CRDS does not need rebranding
March 06, 2018, 10:30:17 AM
Looks like community is mostly in favor of rebranding. Would be good to hear what devs think about this idea, because after all Credits is their project. 
Jump to: