[ANN] Credits(CRDS): CPU-only mining | Argon2d PoW - Masternodes - page 19.

ronnylov

member

Activity: 276

Merit: 13

Quote from: J0HN3F1V3 on March 06, 2018, 07:39:17 AM

Quote from: sylph93 on March 06, 2018, 03:48:53 AM

Quote from: sud on March 06, 2018, 03:22:29 AM

Quote from: NetZero on March 06, 2018, 12:00:02 AM

Coin has a good name, algo, simple feature set and roadmap. Wallet interface is nice and clean.

I'd like to see more updates on how the roadmap and marketing are progressing. Do these conversations
take place outside of the ANN thread?

Name is good, but those new Credits (CS) stole it and hyped their ICO. So I'm wondering if rebranding would be a good idea. For discussion join discord channel, people are very active there.

Rebrand would be good for CRDS. Look Nano and Neo. Both had names which was not very attractive.
I think the name credits is not enough, in addition its been hijacked .
It would be nice to rebrand in accordance with new wallet release.

I would agree, I think a rebranding would be the way to go, I think there should be a new poll to find out if the majority of the community support it

Rebranding could also reduce the confusion between the old and the new website and also confusion between old and new github.

J0HN3F1V3

full member

Activity: 244

Merit: 100

Quote from: sylph93 on March 06, 2018, 03:48:53 AM

Quote from: sud on March 06, 2018, 03:22:29 AM

Quote from: NetZero on March 06, 2018, 12:00:02 AM

Coin has a good name, algo, simple feature set and roadmap. Wallet interface is nice and clean.

I'd like to see more updates on how the roadmap and marketing are progressing. Do these conversations
take place outside of the ANN thread?

Name is good, but those new Credits (CS) stole it and hyped their ICO. So I'm wondering if rebranding would be a good idea. For discussion join discord channel, people are very active there.

Rebrand would be good for CRDS. Look Nano and Neo. Both had names which was not very attractive.
I think the name credits is not enough, in addition its been hijacked .
It would be nice to rebrand in accordance with new wallet release.

I would agree, I think a rebranding would be the way to go, I think there should be a new poll to find out if the majority of the community support it

minercui

newbie

Activity: 85

Merit: 0

Quote from: sycube on March 03, 2018, 08:19:14 AM

We're offering 0.025 BTC or 2500 CRDS to anybody that can find what causes the std::bad_alloc error that also corrupts the wallet when sending CRDS to a multisig address.

Hi Sycube, I fixed this error this cause by wrong pointer.

sylph93

hero member

Activity: 546

Merit: 500

Quote from: sud on March 06, 2018, 03:22:29 AM

Quote from: NetZero on March 06, 2018, 12:00:02 AM

Coin has a good name, algo, simple feature set and roadmap. Wallet interface is nice and clean.

I'd like to see more updates on how the roadmap and marketing are progressing. Do these conversations
take place outside of the ANN thread?

Name is good, but those new Credits (CS) stole it and hyped their ICO. So I'm wondering if rebranding would be a good idea. For discussion join discord channel, people are very active there.

Rebrand would be good for CRDS. Look Nano and Neo. Both had names which was not very attractive.
I think the name credits is not enough, in addition its been hijacked .
It would be nice to rebrand in accordance with new wallet release.

sud

sr. member

Activity: 826

Merit: 301

Quote from: NetZero on March 06, 2018, 12:00:02 AM

Coin has a good name, algo, simple feature set and roadmap. Wallet interface is nice and clean.

I'd like to see more updates on how the roadmap and marketing are progressing. Do these conversations
take place outside of the ANN thread?

Name is good, but those new Credits (CS) stole it and hyped their ICO. So I'm wondering if rebranding would be a good idea. For discussion join discord channel, people are very active there.

NetZero

newbie

Activity: 10

Merit: 0

Coin has a good name, algo, simple feature set and roadmap. Wallet interface is nice and clean.

I'd like to see more updates on how the roadmap and marketing are progressing. Do these conversations
take place outside of the ANN thread?

ronnylov

member

Activity: 276

Merit: 13

USP = Unique Selling Point

I think CPU mining only in combination with masternodes is special.
But I am also interested in what future plans are to make this coin more useful in real world.
I mean it works well and everything is nice but I guess a lot of marketing and real world use cases are needed to make this a success.

JuanPabloCuervo

full member

Activity: 246

Merit: 102

Quote from: rabudde on March 02, 2018, 04:48:32 AM

And sorry to annoy...I've been looking around for some time now, but I cannot find any USP on that coin. I mean, website and specs look really serious, but what is your real-world USP (except POW and GPU resistance) that makes CRDS better than other coins?

call me ignorant but i don´t know what USP is.

but i want to answer your question with another question.

Quote

What makes CRDS better than other coins "except POW Algorithm"?

that´s called the Engine. CRDS Engine.

let me ask you:
¿what makes Ferrari, Lamborghini, Porshe, Bugatti, Maserati & McLaren better?

LOL. Jajajajaja

JuanPabloCuervo

full member

Activity: 246

Merit: 102

some minor suggestions to http://beastpool.com

on the top right corner:
Next Payout: 22:51 UTC

"space UTC" should:
#1. UTC Letters be White.
#2. Space and Letter Background should be Cyan, like CRDS logo.
#3. UTC Letters should be Clickable, and open a New Tab/Window to: https://time.is/UTC or similar.

sud

sr. member

Activity: 826

Merit: 301

Download from the official gitHub site - https://github.com/CRDS/Credits/releases/tag/v1.1.1.0 . It's always the safest place to get coin wallets of all kind. Correct and latest update is credits-1.1.1-win64-setup.exe.

ronnylov

member

Activity: 276

Merit: 13

Quote from: minercui on March 05, 2018, 05:36:08 AM

Quote from: JuanPabloCuervo on March 05, 2018, 12:51:54 AM

Quote from: minercui on March 01, 2018, 06:03:44 AM

Quote from: yadan86 on March 01, 2018, 05:59:09 AM

Quote from: minercui on March 01, 2018, 05:56:20 AM

Hi, what is real official website: crds.co or crds.io? Huh

why did you ask this question ,is there some scam website right now?
i find it on OP , this is official website https://crds.co/

Did you check https://crds.io
2 website have a little different

When trying to download the Windows version gives a 404 error.
Link redirects to:
https://github.com/credits-crds/credits/releases/download/v1.0.0.0/Credits-Windows-x64-v1.0.0.0-Setup.exe

.io is harmless & outdated.
.co should take over .io, because .co is a country as well.
.io is more common in the eCoin world.

I got, but the final release is v1.1.1

You get v1.1.1 on https://crds.co/#download

Edit: At least according to file name. I don't use Windows and compile from source so I have actually not installed precompiled versions.

minercui

newbie

Activity: 85

Merit: 0

Quote from: JuanPabloCuervo on March 05, 2018, 12:51:54 AM

Quote from: minercui on March 01, 2018, 06:03:44 AM

Quote from: yadan86 on March 01, 2018, 05:59:09 AM

Quote from: minercui on March 01, 2018, 05:56:20 AM

Hi, what is real official website: crds.co or crds.io? Huh

why did you ask this question ,is there some scam website right now?
i find it on OP , this is official website https://crds.co/

Did you check https://crds.io
2 website have a little different

When trying to download the Windows version gives a 404 error.
Link redirects to:
https://github.com/credits-crds/credits/releases/download/v1.0.0.0/Credits-Windows-x64-v1.0.0.0-Setup.exe

.io is harmless & outdated.
.co should take over .io, because .co is a country as well.
.io is more common in the eCoin world.

I got, but the final release is v1.1.1

ronnylov

member

Activity: 276

Merit: 13

Quote from: JuanPabloCuervo on March 05, 2018, 12:51:54 AM

Quote from: minercui on March 01, 2018, 06:03:44 AM

Quote from: yadan86 on March 01, 2018, 05:59:09 AM

Quote from: minercui on March 01, 2018, 05:56:20 AM

Hi, what is real official website: crds.co or crds.io? Huh

why did you ask this question ,is there some scam website right now?
i find it on OP , this is official website https://crds.co/

Did you check https://crds.io
2 website have a little different

When trying to download the Windows version gives a 404 error.
Link redirects to:
https://github.com/credits-crds/credits/releases/download/v1.0.0.0/Credits-Windows-x64-v1.0.0.0-Setup.exe

.io is harmless & outdated.
.co should take over .io, because .co is a country as well.
.io is more common in the eCoin world.

https://crds.co/#download
https://github.com/CRDS/Credits/releases

It looks to me that official website has the download links correct. You have probably got wrong link from the old website that is outdated and no longer valid. I know it is confusing and have done the same mistake myself. Original developer left early and someone else took over with no control of old website so they had to create a new website and new github. Problem is that old ones can not be removed. The link to website on first page in this thread is the correct one.

JuanPabloCuervo

full member

Activity: 246

Merit: 102

Quote from: minercui on March 01, 2018, 06:03:44 AM

Quote from: yadan86 on March 01, 2018, 05:59:09 AM

Quote from: minercui on March 01, 2018, 05:56:20 AM

Hi, what is real official website: crds.co or crds.io? Huh

why did you ask this question ,is there some scam website right now?
i find it on OP , this is official website https://crds.co/

Did you check https://crds.io
2 website have a little different

When trying to download the Windows version gives a 404 error.
Link redirects to:
https://github.com/credits-crds/credits/releases/download/v1.0.0.0/Credits-Windows-x64-v1.0.0.0-Setup.exe

.io is harmless & outdated.
.co should take over .io, because .co is a country as well.
.io is more common in the eCoin world.

JuanPabloCuervo

full member

Activity: 246

Merit: 102

Quote from: sycube on March 03, 2018, 08:19:14 AM

We're offering 0.025 BTC or 2500 CRDS to anybody that can find what causes the std::bad_alloc error that also corrupts the wallet when sending CRDS to a multisig address.

What is multisig?
https://themerkle.com/what-is-a-multisignature-bitcoin-address/
How with-qt?
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Multisignature#Creating_a_Multisignature_Address
History, How/where & why multisig originated/comes from:
https://youtu.be/YcmWQe29zro

erdnapa

jr. member

Activity: 101

Merit: 1

Quote from: jbmustaq on March 03, 2018, 09:39:34 PM

I am getting below error while building the miner

checking for gcc... gcc
checking whether the C compiler works... no
configure: error: in `/root/cpuminer-argon2d':
configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
See `config.log' for more details

GCC is already install in the system

root@ubuntu:~/cpuminer-argon2d# gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.8/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu

You have a typo in configure options, like -march=antive or so. Check out config.log, it will tell you.

jbmustaq

full member

Activity: 445

Merit: 100

Quote from: Couiz on February 26, 2018, 01:57:26 AM

Quote from: erdnapa on February 25, 2018, 07:24:44 PM

Quote from: mrankin on February 25, 2018, 06:47:58 PM

Quote from: sud on February 25, 2018, 05:03:10 AM

Quote from: Couiz on February 24, 2018, 08:29:28 PM

Quote from: J0HN3F1V3 on February 24, 2018, 08:24:39 PM

Quote from: dasgardo87 on February 24, 2018, 08:04:40 PM

Someone should quote this post on first page, this will really help miner who want to mining but hesitate because no pool

anyway this miner slower or better than wallet miner?? thank you

I'd also like to know if the miner is faster than the wallet miner

I have in average 20kh/s in wallet and 23-24 kh/s with external Tongue

.

I confirm this, extarnal miner is around 10% faster for me too so better use it instead the wallet one.

Its HPS might be faster but would love to know if you are finding more blocks as a result. Personally, I've seen a jump in the number of blocks found by my wallet miners overnight.

No HPS increase on Linux with the precompiled binary. Also roughly same blocks (after ~8h).

A bit of caution: couldn't compile miner from github sources on Ubuntu 16.04. Release source code only contains empty readme file.

https://github.com/BeastPool/cpuminer-argon2d link for source Tongue

, I'll update release source aswell, didn't know it's empty.

I am getting below error while building the miner

checking for gcc... gcc
checking whether the C compiler works... no
configure: error: in `/root/cpuminer-argon2d':
configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
See `config.log' for more details

GCC is already install in the system

root@ubuntu:~/cpuminer-argon2d# gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.8/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu

sycube

jr. member

Activity: 122

Merit: 1

We're offering 0.025 BTC or 2500 CRDS to anybody that can find what causes the std::bad_alloc error that also corrupts the wallet when sending CRDS to a multisig address.

mrankin

full member

Activity: 312

Merit: 102

Quote from: rabudde on March 02, 2018, 04:48:32 AM

And sorry to annoy...I've been looking around for some time now, but I cannot find any USP on that coin. I mean, website and specs look really serious, but what is your real-world USP (except POW and GPU resistance) that makes CRDS better than other coins?

I assume USP is use case for the coin. We are still working on that. We will be looking at projects that can make use of a highly available, low-latency database.

rabudde

jr. member

Activity: 41

Merit: 1

And sorry to annoy...I've been looking around for some time now, but I cannot find any USP on that coin. I mean, website and specs look really serious, but what is your real-world USP (except POW and GPU resistance) that makes CRDS better than other coins?

Topic: [ANN] Credits(CRDS): CPU-only mining | Argon2d PoW - Masternodes - page 19. (Read 482468 times)