Topic: [ANN] Crypto Rush - Crypto to Crypto exchange (Read 141839 times)

You made it pretty apparent that you are the one who stole the coins off of everyone.

The fact that you have so many details and so much misogyny for your girlfriend is one of the main reasons you are obviously a confirmed sociopath.

You made it pretty apparent that you are the one who stole the coins off of everyone.

The fact that you have so many details and so much misogyny for your girlfriend is one of the main reasons you are obviously a confirmed sociopath.

Well, had you read any of what you quoted you would be able to answer your own questions. Why am I speaking? Because I am trying to answer the questions that people have. Would it be better to just leave everyone hanging, stewing in their own speculation? If so, go right ahead. Nobody is forcing you to read this thread. I never claimed to have no involvement in any of this. Do I own CryptoRush? No. Am I involved? Yes. Involvement and ownership are two completely different things.

Yeah, that site is awful. I have used it in the past to dig up information on clients, but it really isn't all that helpful. All it is there for is a little teaser, hoping you'll purchase a Dun & Bradstreet report. Sort of like googling someone's name and all of the links that pop up first, "Click here for a full background check on ...insert name here..." But if you think you found something, run with it  

What exactly do you think you just summed up?

For the record, CryptoRush, LLC is a registered corporation in the United States. Corporations are required by law to have board members/directors such as CEOs. What is so funny about that

now if i was a hacker i would not leave myself traceable in any way shape or form, so to say you have got this guy i find it hard to believe.
next will you tell us you have the guy from the 1st hack?? or is CR just concerned in findind this guy from second "hack"?
to be a hacker you need to be smart, a smart hacker is not going to be "sloppy".

ok long story short, you seem to know alot more than we know, so CAN YOU GIVE A DEFINITE TIME FRAME WHEN ALL VICTIMS WILL GET THEIR COINS BACK??

not that i care anymore because the whole thing has been a fu@k up from day one.

There have been several mentions of what can be released at this time. Saying a bit more than I should, I can tell you that this last exploit was performed by a very sloppy person. With what little information I had to go on of the user who performed this last exploit, I can tell you his full name, address, occupation, direct phone line at his office, the fact that he has an approximate 14 minute commute to work, his parent's names, their address, even the fact that they have not yet paid their property taxes for this year. I have even seen a picture of his chubby ass and ugly ass girlfriend. I know exactly which coins he took, the fact that he sent most (if not all) to Bittrex, and an exact dollar figure of what he took. All of this information I found within 2 days of finding out what happened. I should also add that I am in NO WAY a hacker of any sort. The line of work I am in, I started at the bottom which required a bit of "cyber stalking" (so to speak) to find contact information of potential clients.

 We are simply awaiting the investigating party to come to the same conclusions we have before anything can be pursued. Patience is key at this time.

This is why you should have read instead of making yourself look like an ass over $3.60 lol

For the record, none of us have made a dime. We instead have paid for everything out of our own pockets

I mentioned that new wallets were downloaded and not fully synced, and the employee moving funds just used the new addresses to transfer funds as quickly as possible in an attempt to move the funds before the thieves could. Because of this and the speed it was completed, there were no confirmations of the coins in the new wallets. Fast-forward several months, we are trying to turn these safe wallets back on and several do not connect because either nodes have changed, wallets have been updated and we are trying to run an outdated wallet, etc. Because of this, many of the new (safe) wallets are reporting a 0.0 balance (the wallets are command line based and do not have a GUI which would show an unconfirmed balance). In order to see a true balance, we need to fully sync the blockchains to determine if we were successful in moving the coins to our wallets before the thieves moved the coins to theirs. The task at hand is determining whether; 1) a coin has a wallet update &/or fork which is why we cannot get any connections; 2) nodes have changed and the nodes listed in different coins' ANN threads are no longer relevant; or 3) the coin is truly "dead" and no active nodes exist, which could be why we get no connections.

I hope that clears up the issues I have been facing. As it stands, probably close to half of the coins report a 0 balance so I am unable to determine whether the coins are gone or just sitting in a wallet that cannot connect to a network. Also, because of the nature of the 2 hacks that were occurring it became frantic fairly quickly which led to the site shutting down last April. One hacker had been slowly leeching coins out of wallets unsuspected. As soon as he realized there was another hacker taking out chunks at a time, it became a race between each of the hackers and CR staff (at the time) to move funds to their respective wallets as quickly as possible.

Well yes, that portion is correct. Rereading, I realized I left a portion out and I apologize. Let me try this again...

I mentioned that new wallets were downloaded and not fully synced, and the employee moving funds just used the new addresses to transfer funds as quickly as possible in an attempt to move the funds before the thieves could. Because of this and the speed it was completed, there were no confirmations of the coins in the new wallets. Fast-forward several months, we are trying to turn these safe wallets back on and several do not connect because either nodes have changed, wallets have been updated and we are trying to run an outdated wallet, etc. Because of this, many of the new (safe) wallets are reporting a 0.0 balance (the wallets are command line based and do not have a GUI which would show an unconfirmed balance). In order to see a true balance, we need to fully sync the blockchains to determine if we were successful in moving the coins to our wallets before the thieves moved the coins to theirs. The task at hand is determining whether; 1) a coin has a wallet update &/or fork which is why we cannot get any connections; 2) nodes have changed and the nodes listed in different coins' ANN threads are no longer relevant; or 3) the coin is truly "dead" and no active nodes exist, which could be why we get no connections.

I hope that clears up the issues I have been facing. As it stands, probably close to half of the coins report a 0 balance so I am unable to determine whether the coins are gone or just sitting in a wallet that cannot connect to a network. Also, because of the nature of the 2 hacks that were occurring it became frantic fairly quickly which led to the site shutting down last April. One hacker had been slowly leeching coins out of wallets unsuspected. As soon as he realized there was another hacker taking out chunks at a time, it became a race between each of the hackers and CR staff (at the time) to move funds to their respective wallets as quickly as possible.

Simply put, no that is not how the audits have taken place. We have the complete and intact database info, but it was/is a mess the way things were before. There was a small time between when the site was taken offline and when the new group gained control over the wallets. Because of this time gap and the way the original hacks occurred, there was a small window where the hackers could still move funds from the old CR wallets on their own whim, unbeknownst to anyone at the time. The fund transfers that did occur as soon as they were possible occurred as soon as a wallet was downloaded, not synced, and were once again safe. The time since then has been dedicated to coding a new site from scratch to provide a new platform by which it would even be possible to return funds to users in a secure way opposed to trusting every email which has come in saying, "I had this many Bitcoins (just an example), please send them to this address." The issue I have been facing since I recently took over the audits has been outdated wallets and the lack of nodes for these different coins.

I also really hope CSL is just attempting to run his mouth again and not expecting a response, because I am no longer responding to any of his posts. If he persists, we will be posting a new link to a self moderated thread and locking this one. There is more than one way to skin a cat... as well a shush a troll

This is the point I made a long time ago. While their intent to try and pay back users is "nice", the lack of ability to ever do so makes it somewhat moot. Mathematically speaking, we'll be long dead before even a fraction of payback could ever result, and this is if fees were 10% or more.

I also have to wonder why it's taken almost a year to finalize an audit to determine what's toast and what isn't, particularly since there is no 'partial repayment' being made. It's database info right? You don't need the blockchain data to determine what happened, you look into your exchange database. The blockchain data should merely support the analysis. You align the data--what's left, what went missing, what should've been there--and then run some scripts to do the analysis. This is, at most, a month's work of work, but more properly in the right hands, maybe a week. If it's more complex than that, then explain your methods. Perhaps folks can assist by providing better methods.

Requests were posted in our IRC channel, on the OP and on Twitter. The link to the sheet was left editable so anyone who has information to add could do so. There is no confidential information contained, so security is not an issue. This is a copy of one sheet from a secure document that is an Excel spreadsheet which contains much more information than is posted on the public sheet. That spreadsheet is only available to the 4 admins on a secure server in an undisclosed location, so I'd say it is fairly safe.