[ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX] - page 363.

cbuchner1

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 502

Quote from: gpuminer on June 11, 2014, 08:55:58 PM

What will be the next step for ccminer going forward ? It seems that there is no news regarding new release or development. Can we expect to see anything new this month ?

I think even before the weekend. Adding that killer groestl should be an easy exercise.

cbuchner1

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 502

Quote from: noobminerd on June 11, 2014, 09:14:27 PM

What is killer groestl quad? I mean what quad does?

quad spreads the state of one hash over 4 threads to save registers.
A necessity for Compute 3.0 devices that have a 63 registers per thread limit.

jsamul

sr. member

Activity: 300

Merit: 250

Quote from: tc61 on June 11, 2014, 10:03:47 PM

What makes the GTX780 so much faster than a 750ti, is it the core speed or the increase amount of memory...

kepler vs maxwell
highend vs lowend

i think for lowend card the GTX750ti does pretty well thanks to the maxwell architecture.
sad the nvidia postponed the highend maxwell cards...
also sad no vendor did launch the dual GM107 card which could save some space for mining rigs.
just hope one day some vendor will create pure mining card with more GPUs, just like asrock did with motherboard.

myagui

legendary

Activity: 1154

Merit: 1001

Me and AizenSou exchanged some settings a few pages back. Shouldn't be too hard to locate if you search my post history.
If these are not helpful, let us know what exactly you're looking for (what card & what's the nfactor), so someone else might have the settings for you.

Cheers,
~ Myagui

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

command-line for mining scrypt jane-n factor?

i can't see it on http://cudamining.cc/

PVmining

sr. member

Activity: 330

Merit: 252

Quote from: djm34 on June 11, 2014, 05:46:11 PM

...and get part of the jackpot (which I missed Angry

,
I had the perfect plan, half of the hashrate on miningpool the other hash@me Angry

I had exactly the same plan - with the exact same success Cool

genebart

newbie

Activity: 18

Merit: 0

Is it normal for jackpotcoin mining to consistently show 1/3 my hashrate being reported on pools via their site?

My 660ti is hashing at a reported 3.5Mh, but the pool I mine on shows 1.5ish.

Also, have I correctly assumed that mining JPC on a pool is better than solo with my limited hashrate?

true-asset

sr. member

Activity: 252

Merit: 250

Uro: 1 URO = 1 metric tonne of Urea N46 fertilizer

Quote from: tc61 on June 11, 2014, 10:03:47 PM

What makes the GTX780 so much faster than a 750ti, is it the core speed or the increase amount of memory...

Its got more than double the amount of GPU cores in the chip.

peacefulmind

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

Christian, I remember when you started this thread.

Any chance you would join over at Litecointalk.org ??

Congratulations on all your success.

tc61

hero member

Activity: 494

Merit: 500

What makes the GTX780 so much faster than a 750ti, is it the core speed or the increase amount of memory...

noobminerd

member

Activity: 61

Merit: 10

What is killer groestl quad? I mean what quad does?

gpuminer

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

Quote from: cbuchner1 on June 11, 2014, 03:47:03 PM

Quote from: cayars on June 11, 2014, 03:23:00 PM

Translation: You'll be able to offer binary versions only in the future?

We don't yet have any codebase for binary only versions.

However the other Christian has dropped out of C&C hash factory (leaving in good terms) to concentrate
more on personal business. So I get to decide the strategy for code releases.

I feel inclined to release the Killer Groestl quad version which works best on Compute 3.0 and still decently
on Compute 3.5. This is nontrivial to port to AMD due to its use of warp shuffle instructions.

What will be the next step for ccminer going forward ? It seems that there is no news regarding new release or development. Can we expect to see anything new this month ?

cbuchner1

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 502

Quote from: primer10 on June 11, 2014, 06:59:40 PM

Hi ppl,
Managed to compile ccminer (linux) on a system without the nvidia card and ran the binary successfully on the rig with 750Ti. The speed is about 2110kh/s and seems to be similar to what others has posted here.

My qn is that Windows binaries offered for download has various version for Compute 3, 3.5 and 5.0. I didn't see that option when I was compiling on Linux. How can we choose which compute to compile for? Does it solely depend on the CUDA toolkit version (was using v6)?

on Linux we build all Compute versions into one binary. Under Visual Studio the GUI doesn't have the flexibility to configure it in the same way.

primer10

sr. member

Activity: 249

Merit: 250

Hi ppl,
Managed to compile ccminer (linux) on a system without the nvidia card and ran the binary successfully on the rig with 750Ti. The speed is about 2110kh/s and seems to be similar to what others has posted here.

My qn is that Windows binaries offered for download has various version for Compute 3, 3.5 and 5.0. I didn't see that option when I was compiling on Linux. How can we choose which compute to compile for? Does it solely depend on the CUDA toolkit version (was using v6)?

cbuchner1

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 502

Quote from: djm34 on June 11, 2014, 05:16:45 PM

I have tried to add another algo the the x11.cu, but all I get is
"result for nonce ... does not validate on cpu.

I tried to repeat the experience by adding a new layer of shavite (known to work) and again all I get is
"result for nonce ... does not validate (instead of boo... if for example I remove an algo)

Did I overlook something ? Is there a limit to the number of algo I can add up (and how can I change it ) ?

there is a CPU version of the hash, and a GPU version. Both have to agree of course,
otherwise you get the dreaded validation error.

Christian

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

Quote from: AizenSou on June 11, 2014, 05:32:21 PM

Quote from: djm34 on June 11, 2014, 05:16:45 PM

I have tried to add another algo the the x11.cu, but all I get is
"result for nonce ... does not validate on cpu.

I tried to repeat the experience by adding a new layer of shavite (known to work) and again all I get is
"result for nonce ... does not validate (instead of boo... if for example I remove an algo)

Did I overlook something ? Is there a limit to the number of algo I can add up (and how can I change it ) ?

Djm34 wants to get us X13 before Christian. Hand clap to him. Bravo dude. Grin

Btw X13 coins are almost craps now. The future is NIST5 Cheesy

It is just for fun and since it does not work... Undecided

(I don't really mine X13 either...)
I stopped mining nist5 (the payout is a bit small at the moment) today to go to jpc and get part of the jackpot (which I missed Angry

,
I had the perfect plan, half of the hashrate on miningpool the other hash@me Angry

Difficult to be more unlucky as I usually mine on hashharder)

sold this morning another million at 64sat, and I am wondering if I should rebuy it at now 48 Grin

(would still be a profit of 0.16btc) or just cash out the 0.64 Grin

AizenSou

hero member

Activity: 938

Merit: 1000

Quote from: djm34 on June 11, 2014, 05:16:45 PM

I have tried to add another algo the the x11.cu, but all I get is
"result for nonce ... does not validate on cpu.

I tried to repeat the experience by adding a new layer of shavite (known to work) and again all I get is
"result for nonce ... does not validate (instead of boo... if for example I remove an algo)

Did I overlook something ? Is there a limit to the number of algo I can add up (and how can I change it ) ?

Djm34 wants to get us X13 before Christian. Hand clap to him. Bravo dude. Grin

Btw X13 coins are almost craps now. The future is NIST5 Cheesy

exemplaar

hero member

Activity: 978

Merit: 506

Hi Christian.

I'm a small miner, just got a share of jackpot mining at hashharder pool.
Is your JPC address in read.me file still actual? Please confirm, and I will send you some coins. Thank you.

If this info can be of any help: Along with 750ti's I'm using MSI 750 non-ti 1gb series also. On jackpotcoin card gives me around 3300+ khs/s in win7 64 and around 3500khs/s with win xp
Using ccminer v0.9. Asrock btc81-pro with Intel Pentium G3220 and 4Gb ram. Classic unpowered risers. OC-ed GPU+170Mhz RAM+100Mhz with precisionX. Cards are cooler than ti's because of less cuda cores, generating less heat. Temp.48c with 48% fan speed. Ti's are hotter, 55c at 66% fan speed. I have mixed rig of 6 cards. Works like a charm, now almost a month.
Tried also solo with 4 cards and found 3 blocks in 48hours at diff around 300 last week.
Thank you again for your dedicated work.

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

I have tried to add another algo the the x11.cu, but all I get is
"result for nonce ... does not validate on cpu.

I tried to repeat the experience by adding a new layer of shavite (known to work) and again all I get is
"result for nonce ... does not validate (instead of boo... if for example I remove an algo)

Did I overlook something ? Is there a limit to the number of algo I can add up (and how can I change it ) ?

Bombadil

hero member

Activity: 644

Merit: 500

Quote from: cryptomines on June 11, 2014, 05:02:50 PM

Quote from: cayars on June 11, 2014, 04:04:08 PM

Hmm, the "C Hash Factory" has a nice ring to it.

Perhaps just the "Cash factory"

+1 =D

Quote from: cbuchner1 on June 11, 2014, 03:47:03 PM

I feel inclined to release the Killer Groestl quad version which works best on Compute 3.0 and still decently
on Compute 3.5. This is nontrivial to port to AMD due to its use of warp shuffle instructions.

Nice, my gtx760 will love the ring of that Cheesy

But it will still give the 2.8MH to a 750ti? Please, say yes Kiss

Topic: [ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX] - page 363. (Read 3426938 times)