Hmm, the "C Hash Factory" has a nice ring to it.
Perhaps just the "Cash factory"
Topic: [ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX] - page 364. (Read 3426976 times)
June 11, 2014, 05:02:50 PM
Hmm, the "C Hash Factory" has a nice ring to it.
Perhaps just the "Cash factory"
June 11, 2014, 04:38:20 PM
Planning to mine cryptonight algo on a single card setup. Should I go r9 280x or gtx 770? Or is it too early to speculate about gtx 770 hashrate?
get an nVidia if you like the progress on ccMiner so far. But why a 770 and not e.g. two or three 750Ti?
Christian
Only have 1 slot. all hash rates look remarkable. But i'm curious how long ill have to wait for cryptonight support and what hashes I can expect from a 770 vs the similarly priced r9 280x. Any hints?
will it be worth the wait? June 11, 2014, 04:04:08 PM
Translation: You'll be able to offer binary versions only in the future?
We don't yet have any codebase for binary only versions.
Quote
However the other Christian has dropped out of C&C hash factory (leaving in good terms) to concentrate
more on personal business. So I get to decide the strategy for code releases.
more on personal business. So I get to decide the strategy for code releases.
Hmm, the "C Hash Factory" has a nice ring to it.
Wishing the other Christian all the best in his endeavors...
Quote
I feel inclined to release the Killer Groestl quad version which works best on Compute 3.0 and still decently
on Compute 3.5. This is nontrivial to port to AMD due to its use of warp shuffle instructions.
Please, Please, Please, been going through new ccminer withdraw. on Compute 3.5. This is nontrivial to port to AMD due to its use of warp shuffle instructions.
June 11, 2014, 03:53:51 PM
What hashrate do you get with CryptoNight and Wild Keccak?
June 11, 2014, 03:47:03 PM
Translation: You'll be able to offer binary versions only in the future?
We don't yet have any codebase for binary only versions.
However the other Christian has dropped out of C&C hash factory (leaving in good terms) to concentrate
more on personal business. So I get to decide the strategy for code releases.
I feel inclined to release the Killer Groestl quad version which works best on Compute 3.0 and still decently
on Compute 3.5. This is nontrivial to port to AMD due to its use of warp shuffle instructions.
June 11, 2014, 03:43:25 PM
Who's that "normal user" that's buying 3.000 USD graphics cards?
thats why i said a normal user wont buy it
their for professional cad developers that need lots of memory, and programs that are limited to rendering on a single card
June 11, 2014, 03:23:00 PM
you can earn TalkCoin, JackpotCoin at great advantage over AMD and with good profitability. Why the complaints?
Yes we mine XMR, BBR and make a killing. Not ready to share yet. We're not even using ccminer for this.
Christian
Yes we mine XMR, BBR and make a killing. Not ready to share yet. We're not even using ccminer for this.
Christian
Christian, reading between the lines here and asking for additional info. Did you rewrite parts of the program to not use any open sources licenses that require posting of source code?
Translation: You'll be able to offer binary versions only in the future?
Carlo
June 11, 2014, 03:08:31 PM
Planning to mine cryptonight algo on a single card setup. Should I go r9 280x or gtx 770? Or is it too early to speculate about gtx 770 hashrate?
get an nVidia if you like the progress on ccMiner so far. But why a 770 and not e.g. two or three 750Ti?
Christian
June 11, 2014, 02:51:01 PM
Planning to mine cryptonight algo on a single card setup. Should I go r9 280x or gtx 770? Or is it too early to speculate about gtx 770 hashrate?
June 11, 2014, 01:43:35 PM
yeh, for any normal user noone will buy it. Even high end cad developers are going to be better off buying 4 gtx 780Ti's and still save some money
their aimed at the people that don't know tech and just buy the most expensive because the higher the price, clearly the higher the performance
their aimed at the people that don't know tech and just buy the most expensive because the higher the price, clearly the higher the performance
Who's that "normal user" that's buying 3.000 USD graphics cards?
In practice, the "most-powerful-single-card-possible", is very useful in configurations where you're either physically constrained (no room for more than 1 double-height card), or constrained by power availability (if you can't feed any more than the typical ~250W TDP). One such example is any Mac Pro user that has stuck with the older generation Macs, for the sake of upgradability.
~ Myagui
I don't think it would work with 250watt, it is a big electron sucker
How would compare the TitanZ to a cheap 780ti quad SLI ?
June 11, 2014, 01:23:58 PM
lol... 3k $. They're out of their mind.
June 11, 2014, 12:58:54 PM
yeh, for any normal user noone will buy it. Even high end cad developers are going to be better off buying 4 gtx 780Ti's and still save some money
their aimed at the people that don't know tech and just buy the most expensive because the higher the price, clearly the higher the performance
their aimed at the people that don't know tech and just buy the most expensive because the higher the price, clearly the higher the performance
Who's that "normal user" that's buying 3.000 USD graphics cards?
In practice, the "most-powerful-single-card-possible", is very useful in configurations where you're either physically constrained (no room for more than 1 double-height card), or constrained by power availability (if you can't feed any more than the typical ~250W TDP). One such example is any Mac Pro user that has stuck with the older generation Macs, for the sake of upgradability.
~ Myagui
June 11, 2014, 10:49:22 AM
yeh, for any normal user noone will buy it. Even high end cad developers are going to be better off buying 4 gtx 780Ti's and still save some money
their aimed at the people that don't know tech and just buy the most expensive because the higher the price, clearly the higher the performance
their aimed at the people that don't know tech and just buy the most expensive because the higher the price, clearly the higher the performance
June 11, 2014, 10:44:17 AM
Disappointing but not surprising:
http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/14/06/10/2215255/3000-geforce-gtx-titan-z-tested-less-performance-than-1500-r9-295x2
better to "wait" (waiting for what actually ?... not even remotely interested) for a guru3d test http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/14/06/10/2215255/3000-geforce-gtx-titan-z-tested-less-performance-than-1500-r9-295x2
June 11, 2014, 10:24:37 AM
it was to be expected. But their designed for graphics, media, and cad developers that need the extra VRAM, hence why the titan z has 4gb more vram
June 11, 2014, 09:54:31 AM
Disappointing but not surprising:
http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/14/06/10/2215255/3000-geforce-gtx-titan-z-tested-less-performance-than-1500-r9-295x2
http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/14/06/10/2215255/3000-geforce-gtx-titan-z-tested-less-performance-than-1500-r9-295x2
June 11, 2014, 09:21:03 AM
Uro is a great X11 coin for ccminer on GTX 750 Ti and GTX 780 Ti, its heavily undervalued due to the fact its 1:1 backed to the value of 1 metric tonne of Urea fertilizer: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annuro-a-real-long-term-currency-1-uro-1-metric-tonne-urea-fertilizer-600639
not profitable at all compared to jackpot and talk, helle maybe even heavycoin is better lol
June 11, 2014, 09:11:30 AM
Uro is a great X11 coin for ccminer on GTX 750 Ti and GTX 780 Ti, its heavily undervalued due to the fact its 1:1 backed to the value of 1 metric tonne of Urea fertilizer: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annuro-a-real-long-term-currency-1-uro-1-metric-tonne-urea-fertilizer-600639
that coin always sounded like a big joke to me (the pisscoin... composition based...). I am pretty sure there is an inside joke everybody overlooked The first thing I thought was that someone was taking a stab at the Euro, due to the similarity in sound when you say them out aloud.
June 11, 2014, 08:30:28 AM
Uro is a great X11 coin for ccminer on GTX 750 Ti and GTX 780 Ti, its heavily undervalued due to the fact its 1:1 backed to the value of 1 metric tonne of Urea fertilizer: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annuro-a-real-long-term-currency-1-uro-1-metric-tonne-urea-fertilizer-600639
that coin always sounded like a big joke to me (the pisscoin... composition based...). I am pretty sure there is an inside joke everybody overlooked June 11, 2014, 07:55:57 AM
Uro is a great X11 coin for ccminer on GTX 750 Ti and GTX 780 Ti, its heavily undervalued due to the fact its 1:1 backed to the value of 1 metric tonne of Urea fertilizer: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annuro-a-real-long-term-currency-1-uro-1-metric-tonne-urea-fertilizer-600639
Jump to: