can i solo darkcoin with ccminer?
yeah but unless you have a strong hashpower, you won't find a block so easily
Topic: [ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX] - page 449. (Read 3426976 times)
May 20, 2014, 06:30:01 AM
yeah but unless you have a strong hashpower, you won't find a block so easily
May 20, 2014, 06:25:44 AM
can i solo darkcoin with ccminer?
May 20, 2014, 06:17:34 AM
Can you PM your full cpu-miner.c and the binary?
Thanks.
Thanks.
Thanks. Ill test it now.
The next thing we have to solve is to restart Afterburner with different overclock settings for Scrypt and X11.
I underclock my Memory -502 if im mining X11.
We have to check also what happens to the performance if cudaminer is starting to work and the ccminer instance will be killed.
If there is still a problem, a possible solution should be to put a timeout into cudaminer after stratum is starting to work so that the script can kill the backup pool first.
By the way: Which Prices do you use for Scrypt & ScryptN? For X11 ill stay at 1.6 BTC.
May 20, 2014, 06:15:55 AM
May 20, 2014, 06:14:58 AM
now cuda support x11 mining?
May 20, 2014, 05:57:51 AM
Can you PM your full cpu-miner.c and the binary?
Thanks.
Thanks.
May 20, 2014, 05:26:27 AM
@cbuchner1
Can i ask you a mini efford?
Please change the sourcecode of both, cudaminer and ccminer like this at the start of the program:
start stratum
wait for stratum
if stratum authentication failed
exit ccminer/cudaminer
else start miner threads
After we are able to combine cudaminer and ccminer to mine at the best price at nicehash. I already posted a Nicehash Script v0.3 doing this.
Now they are disturbing each other. While ccminer is mining, cudaminer tries to initialize the mininc process and we loose performance.
Thanks.
look at the code cpu-miner.c of cudaminer and ccminerCan i ask you a mini efford?
Please change the sourcecode of both, cudaminer and ccminer like this at the start of the program:
start stratum
wait for stratum
if stratum authentication failed
exit ccminer/cudaminer
else start miner threads
After we are able to combine cudaminer and ccminer to mine at the best price at nicehash. I already posted a Nicehash Script v0.3 doing this.
Now they are disturbing each other. While ccminer is mining, cudaminer tries to initialize the mininc process and we loose performance.
Thanks.
Code:
if (!stratum_connect(&stratum, stratum.url) ||
!stratum_subscribe(&stratum) ||
!stratum_authorize(&stratum, rpc_user, rpc_pass)) {
stratum_disconnect(&stratum);
if (opt_retries >= 0 && ++failures > opt_retries) {
applog(LOG_ERR, "...terminating workio thread");
tq_push(thr_info[work_thr_id].q, NULL);
goto out;
}
applog(LOG_ERR, "...retry after %d seconds", opt_fail_pause);
sleep(opt_fail_pause);
}
!stratum_subscribe(&stratum) ||
!stratum_authorize(&stratum, rpc_user, rpc_pass)) {
stratum_disconnect(&stratum);
if (opt_retries >= 0 && ++failures > opt_retries) {
applog(LOG_ERR, "...terminating workio thread");
tq_push(thr_info[work_thr_id].q, NULL);
goto out;
}
applog(LOG_ERR, "...retry after %d seconds", opt_fail_pause);
sleep(opt_fail_pause);
}
Yes, but better if cbuchner is doing it so that all future versions will include it.
when working ccminer failover poll and cudaminer connect to scryptn we will see loose performance (gpu work in ccminer and cudaminer). but when ccminer killed successful performance recover after 1-2 minutes.
tested last version of cudaminer and in this verison they removed checking for stratum code...
May 20, 2014, 05:16:29 AM
@cbuchner1
Can i ask you a mini efford?
Please change the sourcecode of both, cudaminer and ccminer like this at the start of the program:
start stratum
wait for stratum
if stratum authentication failed
exit ccminer/cudaminer
else start miner threads
After we are able to combine cudaminer and ccminer to mine at the best price at nicehash. I already posted a Nicehash Script v0.3 doing this.
Now they are disturbing each other. While ccminer is mining, cudaminer tries to initialize the mininc process and we loose performance.
Thanks.
look at the code cpu-miner.c of cudaminer and ccminerCan i ask you a mini efford?
Please change the sourcecode of both, cudaminer and ccminer like this at the start of the program:
start stratum
wait for stratum
if stratum authentication failed
exit ccminer/cudaminer
else start miner threads
After we are able to combine cudaminer and ccminer to mine at the best price at nicehash. I already posted a Nicehash Script v0.3 doing this.
Now they are disturbing each other. While ccminer is mining, cudaminer tries to initialize the mininc process and we loose performance.
Thanks.
Code:
if (!stratum_connect(&stratum, stratum.url) ||
!stratum_subscribe(&stratum) ||
!stratum_authorize(&stratum, rpc_user, rpc_pass)) {
stratum_disconnect(&stratum);
if (opt_retries >= 0 && ++failures > opt_retries) {
applog(LOG_ERR, "...terminating workio thread");
tq_push(thr_info[work_thr_id].q, NULL);
goto out;
}
applog(LOG_ERR, "...retry after %d seconds", opt_fail_pause);
sleep(opt_fail_pause);
}
!stratum_subscribe(&stratum) ||
!stratum_authorize(&stratum, rpc_user, rpc_pass)) {
stratum_disconnect(&stratum);
if (opt_retries >= 0 && ++failures > opt_retries) {
applog(LOG_ERR, "...terminating workio thread");
tq_push(thr_info[work_thr_id].q, NULL);
goto out;
}
applog(LOG_ERR, "...retry after %d seconds", opt_fail_pause);
sleep(opt_fail_pause);
}
Yes, but better if cbuchner is doing it so that all future versions will include it.
May 20, 2014, 05:10:39 AM
I'm running on GT540m it's 100Mhs on X11 but getting nothing
What's wrong guyz?
What's wrong guyz?
Use ccminer 20 or 30 (dont remember what is the directcompute of the 540) the ccminer50 is for the latest cards
but with a 540m I think u'll have less than 1mhs
The 540M is 2.1, so you would need the version Bombadil made ( https://mega.co.nz/#!gBlGVZbT!0Pxo_T1P89UWmC866NVFIwEd3MJaAfRsdO8L5p4uvz0 ). But the 540M is a laptop card, and in general I advise against using laptops for mining
Thanks a lot
I'm getting 0.25 Mhs now
Well I mean it's accepting shares 
May 20, 2014, 05:06:26 AM
I'm running on GT540m it's 100Mhs on X11 but getting nothing
What's wrong guyz?
What's wrong guyz?
Use ccminer 20 or 30 (dont remember what is the directcompute of the 540) the ccminer50 is for the latest cards
but with a 540m I think u'll have less than 1mhs
The 540M is 2.1, so you would need the version Bombadil made ( https://mega.co.nz/#!gBlGVZbT!0Pxo_T1P89UWmC866NVFIwEd3MJaAfRsdO8L5p4uvz0 ). But the 540M is a laptop card, and in general I advise against using laptops for mining
May 20, 2014, 05:02:02 AM
I'm running on GT540m it's 100Mhs on X11 but getting nothing
What's wrong guyz?
What's wrong guyz?
Use ccminer 20 or 30 (dont remember what is the directcompute of the 540) the ccminer50 is for the latest cards
but with a 540m I think u'll have less than 1mhs
May 20, 2014, 04:58:08 AM
I'm running on GT540m it's 100Mhs on X11 but getting nothing
What's wrong guyz?
What's wrong guyz?
Your running too old of a card
can't I mine x11 with my gpu
May 20, 2014, 04:56:41 AM
I'm running on GT540m it's 100Mhs on X11 but getting nothing
What's wrong guyz?
What's wrong guyz?
Your running too old of a card
May 20, 2014, 04:48:45 AM
I'm running on GT540m it's 100Mhs on X11 but getting nothing
What's wrong guyz?
What's wrong guyz?
May 20, 2014, 04:45:10 AM
@cbuchner1
Can i ask you a mini efford?
Please change the sourcecode of both, cudaminer and ccminer like this at the start of the program:
start stratum
wait for stratum
if stratum authentication failed
exit ccminer/cudaminer
else start miner threads
After we are able to combine cudaminer and ccminer to mine at the best price at nicehash. I already posted a Nicehash Script v0.3 doing this.
Now they are disturbing each other. While ccminer is mining, cudaminer tries to initialize the mininc process and we loose performance.
Thanks.
look at the code cpu-miner.c of cudaminer and ccminerCan i ask you a mini efford?
Please change the sourcecode of both, cudaminer and ccminer like this at the start of the program:
start stratum
wait for stratum
if stratum authentication failed
exit ccminer/cudaminer
else start miner threads
After we are able to combine cudaminer and ccminer to mine at the best price at nicehash. I already posted a Nicehash Script v0.3 doing this.
Now they are disturbing each other. While ccminer is mining, cudaminer tries to initialize the mininc process and we loose performance.
Thanks.
Code:
if (!stratum_connect(&stratum, stratum.url) ||
!stratum_subscribe(&stratum) ||
!stratum_authorize(&stratum, rpc_user, rpc_pass)) {
stratum_disconnect(&stratum);
if (opt_retries >= 0 && ++failures > opt_retries) {
applog(LOG_ERR, "...terminating workio thread");
tq_push(thr_info[work_thr_id].q, NULL);
goto out;
}
applog(LOG_ERR, "...retry after %d seconds", opt_fail_pause);
sleep(opt_fail_pause);
}
!stratum_subscribe(&stratum) ||
!stratum_authorize(&stratum, rpc_user, rpc_pass)) {
stratum_disconnect(&stratum);
if (opt_retries >= 0 && ++failures > opt_retries) {
applog(LOG_ERR, "...terminating workio thread");
tq_push(thr_info[work_thr_id].q, NULL);
goto out;
}
applog(LOG_ERR, "...retry after %d seconds", opt_fail_pause);
sleep(opt_fail_pause);
}
May 20, 2014, 04:37:15 AM
@cbuchner1
Can i ask you a mini efford?
Please change the sourcecode of both, cudaminer and ccminer like this at the start of the program:
start stratum
wait for stratum
if stratum authentication failed
exit ccminer/cudaminer
else start miner threads
After we are able to combine cudaminer and ccminer to mine at the best price at nicehash. I already posted a Nicehash Script v0.3 doing this.
Now they are disturbing each other. While ccminer is mining, cudaminer tries to initialize the mininc process and we loose performance.
Thanks.
Can i ask you a mini efford?
Please change the sourcecode of both, cudaminer and ccminer like this at the start of the program:
start stratum
wait for stratum
if stratum authentication failed
exit ccminer/cudaminer
else start miner threads
After we are able to combine cudaminer and ccminer to mine at the best price at nicehash. I already posted a Nicehash Script v0.3 doing this.
Now they are disturbing each other. While ccminer is mining, cudaminer tries to initialize the mininc process and we loose performance.
Thanks.
May 20, 2014, 04:36:18 AM
@zelante
Can you check and test the described problem of the 0.3 nicehash script?
I updated it now.
Ccminer is loosing performance here if cudaminer is initializing workers.
Performance is not recovering after.
I think the sourcecode of cudaminer has to be changed a bit.
cudaminer source -> cpu-miner.c -> comment 1916 and 1917 string (for loop) -> compile & test Can you check and test the described problem of the 0.3 nicehash script?
I updated it now.
Ccminer is loosing performance here if cudaminer is initializing workers.
Performance is not recovering after.
I think the sourcecode of cudaminer has to be changed a bit.
May 20, 2014, 03:50:57 AM
@zelante
Can you check and test the described problem of the 0.3 nicehash script?
I updated it now.
Ccminer is loosing performance here if cudaminer is initializing workers.
Performance is not recovering after.
I think the sourcecode of cudaminer has to be changed a bit.
Can you check and test the described problem of the 0.3 nicehash script?
I updated it now.
Ccminer is loosing performance here if cudaminer is initializing workers.
Performance is not recovering after.
I think the sourcecode of cudaminer has to be changed a bit.
May 20, 2014, 03:41:39 AM
AMD playing catch up with x11. Almost 40% performance increase
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annx11-x11darkcoin-gpu-miner-updated-to-use-leaked-binaries-even-faster-616786
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annx11-x11darkcoin-gpu-miner-updated-to-use-leaked-binaries-even-faster-616786
they are still behind if the 2.8MH/s for a 750ti would be true
2.8Mh/s Out yet for the 750ti?
May 20, 2014, 03:31:38 AM
@cbuchner1
Did you see that? What do you think about it?
http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-642-55220-5_1
Did you see that? What do you think about it?
http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-642-55220-5_1
Jump to: