. 
Topic: [ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX] - page 681. (Read 3426922 times)
March 18, 2014, 07:26:11 PM
I dont find anything HVC in 30 minutes on heavycoinpool.com and 556650 Shares submitted , and 15000 kh/s ( 3 Nvidia 750 ti ) .
. March 18, 2014, 07:25:06 PM
Same situation.
It doesn't seem to use more than 77% of the gpu though.
It doesn't seem to use more than 77% of the gpu though.
Google Chrome Trick maybe?
Also consider running 2 instances side by side. It helped to get some extra 10-20% sometimes.
March 18, 2014, 07:22:00 PM
Question: Can I expect better hashrates compiling for 3.0/3.5 on a 780ti ? Using this release I am getting about 22000 khash/s on a 2x 780ti & 3930K system.
what coin?
Heavy.
Thanks
Same situation.
It doesn't seem to use more than 77% of the gpu though.
March 18, 2014, 07:21:43 PM
All of this was hacked in 9 days, and Fugue within approximately 24 hours. Only
minimal cleanup afterwards.
Christian
I just got a yay!!! on FC after such a long time mining, finally! Thanks Christian! :-)
I am still getting about 10 Yays per hour on each rig of ca. 500 MHash/s.
It felt like one per minute per Yay on each rig when I was having half the network hash rate. ;-)
March 18, 2014, 07:20:39 PM
Ok, I tried to compile with compute 3.5, I don't see any difference. Running now at 240Mhash/s at 1270MHz (was running 230MHash/s at 1250MHash/s)
The GPU usage is rather low 93% and the power doesn't go further than 99% (even if it allows to
The GPU usage is rather low 93% and the power doesn't go further than 99% (even if it allows to
if you built on Linux, try putting sm_35 instead of compute_35 into Makefile.am (and rerun ./autogen.sh). The latter case only generates PTX code from the nvcc compiler which then later the driver translates into binary form - whereas in the sm_35 option nvcc generates the binary kernels (with full register assignments and optimizations). This may be more performant, as nvcc does smarter optimization.
March 18, 2014, 07:16:38 PM
Ok, I tried to compile with compute 3.5, I don't see any difference. Running now at 240Mhash/s at 1270MHz (was running 230MHash/s at 1250MHash/s)
The GPU usage is rather low 93% and the power doesn't go further than 99% (even if it allows to
The GPU usage is rather low 93% and the power doesn't go further than 99% (even if it allows to
if you built on Linux, try putting sm_35 instead of compute_35 into Makefile.am (and rerun ./autogen.sh). The latter case only generates PTX code from the nvcc compiler which then later the driver translates into binary form - whereas in the sm_35 option nvcc generates the binary kernels (with full register assignments and optimizations). This may be more performant, as nvcc does smarter optimization.
March 18, 2014, 07:14:41 PM
660Ti (msi afterburner: +125 core, +580 memory, 114 power limit, temperature 57C) ~6000 khash/s (on heavycoinpool)
Can anyone compile with compute 3.0, plz?
Can anyone compile with compute 3.0, plz?
When building for Compute 3.5 with the intention to mine Heavycoin, try a max reg. count of 128.
Some kernels may need so much register space. I found it may make a 10-20% difference to target
Compute 3.5 on platforms like the GTX 780 (Ti)...
Compute 3.0 only supports a max reg. count 63 unfortunately.
I will investigate how future Windows builds can include kernels for all platforms simultaneously.
There's got to be a way.
Christian
March 18, 2014, 07:14:25 PM
Initial CCminer results on fugue:
780 (very mild oc) - ~170mh
750ti (+100core, 500mem) ~ 47mh (seems a bit on the low side. might need > comp 2.0 )
780 (very mild oc) - ~170mh
750ti (+100core, 500mem) ~ 47mh (seems a bit on the low side. might need > comp 2.0 )
yes, the performance really scales with number of SMX. So the 750 Ti loses bad against a 780 Ti. Such is life.
Still crushes my 5870+6970 combined lol
March 18, 2014, 07:14:03 PM
March 18, 2014, 07:13:46 PM
Ok, I tried to compile with compute 3.5, I don't see any difference. Running now at 240Mhash/s at 1270MHz (was running 230MHash/s at 1250MHash/s)
The GPU usage is rather low 93% and the power doesn't go further than 99% (even if it allows to).
Still didn't find a block with it. (2 blocks were found by the other cards since I started the gtx780, had only one boo with it)
The GPU usage is rather low 93% and the power doesn't go further than 99% (even if it allows to).
Still didn't find a block with it. (2 blocks were found by the other cards since I started the gtx780, had only one boo with it)
March 18, 2014, 07:08:46 PM
660Ti (msi afterburner: +125 core, +580 memory, 114 power limit, temperature 57C) ~6000 khash/s (on heavycoinpool)
Can anyone compile with compute 3.0, plz?
Can anyone compile with compute 3.0, plz?
March 18, 2014, 07:04:45 PM
Initial CCminer results on fugue:
780 (very mild oc) - ~170mh
750ti (+100core, 500mem) ~ 47mh (seems a bit on the low side. might need > comp 2.0 )
780 (very mild oc) - ~170mh
750ti (+100core, 500mem) ~ 47mh (seems a bit on the low side. might need > comp 2.0 )
yes, the performance really scales with number of SMX. So the 750 Ti loses bad against a 780 Ti. Such is life.
March 18, 2014, 06:58:27 PM
Initial CCminer results on fugue:
780 (very mild oc) - ~170mh
750ti (+100core, 500mem) ~ 47mh (seems a bit on the low side. might need > comp 2.0 )
670gtx (200 core, 400mem) ~52mh-95mh (2 of the 670s are doing low 50s (2 pnys) however a stock clocked evga 670 gtx in another system is doing 95mh. Don't have time atm
to explore this. )
650ti (stock) ~52mh (rawr.)
780 (very mild oc) - ~170mh
750ti (+100core, 500mem) ~ 47mh (seems a bit on the low side. might need > comp 2.0 )
670gtx (200 core, 400mem) ~52mh-95mh (2 of the 670s are doing low 50s (2 pnys) however a stock clocked evga 670 gtx in another system is doing 95mh. Don't have time atm
to explore this. )
650ti (stock) ~52mh (rawr.)
March 18, 2014, 06:55:06 PM
All of this was hacked in 9 days, and Fugue within approximately 24 hours. Only
minimal cleanup afterwards.
Christian
I just got a yay!!! on FC after such a long time mining, finally! Thanks Christian! :-)
March 18, 2014, 06:54:34 PM
Im go 9000 kh/s on 2 Nvidia 750 ti Overclocked at 180 gpu and 570 mem ( 4500 kh/s at one ) , It's ok ? .
Im use :
ccminer.exe -a heavy -o stratum+tcp://stratum01.heavycoinpool.com:5333 -u username.worker -p workerpassword -v 512
On X86 Directory .
Sounds good, my 750Ti did ~4000...Im use :
ccminer.exe -a heavy -o stratum+tcp://stratum01.heavycoinpool.com:5333 -u username.worker -p workerpassword -v 512
On X86 Directory .
If you want, you could try to compile it with compute 3.5, maybe this could speedup the things a Little bit...
March 18, 2014, 06:51:26 PM
Im go 9000 kh/s on 2 Nvidia 750 ti Overclocked at 180 gpu and 570 mem ( 4500 kh/s at one ) , It's ok ? .
Im use :
ccminer.exe -a heavy -o stratum+tcp://stratum01.heavycoinpool.com:5333 -u username.worker -p workerpassword -v 512
On X86 Directory .
Im use :
ccminer.exe -a heavy -o stratum+tcp://stratum01.heavycoinpool.com:5333 -u username.worker -p workerpassword -v 512
On X86 Directory .
March 18, 2014, 06:49:15 PM
what khash can i expect from a gtx660 or a 750Ti @ HVC?
March 18, 2014, 06:48:04 PM
Interesting, on fugue256, the gtx780ti gives 232Mhash/s and clearly beats the R9290x which does only 157Mhash/s
yes, we've done a midstate optimization, the OpenCL code does the full hashing on GPU. If they optimize, your GTX 780Ti is toast.
BTW I am only getting 175 MHash/s per 780Ti on Linux (550 MHash/s on my rig of 3) - but I have no OC options there.
Christian
March 18, 2014, 06:46:24 PM
CCMiner is released.
No -d flag? Does -t flag use first GPU or first available GPU?uses all GPUs by default. Uses less if you give a smaller -t. No GPU selection, sorry.
Source code is available to tinker.
All of this was hacked in 9 days, and Fugue within approximately 24 hours. Only
minimal cleanup afterwards.
Christian
March 18, 2014, 06:43:57 PM
CCMiner is released.
No -d flag? Does -t flag use first GPU or first available GPU?uses all GPUs by default. Uses less if you give a smaller -t. No GPU selection, sorry.
Source code is available to tinker.
All of this was hacked in 9 days, and Fugue within approximately 24 hours. Only
minimal cleanup afterwards.
Christian
Thank you. Beggars can't be choosers, and I appreciate your effort.
Jump to: