oh
fake 
Topic: [ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX] - page 71. (Read 3426930 times)
October 04, 2014, 07:49:28 AM
October 04, 2014, 05:28:02 AM
loving these pics haha
....mmmh. now my girl does not believe anymore that I'm just interested in cryptos seeing these boobs... thanks
October 04, 2014, 04:09:19 AM
October 04, 2014, 12:56:04 AM
oh
October 03, 2014, 10:25:29 PM
Depends a lot on both the algorithm and the amount of stupid in the public code. CUDA used to be rarely worth it, but when it was, the profit level was off the charts. Reason being, not many people were doing it, and if Nvidia cards happened to have even just a decent advantage because of their hardware, I could leverage the resources of the group - who in turn would leverage the effectively unlimited resources of AWS. Wasn't super often you could do this, but when you can... it's the bomb.
On the AMD side, I usually don't do it really often, because CUDA is very nice to work with, and AMD OpenCL, compared to it, feels like flying blind. However, I'm doing it a lot more now, because usually, the level of stupid in public AMD miners is just staggering - while currently active public CUDA miner devs range from decent to good, the currently active OpenCL miner "devs" just beat off into a text editor. I've gotten maybe 50% over SG5's X11 with a few days to maybe a week's worth of work, but spread out over a while. A lot of people think that's impressive, but it's amateur hour, believe that. Were I to really work nonstop on X11 for a good while, between 2x to 2.5x is a virtual certainty. 3x I would say is likely, 3.5x more than possible. Beyond that, I'd need to continue my work to further speculate, otherwise I would be basing predictions on top of other predictions, which would likely reduce the accuracy of them dramatically.
On the AMD side, I usually don't do it really often, because CUDA is very nice to work with, and AMD OpenCL, compared to it, feels like flying blind. However, I'm doing it a lot more now, because usually, the level of stupid in public AMD miners is just staggering - while currently active public CUDA miner devs range from decent to good, the currently active OpenCL miner "devs" just beat off into a text editor. I've gotten maybe 50% over SG5's X11 with a few days to maybe a week's worth of work, but spread out over a while. A lot of people think that's impressive, but it's amateur hour, believe that. Were I to really work nonstop on X11 for a good while, between 2x to 2.5x is a virtual certainty. 3x I would say is likely, 3.5x more than possible. Beyond that, I'd need to continue my work to further speculate, otherwise I would be basing predictions on top of other predictions, which would likely reduce the accuracy of them dramatically.
OK well stop tickling my balls with all these nice words. I'm going to organise you a project and some crowd sourced funding from the DRK community. I'm going to set you a date to finish by, the more funds I get the more time you can spend hopefully.
Saturday the 25th October 2014, can you work on project WolfMiner between now and then? An SGMiner especially optimised for x11
Do we have a deal?
As soon as you give me the go-ahead I will get cracking, crowd-funding projects have worked really well in the past with the DRK community.
P.S. Don't forget to give the 270x some loving, I can send you one to practice on if need be
I've told you - I can't do that. Also, I do have a 270X.
Hey, hey, AMD guys, stop hijacking this thread plox 
No mooching with AMD here ^^
No mooching with AMD here ^^There are plenty of Nvidia x11 miners as well, the TDP on my 750ti's never goes above 55%, so the Nvidia project will be next.
A lot will ride on the success of Wolf0's efforts, if he' agrees and it's received well I will come here and organise a cuda project for x11.
Sorry to hijack the thread all.
Hmm... this, I think I could do.
Let's take this to PM...
October 03, 2014, 10:19:45 PM
Hey, hey, AMD guys, stop hijacking this thread plox No mooching with AMD here ^^
No mooching with AMD here ^^There are plenty of Nvidia x11 miners as well, the TDP on my 750ti's never goes above 55%, so the Nvidia project will be next.
A lot will ride on the success of Wolf0's efforts, if he' agrees and it's received well I will come here and organise a cuda project for x11.
Sorry to hijack the thread all.
Hmm... this, I think I could do.
I'll reply to this quote with a quote
October 03, 2014, 10:08:48 PM
October 03, 2014, 10:08:17 PM
Hey, hey, AMD guys, stop hijacking this thread plox No mooching with AMD here ^^
No mooching with AMD here ^^There are plenty of Nvidia x11 miners as well, the TDP on my 750ti's never goes above 55%, so the Nvidia project will be next.
A lot will ride on the success of Wolf0's efforts, if he' agrees and it's received well I will come here and organise a cuda project for x11.
Sorry to hijack the thread all.
October 03, 2014, 09:58:18 PM
Depends a lot on both the algorithm and the amount of stupid in the public code. CUDA used to be rarely worth it, but when it was, the profit level was off the charts. Reason being, not many people were doing it, and if Nvidia cards happened to have even just a decent advantage because of their hardware, I could leverage the resources of the group - who in turn would leverage the effectively unlimited resources of AWS. Wasn't super often you could do this, but when you can... it's the bomb.
On the AMD side, I usually don't do it really often, because CUDA is very nice to work with, and AMD OpenCL, compared to it, feels like flying blind. However, I'm doing it a lot more now, because usually, the level of stupid in public AMD miners is just staggering - while currently active public CUDA miner devs range from decent to good, the currently active OpenCL miner "devs" just beat off into a text editor. I've gotten maybe 50% over SG5's X11 with a few days to maybe a week's worth of work, but spread out over a while. A lot of people think that's impressive, but it's amateur hour, believe that. Were I to really work nonstop on X11 for a good while, between 2x to 2.5x is a virtual certainty. 3x I would say is likely, 3.5x more than possible. Beyond that, I'd need to continue my work to further speculate, otherwise I would be basing predictions on top of other predictions, which would likely reduce the accuracy of them dramatically.
On the AMD side, I usually don't do it really often, because CUDA is very nice to work with, and AMD OpenCL, compared to it, feels like flying blind. However, I'm doing it a lot more now, because usually, the level of stupid in public AMD miners is just staggering - while currently active public CUDA miner devs range from decent to good, the currently active OpenCL miner "devs" just beat off into a text editor. I've gotten maybe 50% over SG5's X11 with a few days to maybe a week's worth of work, but spread out over a while. A lot of people think that's impressive, but it's amateur hour, believe that. Were I to really work nonstop on X11 for a good while, between 2x to 2.5x is a virtual certainty. 3x I would say is likely, 3.5x more than possible. Beyond that, I'd need to continue my work to further speculate, otherwise I would be basing predictions on top of other predictions, which would likely reduce the accuracy of them dramatically.
OK well stop tickling my balls with all these nice words. I'm going to organise you a project and some crowd sourced funding from the DRK community. I'm going to set you a date to finish by, the more funds I get the more time you can spend hopefully.
Saturday the 25th October 2014, you will finish project WolfMiner, SGMiner especially optimised for x11
Do we have a deal?
Don't forget to give the 270x some loving, I can send you one to practice on if need be.
Hey, hey, AMD guys, stop hijacking this thread plox
No mooching with AMD here ^^ October 03, 2014, 08:48:45 PM
Depends a lot on both the algorithm and the amount of stupid in the public code. CUDA used to be rarely worth it, but when it was, the profit level was off the charts. Reason being, not many people were doing it, and if Nvidia cards happened to have even just a decent advantage because of their hardware, I could leverage the resources of the group - who in turn would leverage the effectively unlimited resources of AWS. Wasn't super often you could do this, but when you can... it's the bomb.
On the AMD side, I usually don't do it really often, because CUDA is very nice to work with, and AMD OpenCL, compared to it, feels like flying blind. However, I'm doing it a lot more now, because usually, the level of stupid in public AMD miners is just staggering - while currently active public CUDA miner devs range from decent to good, the currently active OpenCL miner "devs" just beat off into a text editor. I've gotten maybe 50% over SG5's X11 with a few days to maybe a week's worth of work, but spread out over a while. A lot of people think that's impressive, but it's amateur hour, believe that. Were I to really work nonstop on X11 for a good while, between 2x to 2.5x is a virtual certainty. 3x I would say is likely, 3.5x more than possible. Beyond that, I'd need to continue my work to further speculate, otherwise I would be basing predictions on top of other predictions, which would likely reduce the accuracy of them dramatically.
On the AMD side, I usually don't do it really often, because CUDA is very nice to work with, and AMD OpenCL, compared to it, feels like flying blind. However, I'm doing it a lot more now, because usually, the level of stupid in public AMD miners is just staggering - while currently active public CUDA miner devs range from decent to good, the currently active OpenCL miner "devs" just beat off into a text editor. I've gotten maybe 50% over SG5's X11 with a few days to maybe a week's worth of work, but spread out over a while. A lot of people think that's impressive, but it's amateur hour, believe that. Were I to really work nonstop on X11 for a good while, between 2x to 2.5x is a virtual certainty. 3x I would say is likely, 3.5x more than possible. Beyond that, I'd need to continue my work to further speculate, otherwise I would be basing predictions on top of other predictions, which would likely reduce the accuracy of them dramatically.
OK well stop tickling my balls with all these nice words. I'm going to organise you a project and some crowd sourced funding from the DRK community. I'm going to set you a date to finish by, the more funds I get the more time you can spend hopefully.
Saturday the 25th October 2014, can you work on project WolfMiner between now and then? An SGMiner especially optimised for x11
Do we have a deal?
As soon as you give me the go-ahead I will get cracking, crowd-funding projects have worked really well in the past with the DRK community.
P.S. Don't forget to give the 270x some loving, I can send you one to practice on if need be
October 03, 2014, 07:51:29 PM
Yeh i have noticed that this thread is getting less and less people using it.
Amph, Djm, Wolf, Me, Sp
main people in the thread now unless i have missed someone
been working on my rig ..have 4 cards on it Amph, Djm, Wolf, Me, Sp
main people in the thread now unless i have missed someone
October 03, 2014, 07:04:59 PM
Anyone still mining Ultra Coin?
If so do you have a current bat for a 750ti?
If so do you have a current bat for a 750ti?
cudaminer -s 10 --algo=scrypt-jane:UTC -H 2 -i 0 -m 1 -l t25x4 -L 4 -b 16384 -o stratum+tcp://stratum.tumblingblock.com:5555
Thanks.
I will try it when I get home.
October 03, 2014, 04:18:47 PM
Anyone still mining Ultra Coin?
If so do you have a current bat for a 750ti?
If so do you have a current bat for a 750ti?
cudaminer -s 10 --algo=scrypt-jane:UTC -H 2 -i 0 -m 1 -l t25x4 -L 4 -b 16384 -o stratum+tcp://stratum.tumblingblock.com:5555
October 03, 2014, 11:07:58 AM
not the open code 
October 03, 2014, 10:59:49 AM
maybe on its basis someone will make a new miner under nvidia
on the basis of what ? (cryptonote nvidia miner are free and opensource) October 03, 2014, 10:57:58 AM
maybe on its basis someone will make a new miner under nvidia
lol... just in case you didn't realise (yet), it is a Nvidia thread... you should post that on claymore thread (that would be a more profitable, for you, hijacking of a thread) October 03, 2014, 10:30:37 AM
maybe on its basis someone will make a new miner under nvidia
October 03, 2014, 10:24:45 AM
The program takes the commission of 0.7%!!!
October 03, 2014, 10:22:49 AM
new miner for amd (cryptonote) kachur
Win64:
https://mega.co.nz/#!71cV3YCb!i9dd4ABajFd-gBj29mPJU7UXdUCjwobsp9mr3BwMy_g
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B__6vWtjsGfQX2EzN1hpT0lIV2s/edit?usp=sharing
Win32:
https://mega.co.nz/#!6g9m3S5a!EkY8gYKBk_6t0XntoSSlVYm1oN8aB3dRONyf-KxQ5P0
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B__6vWtjsGfQU0lmRHlpYkVSSjg/edit?usp=sharing
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
kachur.exe -u 48XNFCHJvXojX41b2WPNGZEeYjMQEhcii6MSeAUWYd1FjQZp9G61qREYRK5HN4rcmmVdtni2E3VxMJQ eCn7kUoTsH37CKen -p x -o stratum+tcp://erebor.dwarfpool.com:8050 -m 2 -i 10
280x - i 10, 550 hesh
290x - i 10,
7850 - i 10
7950 - i 10 550 hesh
Win64:
https://mega.co.nz/#!71cV3YCb!i9dd4ABajFd-gBj29mPJU7UXdUCjwobsp9mr3BwMy_g
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B__6vWtjsGfQX2EzN1hpT0lIV2s/edit?usp=sharing
Win32:
https://mega.co.nz/#!6g9m3S5a!EkY8gYKBk_6t0XntoSSlVYm1oN8aB3dRONyf-KxQ5P0
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B__6vWtjsGfQU0lmRHlpYkVSSjg/edit?usp=sharing
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
kachur.exe -u 48XNFCHJvXojX41b2WPNGZEeYjMQEhcii6MSeAUWYd1FjQZp9G61qREYRK5HN4rcmmVdtni2E3VxMJQ eCn7kUoTsH37CKen -p x -o stratum+tcp://erebor.dwarfpool.com:8050 -m 2 -i 10
280x - i 10, 550 hesh
290x - i 10,
7850 - i 10
7950 - i 10 550 hesh
October 03, 2014, 08:41:16 AM
You shouldn't need Visual Studio to tweak settings for a miner lol!
More people would donate if they knew exactly what was possible, at the moment it's all smoke and mirrors and rumours of private mining groups having massive performance gains through custom mining software from the deep web...
More people would donate if they knew exactly what was possible, at the moment it's all smoke and mirrors and rumours of private mining groups having massive performance gains through custom mining software from the deep web...
Hey, even im not in those sorts of groups
You need djm to hook you up, he's a bit of an underworld mining boss...
I wished...past tense ay?
Jump to: