I don't get any "accepted" is that normal ?
2014-02-08 15:36:35] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 560, 16167 khash/s
2014-02-08 15:36:35] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 560, 16290 khash/s
2014-02-08 15:36:37] Stratum detected new block
2014-02-08 15:36:37] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 560, 16343 khash/s
2014-02-08 15:36:37] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 560, 16139 khash/s
2014-02-08 15:36:51] Stratum detected new block
2014-02-08 15:36:51] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 560, 16325 khash/s
2014-02-08 15:36:51] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 560, 16158 khash/s
2014-02-08 15:36:55] Stratum detected new block
2014-02-08 15:36:55] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 560, 16234 khash/s
2014-02-08 15:36:55] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 560, 16162 khash/s
2014-02-08 15:36:59] Stratum detected new block
2014-02-08 15:36:59] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 560, 16346 khash/s
2014-02-08 15:36:59] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 560, 16165 khash/s
Topic: [ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX] - page 840. (Read 3426982 times)
February 08, 2014, 03:44:27 PM
February 08, 2014, 03:30:55 PM
I am still getting a segmentation fault when running. Build runs without any problems. So basically im just using the 2014-02-04 version and everything after that gives me a segmentation fault. By the way found a block solo
but I take it you're not doing MaxCoin with the 2014-02-04 version...
"Build runs without any problems" means you've built your own version from source then? Visual Studio 2010 also, or a different one?
I am running 2014-02-04 on MaxCoin. Im running linux and building from git source. Every build after 2014-02-04 gives me a segmentation fault.
February 08, 2014, 03:27:44 PM
I am still getting a segmentation fault when running. Build runs without any problems. So basically im just using the 2014-02-04 version and everything after that gives me a segmentation fault. By the way found a block solo
but I take it you're not doing MaxCoin with the 2014-02-04 version...
"Build runs without any problems" means you've built your own version from source then? Visual Studio 2010 also, or a different one?
February 08, 2014, 03:27:20 PM
It makes me quite sad tbh. The "game" has now turned into who's able to DDoS the competition the most.
Attack the largest pools, get difficulty to drop, profit.
Attack the largest pools, get difficulty to drop, profit.
Nah, that's long gone. One or two pools being down doesn't affect the network hashrate like at all anymore. There's a bunch of pool out there and a GUI wallet so everybody can solomine.
February 08, 2014, 03:23:27 PM
is the boo issue on the pools end or our end?
could be a wrong difficulty target. what's the rate of yay's vs. boo's you're getting?
February 08, 2014, 03:22:46 PM
ok it seems to works, I have about the same speed as in the previous (333Mhash gtx780ti+gtx660) and the cpu usage is around 3% which is much better.
cool. The latest version also seems to behave better with multi-GPU support. I can now mine keccak on 3 GPUs with just one cudaminer.
ETA on an official x86 build?
I would like to do a little more cleanups before releasing an update. Probably later tomorrow.
February 08, 2014, 03:20:47 PM
Guys, I changed maxcoin.cpp to use two CUDA streams in an alternating and overlapping fashion,
like it's done in scrypt.cpp and scrypt-jane.cpp. This should get the same performance boost
as the previous commit, except that it doesn't raise the CPU utilization so much.
It's really hard for me to verify that this works though. If someone able to compile the sources
would report back if he can still pool-mine at the same Yay! rate as before, this would be great.
I don't have a pool setup for doing testing on my own, that's why I am asking...
Christian
ok it seems to works, I have about the same speed as in the previous (333Mhash gtx780ti+gtx660) and the cpu usage is around 3% which is much better.like it's done in scrypt.cpp and scrypt-jane.cpp. This should get the same performance boost
as the previous commit, except that it doesn't raise the CPU utilization so much.
It's really hard for me to verify that this works though. If someone able to compile the sources
would report back if he can still pool-mine at the same Yay! rate as before, this would be great.
I don't have a pool setup for doing testing on my own, that's why I am asking...
Christian
I am still getting a segmentation fault when running. Build runs without any problems. So basically im just using the 2014-02-04 version and everything after that gives me a segmentation fault. By the way found a block solo
February 08, 2014, 03:19:07 PM
is the boo issue on the pools end or our end?
February 08, 2014, 03:16:00 PM
If you really want big hash number, you have to go smalltimeminer, I am doing 40GH... (wonder why, I am only getting 0.01 max/per block or so...)
its closed to new users, is there an invite option? February 08, 2014, 03:13:49 PM
Guys, I changed maxcoin.cpp to use two CUDA streams in an alternating and overlapping fashion,
like it's done in scrypt.cpp and scrypt-jane.cpp. This should get the same performance boost
as the previous commit, except that it doesn't raise the CPU utilization so much.
It's really hard for me to verify that this works though. If someone able to compile the sources
would report back if he can still pool-mine at the same Yay! rate as before, this would be great.
I don't have a pool setup for doing testing on my own, that's why I am asking...
Christian
wow, I'm looking forward to this update. i am at smalltimeminer atm.i get 110 khash/s avg out of my gtx 780. like it's done in scrypt.cpp and scrypt-jane.cpp. This should get the same performance boost
as the previous commit, except that it doesn't raise the CPU utilization so much.
It's really hard for me to verify that this works though. If someone able to compile the sources
would report back if he can still pool-mine at the same Yay! rate as before, this would be great.
I don't have a pool setup for doing testing on my own, that's why I am asking...
Christian
February 08, 2014, 03:13:35 PM
If you really want big hash number, you have to go smalltimeminer, I am doing 40GH... (wonder why, I am only getting 0.01 max/per block or so...)
its closed to new users, is there an invite option?their stats are broken.
February 08, 2014, 03:11:32 PM
ok it seems to works, I have about the same speed as in the previous (333Mhash gtx780ti+gtx660) and the cpu usage is around 3% which is much better.
cool. The latest version also seems to behave better with multi-GPU support. I can now mine keccak on 3 GPUs with just one cudaminer.
ETA on an official x86 build?
February 08, 2014, 03:08:17 PM
If you really want big hash number, you have to go smalltimeminer, I am doing 40GH... (wonder why, I am only getting 0.01 max/per block or so...)
its closed to new users, is there an invite option? February 08, 2014, 03:08:12 PM
ok it seems to works, I have about the same speed as in the previous (333Mhash gtx780ti+gtx660) and the cpu usage is around 3% which is much better.
cool. The latest version also seems to behave better with multi-GPU support. I can now mine keccak on 3 GPUs with just one cudaminer.
February 08, 2014, 03:05:15 PM
Guys, I changed maxcoin.cpp to use two CUDA streams in an alternating and overlapping fashion,
like it's done in scrypt.cpp and scrypt-jane.cpp. This should get the same performance boost
as the previous commit, except that it doesn't raise the CPU utilization so much.
It's really hard for me to verify that this works though. If someone able to compile the sources
would report back if he can still pool-mine at the same Yay! rate as before, this would be great.
I don't have a pool setup for doing testing on my own, that's why I am asking...
like it's done in scrypt.cpp and scrypt-jane.cpp. This should get the same performance boost
as the previous commit, except that it doesn't raise the CPU utilization so much.
It's really hard for me to verify that this works though. If someone able to compile the sources
would report back if he can still pool-mine at the same Yay! rate as before, this would be great.
I don't have a pool setup for doing testing on my own, that's why I am asking...
This new version gives insanely more yay!'s than before. Probably 5-10 times as many. What does that mean? It makes the hashrate in mpos way off too. I went from 70 Mh/s to 700 Mh/s on the pool, lol.
I get about 10% CPU usage on a Q9550 @ 3.4 Ghz.
February 08, 2014, 03:02:19 PM
can you use the maxcoin cgminer with nvidia cards ? because mine does nog work en read here that some actually pulled it off someone please help?
It works however my ti560 was 40000 vs 72000.
I just used their compiled version with defaults and it ran, when I tried to optomize it cgminer would crash.
February 08, 2014, 02:56:30 PM
can you use the maxcoin cgminer with nvidia cards ? because mine does nog work en read here that some actually pulled it off someone please help?
read the thread dude + look on page 1 February 08, 2014, 02:56:22 PM
Guys, I changed maxcoin.cpp to use two CUDA streams in an alternating and overlapping fashion,
like it's done in scrypt.cpp and scrypt-jane.cpp. This should get the same performance boost
as the previous commit, except that it doesn't raise the CPU utilization so much.
It's really hard for me to verify that this works though. If someone able to compile the sources
would report back if he can still pool-mine at the same Yay! rate as before, this would be great.
I don't have a pool setup for doing testing on my own, that's why I am asking...
Christian
ok it seems to works, I have about the same speed as in the previous (333Mhash gtx780ti+gtx660) and the cpu usage is around 3% which is much better. like it's done in scrypt.cpp and scrypt-jane.cpp. This should get the same performance boost
as the previous commit, except that it doesn't raise the CPU utilization so much.
It's really hard for me to verify that this works though. If someone able to compile the sources
would report back if he can still pool-mine at the same Yay! rate as before, this would be great.
I don't have a pool setup for doing testing on my own, that's why I am asking...
Christian
February 08, 2014, 02:52:42 PM
can you use the maxcoin cgminer with nvidia cards ? because mine does nog work en read here that some actually pulled it off someone please help?
February 08, 2014, 02:45:02 PM
Can anyone provide the windows binary?
Jump to: