Topic: [ANN] DARKCREDIT - Fueling a blockchain based future - MANDATORY UPDATE! - page 4. (Read 27628 times)
March 04, 2015, 04:49:37 AM
The need to invest Darkcredit will be the first to C-CEX
March 04, 2015, 04:31:27 AM
I am still waiting
Scam or Not
Scam or Not
March 04, 2015, 03:50:58 AM
If you look in the code you see that it will not accept PoW blocks after 83,636 PoW blocks
https://github.com/DarkCredit/DarkCredit/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=LAST_POW_BLOCK+
if (IsProofOfWork() && nHeight > LAST_POW_BLOCK)
return DoS(100, error("AcceptBlock() : reject proof-of-work at height %d", nHeight));
this checks if the block is PoW and checks the height to make sure it doesn't pass 83636 PoW blocks
No one is claiming to be genius coders?
Just average guys with a passion for crypto and coding new things
Another thing we plan to destroy some of the premine no one wants to dump?
https://github.com/DarkCredit/DarkCredit/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=LAST_POW_BLOCK+
if (IsProofOfWork() && nHeight > LAST_POW_BLOCK)
return DoS(100, error("AcceptBlock() : reject proof-of-work at height %d", nHeight));
this checks if the block is PoW and checks the height to make sure it doesn't pass 83636 PoW blocks
No one is claiming to be genius coders?
Just average guys with a passion for crypto and coding new things
Another thing we plan to destroy some of the premine no one wants to dump?
Why did you say this then:
The 5m POW will be mined without problems
POW will end after at 83636
PoS blocks shouldn't count towards the 83636
Take a look in the code for yourself you see that the code checks if it's PoW and makes sure it doesn't pass the POW limit
all coins will be mined without problem?
PoS blocks aren't counted toward the POW limit as seen in the code
I believe your letting confustion get the best of you
Wow.
I've heard plenty. I'd say it is clearly you who are confused.
LOL Okay
Have a nice one!
March 04, 2015, 03:42:37 AM
If you look in the code you see that it will not accept PoW blocks after 83,636 PoW blocks
https://github.com/DarkCredit/DarkCredit/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=LAST_POW_BLOCK+
if (IsProofOfWork() && nHeight > LAST_POW_BLOCK)
return DoS(100, error("AcceptBlock() : reject proof-of-work at height %d", nHeight));
this checks if the block is PoW and checks the height to make sure it doesn't pass 83636 PoW blocks
No one is claiming to be genius coders?
Just average guys with a passion for crypto and coding new things
Another thing we plan to destroy some of the premine no one wants to dump?
https://github.com/DarkCredit/DarkCredit/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=LAST_POW_BLOCK+
if (IsProofOfWork() && nHeight > LAST_POW_BLOCK)
return DoS(100, error("AcceptBlock() : reject proof-of-work at height %d", nHeight));
this checks if the block is PoW and checks the height to make sure it doesn't pass 83636 PoW blocks
No one is claiming to be genius coders?
Just average guys with a passion for crypto and coding new things
Another thing we plan to destroy some of the premine no one wants to dump?
Why did you say this then:
The 5m POW will be mined without problems
POW will end after at 83636
PoS blocks shouldn't count towards the 83636
Take a look in the code for yourself you see that the code checks if it's PoW and makes sure it doesn't pass the POW limit
all coins will be mined without problem?
PoS blocks aren't counted toward the POW limit as seen in the code
I believe your letting confustion get the best of you
Wow.
I've heard plenty. I'd say it is clearly you who are confused.
March 04, 2015, 03:33:09 AM
If you look in the code you see that it will not accept PoW blocks after 83,636 PoW blocks
https://github.com/DarkCredit/DarkCredit/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=LAST_POW_BLOCK+
if (IsProofOfWork() && nHeight > LAST_POW_BLOCK)
return DoS(100, error("AcceptBlock() : reject proof-of-work at height %d", nHeight));
this checks if the block is PoW and checks the height to make sure it doesn't pass 83636 PoW blocks
No one is claiming to be genius coders?
Just average guys with a passion for crypto and coding new things
Another thing we plan to destroy some of the premine no one wants to dump?
https://github.com/DarkCredit/DarkCredit/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=LAST_POW_BLOCK+
if (IsProofOfWork() && nHeight > LAST_POW_BLOCK)
return DoS(100, error("AcceptBlock() : reject proof-of-work at height %d", nHeight));
this checks if the block is PoW and checks the height to make sure it doesn't pass 83636 PoW blocks
No one is claiming to be genius coders?
Just average guys with a passion for crypto and coding new things
Another thing we plan to destroy some of the premine no one wants to dump?
Why did you say this then:
The 5m POW will be mined without problems
POW will end after at 83636
PoS blocks shouldn't count towards the 83636
Take a look in the code for yourself you see that the code checks if it's PoW and makes sure it doesn't pass the POW limit
all coins will be mined without problem?
PoS blocks aren't counted toward the POW limit as seen in the code
I believe your letting confustion get the best of you
March 04, 2015, 03:30:40 AM
If you look in the code you see that it will not accept PoW blocks after 83,636 PoW blocks
https://github.com/DarkCredit/DarkCredit/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=LAST_POW_BLOCK+
if (IsProofOfWork() && nHeight > LAST_POW_BLOCK)
return DoS(100, error("AcceptBlock() : reject proof-of-work at height %d", nHeight));
this checks if the block is PoW and checks the height to make sure it doesn't pass 83636 PoW blocks
No one is claiming to be genius coders?
Just average guys with a passion for crypto and coding new things
Another thing we plan to destroy some of the premine no one wants to dump?
https://github.com/DarkCredit/DarkCredit/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=LAST_POW_BLOCK+
if (IsProofOfWork() && nHeight > LAST_POW_BLOCK)
return DoS(100, error("AcceptBlock() : reject proof-of-work at height %d", nHeight));
this checks if the block is PoW and checks the height to make sure it doesn't pass 83636 PoW blocks
No one is claiming to be genius coders?
Just average guys with a passion for crypto and coding new things
Another thing we plan to destroy some of the premine no one wants to dump?
Why did you say this then:
The 5m POW will be mined without problems
POW will end after at 83636
PoS blocks shouldn't count towards the 83636
March 04, 2015, 03:27:03 AM
If you look in the code you see that it will not accept PoW blocks after 83,636 PoW blocks
https://github.com/DarkCredit/DarkCredit/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=LAST_POW_BLOCK+
if (IsProofOfWork() && nHeight > LAST_POW_BLOCK)
return DoS(100, error("AcceptBlock() : reject proof-of-work at height %d", nHeight));
this checks if the block is PoW and checks the height to make sure it doesn't pass 83636 PoW blocks
No one is claiming to be genius coders?
Just average guys with a passion for crypto and coding new things
Another thing we plan to destroy 100k of the premine
https://github.com/DarkCredit/DarkCredit/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=LAST_POW_BLOCK+
if (IsProofOfWork() && nHeight > LAST_POW_BLOCK)
return DoS(100, error("AcceptBlock() : reject proof-of-work at height %d", nHeight));
this checks if the block is PoW and checks the height to make sure it doesn't pass 83636 PoW blocks
No one is claiming to be genius coders?
Just average guys with a passion for crypto and coding new things
Another thing we plan to destroy 100k of the premine
March 04, 2015, 03:24:19 AM
at this rate looks like we will be well below 5M coins due to staked blocks. Currently about 1.6M mined
The 5m POW will be mined without problems POW will end after at 83636
PoS blocks shouldn't count towards the 83636
Code:
static const int LAST_POW_BLOCK = 83636; // POW
Really? PoS blocks don't count toward the 83636?
And yeah, I am also the guy who a few pages back had to correct you on the code you used to "fix" PoS. A guy who doesn't know how to code at all.
Ok, level with me, why does it seem like you have absolutely no clue what you are doing, and why should I believe you have the technical capabilities to deliver sidechains and all these pie-in-the-sky features when you are fucking up very basic stuff?
You didn't correct anyone on the PoS fix simply a file that shouldn't have been pushed to git got pushed which was fixed here
https://github.com/DarkCredit/DarkCredit/commit/a49819606c6b1bdbb9abb4854a4a40ee954f89ab
You simply spotted the issue before we did
You can see the PoS fix here
https://github.com/DarkCredit/DarkCredit/commit/4ee0fef9ed9d09b84e68bf992997d37e88e07a2a
Here's where the file accidentally was pushed https://github.com/DarkCredit/DarkCredit/commit/b31bce877b452206b17180679ea27272af1bb1e4
this guy tried to clone the idea behind bitcredits and failed. He has ZERO coding ability and no visible progress. Why do you people even waste time with these obvious scams?
The lack of understanding of basic coding and economics spells doom for those who would greedily invest in something without doing due diligence.
See this : -https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIasr2AiyZ0 to understand the depth of your mistakes when you support these wastes of spa time and resources.
The lack of understanding of basic coding and economics spells doom for those who would greedily invest in something without doing due diligence.
See this : -https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIasr2AiyZ0 to understand the depth of your mistakes when you support these wastes of spa time and resources.
For one we are a team not a single person
Someone needs to get facts together before starting FUD
No one tired to clone bitcredits lol
Zero coding ability? haha okay just leave the thread alone no one asked you to comment
The nvidia version of the video is better btw!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=spZJrsssPA0
You are on a public forum for discussion of alternative cryptocurrency. I and anyone else can comment whenever we damn well please.
You are full of shit because your original "fix" included the line
static const int MODIFIER_INTERVAL_SWITCH = 83636
which you had altered from
static const int MODIFIER_INTERVAL_SWITCH = 15000
It was only after you released a broken client and I pointed it out to you that you changed it to
static const int MODIFIER_INTERVAL_SWITCH = 200
And you still haven't explained why it is a talented team of coders seems to think "PoS blocks shouldn't count towards the 83636" which is a mindbogglingly fucktarded statement that is 100% incorrect.
Being a rude fuck doesn't get you anywhere
Don't really give two fucks about what you think
Now have a nice fucking day!
Shit coin.
Going nowhere.
Nothing you promise will be delivered because there are no genius coders.
No one believes you.
PoW is well over 50% complete and and not even that cesspool called c-cex will list you.
You will never get to dump your 400k premine.
Scamcoin abandoned in 3....2....1........
March 04, 2015, 03:10:33 AM
at this rate looks like we will be well below 5M coins due to staked blocks. Currently about 1.6M mined
The 5m POW will be mined without problems POW will end after at 83636
PoS blocks shouldn't count towards the 83636
Code:
static const int LAST_POW_BLOCK = 83636; // POW
Really? PoS blocks don't count toward the 83636?
And yeah, I am also the guy who a few pages back had to correct you on the code you used to "fix" PoS. A guy who doesn't know how to code at all.
Ok, level with me, why does it seem like you have absolutely no clue what you are doing, and why should I believe you have the technical capabilities to deliver sidechains and all these pie-in-the-sky features when you are fucking up very basic stuff?
You didn't correct anyone on the PoS fix simply a file that shouldn't have been pushed to git got pushed which was fixed here
https://github.com/DarkCredit/DarkCredit/commit/a49819606c6b1bdbb9abb4854a4a40ee954f89ab
You simply spotted the issue before we did
You can see the PoS fix here
https://github.com/DarkCredit/DarkCredit/commit/4ee0fef9ed9d09b84e68bf992997d37e88e07a2a
Here's where the file accidentally was pushed https://github.com/DarkCredit/DarkCredit/commit/b31bce877b452206b17180679ea27272af1bb1e4
this guy tried to clone the idea behind bitcredits and failed. He has ZERO coding ability and no visible progress. Why do you people even waste time with these obvious scams?
The lack of understanding of basic coding and economics spells doom for those who would greedily invest in something without doing due diligence.
See this : -https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIasr2AiyZ0 to understand the depth of your mistakes when you support these wastes of spa time and resources.
The lack of understanding of basic coding and economics spells doom for those who would greedily invest in something without doing due diligence.
See this : -https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIasr2AiyZ0 to understand the depth of your mistakes when you support these wastes of spa time and resources.
For one we are a team not a single person
Someone needs to get facts together before starting FUD
No one tired to clone bitcredits lol
Zero coding ability? haha okay just leave the thread alone no one asked you to comment
The nvidia version of the video is better btw!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=spZJrsssPA0
You are on a public forum for discussion of alternative cryptocurrency. I and anyone else can comment whenever we damn well please.
You are full of shit because your original "fix" included the line
static const int MODIFIER_INTERVAL_SWITCH = 83636
which you had altered from
static const int MODIFIER_INTERVAL_SWITCH = 15000
It was only after you released a broken client and I pointed it out to you that you changed it to
static const int MODIFIER_INTERVAL_SWITCH = 200
And you still haven't explained why it is a talented team of coders seems to think "PoS blocks shouldn't count towards the 83636" which is a mindbogglingly fucktarded statement that is 100% incorrect.
Being a rude fuck doesn't get you anywhere
If you look in the code you see that it will not accept PoW blocks after 83,636 PoW blocks
https://github.com/DarkCredit/DarkCredit/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=LAST_POW_BLOCK+
if (IsProofOfWork() && nHeight > LAST_POW_BLOCK)
return DoS(100, error("AcceptBlock() : reject proof-of-work at height %d", nHeight));
this checks if the block is PoW and checks the height to make sure it doesn't pass 83636 PoW blocks
March 04, 2015, 03:04:03 AM
at this rate looks like we will be well below 5M coins due to staked blocks. Currently about 1.6M mined
The 5m POW will be mined without problems POW will end after at 83636
PoS blocks shouldn't count towards the 83636
Code:
static const int LAST_POW_BLOCK = 83636; // POW
Really? PoS blocks don't count toward the 83636?
And yeah, I am also the guy who a few pages back had to correct you on the code you used to "fix" PoS. A guy who doesn't know how to code at all.
Ok, level with me, why does it seem like you have absolutely no clue what you are doing, and why should I believe you have the technical capabilities to deliver sidechains and all these pie-in-the-sky features when you are fucking up very basic stuff?
You didn't correct anyone on the PoS fix simply a file that shouldn't have been pushed to git got pushed which was fixed here
https://github.com/DarkCredit/DarkCredit/commit/a49819606c6b1bdbb9abb4854a4a40ee954f89ab
You simply spotted the issue before we did
You can see the PoS fix here
https://github.com/DarkCredit/DarkCredit/commit/4ee0fef9ed9d09b84e68bf992997d37e88e07a2a
Here's where the file accidentally was pushed https://github.com/DarkCredit/DarkCredit/commit/b31bce877b452206b17180679ea27272af1bb1e4
this guy tried to clone the idea behind bitcredits and failed. He has ZERO coding ability and no visible progress. Why do you people even waste time with these obvious scams?
The lack of understanding of basic coding and economics spells doom for those who would greedily invest in something without doing due diligence.
See this : -https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIasr2AiyZ0 to understand the depth of your mistakes when you support these wastes of spa time and resources.
The lack of understanding of basic coding and economics spells doom for those who would greedily invest in something without doing due diligence.
See this : -https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIasr2AiyZ0 to understand the depth of your mistakes when you support these wastes of spa time and resources.
For one we are a team not a single person
Someone needs to get facts together before starting FUD
No one tired to clone bitcredits lol
Zero coding ability? haha okay just leave the thread alone no one asked you to comment
The nvidia version of the video is better btw!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=spZJrsssPA0
You are on a public forum for discussion of alternative cryptocurrency. I and anyone else can comment whenever we damn well please.
You are full of shit because your original "fix" included the line
static const int MODIFIER_INTERVAL_SWITCH = 83636
which you had altered from
static const int MODIFIER_INTERVAL_SWITCH = 15000
It was only after you released a broken client and I pointed it out to you that you changed it to
static const int MODIFIER_INTERVAL_SWITCH = 200
And you still haven't explained why it is a talented team of coders seems to think "PoS blocks shouldn't count towards the 83636" which is a mindbogglingly fucktarded statement that is 100% incorrect.
March 04, 2015, 02:40:39 AM
Feel free to go ahead the source is available on github
The team doesn't care what you say we will continue our work on this project no matter what
BlockLoan is the outcome of a brainstorming session
also never heard of bitcredits til your post.
No copy-paste was done we cherry picked features we liked from other coins to create a solid base for our projects
Also taking a guess you most be the bitcredits dev
We will not be moving forward with BlockLoan we will be focusing on decentralized domains and assets
The team doesn't care what you say we will continue our work on this project no matter what
BlockLoan is the outcome of a brainstorming session
also never heard of bitcredits til your post.
No copy-paste was done we cherry picked features we liked from other coins to create a solid base for our projects
Also taking a guess you most be the bitcredits dev
We will not be moving forward with BlockLoan we will be focusing on decentralized domains and assets
March 04, 2015, 02:27:23 AM
at this rate looks like we will be well below 5M coins due to staked blocks. Currently about 1.6M mined
The 5m POW will be mined without problems POW will end after at 83636
PoS blocks shouldn't count towards the 83636
Code:
static const int LAST_POW_BLOCK = 83636; // POW
Really? PoS blocks don't count toward the 83636?
And yeah, I am also the guy who a few pages back had to correct you on the code you used to "fix" PoS. A guy who doesn't know how to code at all.
Ok, level with me, why does it seem like you have absolutely no clue what you are doing, and why should I believe you have the technical capabilities to deliver sidechains and all these pie-in-the-sky features when you are fucking up very basic stuff?
You didn't correct anyone on the PoS fix simply a file that shouldn't have been pushed to git got pushed which was fixed here
https://github.com/DarkCredit/DarkCredit/commit/a49819606c6b1bdbb9abb4854a4a40ee954f89ab
You simply spotted the issue before we did
You can see the PoS fix here
https://github.com/DarkCredit/DarkCredit/commit/4ee0fef9ed9d09b84e68bf992997d37e88e07a2a
Here's where the file accidentally was pushed https://github.com/DarkCredit/DarkCredit/commit/b31bce877b452206b17180679ea27272af1bb1e4
this guy tried to clone the idea behind bitcredits and failed. He has ZERO coding ability and no visible progress. Why do you people even waste time with these obvious scams?
The lack of understanding of basic coding and economics spells doom for those who would greedily invest in something without doing due diligence.
See this : -https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIasr2AiyZ0 to understand the depth of your mistakes when you support these wastes of spa time and resources.
The lack of understanding of basic coding and economics spells doom for those who would greedily invest in something without doing due diligence.
See this : -https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIasr2AiyZ0 to understand the depth of your mistakes when you support these wastes of spa time and resources.
For one we are a team not a single person
Someone needs to get facts together before starting FUD
No one tired to clone bitcredits lol
Zero coding ability? haha okay just leave the thread alone no one asked you to comment
The nvidia version of the video is better btw!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=spZJrsssPA0
If 5 users of this coin agree, i will do a FREE code review. And i will expose the lack of innovation, copy-paste methods and complete absence of talent in this here project. You seem to think that this is FUD or a joking matter. Frankly it's disturbing that you would take such a stance.
So will you take up my challenge?
As to your comment about bitcredits..... do explain the origins of your Blockloan idea?
March 04, 2015, 02:13:24 AM
at this rate looks like we will be well below 5M coins due to staked blocks. Currently about 1.6M mined
The 5m POW will be mined without problems POW will end after at 83636
PoS blocks shouldn't count towards the 83636
Code:
static const int LAST_POW_BLOCK = 83636; // POW
Really? PoS blocks don't count toward the 83636?
And yeah, I am also the guy who a few pages back had to correct you on the code you used to "fix" PoS. A guy who doesn't know how to code at all.
Ok, level with me, why does it seem like you have absolutely no clue what you are doing, and why should I believe you have the technical capabilities to deliver sidechains and all these pie-in-the-sky features when you are fucking up very basic stuff?
You didn't correct anyone on the PoS fix simply a file that shouldn't have been pushed to git got pushed which was fixed here
https://github.com/DarkCredit/DarkCredit/commit/a49819606c6b1bdbb9abb4854a4a40ee954f89ab
You simply spotted the issue before we did
You can see the PoS fix here
https://github.com/DarkCredit/DarkCredit/commit/4ee0fef9ed9d09b84e68bf992997d37e88e07a2a
Here's where the file accidentally was pushed https://github.com/DarkCredit/DarkCredit/commit/b31bce877b452206b17180679ea27272af1bb1e4
this guy tried to clone the idea behind bitcredits and failed. He has ZERO coding ability and no visible progress. Why do you people even waste time with these obvious scams?
The lack of understanding of basic coding and economics spells doom for those who would greedily invest in something without doing due diligence.
See this : -https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIasr2AiyZ0 to understand the depth of your mistakes when you support these wastes of spa time and resources.
The lack of understanding of basic coding and economics spells doom for those who would greedily invest in something without doing due diligence.
See this : -https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIasr2AiyZ0 to understand the depth of your mistakes when you support these wastes of spa time and resources.
For one we are a team not a single person
Someone needs to get facts together before starting FUD
No one tired to clone bitcredits lol
Zero coding ability? haha okay just leave the thread alone no one asked you to comment
The nvidia version of the video is better btw!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=spZJrsssPA0
March 04, 2015, 01:51:50 AM
this guy tried to clone the idea behind bitcredits and failed. He has ZERO coding ability and no visible progress. Why do you people even waste time with these obvious scams?
The lack of understanding of basic coding and economics spells doom for those who would greedily invest in something without doing due diligence.
See this : -https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIasr2AiyZ0 to understand the depth of your mistakes when you support these wastes of spa time and resources.
The lack of understanding of basic coding and economics spells doom for those who would greedily invest in something without doing due diligence.
See this : -https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIasr2AiyZ0 to understand the depth of your mistakes when you support these wastes of spa time and resources.
March 04, 2015, 01:27:56 AM
at this rate looks like we will be well below 5M coins due to staked blocks. Currently about 1.6M mined
The 5m POW will be mined without problems POW will end after at 83636
PoS blocks shouldn't count towards the 83636
Code:
static const int LAST_POW_BLOCK = 83636; // POW
Really? PoS blocks don't count toward the 83636?
And yeah, I am also the guy who a few pages back had to correct you on the code you used to "fix" PoS. A guy who doesn't know how to code at all.
Ok, level with me, why does it seem like you have absolutely no clue what you are doing, and why should I believe you have the technical capabilities to deliver sidechains and all these pie-in-the-sky features when you are fucking up very basic stuff?
March 04, 2015, 12:56:26 AM
can't wait 6 hours again , i hope exchange release 
, we need exchange for build commnity , show to the world , and other activity for cryptocurrency . good luck dev
, we need exchange for build commnity , show to the world , and other activity for cryptocurrency . good luck dev March 03, 2015, 11:50:23 PM
Pushed the new website and found a few bugs when viewed on firefox
restoring the old site til it's fixed
sorry for the inconvenience
restoring the old site til it's fixed
sorry for the inconvenience
March 03, 2015, 11:04:23 PM
We need some activity here! 
New website will be active tomorrow!
New website will be active tomorrow!
Well you could've paid me to comment here but you didn't need to
I would like to know why you chose 12% interest
12% was chosen for the 12 months of the year
my wallet 50k
1 DCX = 10$ Really?
minimum exchange starting price?
1 DCX = 10$ Really?
minimum exchange starting price?
I agree the $10 is quite a goal, but the dev mentioned that he feels is very possible with time based on their development planned.
We agree 10$ is a big goal but it's fully possible with advancing features and a dedicated team.
I get it but it seems a little high, ~6% would be my recommendation not really based on anything except that's a generous amount of interest to earn
March 03, 2015, 06:41:28 PM
We need some activity here!
New website will be active tomorrow!
New website will be active tomorrow!
Well you could've paid me to comment here but you didn't need to
I would like to know why you chose 12% interest
12% was chosen for the 12 months of the year
my wallet 50k
1 DCX = 10$ Really?
minimum exchange starting price?
1 DCX = 10$ Really?
minimum exchange starting price?
I agree the $10 is quite a goal, but the dev mentioned that he feels is very possible with time based on their development planned.
We agree 10$ is a big goal but it's fully possible with advancing features and a dedicated team.
March 03, 2015, 03:32:25 PM
my wallet 50k
1 DCX = 10$ Really?
minimum exchange starting price?
1 DCX = 10$ Really?
minimum exchange starting price?
I agree the $10 is quite a goal, but the dev mentioned that he feels is very possible with time based on their development planned.
Jump to: